If the next game is a sequel to andromeda would you want some decisions to carry over.

First and foremost, I'd like the ability to import saves just like the OT. Having a means to select/change various aspects without replaying the game is fine; but I like the game and have replayed it several times already, so I'd probably replay it and import saves if given that option.

I admit that I prefer this because it feels  more personal. However I have a feeling it isn't an option. So I went with the keep instead. However if they do that I will replay the game and  get saves ready. I am actually rerunning my mass effect trilogy and getting my saves lined up again since my old xbox 360 broke and am playing it on xbox one now

If they do have a sequel with Ryder returning, I like for the game to start a short time after the events of MEA because of the kett. They're still a threat.

With the choice's, the only one that matter, at least for me, is completing the turian ark mission and Harper's loyalty mission so that Dunn survives.

Her name is Vetra.

If they don't, I'm not gonna play it.

Where did they say that? Sure, they said there was no DLC, but that's not the same as no future games. And the books did not bring closure. Or did they deal with the continued threat of the kett (a larger empire than we saw) and the nature of the Jardaan in some book none of us ever heard about? That's not to say that BioWare won't drop it but they've given no indication about their future ME plans.

Considering the Montreal studio shuttered and no further indication of Andromeda related media, other than the books, has been referenced, I don't think said title gripped its audience, nor would Edmonton further want to associate themselves with it. They also said that the closure would be provided through the books. Closure is a very final word, as far as franchises go. On the off chance that they would continue with Andromeda, furthering the Ryder saga, we could tackle the unanswered questions of the original game in the sequel. It would be a nice chunk of content for the base game and since it would have been in development for a while, it'd be fleshed out enough to be, possibly, the pinnacle of the game. In other words, it is a waste to relegate it to book content, if you plan to continue the franchise in said fashion, therefore, I don't think we'll ever be seeing Andromeda again.

Consider me doubtful on that.

Austin and Edmonton, right, both of which considered Montreal as their retarded cousin, so to speak and would probably be very reserved to picking their "shit" up.

I'd like to see something like they did in Dragon Age. Have some important decisions carry forward in a small way, so we can recognize that this is our world state but do not go over board to weigh down the game in branching narrative (which did become a bit of a problem for the MW trilogy towards the end, I think).

For MEA it's very easy.  There are hardly any decisions that would have much an impact on future games.  In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if BioWare didn't go out of their way to avoid anything like the MET endings.

*sigh* If only... 😭