dragonsongs
N1
Posts: 2
inherit
1729
0
Feb 21, 2017 21:17:46 GMT
0
dragonsongs
2
October 2016
dragonsongs
|
Post by dragonsongs on Oct 19, 2016 5:04:55 GMT
Hello Everyone, This is, as the subject line suggests, a simple marketing survey for my Technical Writing class. We had to come up with a game we could make working prototypes for. Being a long time Bioware fan I figured a card collecting game that would put Mass Effect and Dragon Age decks against each other would be fun to make. It would only take a minute or two and any additional comments would be most welcome. www.surveymonkey.com/r/MQL6T8G |
|
inherit
✜ Forge Mechanic
352
0
Aug 30, 2023 16:01:17 GMT
6,256
PapaCharlie9
3,851
August 2016
papacharlie9
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age Inquisition, Neverwinter Nights, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by PapaCharlie9 on Oct 19, 2016 19:15:03 GMT
Done.
A couple of comments:
I kind of tripped over question #4: "4. Would you be more interested in a card collecting game based on a video game you enjoyed?" Yes/No.
"More interested" implies a comparison. It begs the question, "more than what?" If you simply drop the "more" from the question, it becomes more sensible to answer yes or no.
The question about traiditonal (ccg), pc/mobile, or neither, needs a "both" answer. That's what I wanted to say. Unless you need to force an either/or, but in that case, the question should be rephrased as, "If you had to choose one ..." and drop the Neither option.
The final question, again yes/no, asks if I'd like a ccg that combines science fiction and fantasy. That's fine the way it is, but it's also a loaded question. It forces me to think about the combination as a given, instead of the possible value of a combination emerging from people's answer to a more basic question, like, "Which genres would you like a CCG to be based on (check all that apply)" and then count all the answers where both SF and fantasy were checked. Does that make sense?
|
|
