inherit
168
0
14,263
Rascoth
4,262
August 2016
rascoth
|
Post by Rascoth on Sept 13, 2020 21:33:44 GMT
Maybe not whole train, but I bet we can find at least one carriage that welcomes cautious optimistic. I definitely plan to sit there with tea and popcorn, if the latter is needed. I hope I won't need it, but better be prepared.That's not how you spell booze. Better?
|
|
inherit
401
0
1
44,085
DragonKingReborn
21,408
August 2016
dragonkingreborn
http://bsn.boards.net/threads/recent/143
https://i.imgur.com/1myVt9D.jpg
DragonKingReborn
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
887
590
|
Post by DragonKingReborn on Sept 13, 2020 21:36:36 GMT
That's not how you spell booze. Better?
|
|
inherit
1033
0
35,910
colfoley
18,746
Aug 17, 2016 10:19:37 GMT
August 2016
colfoley
|
Post by colfoley on Sept 13, 2020 21:39:08 GMT
On the Cory/ Solas front... Cory was at best a 7.5 villain. My interest in Solas is at least a 9. Maybe a ten. Yes I'm worried they'll cock it up but only because he is such a fascinating character and a lot may be riding on him for 4....if he is the main antagonist. And his success or failure or whether he is Cory 2.0 would be the same no matter who the protagonist is.
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
Oct 31, 2024 18:26:04 GMT
31,574
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Sept 13, 2020 21:47:51 GMT
On the Cory/ Solas front... Cory was at best a 7.5 villain. My interest in Solas is at least a 9. Maybe a ten. Yes I'm worried they'll cock it up but only because he is such a fascinating character and a lot may be riding on him for 4....if he is the main antagonist. And his success or failure or whether he is Cory 2.0 would be the same no matter who the protagonist is. Interest for Solas is a 0/10 now (was formerly at similar levels to you). I’m fully with those who want him killed off before the game starts or during the opening and have the rest of the game deal with something else.
|
|
inherit
1033
0
35,910
colfoley
18,746
Aug 17, 2016 10:19:37 GMT
August 2016
colfoley
|
Post by colfoley on Sept 13, 2020 21:54:50 GMT
On the Cory/ Solas front... Cory was at best a 7.5 villain. My interest in Solas is at least a 9. Maybe a ten. Yes I'm worried they'll cock it up but only because he is such a fascinating character and a lot may be riding on him for 4....if he is the main antagonist. And his success or failure or whether he is Cory 2.0 would be the same no matter who the protagonist is. Interest for Solas is a 0/10 now (was formerly at similar levels to you). I’m fully with those who want him killed off before the game starts or during the opening and have the rest of the game deal with something else. I keep on relating Solas to the Illusive Man...and in that situation Commander Shepard was still his protagonist to his antagonist after they were in an alliance. And yet BioWare ruined his character in 3. Now whatever bioware does for the protagonist for 4 we won't know what the other situation...that'll be other universe stuff...but just because a protagonist knows their antagonist does not automatically make something good.
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
Oct 31, 2024 18:26:04 GMT
31,574
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Sept 13, 2020 22:00:58 GMT
Interest for Solas is a 0/10 now (was formerly at similar levels to you). I’m fully with those who want him killed off before the game starts or during the opening and have the rest of the game deal with something else. I keep on relating Solas to the Illusive Man...and in that situation Commander Shepard was still his protagonist to his antagonist after they were in an alliance. And yet BioWare ruined his character in 3. Now whatever bioware does for the protagonist for 4 we won't know what the other situation...that'll be other universe stuff...but just because a protagonist knows their antagonist does not automatically make something good. But in this case, it does. Otherwise again it’s just a repeat of the last villain.
|
|
inherit
1033
0
35,910
colfoley
18,746
Aug 17, 2016 10:19:37 GMT
August 2016
colfoley
|
Post by colfoley on Sept 13, 2020 22:02:41 GMT
I keep on relating Solas to the Illusive Man...and in that situation Commander Shepard was still his protagonist to his antagonist after they were in an alliance. And yet BioWare ruined his character in 3. Now whatever bioware does for the protagonist for 4 we won't know what the other situation...that'll be other universe stuff...but just because a protagonist knows their antagonist does not automatically make something good. But in this case, it does. Otherwise again it’s just a repeat of the last villain. we disagree.
