inherit
1227
0
3,663
Phantom
2,657
August 2016
deathscepter
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Jade Empire
|
Post by Phantom on Aug 30, 2019 23:45:48 GMT
have you actually consider writing Warhammer 40K professional? Lets face it, that sounds like a standard plot within that universe. Dark gritty and messed up. I have toyed with the idea (in fact I even wrote a few chapters on it) but I could never agree on where to take the plot (I did a part where a vanguard fleet invades, but, after some more research, I found even a vanguard Hive Fleet would all but take out 60 to 80% of the ME universe's total fleets before being destroyed. Leaving the main wave little to deal with). So I abandoned it. well Take notes from that and actually see what it takes to make a stand alone story for that Universe by emailing that company that actually producing material for it.
|
|
inherit
2754
0
5,958
Son of Dorn
Fortifying everything.
6,271
Jan 11, 2017 14:17:27 GMT
January 2017
doomlolz
Dragon Age Inquisition
|
Post by Son of Dorn on Aug 30, 2019 23:51:10 GMT
I have toyed with the idea (in fact I even wrote a few chapters on it) but I could never agree on where to take the plot (I did a part where a vanguard fleet invades, but, after some more research, I found even a vanguard Hive Fleet would all but take out 60 to 80% of the ME universe's total fleets before being destroyed. Leaving the main wave little to deal with). So I abandoned it. well Take notes from that and actually see what it takes to make a stand alone story for that Universe by emailing that company that actually producing material for it. Well, I have been a W40k gamer since I was 15 (now 32), so I know quite a lot about the universe. It's just that, with the Tyranids, do you use them by themselves, or do you add the Reapers in and just say that the Tyranids wiped them out as they advanced towards the Milky Way galaxy?
|
|
inherit
1227
0
3,663
Phantom
2,657
August 2016
deathscepter
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Jade Empire
|
Post by Phantom on Aug 31, 2019 0:08:32 GMT
well Take notes from that and actually see what it takes to make a stand alone story for that Universe by emailing that company that actually producing material for it. Well, I have been a W40k gamer since I was 15 (now 32), so I know quite a lot about the universe. It's just that, with the Tyranids, do you use them by themselves, or do you add the Reapers in and just say that the Tyranids wiped them out as they advanced towards the Milky Way galaxy? That is cool about that. Side note: The Thing is a good movie with Kurt Russell. I have a Rough idea that having Lovecraftian Horror that exist in an hole within Dark Space that having a Dark Citadel as a bridge bridges our universe to a pocket dark universe that this Lovecraftian Horror simply exist and by existing indoctrinates Leviathan and Leviathan augment themselves into Reapers to travel back and forth between the dark pocket universe and Normal space. Leviathan now Reapers believe that all organic is an accident due to existence of this Lovecraftian Horror. Then having the Player Character destroying the Dark Citadel while sealing the Breech in Dark Space to this nightmare. One of the underlining themes within this rough idea that Shepard's actions did directly or indirectly help the Player Character a great deal. Also themikefest might like this idea that this Player Character will happily trash talk Harbinger and just as big of a troll as possible. and Depending on your choices, it will be possible to escape the Destruction and Looking out into Space and making an Andromeda reference.
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
Apr 23, 2024 17:30:54 GMT
30,246
Hanako Ikezawa
22,353
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Aug 31, 2019 1:11:00 GMT
Even more reasons why I’m thankful none of you are making the game, and I’m not even a Liaramancer. Hanako, the only reason that I would accept Liara as a villain is that it would be unexpected for everyone in addition to the salty rivers. Also it is the same reason I want a Cerberus Phantom for Player Character because it will be unexpected as hell regardless of era or either galaxy. Will all the other major characters also experience this kind of thing?
|
|
inherit
1227
0
3,663
Phantom
2,657
August 2016
deathscepter
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Jade Empire
|
Post by Phantom on Aug 31, 2019 1:14:36 GMT
Hanako, the only reason that I would accept Liara as a villain is that it would be unexpected for everyone in addition to the salty rivers. Also it is the same reason I want a Cerberus Phantom for Player Character because it will be unexpected as hell regardless of era or either galaxy. Will all the other major characters also experience this kind of thing? Well Depends on the requests, If the demand is high enough of course I would. Any faction and Any character. If there is a character that annoys you to no end, it is alright to make a request to have them to killed any method you want or at least have giggle fits. So you can have Kai leng and accidently see him die more violently by the hands of the Black Talons than what we gotten within ME3.
|
|
inherit
11247
0
1,639
Buckeldemon
Now stealin' more kidz.
