inherit
ღ Grumpy Old Man
1046
0
Feb 12, 2024 15:48:21 GMT
15,499
Space Cowboy
They call me a Space Cowboy
4,937
Aug 17, 2016 20:09:17 GMT
August 2016
spacecowboy
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Jade Empire
|
Post by Space Cowboy on Dec 21, 2018 13:44:57 GMT
Then you run other tests to determine whether or not there is anything wrong with the car.
If there isn't anything wrong with the car and you've already determined there's no gas in it, then that's likely the reason why it's not starting. If repeated tests determine each time that the car will not start without the presence of gas in the tank, then the only conclusion one can draw from the evidence is that gas is required for the car to work.
The point is there are or could be other explanations. Why you can never start with your outcome. So why start with the flat earth, and then attempt to prove it, like you've been doing? It seems you can't trust your own eyes, yet insist on using them as 'proof' when it's convenient.
|
|
inherit
Champion of Kirkwall
1212
0
8,025
Sifr
3,737
Aug 25, 2016 20:05:11 GMT
August 2016
sifr
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire
|
Post by Sifr on Dec 21, 2018 13:47:07 GMT
Then you run other tests to determine whether or not there is anything wrong with the car.
If there isn't anything wrong with the car and you've already determined there's no gas in it, then that's likely the reason why it's not starting. If repeated tests determine each time that the car will not start without the presence of gas in the tank, then the only conclusion one can draw from the evidence is that gas is required for the car to work.
The point is there are or could be other explanations. Which can be whittled down and removed via the process of elimination, as you conduct various tests and experiments to determine whether anything else might be causing the results that seem to be in front of you.
If at the end of the day, you've tried everything and the car still won't start without putting gas in the tank, then no amount of belief or assertion "it could be something else" will make that car start. Buy some gas and stop holding everyone up at the pump!
(Seriously, there's a line behind you backed up so far that it's gone over the horizon)
|
|
inherit
N7
289
0
Sept 21, 2024 0:54:11 GMT
8,016
Terminator Force
4,314
August 2016
terminatorforce
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
TerminatorForce2
|
Post by Terminator Force on Dec 21, 2018 13:48:48 GMT
The point is there are or could be other explanations. Why you can never start with your outcome. So why start with the flat earth, and then attempt to prove it, like you've been doing? It seems you can't trust your own eyes, yet insist on using them as 'proof' when it's convenient. I'm not starting with anything, the Earth is obviously and observably flat. Why would I need to start with anything is that's what my eyes see? Have never seen Earth curve, so there's no logical reason to arrive at the thought.
|
|
inherit
ღ Grumpy Old Man
1046
0
Feb 12, 2024 15:48:21 GMT
15,499
Space Cowboy
They call me a Space Cowboy
4,937
Aug 17, 2016 20:09:17 GMT
August 2016
spacecowboy
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Jade Empire
|
Post by Space Cowboy on Dec 21, 2018 13:55:30 GMT
You're asserting the curve of the moon is Earth shadow is an affirming the consequent fallacy. You are asserting a flat earth based on what you can personally see, Yet you can't see the whole planet. Affirming the consequent fallacy Or maybe this one Weak Analogy (also known as: bad analogy, false analogy, faulty analogy, questionable analogy, argument from spurious similarity, false metaphor) Description: When an analogy is used to prove or disprove an argument, but the analogy is too dissimilar to be effective, that is, it is unlike the argument more than it is like the argument.
|
|
inherit
ღ Grumpy Old Man
1046
0
Feb 12, 2024 15:48:21 GMT
15,499
Space Cowboy
They call me a Space Cowboy
4,937
Aug 17, 2016 20:09:17 GMT
August 2016
spacecowboy
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Jade Empire
|
Post by Space Cowboy on Dec 21, 2018 13:56:12 GMT
I'm not starting with anything, the Earth is obviously and observably flat. lol
|
|
inherit
ღ Grumpy Old Man
1046
0
Feb 12, 2024 15:48:21 GMT
15,499
Space Cowboy
They call me a Space Cowboy
4,937
Aug 17, 2016 20:09:17 GMT
August 2016
spacecowboy
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Jade Empire
|
Post by Space Cowboy on Dec 21, 2018 13:57:17 GMT
Alleged Certainty
(also known as: assuming the conclusion)
Description: Asserting a conclusion without evidence or premises, through a statement that makes the conclusion appear certain when, in fact, it is not.
Logical Form:
Everybody knows that X is true.