|
|
Noxluxe
N4
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
Posts: 2,024 Likes: 3,563
inherit
10359
0
Mar 14, 2019 16:10:11 GMT
3,563
Noxluxe
2,024
Jul 21, 2018 23:55:09 GMT
July 2018
noxluxe
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
|
Post by Noxluxe on Sept 13, 2020 22:03:32 GMT
I've said elsewhere, but I don't buy into the notion of antivillains. Every villain is the hero of their own story, and are doing what they think is right and best for the world. They're simply deluding themselves to not feel bad for their actions. If anything, I'd say Corypheus is actually less of a monster than Solas is. At least he offered his "salvation" to anyone who chose it, regardless of race, sex, class, and so on. He even offered it to people trying to kill him. Meanwhile Solas is a racist who as you argued only cares about his kind due to a false sense of superior worth. If your drawven rogue is your Inquisitor, they won't be doing shit according to Bioware. Not at all true. People who are too damaged or stunted to even begin to care whether or not they could be called a hero in any sense whatsoever are definitely real, both in stories and in the world we live in. I'd put Corypheous in that category at the extreme end of the scale along with Voldemort and Emperor Palpatine. Anything he offers to anyone is entirely to ease his own quest for power. 'Salvation' is his sales pitch, it's not his motivation. Villains who could creditably be considered heroes of their own story, like you're referring to, are usually considered anti-villains when done right. And I wouldn't even say that Solas conforms to that. He obviously feels terrible about what he's done, doing and going to do, and is just trying to make the best of a terrible situation because he's the only one with the power and knowledge to do so. If he gives up then he's personally responsible for the extinction of his people. There's no-one else to pass the buck to. And if he goes ahead then the blood of our people are on his hands, and he has to deal with that. He has to choose between one genocide or another, and there's no possible third option. You don't want anyone ordinary to get it into their heads that they can start taking those kinds of decisions into their own hands, but if a human being is someday put in a position of being forced to choose between several potentially terrible outcomes for humanity as well as other species, a la Shepard in ME3, I'd want that person to have the spine and sense to get the least bad deal for us even if it still involves a lot of suffering. Rather than taking the route that seems most like inaction to keep their conscience as clean as possible. I don't see him seeing himself as a hero at all, and I don't see him having any delusions about what he's doing. Which makes him my very favorite kind of villain. He knows exactly how much damage he's causing, and he hates it, but he also has very real reason to think that it's better than the alternative. I'd compare him to Infinity War Thanos, except that while Thanos' heart was in the right place his logic was fundamentally totally warped and insane. In contrast, Solas knows way more about the bigger picture than we do, and so far as we know he's undertaking his quest with a clear view of what's at stake. And if considering human lives more important than chimps' isn't racist then favoring Solas' era of immortal superpowered elves intrinsically over modern humans, dwarves and elves isn't either. Calling him that just because that's what he'd be if he was a real human person favoring one human race over another for made-up reasons doesn't make it true. They're two completely different things. No matter how much you understandably don't like racists.
|
|
linksocarina
N5
Always teacher, sometimes writer
Teaching Mode Activated
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
PSN: LinksOcarina
Posts: 3,186 Likes: 4,072
inherit
Always teacher, sometimes writer
370
0
4,072
linksocarina
Teaching Mode Activated
3,186
August 2016
linksocarina
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
LinksOcarina
|
Post by linksocarina on Sept 13, 2020 22:08:15 GMT
I don't know who that is, so what do you mean? He was the main antagonist in Baldurs Gate 2. From what I recall he wanted to have greater power, attacked the tree of the people to get it and was punished by being stripped of his elven soul. So he was now mortal and lacking a soul. I don't really get the comparison myself. Sympathetic villain was the line I was going for...
