So will the inquisitor show up in the next dragon age game? I think he will be a guide/mentor of som

Was not quite difficult to recreate Hawke? The Inquisitor will the next one? S/he don't have hand. This fact as a mage perhaps could be still fine, but as warrior for example, I think I would miss my hand.

I see him appearing like Hawke did, Why not.
But he will be able to use intermediaries, could it be Cassandra or Leliana, or somebody else.
3 possiilities : Hawke appearance like(time lapse not action), if not Cullen/Leliana like, or indirectly by messengers.
As BW always used some old characters to make a link with the new episode, I imagine easily some DAI's protagonists reappear the same way.
So it's not sure we'll see him again, but hear about him , that's for sure.

I think I'm going to wait and see. The game hasn't even been officially announced yet. Though, tbh, I'd rather have the warden show up.

I have a feeling it would require blood magic to create a hand from nothing, or even to reattach a hand from a corpse (looking at you, Quentin), so I don't think we're likely to see that...unless it becomes a mission option for the player to choose such a path.

I do not want the Inquisitor to be a NPC. They completely ruined my Hawke and I do not want to see the same thing happen with my Inquisitor.

Please just make the Inquisitor a/the protagonist again to finish this story, Bioware.

I hope the Inquisitor won't show up. If Bioware considers the Inquisitors story to be wrapped up they should just leave them be.

If they bring back any PC then they should give us full control of their dialogue with their very own wheel (even if they're an npc who you won't control in any other way, and you end up talking to yourself), if they're not prepared to do that then I don't think they should bring them back at all.

I think this because of the various degrees of cringey OOC mess that my Hawkes were in DAI.

As talented as Dagna is, I believe she could make a mechanical arm for the Inquisitor. She/he can have a new set of powers based on the new arm

I too would like to have my femquisitor be the main character. Mostly to hear AWR's voice, but also would fit well if Solas is part of the game.

If not, I can see the Inquisitor as an advisor, as someone mentioned above, or maybe the one that hires someone to track Solas.

I've been thinking about this lately and speculate that having the Inquisitor/former Inquisitor in a role similar to the Illusive Man in ME2, where he/she finances the new PC for recruiting a new team to stop the Dread Wolf would be kinda cool. They could do so much with that kind of scenario, and the suicide mission could include the Quizzy. It doesn't have to be identical to ME2, but the basic formula of deep recruitment missions plus engaging loyalty missions plus a new player character and LIs, seems exciting to me.

Believe it or not it apparently doesn't take blood magic to regrow and arm with healing magic.  In the original "Dragon Age Comic" Minderel, a character with a long missing arm, had his leg wounded by a giant spider and his mage companion Gleam (the Protagonist of that story) while healing his leg regenerated his long gone arm in the process.  It was an accident admittedly and the regrown arm was rather "stubby" in comparison its counterpart, but it did actually work lol!  If you really think about it I can't imagine regeneration magic is all that much different than a mix of Healing Magic and Morrigan's Shapeshifting Magic.  

Perhaps that's part of the reason why I was so confused as to why people were like  "THE ARM IS GONE, THE QUIZZY CAN'T FIGHT ANYMORE!".  It may be obscure, hell it may not even be considered canon anymore, but the regrowing of a limb that was long gone with magic has occurred at least once in a licensed DA material, without anything nefarious required.  It's not like the designs for the mechanical prosthetic Bioware created for their original version of Iron Bull (who was oddly missing the very same part of the arm the Inquisitor is currently missing) which never made the cut (which until I hear otherwize I will assume since they were planned, they are cannon, even if they didn't make the cut for Bull himself).  

I mean I certainly agree.  If the purpose of "Trespasser" was to put an end to the Inquisitor's story Bioware could not have done a worse job of it.  If anything I want to play the Quizzie again more now than I did when the Base Game ended, because now I know there is the option of having the Inquisitor actually be a part of a story that THEY are related to (unlike Inquisition itself in which they were merely cleaning up after Hawke's mess).  Magic or Prosthetic could be a viable method to deal with the Arm, the missing limb itself is not a big deal in the setting of Thedas. 

If they really wanted the Inquisitor out, they need only have altered the ending of Trespasser slightly.  Have Solas monologue about his evil plan, remove the Anchor, say his goodbyes (LI/Enemy/Friend) and then instead of merely walking away ... he Petrifies the Inquisitor before leaving.  Whether he believes this will save them from the fall of the Veil (Friend route), or whether he wishes merely to awaken them when its too late to stop him (Enemy route) it doesn't matter, because functionally what this would have done is open up the window for the new PC to come in and still provide the information Bioware wished to present to the players.  The only one who know's Solas plans is the Inquistor and they need to be saved before anyone else can know.  As such it allows a new PC to be created for DA4 independently from the whole Solas issue and then they can be the one to save the Inquisitor at some point during their game, at which point then their dragged into that mess.  The Inquisitor is then thawed out in the very same condition they were in before they became stone (In immense pain with arm just being thoroughly gutted by Magic) and therefore they are literally in no condition to fight Solas before time runs out.  The Inquisitor could get some Player chosen dialogue from that point on, but they aren't prepared for combat.  The only thing that would be lost in this little exchange is the choice to disband or retain the Inquisition and honestly if done right it could actually enhance that choice, as the player would be privy to what exactly the organization became without them before getting the option to make it (even for just a short time).  There Bioware I fixed it, thats how you do what you did in "Trespasser"and remove the Inquisitor, while still setting up the conflict for the next game's PC. 

"Death" seems rather harsh.  Remember in DA:O we've met a character imprisoned in stone in the Mage Circle origin, though in their case they were still conscious.  It's more like Bioware would be Han Solo'ing the Quizzy for a time, setting them on ice until the story actually needed their character.  The Inquisitor PC would still be the only DA Game Protagonist thus far that can't be "dead" (yes I know Hawke's not technically proven dead if they're left in the Fade, I just don't see us meeting them again any time soon if they did survive in one form or another).

At its core the Arm is actually MORE infuriating than simply killing or freezing a character, because ultimately this is the World of Thedas and the loss of the limb should really not be that big of a deal.  The Inquisitor has tons of options to continue the fight, even physically, and yet it seems Bioware may be using the maiming as a poor excuse to remove them from the front line for future installments.  It's not definitive, it doesn't make sense, its hard-lining even Mage Inquisitors into sitting on the sidelines for no damned good reason ... potentially all for the sake of introducing the threat of Solas for a future game, and for a future PC?  What sort of narrative sense does that make?!