Who do you think is doing the dlc?

If it's not Montreal, and this is assuming the DLC isn't already finished, I'm thinking BioWare Austin.

I'm not convinced Montreal isn't the lead on dlc development...

That said Austin wrote the Descent and we know how that turned out.

No idea. Project Pataaaa lol

So official sources (EA/Bioware) talking about the studio means nothing but a blogger quoting some hidden source is totally legit?

Remind me what the descent was?

When the Inquisitor goes into the Deep Roads to help the Legion. 

Never know. Ubisoft did their full expansion for Assassins Creed unity for free after it's bad release and criticisms. I don't think MEA is even in the same ball park as AC Unity's bugs but EA may want to capture good will again doing something small as a thank you to people who bought it. Then again, all the Multiplayer dlc is free which is pretty cool.

In fact data shows it pushed exactly the numbers they were expecting. They expected 3 million in sales in the first week, and data backs up the fact that they got that 3 million in the first week.

Well I like both series although I do prefer ME over DA.

Reyes DLC?  I missed something.  Don't be teasing me!

It's already out! No one told you???? You need a super secret code to download it and I had to sign a contract not to reveal the code to others, but it is the best Bioware DLC EVER! 

It's Montreal. They're going to support Andromeda until the development cycle is over. It does sound however that Montreal will have to wait a while before taking on another full title. They're veterans now and you know what? Ever hear the term, "Set up for failure." It's no wonder Edmonton had to save face. I know investors want their money, but eight weeks? Two months. Two more months to make sure Bioware's name isn't going to be dragged through the mud. Eight weeks was too long to wait after investing a measly $40 million and zero marketing? Eight weeks and EA was unaware of the brewing s***storm in YouTube circles? (Scoff all you want. YouTube 1, EA/Bioware 0) EA had to hubris think that there wasn't any real resentment after ME3? EA said to themselves, F*** it all... Or was it Bioware that signed off on this? Did Bioware say, "Hey, screw it... send it into the wild." Who didn't say, "Please take another take. Liam sounds like he's stroking in mid-sentence." Who didn't say, "My face is tired... WTF is that? Can we record another line like, "... I'm so exhausted carrying everyone on my shoulders. I hope you can help me..." or something to that effect? AND IF THEY WERE TOLD, NOT TO CRITIQUE... then why do you have directors? What the hell happened so badly that the lead left along with 13 other leads. I know it can't be all on HR, but holy cow... who made these horrible hires? Or did they just quit? How do you stay on schedule with all those replacements? How much was blown on experimenting on something that never came to fruition and why? Frostbite that complicated or that limited? I'm pretty sure it's both and who thought, "Sure, let's give it to Montreal who has never dealth with Frostbite before." They did a pretty good job considering. People's reputations are at risk. The stigma of claiming Andromeda on your resume is going to be there. There will be baggage associated with that. That's two years of your employment history or more. The only thing you can do now, is keep polishing the mechanics of the game and tighten up on quality. But you already know that. I'm looking forward to this new rig. The DLC will be icing on the cake.