|
|
inherit
1033
0
35,910
colfoley
18,746
Aug 17, 2016 10:19:37 GMT
August 2016
colfoley
|
Post by colfoley on Sept 13, 2020 22:08:50 GMT
I've said elsewhere, but I don't buy into the notion of antivillains. Every villain is the hero of their own story, and are doing what they think is right and best for the world. They're simply deluding themselves to not feel bad for their actions. If anything, I'd say Corypheus is actually less of a monster than Solas is. At least he offered his "salvation" to anyone who chose it, regardless of race, sex, class, and so on. He even offered it to people trying to kill him. Meanwhile Solas is a racist who as you argued only cares about his kind due to a false sense of superior worth. If your drawven rogue is your Inquisitor, they won't be doing shit according to Bioware. Not at all true. People who are too damaged or stunted to even begin to care whether or not they could be called a hero in any sense whatsoever are definitely real, both in stories and in the world we live in. I'd put Corypheous in that category at the extreme end of the scale along with Voldemort and Emperor Palpatine. Anything he offers to anyone is entirely to ease his own quest for power. 'Salvation' is his sales pitch, it's not his motivation. Villains who could creditably be considered heroes of their own story, like you're referring to, are usually considered anti-villains when done right. And I wouldn't even say that Solas conforms to that. He obviously feels terrible about what he's done, doing and going to do, and is just trying to make the best of a terrible situation because he's the only one with the power and knowledge to do so. If he gives up then he's personally responsible for the extinction of his people. There's no-one else to pass the buck to. And if he goes ahead then the blood of our people are on his hands, and he has to deal with that. He has to choose between one genocide or another, and there's no possible third option. You don't want anyone ordinary to get it into their heads that they can start taking those kinds of decisions into their own hands, but if a human being is someday put in a position of being forced to choose between several potentially terrible outcomes for humanity as well as other species, a la Shepard in ME3, I'd want that person to have the spine and sense to get the least bad deal for us even if it still involves a lot of suffering. Rather than taking the route that seems most like inaction to keep their conscience as clean as possible. I don't see him seeing himself as a hero at all, and I don't see him having any delusions about what he's doing. Which makes him my very favorite kind of villain. He knows exactly how much damage he's causing, and he hates it, but he also has very real reason to think that it's better than the alternative. I'd compare him to Infinity War Thanos, except that while Thanos' heart was in the right place his logic was fundamentally totally warped and insane. In contrast, Solas knows way more about the bigger picture than we do, and so far as we know he's undertaking his quest with a clear view of what's at stake. And if considering human lives more important than chimps' isn't racist then favoring Solas' era of immortal superpowered elves intrinsically over modern humans, dwarves and elves isn't either. Calling him that just because that's what he'd be if he was a real human person favoring one human race over another doesn't make it true. They're two completely different things. No matter how much you understandably don't like racists. yeah the Thanos connection is very apt. As is your comment on even Solas does not see himself as a hero. ...and I agree with you about how that makes him compelling as hell.
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
Oct 31, 2024 18:26:04 GMT
31,574
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Sept 13, 2020 22:16:36 GMT
I've said elsewhere, but I don't buy into the notion of antivillains. Every villain is the hero of their own story, and are doing what they think is right and best for the world. They're simply deluding themselves to not feel bad for their actions. If anything, I'd say Corypheus is actually less of a monster than Solas is. At least he offered his "salvation" to anyone who chose it, regardless of race, sex, class, and so on. He even offered it to people trying to kill him. Meanwhile Solas is a racist who as you argued only cares about his kind due to a false sense of superior worth. If your drawven rogue is your Inquisitor, they won't be doing shit according to Bioware. Not at all true. People who are too damaged or stunted to even begin to care whether or not they could be called a hero in any sense whatsoever are definitely real, both in stories and in the world we live in. I'd put Corypheous in that category at the extreme end of the scale along with Voldemort and Emperor Palpatine. Anything he offers to anyone is entirely to ease his own quest for power. 'Salvation' is his sales pitch, it's not his motivation. Villains who could creditably be considered heroes of their own story, like you're referring to, are usually considered anti-villains when done right. And I wouldn't even say that Solas conforms to that. He obviously feels terrible about what he's done, doing and going to do, and is just trying to make the best of a terrible situation because he's the only one with the power and knowledge to do so. If he gives up then he's personally responsible for the extinction of his people. There's no-one else to pass the buck to. And if he goes ahead then the blood of our people are on his hands, and he has to deal with that. He has to choose between one genocide or another, and there's no possible third option. You don't want anyone ordinary to get it into their heads that they can start taking those kinds of decisions into their own hands, but if a human being is someday put in