Are there too many choices to make in Andromeda?

Nah. Only down side I see to lots of choices is how much it can complicate sequels; and that's Bioware's problem, not mine.

I'm being sneaky, sly and inconspicuous.

*Slips Ryncol*

Do I have to vote?

Yeah, this. Would also have preferred extra perk-based dialogue choices like DAI.

Depends on the choice

Look at the choice to save krogan or the salarian pathfinder. Before entering Archie the Archon's room, the sam thing doesn't mention anything about krogan on the ship. The only thing mention is the one in the tank that has krogan dna. When leaving Archie's room, the sam thing says there's krogan onboard. Really? So now Rookie Ryder has to choose between saving krogan or salarian pathfinder. What about the other squadmates? They're sitting on the tempest with their paw/claw/tentacle/hand/whatever up their fifth point of contact doing nothing. Why can't they get the krogan or pathfinder while Rookie Ryder gets the other? What's the point of having squadmates if they're just going to sit around doing nothing? That is the mission I would have included the other squadmates.

Yep that was my reaction.  "You are only telling me this NOW why exactly?"  Maybe if someone had mentioned this earlier Drack could have led a squad to go get them while I dealt with the primary mission.  A completely contrived situation that just felt dumb in the moment.

I really hated the Convict murder case options.

After collecting all the evidence it's clear he didn't kill the victim, but it's also abundantly clear that he sure as hell tried to.

You can either lie and keep the charge as murder with a sentence of exile or clear his name and let him stay on the nexus because he technically didn't kill anyone.

Last time I checked attempted murder is still pretty freaking illegal. Why can't we make a statement to the public about new evidence? If we don't think he deserves death by exile (which he doesn't die anyway) but don't think it's safe to just pretend that he's not at all a violent criminal then there needs to be a third option of some form of incarceration with a chance of parole after time served.

I know Tann is an accountant but hasn't he seen whatever the Salarian version of Law and Order is?

I believe strongly both ways.

I've only played through once so far and that was at the beginning of the game so I cannot remember all the details, but I was under the impression that there were resource limitations that made it difficult to hold someone for an extended period of time. So I believe you're right.

That should have been the central conflict and had a lot more dialogue revolving around it even if it ultimately meant you only had two options. Instead it was just cut down into such a basic binary choice with little to no discussion. At that point I'd have rather had Tann just say "k thx" and then make his own decision in which I could either accept it or protest in vain over his decision. 

You could do a full episode of Star Trek about the moral quandary of the situation...

To me it isn't about more or less choices its about making meaningful ones. Unfortunately, I think Andromeda misses the mark there. None of them feel very meaningful in the long run, but then again I haven't finished so who knows. But so far I feel like most of those choices don't really matter.