1,200
July 2019
buckeldemon
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Buckeldemon on Aug 31, 2019 16:45:18 GMT
Ahh. The good ol' "kill a character you don't like in the most brutal way imaginable"-fan fiction. I don't know what constitutes being this type of "Liaramancer" that apparently everyone active in here seems to dislike. Can somebody fill me in on that? My first Shepard romanced her. My second did Garrus. I do like her in ME, but she looses points later. A bit too edgy too quickly. What if I would suggest someone like, you know, Miranda for brutal death? I guess I don't really hate her, at least not as passionately as you guys appear to hate Liara, I honestly just cannot understand all the hype Lawson gets, in here especially. Just take her off my ship and make her stop messing around with my Shepards and I'm fine. Also, racist science trolls must burn.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
10036
0
Apr 26, 2024 11:05:59 GMT
Deleted
0
Apr 26, 2024 11:05:59 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2019 16:53:10 GMT
Ahh. The good ol' "kill a character you don't like in the most brutal way imaginable"-fan fiction. I don't know what constitutes being this type of "Liaramancer" that apparently everyone active in here seems to dislike. Can somebody fill me in on that? My first Shepard romanced her. My second did Garrus. I do like her in ME, but she looses points later. A bit too edgy too quickly. What if I would suggest someone like, you know, Miranda for brutal death? I guess I don't really hate her, at least not as passionately as you guys appear to hate Liara, I honestly just cannot understand all the hype Lawson gets, in here especially. Just take her off my ship and make her stop messing around with my Shepards and I'm fine. Also, racist science trolls must burn. I take it you don't giver Miranda the data she wants in ME3. My Shepard's will either romance her through both ME2 and ME3... but not trust her with the data... to get that death scene... or, we like killing her off in ME, by taking her to face the proto-Reaper without her being loyal.. If I'm killing of other ME2 squad mates (looking at you, Jacob), then I'll arrange it so the deaths on the SM are her fault. The best is when I make multiple deaths on the SM her fault, but then continue to romance her and finish her off in ME3. It's satisfying to toy with her in that way... control chip indeed.
|
|
inherit
4578
0
5,014
griffith82
Hope for the best, plan for the worst
4,259
Mar 15, 2017 21:36:52 GMT
March 2017
griffith82
|
Post by griffith82 on Aug 31, 2019 16:59:28 GMT
Because that means that Shepard’s body is in London instead of on the Citadel, thus suggesting they never went on the Citadel and that that part wasn’t real. What I don't get is how that expressly pushes indoctrination. That dying or even severely traumatized organics hallucinate is a medical reality. There are several points in the Trilogy where the series could be made to branch off into a dream-based alternative time line and be made to continue towards an entirely new "ending." It doesn't discount the player choices made after that point because Shepard still thought them and what he/she thinks can still have a bearing on how a new ending plays out. To me, it would be the most expedient way of moving ME3 forward. That would be a copout. They need to stick to their guns and keep the endings the way they are. It was real like it or not.
|
|
inherit
2754
0
5,958
Son of Dorn
Fortifying everything.
6,271
Jan 11, 2017 14:17:27 GMT
January 2017
doomlolz
Dragon Age Inquisition
|
Post by Son of Dorn on Aug 31, 2019 17:12:15 GMT
Ahh. The good ol' "kill a character you don't like in the most brutal way imaginable"-fan fiction. I don't know what constitutes being this type of "Liaramancer" that apparently everyone active in here seems to dislike. Can somebody fill me in on that? My first Shepard romanced her. My second did Garrus. I do like her in ME, but she looses points later. A bit too edgy too quickly. What if I would suggest someone like, you know, Miranda for brutal death? I guess I don't really hate her, at least not as passionately as you guys appear to hate Liara, I honestly just cannot understand all the hype Lawson gets, in here especially. Just take her off my ship and make her stop messing around with my Shepards and I'm fine. Also, racist science trolls must burn. I have prefer the "give the character you don't like the most gruesome fate worse than death" treatment. It's way more fun and creative. Don't you agree? 😈😉
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
10036
0
Apr 26, 2024 11:05:59 GMT
Deleted
0
Apr 26, 2024 11:05:59 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2019 17:45:50 GMT
What I don't get is how that expressly pushes indoctrination. That dying or even severely traumatized organics hallucinate is a medical reality. There are several points in the Trilogy where the series could be made to branch off into a dream-based alternative time line and be made to continue towards an entirely new "ending." It doesn't discount the player choices made after that point because Shepard still thought them and what he/she thinks can still have a bearing on how a new ending plays out. To me, it would be the most expedient way of moving ME3 forward. That would be a copout. They need to stick to their guns and keep the endings the way they are. It was real like it or not. They can certainly do that by just not returning to the Milky Way until after a subsequent "catastrophe" equalizes the different ME3 ending states for the galaxy and the races that were there in 2187... or by just never returning to the Milky Way. My preference again is to continue in Andromeda.
I still say that declaring one of the existing endings canon makes the other "unreal" as effectively as skewing off the timeline before those endings happened. I don't see a difference there that makes the one more desirable than the other. One throws them all away and the other just plays a "favorite" card between the fans... and it still doesn't explain why the IT card is always pulled out during discussions about this.
|
|