a position of being forced to choose between several potentially terrible outcomes for humanity as well as other species, a la Shepard in ME3, I'd want that person to have the spine and sense to get the least bad deal for us even if it still involves a lot of suffering. Rather than taking the route that seems most like inaction to keep their conscience as clean as possible. I don't see him seeing himself as a hero at all, and I don't see him having any delusions about what he's doing. Which makes him my very favorite kind of villain. He knows exactly how much damage he's causing, and he hates it, but he also has very real reason to think that it's better than the alternative. I'd compare him to Infinity War Thanos, except that while Thanos' heart was in the right place his logic was fundamentally totally warped and insane. In contrast, Solas knows way more about the bigger picture than we do, and so far as we know he's undertaking his quest with a clear view of what's at stake. And if considering human lives more important than chimps' isn't racist then favoring Solas' era of immortal superpowered elves intrinsically over modern humans, dwarves and elves isn't either. Calling him that just because that's what he'd be if he was a real human person favoring one human race over another doesn't make it true. They're two completely different things. No matter how much you understandably don't like racists. I disagree completely, or at least see no difference between Solas and those you listed. His feelings are irrelevant. You can feel as bad as you want, it doesn't excuse your actions. His "make the best of a bad situation" is genocide to make the world he likes back, so selfish reasons. And no, him not acting isn't committing genocide on his people. I don't want anyone who would even consider murdering millions of innocent people anywhere near a situation where they could make that happen. Solas is just as insane and deluded as IW Thanos. Actually I take that back. THanos is actually better since he is doing this for everyone (well, half of everyone) and applying it evenly while Solas is just doing it for him and his few immortal elven buddies. Except he doesn't think the modern races are people. Even the modern elves aren't his kind of elves. He literally explicitly states this to us. So yes, he would be the kind of person who would go "Well they aren't people, they're just monkeys."
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
Oct 31, 2024 18:26:04 GMT
31,574
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Sept 13, 2020 22:17:08 GMT
He was the main antagonist in Baldurs Gate 2. From what I recall he wanted to have greater power, attacked the tree of the people to get it and was punished by being stripped of his elven soul. So he was now mortal and lacking a soul. I don't really get the comparison myself. Sympathetic villain was the line I was going for... Doesn't sound sympathetic from gervaise21 explanation.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
23,527
smilesja
14,346
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Sept 13, 2020 22:34:41 GMT
Because people on the hype train actually make use of their time rather than spending it complaining on the internet. No, they just spend it complaining about the complainers. We disagree.
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
Oct 31, 2024 18:26:04 GMT
31,574
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Sept 13, 2020 22:38:06 GMT
No, they just spend it complaining about the complainers. We disagree. I rest my case, Your Honor.
|
|
Noxluxe
N4
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
Posts: 2,024 Likes: 3,563
inherit
10359
0
Mar 14, 2019 16:10:11 GMT
3,563
Noxluxe
2,024
Jul 21, 2018 23:55:09 GMT
July 2018
noxluxe
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
|
Post by Noxluxe on Sept 13, 2020 22:48:17 GMT
I disagree completely, or at least see no difference between Solas and those you listed. His feelings are irrelevant. You can feel as bad as you want, it doesn't excuse your actions. His "make the best of a bad situation" is genocide to make the world he likes back, so selfish reasons. And no, him not acting isn't committing genocide on his people. I don't want anyone who would even consider murdering millions of innocent people anywhere near a situation where they could make that happen. Solas is just as insane and deluded as IW Thanos. Actually I take that back. THanos is actually better since he is doing this for everyone (well, half of everyone) and applying it evenly while Solas is just doing it for him and his few immortal elven buddies. Except he doesn't think the modern races are people. Even the modern elves aren't his kind of elves. He literally explicitly states this to us. So yes, he would be the kind of person who would go "Well they aren't people, they're just monkeys." If you choose to deliberately disregard someone's thoughts and feelings then I don't see how you get off feeling like you can judge them in any real sense. You're just making the point that you don't like people who do bad things. Which is fine. It just also doesn't really mean anything. Nobody is saying that his feelings in any way excuse his actions, just that they're relevant to how interesting or engaging a villain he is. And yes, if someone is about to fall over a cliff and you know for a fact that you can save them, and you choose not to, then you're morally responsible for their fall in a utilitarian sense. You chose their death out of two options. Solas' people are very close to being lost to the world forever. He can save them. Refusing to do so makes him morally responsible for their loss. Even if he wasn't the one who sent them there to begin with, which he was, making him doubly responsible. Nobody wants anyone to consider murdering millions of innocent people. But if events hypothetically conspired to FORCE one