Assassins Creed Odyssey

I finished the Atlantis dlc. For a dlc that I paid half price for, it was alright.

I have to agree with some about Layla, or as I call her Lamela. So obsessed with the crap she's pursuing that it's clouded her mind leading to bad things, namely the death of Victoria. She couldn't have been much of a friend if Lamela killed her without hesitation. I understand someone being very interested in stuff, but I wouldn't let overwhelm me to the point I lose control. I'm curious what she do in the next game. That might be the mian reason I get the game. Of course I won't get it until I have a ps5 even though it's available for the ps4 as well.


After completing the dlc, started another playthrough with Kassandra

Uh guys i'm still waiting 



for that dessert.

Regarding Hellblade...

So in regards to Hellblade, it was 7.49 on Steam, so, I mighta already bought it and started it But I'm only to the first fight so I might attempt it then break for the night.

As for Odyssey, I think I might just go back to it. I have no desire to play though Valhalla a 2nd time, which is sad to me I'm not sure what my problem with it is, the story is fine, I like Eivor okay but ...I just don't know what it is?? Also, been hankering for DDDA and ACBF too. Decisions, Decisions.

I haven't finished Valhalla yet due to bugs and glitches but so far the game did not grab me like Odyssey does at the beginning so i tend to agree with you but not really sure yet.

Yes i'm still playing Odyssey and i'm on my fifth PT and i'm afraid i do not play as Sexios.

So all Hail Kassandra.  

Odyssey allowed me to have nonlethal combat options so it is objectively superior to Valhalla.

I want to be a Templar again. We also need the Templars developed like the Colonial Rite in 3, 4, and Rogue or a few other individuals like Starrick in Syndicate, Aspasia in Odyssey, or Alfred in Valhalla. Since then and besides those exceptions, they went back to the cartoon villains like in the Ezio Trilogy.

Which one?  Valhalla, or Cyberpunk? 

Different horses for different courses I suppose, I just found Odyssey's combat far more entertaining if not realistic and Kassandra a more fun protagonist to play due to her wit and sense of humour and her passion. There were far more options with armour, weapons and build and the environment was far more appealing for me to explore. Though repetitive the forts etc. I always found challenging to try and 100% stealth take down whereas Valhalla I enjoy for the shear Viking thing of knocking the door down and running amok. There is no doubt for me that Valhallas story is superior but the environment of England just isn't appealing. Though I complained about it early on in Odyssey just the brutal nature of the wildlife in ACOD was also something that enriched it, England doesn't have that feel.


The Mythical bosses were also great because they are something I grew up reading about and enjoyed whereas The Daughters of Larion didn't have the same feel. It would have been great to fight a spectre of King Arthur to prove your worth for Excalibur or to have to fight Thor for Mjolnir.  

Maybe you're the only one here who prefers Valhalla to Odyssey but you're not the only one out there who thinks the same as you do so you can stop worrying.  I don't think you're in the majority though.

And to be honest i don't think that with 10ish hours you gave AC Odyssey an actual chance though but that's just my opinion.   

I know I played Valhalla differently then I played Odyssey.  I was looking for all the different things in the different areas before moving on with Odyssey, but with Valhalla I focused to the primary story.  As far as your question I prefer Valhalla to Odyssey, but I rarely come to the Odyssey thread anymore.  It took me almost a year and half to finish Odyssey for I just didn't enjoy any of my time with it at best I was indifferent.  I think the major issues I had with Odyssey is the skill system being locked behind the spear's level and the naval combat.