Therefore, X is true.
|
|
inherit
N7
289
0
Sept 21, 2024 0:54:11 GMT
8,016
Terminator Force
4,314
August 2016
terminatorforce
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
TerminatorForce2
|
Post by Terminator Force on Dec 21, 2018 13:57:19 GMT
The point is there are or could be other explanations. Which can be whittled down and removed via the process of elimination, as you conduct various tests and experiments to determine whether anything else might be causing the results that seem to be in front of you.
If at the end of the day, you've tried everything and the car still won't start without putting gas in the tank, then no amount of belief or assertion "it could be something else" will make that car start. Buy some gas and stop holding everyone up at the pump!
(Seriously, there's a line behind you backed up so far that it's gone over the horizon) And how do you know you've eliminated all other possible causes? That's why it's a fallacy, if you can't vary and manipulate the cause, you can't prove the cause.
|
|
inherit
ღ Grumpy Old Man
1046
0
Feb 12, 2024 15:48:21 GMT
15,499
Space Cowboy
They call me a Space Cowboy
4,937
Aug 17, 2016 20:09:17 GMT
August 2016
spacecowboy
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Jade Empire
|
Post by Space Cowboy on Dec 21, 2018 14:00:43 GMT
Appeal to Common Sense
Description: Asserting that your conclusion or facts are just “common sense” when, in fact, they are not. We must argue as to why we believe something is common sense if there is any doubt that the belief is not common, rather than just asserting that it is. This is a more specific version of alleged certainty.
Logical Form:
It's common sense that X is true.
Therefore, X is true.
===
Appeal to Self-evident Truth
Description: Making the claim that something is "self-evident" when it is not self-evident in place of arguing a claim with reason. In everyday terms, something is "self-evident" when understanding what it means immediately results in knowing that it is true, such as 2+2=4. The concept of self-evidence is contentions and argued among philosophers based on their ideas of epistemology. This means that what is "self-evident" to one person is not necessarily self-evident to another. However, some ideas are clearly self-evident and some are not.
Logical Form:
Person 1 claims Y without evidence.
Person 2 asks for evidence.
Person 1 claims that Y is self-evident.
|
|
inherit
ღ Grumpy Old Man
1046
0
Feb 12, 2024 15:48:21 GMT
15,499
Space Cowboy
They call me a Space Cowboy
4,937
Aug 17, 2016 20:09:17 GMT
August 2016
spacecowboy
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Jade Empire
|
Post by Space Cowboy on Dec 21, 2018 14:02:50 GMT
Wow, a lot of them fit here
Avoiding the Issue
(also known as: avoiding the question [form of], missing the point, straying off the subject, digressing, distraction [form of])
Description: When an arguer responds to an argument by not addressing the points of the argument. Unlike the strawman fallacy, avoiding the issue does not create an unrelated argument to divert attention, it simply avoids the argument.
Logical Form:
Person 1 makes claim X.
Person 2 makes unrelated statement.
Audience and/or person 1 forgets about claim X.
|
|
inherit
ღ Grumpy Old Man
1046
0
Feb 12, 2024 15:48:21 GMT
15,499
Space Cowboy
They call me a Space Cowboy
4,937
Aug 17, 2016 20:09:17 GMT
August 2016
spacecowboy
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Jade Empire
|
Post by Space Cowboy on Dec 21, 2018 14:03:30 GMT
Which can be whittled down and removed via the process of elimination, as you conduct various tests and experiments to determine whether anything else might be causing the results that seem to be in front of you.
If at the end of the day, you've tried everything and the car still won't start without putting gas in the tank, then no amount of belief or assertion "it could be something else" will make that car start. Buy some gas and stop holding everyone up at the pump!
(Seriously, there's a line behind you backed up so far that it's gone over the horizon) And how do you know you've eliminated all other possible causes? That's why it's a fallacy, if you can't vary and manipulate the cause, you can't prove the cause. <header> Argument from Fallacy</header> argumentum ad logicam (also known as: disproof by fallacy, argument to logic, fallacy fallacy, fallacist's fallacy, bad reasons fallacy [form of]) Description: Concluding that the truth value of an argument is false based on the fact that the argument contains a fallacy. Logical Form: Argument X is fallacious. Therefore, the conclusion or truth claim of argument X is false.