specific person to have to make such a call, as for example happens in ME3, as could theoretically someday happen in real life, and the cost of inaction is way higher than any potential action, you clearly want them to have the strength to make the least terrible choice even if they'll personally feel horrible about it. Chimps are intelligent and passionate animals. They have familial feelings and internal politics and are capable of love and hate and jealousy(oh boy) and murderous rage just like we are. They're more than smart enough to use tools. In fact, it's currently being hypothesized that they're in the middle of entering their own Stone Age. The fact that our brains are currently three times bigger is only a question of relative evolution over time. How exactly is the difference between Solas' race of immortal and nearly all-powerful elves and the modern humans, dwarves and elves of Thedas, none of whom live much more than a century or can do much more than throw a fireball, less functionally significant than the difference between you and the chimps with whom you share 98.8 percent of your DNA?
|
|
inherit
1033
0
35,910
colfoley
18,746
Aug 17, 2016 10:19:37 GMT
August 2016
colfoley
|
Post by colfoley on Sept 13, 2020 22:51:47 GMT
Besides even if Solas was a racist...he isn't now.
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
Oct 31, 2024 18:26:04 GMT
31,574
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Sept 13, 2020 23:00:18 GMT
I disagree completely, or at least see no difference between Solas and those you listed. His feelings are irrelevant. You can feel as bad as you want, it doesn't excuse your actions. His "make the best of a bad situation" is genocide to make the world he likes back, so selfish reasons. And no, him not acting isn't committing genocide on his people. I don't want anyone who would even consider murdering millions of innocent people anywhere near a situation where they could make that happen. Solas is just as insane and deluded as IW Thanos. Actually I take that back. THanos is actually better since he is doing this for everyone (well, half of everyone) and applying it evenly while Solas is just doing it for him and his few immortal elven buddies. Except he doesn't think the modern races are people. Even the modern elves aren't his kind of elves. He literally explicitly states this to us. So yes, he would be the kind of person who would go "Well they aren't people, they're just monkeys." If you choose to deliberately disregard someone's thoughts and feelings then I don't see how you get off feeling like you can judge them in any real sense. You're just making the point that you don't like people who do bad things. Which is fine. It just also doesn't really mean anything. Nobody is saying that his feelings in any way excuse his actions, just that they're relevant to how interesting or engaging a villain he is. And yes, if someone is about to fall over a cliff and you know for a fact that you can save them, and you choose not to, then you're morally responsible for their fall in a utilitarian sense. You chose their death out of two options. Solas' people are very close to being lost to the world forever. He can save them. Refusing to do so makes him morally responsible for their loss. Even if he wasn't the one who sent them there to begin with, which he was, making him doubly responsible. Nobody wants anyone to consider murdering millions of innocent people. But if events hypothetically conspired to FORCE one specific person to have to make such a call, as for example happens in ME3, as could theoretically someday happen in real life, and the cost of inaction is way higher than any potential action, you clearly want them to have the strength to make the least terrible choice even if they'll personally feel horrible about it. Chimps are intelligent and passionate animals. They have familial feelings and internal politics and are capable of love and hate and jealousy(oh boy) and murderous rage just like we are. They're more than smart enough to use tools. In fact, it's currently being hypothesized that they're in the middle of entering their own Stone Age. The fact that our brains are currently three times bigger is only a question of relative evolution over time. How exactly is the difference between Solas' race of immortal and nearly all-powerful elves and the modern humans, dwarves and elves of Thedas, none of whom live much more than a century or can do much more than throw a fireball, less functionally significant than the difference between you and the chimps with whom you share 98.8 percent of your DNA? I'm not disregarding anything. I just said how they feel doesn't excuse or diminish their action. If a man murders a family, him feeling desperate or sad aout it doesn't make him any less awful because he still murdered a family. And Solas is murdering many, many, many families. Not really. I don't see a villain who cries themselves to sleep at night for all the death they cause any more interesting than one who laughs themselves to sleep for the same act. Unless you pushed them off the cliff, you are not responsible for them dying from said fall. Though as you said, Solas is guilty of pushing his people off that cliff. But now he is pushing a bunch of people off that cliff so when the first finishes falling they're okay because all the bodies broke the fall. There's never a situation where there are only those extreme. ME3 last I checked doesn't involve mass murder in all the choices. Only one of them actually, leaving two that don't. You're talking to someone who doesn't think chimps should be murdered either, so I don't really get your argument. If Planet of the Apes happened and they started talking, I'm all for living together. I wouldn't wipe them all out just so me and my buddies get more room to live in. Besides even if Solas was a racist...he isn't now. Yes he is.
