Ability to max out skill trees yes or no?

No. What makes different builds interesting is that you have to make sacrifices in some areas in order to excel in others. And merely choosing between A and B evolutions doesn't quite accomplish this.

Also, one rank in a skill doesn't always mean that the skill gets neglected. Sometimes one rank is simply enough to fulfil its purpose, even though the skill gets to be used all the time. For example, I have only one point in Pull on my human adept, but it's on cooldown 90% of the time. There are many more examples.

I do dislike the fact that Rank 6 evos tend to be so important in MEA though, that's why we have so many 1/6/6/6/6 builds and very few 3/5/6/6/6, 4/4/6/6/6 or 5/5/5/5/6 builds.

By Neglected I didnt mean not use its great that we can still have access to it. And sure it might do something small but in this game with only 3 powers to begin with it feels like its a shame that you do have to make a sacrifice at all.
You get 2 powers that have all these bonuses and nice effects then 1 power thats just ok or sometimes not even that.

I dislike the approach of making a build being you having to  basically pick least useful skill then avoid putting points into it. 
Id much rather it be focus on the evolution's and picking do you go with extra melee damage, or cool downs do you get this buff for gun damage or do you focus on powers.

If i recall ME3 was much the same being 6/6/6/6/0 for a lot of builds. 

No, anyone that disagrees is bad at the game.

No. I already feel that somehow most skill trees offer less (viable) diversity than what ME3's trees offered. It would completely remove the point of putting the skill points yourself, might as well we just get pre-done characters that you just slap Vanquisher/Piranha different weapons on.

Most powers are weak even when you're maxing both the power itself and every single power damage bonus skill on your kit.
The amount of skill points isn't the issue, BW nerfing 90% of the powers and weapons (compared to ME3) to the ground IS. Which is kind of mind-boggling since quite a lot of powers in ME3 were already lacking in the damage department and better specced for cc/utility.

But we already have enough points to max 4 powers at the cost of sacrificing one, not to mention some powers give you a decent value with only one point invested while you can safely skip some rank 6 evos. Maxing everything would barely change anything.

The real problem is the combination of low damage and long recharge and that 's what BW should address (but that bunch of pyjaks probably won't, I'm sure that Assault Turret or Flak Cannon are absolute monters on Bronze).

Plus, at the end of the day, Mass Effect is still 50% RPG so making choices is an inherent part of the game and what makes speccing a character interesting. It's highly subjective but "Max ALL the things !" simply is boring and I don't think having to pick between evos is enough to compensate.

The singleplayer forums are over there

I'd rather have 3 good/decent/fun ones, so I can be torn between them or run builds that would give BSN a stroke.

66653 power damage KroSol with a Claymore

Click the link, first non-pinned thread is dealing with Asari reproduction.

I mean Mass Effect (well, 1/2/3) is about SP more than multi for me even if I played like 2.5K MP games, but nope.

Nopenopenope.

It depends on the power. About one third of the time the rank 5 or six evos aren't that good.. or the rank 6 evo is and the rank 5 isn't.. so you have to ask yourself if the rank six evo is worth 11 points. What could those 11 points be in four ranks of another power?

Basically.. it's not always black and white. Saying 6/6/1/6/6 is always best is silly. With so many characters, there's a lot that's possible.

I voted no. If you play long enough you'll get to the point where you won't miss the evolutions you skipped.

That being said, if they allowed it I certainly wouldn't complain.

Meh, I do think maybe it would make people grind more to promote if they got some extra skill points. Honestly though there are several changes that need to be made if this game is going to have some longevity though.

I think it's better for diversity to be unable to max all trees.

In response to all those 6/6/1/6/6 builds, I think if a power or a passive is consistently neglected and stays at 1, it should be either buffed tremendously or completely reworked.

Every evolution should be worthwhile, it should make you feel bad to have to choose. This would promote diversity a thousand fold and people would play a lot more to test all the variations.