|
|
inherit
ღ Grumpy Old Man
1046
0
Feb 12, 2024 15:48:21 GMT
15,499
Space Cowboy
They call me a Space Cowboy
4,937
Aug 17, 2016 20:09:17 GMT
August 2016
spacecowboy
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Jade Empire
|
Post by Space Cowboy on Dec 21, 2018 14:07:00 GMT
So why start with the flat earth, and then attempt to prove it, like you've been doing? It seems you can't trust your own eyes, yet insist on using them as 'proof' when it's convenient. I'm not starting with anything, the Earth is obviously and observably flat. Why would I need to start with anything is that's what my eyes see? Have never seen Earth curve, so there's no logical reason to arrive at the thought. <header> Begging the Question</header> petitio principii (also known as: assuming the initial point, assuming the answer, chicken and the egg argument, circulus in probando, circular reasoning [form of], vicious circle) Description: Any form of argument where the conclusion is assumed in one of the premises. Many people use the phrase “begging the question” incorrectly when they use it to mean, “prompts one to ask the question”. That is NOT the correct usage. Begging the question is a form of circular reasoning. Logical Form: Claim X assumes X is true. Therefore, claim X is true. Example #1: Paranormal activity is real because I have experienced what can only be described as paranormal activity.
<header> Argument from Incredulity</header> (also known as: argument from personal astonishment, argument from personal incredulity, personal incredulity) Description: Concluding that because you can't or refuse to believe something, it must not be true, improbable, or the argument must be flawed. This is a specific form of the argument from ignorance. Logical Form: Person 1 makes a claim. Person 2 cannot believe the claim. Person 2 concludes, without any reason besides he or she cannot believe or refuses to believe it, that the claim is false or improbable.
|
|
inherit
Champion of Kirkwall
1212
0
8,025
Sifr
3,737
Aug 25, 2016 20:05:11 GMT
August 2016
sifr
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire
|
Post by Sifr on Dec 21, 2018 14:07:47 GMT
And how do you know you've eliminated all other possible causes? Because if you and a team of mechanics have stripped down the car to it's constituent parts to determine there's no mechanical faults at work, then the only available explanation left to you is that you needed to put fuel in the tank for it to work.
You can even work out from these experiments if you've been using the wrong type of fuel, as you may have accidentally borked your engine by trying to run a diesel engine off of regular old petrol, thereby accounting for the mechanical failure you've been experiencing.
|
|
inherit
ღ Grumpy Old Man
1046
0
Feb 12, 2024 15:48:21 GMT
15,499
Space Cowboy
They call me a Space Cowboy
4,937
Aug 17, 2016 20:09:17 GMT
August 2016
spacecowboy
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Jade Empire
|
Post by Space Cowboy on Dec 21, 2018 14:09:39 GMT
Here's one TF uses a lot
Conspiracy Theory
(also known as: canceling hypothesis, canceling hypotheses, cover-ups)
Description: Explaining that your claim cannot be proven or verified because the truth is being hidden and/or evidence destroyed by a group of two or more people. When that reason is challenged as not being true or accurate, the challenge is often presented as just another attempt to cover up the truth and presented as further evidence that the original claim is true.
Logical Form:
A is true.
B is why the truth cannot be proven.
Therefore, A is true.
|
|
inherit
ღ Grumpy Old Man
1046
0
Feb 12, 2024 15:48:21 GMT
15,499
Space Cowboy
They call me a Space Cowboy
4,937
Aug 17, 2016 20:09:17 GMT
August 2016
spacecowboy
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Jade Empire
|
Post by Space Cowboy on Dec 21, 2018 14:12:55 GMT
Fantasy Projection
Description: Confusing subjective experiences, usually very emotionally charged, with objective realities, then suggesting or demanding that others accept the fantasy as truth.
Logical Form:
Person 1 has subjective experience X.
Person 1 incorrectly believes that experience X represents reality.
Therefore, person 1 insists that others accept that X represents reality.
|
|
inherit
N7
289
0
Sept 21, 2024 0:54:11 GMT
8,016
Terminator Force
4,314
August 2016
terminatorforce
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
TerminatorForce2
|
Post by Terminator Force on Dec 21, 2018 14:13:57 GMT
And how do you know you've eliminated all other possible causes? Because if you and a team of mechanics have stripped down the car to it's constituent parts to determine there's no mechanical faults at work, then the only available explanation left to you is that you needed to put fuel in the tank for it to work.
You can even work out from these experiments if you've been using the wrong type of fuel, as you may have accidentally borked your engine by trying to run a diesel engine off of regular old petrol, thereby accounting for the mechanical failure you've been experiencing.