|
|
Noxluxe
N4
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
Posts: 2,024 Likes: 3,563
inherit
10359
0
Mar 14, 2019 16:10:11 GMT
3,563
Noxluxe
2,024
Jul 21, 2018 23:55:09 GMT
July 2018
noxluxe
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
|
Post by Noxluxe on Sept 13, 2020 23:06:46 GMT
Besides even if Solas was a racist...he isn't now. I honestly think it's a silly comparison to make. Solas believes that his people trump ours (if necessary) because:*They potentially live forever vs. a hundred years and change at most. That's potentially an infinity more of sentient, sapient living per life. *They all have power over the laws of nature far beyond what modern mages know, and their civilizations reached advancement and sophistication far beyond ours because of it. *They're all attuned and awake to and capable of appreciating the magical nature of everything around them. Not unlike the difference between sapience and non-sapience, at least the way Solas describes it. *They were here first, and we only came about in the first place because a catastrophic mistake winked them out of existence for a while. In contrast, a true, diehard racist believes that one race is favorable to another because:*They have a slightly different skin pigmentation. ... That's it. Calling Solas' dilemma racism is reductive as fuck. The two can't be compared at all.
|
|
inherit
1033
0
35,910
colfoley
18,746
Aug 17, 2016 10:19:37 GMT
August 2016
colfoley
|
Post by colfoley on Sept 13, 2020 23:07:52 GMT
Rewatching season 1 of Thrones trying to watch the series again and the idea of mirroring and repetition have come up. Just watched Tyrion request his trial by combat...almost the exact same scene as in 4...yet repeating ideas in fiction can be important for compare and contrast, and to set up important ideas.
|
|
inherit
Friend of Red Jenny
90
0
18,922
vertigomez
5,281
August 2016
vertigomez
|
Post by vertigomez on Sept 13, 2020 23:08:36 GMT
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
Oct 31, 2024 18:26:04 GMT
31,574
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Sept 13, 2020 23:13:56 GMT
Besides even if Solas was a racist...he isn't now. I honestly think it's a silly comparison to make. Solas believes that his people trump ours (if necessary) because:*They potentially live forever vs. a hundred years and change at most. That's potentially an infinity more of sentient, sapient living per life. *They all have power over the laws of nature far beyond what modern mages know, and their civilizations reached advancement and sophistication far beyond ours because of it. *They're all attuned and awake to and capable of appreciating the magical nature of everything around them. Not unlike the difference between sapience and non-sapience, at least the way Solas describes it. *They were here first, and we only came about in the first place because a catastrophic mistake winked them out of existence for a while. In contrast, a true, diehard racist believes that one race is favorable to another because:*They have a slightly different skin pigmentation. ... That's it. Calling Solas' dilemma racism is reductive as fuck. The two can't be compared at all. They don't live as long. They are primitive savages. They aren't as smart as us. They're here to take our land. Yeah, racists have never made arguments like that.
