Has BioWare abandoned Andromeda completely?

Whatever they tried to do they failed at it. It would have been better if Bio never went with the Reaper plot and just kept it simple.

Which fell flat on its face. The Reaper plot could be considered a cautionary tale of how not to write an overpowered antagonist.

Well, last time I checked Makos are not starships, so they wouldn't have the same tech that ships like the Normandy has that protects the crew from the g forces of traveling from Mass Relays.

Or did Bio make some shit up stating that everything somehow has starship grade drivecores slapped into everything?

Reapers are supposed to be Lovecraftian creatures in short, Eldritch abomination. Lets face it, Eldritch Abomination can't be explained properly. They just exist.

I disagree, ME1, and 2 in many ways, heavily favored realistic scientific concepts, the mass effect itself, and Eezo, was the one cheat the setting had at the time. THey literally did interviews with real scientists who talked about how tech savy ME was back in the day. This was something they very much cared about in the beginning. 

Settings needs to remain internally consistent. Just throwing whatever into your universe based on whim, or because your too lazy to properly explain why this exception is possible, is just poor writing at the end of the day. Not to mention it just makes you as a writer look really effing stupid. You can't as a writer, start here - "Ship mobility dominates space combat; the primary objective is to align the mass accelerator along the bow with the opposing vessel's broadside. Battles typically play out as artillery duels fought at ranges measured in thousands of kilometers, though assault through defended mass relays often occur at "knife fight" ranges as close as a few dozen kilometers.



Most ship-to-ship engagements are skirmishes between patrol vessels of cruiser weight and below, with dreadnoughts and carriers only deployed in full-scale fleet actions. Battles in open space are short and often inconclusive, as the weaker opponent generally disengages.



Once a ship enters FTL flight the combat is effectively over; there are no sensors capable of tracking them, or weapons capable of damaging them. The only way to guarantee an enemy will stand and fight is to attack a location they have a vested interest in, such as a settled world or a strategically-important mass relay."

and here 



And end up here




and expect people to take your writing seriously. 

You are literally advocating for bad writing, because fuck it, who cares. It's ridiculous. Following that logic, don't even bother with any narrative at all, just have the whole game be a giant sandbox where you shoot things with progressively more outrageous methods, like Dead Rising in space. 

2 didn't, otherwise you wouldn't have that "bring Shepherd back from the dead" BS.

Or using rebreathers in space instead of a full on air tight space suit.

(Have no problems with the Rule of Sexy per say, I still like some realism in my video games).