You're not getting it. You eventually figure out the effect of the problem with car by searching for the cause, you find and prove the cause by varying and manipulating it. So only way to 100% prove Earth shadow on moon is by varying and manipulating the movement of Earth.
|
|
inherit
ღ Grumpy Old Man
1046
0
Feb 12, 2024 15:48:21 GMT
15,499
Space Cowboy
They call me a Space Cowboy
4,937
Aug 17, 2016 20:09:17 GMT
August 2016
spacecowboy
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Jade Empire
|
Post by Space Cowboy on Dec 21, 2018 14:50:25 GMT
Because if you and a team of mechanics have stripped down the car to it's constituent parts to determine there's no mechanical faults at work, then the only available explanation left to you is that you needed to put fuel in the tank for it to work.
You can even work out from these experiments if you've been using the wrong type of fuel, as you may have accidentally borked your engine by trying to run a diesel engine off of regular old petrol, thereby accounting for the mechanical failure you've been experiencing.
You're not getting it. You eventually figure out the effect of the problem with car by searching for the cause, you find and prove the cause by varying and manipulating it. So only way to 100% prove Earth shadow on moon is by varying and manipulating the movement of Earth. Something that can easily be recreated with a couple of balls.
|
|
inherit
N7
289
0
Sept 21, 2024 0:54:11 GMT
8,016
Terminator Force
4,314
August 2016
terminatorforce
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
TerminatorForce2
|
Post by Terminator Force on Dec 21, 2018 14:54:58 GMT
Because if you and a team of mechanics have stripped down the car to it's constituent parts to determine there's no mechanical faults at work, then the only available explanation left to you is that you needed to put fuel in the tank for it to work.
You can even work out from these experiments if you've been using the wrong type of fuel, as you may have accidentally borked your engine by trying to run a diesel engine off of regular old petrol, thereby accounting for the mechanical failure you've been experiencing.
You're not getting it. You eventually figure out the effect of the problem with car by searching for the cause, you find and prove the cause by varying and manipulating it. So only way to 100% prove Earth shadow on moon is by varying and manipulating the movement of Earth. This is why science is always 100% correct and infallible, because it's only about establishing cause and effect. And you don't get more 100% about your cause then being able to manipulate it. Look up the definition of science; Then look up the definition of scientific method cause and effect;
|
|
inherit
N7
289
0
Sept 21, 2024 0:54:11 GMT
8,016
Terminator Force
4,314
August 2016
terminatorforce
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
TerminatorForce2
|
Post by Terminator Force on Dec 21, 2018 14:56:09 GMT
You're not getting it. You eventually figure out the effect of the problem with car by searching for the cause, you find and prove the cause by varying and manipulating it. So only way to 100% prove Earth shadow on moon is by varying and manipulating the movement of Earth. Something that can easily be recreated with a couple of balls. Models are pseudoscience.
|
|
inherit
ღ Twelfth Level Geek
139
0
8,911
Jeremiah12LGeek
Mostly silly, occasionally useful.
2,996
August 2016
jeremiah12thlvlgeek
Bottom
|
Post by Jeremiah12LGeek on Dec 21, 2018 14:57:45 GMT
There is no depth of stupid to which Sinful will not take this, so arguing with him is entirely pointless.
I'm not saying to stop, just pointing out that it will never go anywhere.
|
|
inherit
ღ Grumpy Old Man
1046
0
Feb 12, 2024 15:48:21 GMT
15,499
Space Cowboy
They call me a Space Cowboy
4,937
Aug 17, 2016 20:09:17 GMT
August 2016
spacecowboy
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Jade Empire
|
Post by Space Cowboy on Dec 21, 2018 15:20:25 GMT
There is no depth of stupid to which Sinful will not take this, so arguing with him is entirely pointless. I'm not saying to stop, just pointing out that it will never go anywhere. or to put it differently. never mud wrestle a pig. You'll just get tired and frustrated, adn the pig enjoys it.
Why do you call him Sinful?