|
|
Noxluxe
N4
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
Posts: 2,024 Likes: 3,563
inherit
10359
0
Mar 14, 2019 16:10:11 GMT
3,563
Noxluxe
2,024
Jul 21, 2018 23:55:09 GMT
July 2018
noxluxe
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
|
Post by Noxluxe on Sept 14, 2020 0:00:12 GMT
I'm not disregarding anything. I just said how they feel doesn't excuse or diminish their action. If a man murders a family, him feeling desperate or sad aout it doesn't make him any less awful because he still murdered a family. And Solas is murdering many, many, many families. Not really. I don't see a villain who cries themselves to sleep at night for all the death they cause any more interesting than one who laughs themselves to sleep for the same act. Unless you pushed them off the cliff, you are not responsible for them dying from said fall. Though as you said, Solas is guilty of pushing his people off that cliff. But now he is pushing a bunch of people off that cliff so when the first finishes falling they're okay because all the bodies broke the fall. There's never a situation where there are only those extreme. ME3 last I checked doesn't involve mass murder in all the choices. Only one of them actually, leaving two that don't. You're talking to someone who doesn't think chimps should be murdered either, so I don't really get your argument. If Planet of the Apes happened and they started talking, I'm all for living together. I wouldn't wipe them all out just so me and my buddies get more room to live in. Saying that he's awful because he's murdering families is a completely superficial observation. You can truthfully say that about almost any man or woman who has ever made anything significant happen at all. It's just not a meaningful or useful statement, either for judging him as a fictional villain or figuring out how to gauge and minimize evil and suffering in the real world. Nobody is out there killing families just to kill families. Yes, you are. If you knew for a fact that you could save them then you chose between a world where you did so, and a world where you didn't, and they died because you chose the latter. Functionally, you're exactly as responsible for their death as if you'd cut their throat or drowned them in a river. The only reasons you wouldn't be held legally responsible for it are because there's no possible way to enforce such a thing without an omniscient judicial system, and because people are cowards and don't want to be made to feel bad about their general tendencies towards inaction. Solas has to choose between a world where his people live and a lot of ours die because of it, and a world where his people are dead and ours aren't. That's it. No matter which he chooses, he functionally has oceans of blood on his hands. Your own preferred narrative about his situation simply doesn't change that. There could absolutely be a situation that extreme someday. In 1944, a Norwegian resistance soldier named Knut Haukelid and his men blew up a civilian ferry carrying the materials necessary for Nazi Germany to start their nuclear weapons program. ...With ten innocent bystanders onboard, the warning of whom would have endangered the mission and risked Hitler gaining access to nukes. Terrible choices definitely exist, and if you're unfortunate enough to be forced to make one someday then you better be on the ball. Saying "I don't want to be responsible for making this choice" doesn't keep nuclear weapons out of Nazi hands, and it doesn't save anyone who's going to die while you stand there whining about how wrong and unfair the situation is. Nobody said that the chimps should be murdered. We're just comparing their intrinsic value to ours. If someone put a gun to your head and ordered you to choose between the deaths of five young chimps and the deaths of five human babies you'd never met, with all of them dying if you refused to make a choice at all, I'd wager that you would most likely save the babies, because unless you've gotten your wires crossed we're intrinsically more valuable than the demonstratively less evolved and aware chimps who individually have a fraction of our potential. Likewise, Solas is choosing to save the people he knows have the higher intrinsic value because they individually have more potential than modern humans, dwarves and elves do. If you insist on comparing it with contemporary real-world mindsets then at least call it speciesism, which might actually be superficially accurate.
|
|
Noxluxe
N4
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
Posts: 2,024 Likes: 3,563
inherit
10359
0
Mar 14, 2019 16:10:11 GMT
3,563
Noxluxe
2,024
Jul 21, 2018 23:55:09 GMT
July 2018
noxluxe
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
|
Post by Noxluxe on Sept 14, 2020 0:13:33 GMT
They don't live as long. They are primitive savages. They aren't as smart as us. They're here to take our land. Yeah, racists have never made arguments like that. False equivalency. With human beings of different races we know for a fact that those factors are almost entirely environmental. Diet, lifestyle, upbringing. One human is fundamentally 99.9% identical to every other one. That isn't the case with Solas' people. The differences between those and modern elves are stark and real and entirely natural, not just a matter of perspective or circumstance, at least so far as we know. I'm curious. Do you understand that you just used millions of real people's suffering in an attempt to virtue-signal and manipulate your way out of having to actually respond to a point about a hypothetical meeting and comparing of species in a fictional video game? If so, does that... gross you out at all? Like, even a little bit?
|
|
inherit
1033
0
35,910
colfoley
18,746
Aug 17, 2016 10:19:37 GMT
August 2016
colfoley
|
Post by colfoley on Sept 14, 2020 0:24:00 GMT
I'm not disregarding anything. I just said how they feel doesn't excuse or diminish their action. If a man murders a family, him feeling desperate or sad aout it doesn't make him any less awful because he still murdered a family. And Solas is murdering many, many, many families. Not really. I don't see a villain who cries themselves to sleep at night for all the death they cause any more interesting than one who laughs themselves to sleep for the same act. Unless you pushed them off the cliff, you are not responsible for them dying from said fall. Though as you said, Solas is guilty of pushing his people off that cliff. But now he is pushing a bunch of people off that cliff so when the first finishes falling they're okay because all the bodies broke the fall. There's never a situation where there are only those extreme. ME3 last I checked doesn't involve mass murder in all the choices. Only one of them actually, leaving two that don't. You're talking to someone who doesn't think chimps should be murdered either, so I don't really get your argument. If Planet of the Apes happened and they started talking, I'm all for living together. I wouldn't wipe them all out just so me and my buddies get more room to live in. Saying that he's awful because he's murdering families is a completely superficial observation. You can truthfully say that about almost any man or woman who has ever made anything significant happen at all. It's just not a meaningful or useful statement, either for judging him as a fictional villain or figuring out how to gauge and minimize evil and suffering in the real world. Nobody is out there killing families just to kill families. Yes, you are. If you knew for a fact that you could save them then you chose between a world where you did so, and a world where you didn't, and they died because you chose the latter. Functionally, you're exactly as responsible for their death as if you'd cut their throat or drowned them in a river. The only reasons you wouldn't be held legally responsible for it are because there's no possible way to enforce such a thing without an omniscient judicial system, and because people are cowards and don't want to be made to feel bad about their general tendencies towards inaction. Solas has to choose between a world where his people live and a lot of ours die because of it, and a world where his people are dead and ours aren't. That's it. No matter which he chooses, he functionally has oceans of blood on his hands. Your own preferred narrative about his situation simply doesn't change that. There could absolutely be a situation that extreme someday. In 1944, a Norwegian resistance soldier named Knut Haukelid and his men blew up a civilian ferry carrying the materials necessary for Nazi Germany to start their nuclear weapons program. ...With ten innocent bystanders onboard, the warning of whom would have endangered the mission and risked Hitler gaining access to nukes. Terrible choices definitely exist, and if you're unfortunate enough to be forced to make one someday then you better be on the ball. Saying "I don't want to be responsible for making this choice" doesn't keep nuclear weapons out of Nazi hands, and it doesn't save anyone who's going to die while you stand there whining about how wrong and unfair the situation is. Nobody said that the chimps should be murdered. We're just comparing their intrinsic value to ours. If someone put a gun to your head and ordered you to choose between the deaths of five young chimps and the deaths of five human babies you'd never met, with all of them dying if you refused to make a choice at all, I'd wager that you would most likely save the babies, because unless you've gotten your wires crossed we're intrinsically more valuable than the demonstratively less evolved and aware chimps who individually have a fraction of our potential. Likewise, Solas is choosing to save the people he knows have the higher intrinsic value because they individually have more potential than modern humans, dwarves and elves do. If you insist on comparing it with contemporary real-world mindsets then at least call it speciesism, which might actually be superficially accurate. I don't think Solas main concern is practical but sentimental...at least when it comes to restoring his people. He does not want to elevate them again because it would be better for Thedas...just that they are *his people* and on top of that he's the reason they fell in the first place.
|
|
inherit
9459
0
Nov 24, 2021 20:18:46 GMT
5,628
SirSourpuss
7,694
Oct 16, 2017 16:19:07 GMT
October 2017
sirpetrakus
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, SWTOR
|
Post by SirSourpuss on Sept 14, 2020 0:36:41 GMT
Saying that he's awful because he's murdering families is a completely superficial observation Hang on, just what does a guy have to do, in order to warrant being called awful? The bloody holocaust?
|
|