|
|
inherit
ღ Grumpy Old Man
1046
0
Feb 12, 2024 15:48:21 GMT
15,499
Space Cowboy
They call me a Space Cowboy
4,937
Aug 17, 2016 20:09:17 GMT
August 2016
spacecowboy
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Jade Empire
|
Post by Space Cowboy on Dec 21, 2018 15:24:30 GMT
You're not getting it. You eventually figure out the effect of the problem with car by searching for the cause, you find and prove the cause by varying and manipulating it. So only way to 100% prove Earth shadow on moon is by varying and manipulating the movement of Earth. This is why science is always 100% correct and infallible, because it's only about establishing cause and effect. And you don't get more 100% about your cause then being able to manipulate it. Look up the definition of science; Then look up the definition of scientific method cause and effect; science noun 1 : the state of knowing : knowledge as distinguished from ignorance or misunderstanding
2a : a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study the science of theology b : something (such as a sport or technique) that may be studied or learned like systematized knowledge have it down to a science 3a : knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through scientific method b : such knowledge or such a system of knowledge concerned with the physical world and its phenomena : natural science
scientific method noun Definition of scientific method : principles and procedures for the systematic pursuit of knowledge involving the recognition and formulation of a problem, the collection of data through observation and experiment, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses
[/span] [/p] [/span][/div][/div][/spoiler] Stop making up your own definitions. Sorry for the formatting
[/div][/div][/div]
|
|
inherit
N7
289
0
Sept 21, 2024 0:54:11 GMT
8,016
Terminator Force
4,314
August 2016
terminatorforce
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
TerminatorForce2
|
Post by Terminator Force on Dec 21, 2018 15:33:11 GMT
This is why science is always 100% correct and infallible, because it's only about establishing cause and effect. And you don't get more 100% about your cause then being able to manipulate it. Look up the definition of science; Then look up the definition of scientific method cause and effect; sciencenoun 1 : the state of knowing : knowledge as distinguished from ignorance or misunderstanding
2a : a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study the science of theology b : something (such as a sport or technique) that may be studied or learned like systematized knowledge have it down to a science 3a : knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through scientific method b : such knowledge or such a system of knowledge concerned with the physical world and its phenomena : natural science
scientific method noun Definition of scientific method : principles and procedures for the systematic pursuit of knowledge involving the recognition and formulation of a problem, the collection of data through observation and experiment, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses
Stop making up your own definitions. Sorry for the formatting
I'll make this easy for everyone, show me the science that proves the shape of the Earth.
|
|
inherit
ღ Grumpy Old Man
1046
0
Feb 12, 2024 15:48:21 GMT
15,499
Space Cowboy
They call me a Space Cowboy
4,937
Aug 17, 2016 20:09:17 GMT
August 2016
spacecowboy
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Jade Empire
|
Post by Space Cowboy on Dec 21, 2018 15:44:41 GMT
sciencenoun 1 : the state of knowing : knowledge as distinguished from ignorance or misunderstanding
2a : a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study the science of theology b : something (such as a sport or technique) that may be studied or learned like systematized knowledge have it down to a science 3a : knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through scientific method b : such knowledge or such a system of knowledge concerned with the physical world and its phenomena : natural science
scientific method noun Definition of scientific method : principles and procedures for the systematic pursuit of knowledge involving the recognition and formulation of a problem, the collection of data through observation and experiment, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses
Stop making up your own definitions. Sorry for the formatting
I'll make this easy for everyone, show me the science that proves the shape of the Earth. Spoilering that mess was a good idea, lol.
And why should anyone do that? You know you'll just trot out some ''disproof' video or diagram as an excuse to reject it.
Also, as others have noted, repeatedly, you have the burden of proof, and science does not work with proof, it works with evidence and coming to the most likely cause of an observable fact.
|
|
dmc1001
N7
Biotic Booty
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Origin: ferroboy
Prime Posts: 77
Posts: 9,941 Likes: 17,683
inherit
Biotic Booty
1031
0
Apr 19, 2024 16:40:05 GMT
17,683
dmc1001
9,941
August 2016
dmc1001
Top
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
ferroboy
77
|
Post by dmc1001 on Dec 21, 2018 15:57:45 GMT
I'll make this easy for everyone, show me the science that proves the shape of the Earth. View from space? But that's fake. If all evidence is fake, there's no proving anything. Hence, debating with you is pointless.
|
|
inherit
ღ Twelfth Level Geek
139
0
8,911
Jeremiah12LGeek
Mostly silly, occasionally useful.
2,996
August 2016
jeremiah12thlvlgeek
Bottom
|
Post by Jeremiah12LGeek on Dec 21, 2018 16:01:52 GMT
There is no depth of stupid to which Sinful will not take this, so arguing with him is entirely pointless. I'm not saying to stop, just pointing out that it will never go anywhere. or to put it differently. never mud wrestle a pig. You'll just get tired and frustrated, adn the pig enjoys it. Why do you call him Sinful?
He has had a few names over his history with BSN. The first that I was aware of was "Sinful Force." I still refer to a somewhat well-known uBSN-hater as "superblaze" because of their original user name. I think it's my way of signalling "I see through your shit," but mostly I do it because it sometimes annoys the people in question while being very difficult for them to complain about without looking petty. Sort of a subtle form of "counter-trolling."
|
|