dgcatanisiri
N2
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
Posts: 171 Likes: 824
inherit
4884
0
824
dgcatanisiri
171
Mar 17, 2017 23:31:21 GMT
March 2017
dgcatanisiri
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by dgcatanisiri on May 10, 2017 4:24:22 GMT
Evfra didn't instantly click for me in the same way that Kandros did (the whole 'I was the good one' thing really worked well for how I pictured the Ryder family dynamics), but I can see why he'd be easy to latch on to - harsh because his experiences have told him to be distrustful of these invading aliens who speak nice words but could be hiding something sinister (plus if Reyes is a contact for the angaran resistance, he's probably had dealings with the Exiles, which won't paint the Initiative or humans in general in a positive light). Like... the kett's arrival totally scarred the angarans for life at a time they were already vulnerable, because of the Scourge. I can totally see why people would gravitate to the idea of helping him see humanity in a more positive light.
And, more broadly, making Evfra a gay romance (beyond being a pipe dream) wouldn't be cutting content for women, who already have access to Jaal's romance, as opposed to, for example, making Jaal gay, rather than bi. Considering how little content is for gay men in general, even before getting to how shitty it is that in ten years there has yet to be a single gay or bi male alien in the series, while Liara was an option from day one (even if her romance skewed towards a male Shepard)... Yeah, I get why this is a thing.
As for the patch, I'm honestly not gonna get my hopes up - this is probably oriented mostly for multiplayer, we MIGHT get a few expanded cutscenes, but actual genuine content fixes? Not likely. The 'within two months' thing came out in late March/early April, I would expect more of that in the patch after this one, not now.
|
|
inherit
6799
0
Jul 11, 2017 11:39:13 GMT
948
toomanyclouds
249
April 2017
toomanyclouds
|
Post by toomanyclouds on May 10, 2017 5:01:09 GMT
Evfra didn't instantly click for me in the same way that Kandros did (the whole 'I was the good one' thing really worked well for how I pictured the Ryder family dynamics), but I can see why he'd be easy to latch on to - harsh because his experiences have told him to be distrustful of these invading aliens who speak nice words but could be hiding something sinister (plus if Reyes is a contact for the angaran resistance, he's probably had dealings with the Exiles, which won't paint the Initiative or humans in general in a positive light). Like... the kett's arrival totally scarred the angarans for life at a time they were already vulnerable, because of the Scourge. I can totally see why people would gravitate to the idea of helping him see humanity in a more positive light. And, more broadly, making Evfra a gay romance (beyond being a pipe dream) wouldn't be cutting content for women, who already have access to Jaal's romance, as opposed to, for example, making Jaal gay, rather than bi. Considering how little content is for gay men in general, even before getting to how shitty it is that in ten years there has yet to be a single gay or bi male alien in the series, while Liara was an option from day one (even if her romance skewed towards a male Shepard)... Yeah, I get why this is a thing. As for the patch, I'm honestly not gonna get my hopes up - this is probably oriented mostly for multiplayer, we MIGHT get a few expanded cutscenes, but actual genuine content fixes? Not likely. The 'within two months' thing came out in late March/early April, I would expect more of that in the patch after this one, not now. That's another good point. If you talk to the Aya governor Paaran Shie, she will actually say the angara until recently didn't even realise that the Nexus people and the Exiles were different factions. Considering they had no communications with their Nexus leadership at that point, that makes sense, so they can't really know if the way Kadara went is just how the Nexus plans to do things in general. But I agree with you that the gay Evfra debate is a theoretical one, it's not something that's likely to happen anyway. I'm pretty sure today's patch is gonna focus on fixing the broken MP. (Prove me wrong, Bioware, come on, I dare, you I double-dare you.) Also, there's still enough glitches in the SP that they probably want to fix, plus they said that wanted to make general improvements to the CC, which I imagine takes time.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
584
0
Nov 28, 2024 15:35:07 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 28, 2024 15:35:07 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 5:04:43 GMT
The biggest glitch that needs to get fixed is Jaal not being a romance for Scott. Clearly an accidental and unfortunate mishap.
|
|
inherit
M'lady of Fine Arts
434
0
4,610
Lady Artifice
1,835
August 2016
ladyartifice
|
Post by Lady Artifice on May 10, 2017 5:13:56 GMT
But that's exactly what I'm wondering. First, is there some hint he might be gay? Second, still why? He's barely ever not hostile and brazenly racist toward Ryder. What is this attractiveness basically everyone but me seems to see? I find it funny how people rag on the more unfriendly angara, like Evfra and at times the Moshae, as if they have 0.01 reasons to be nice to you from the get-go. Evfra is an ass to you because why shouldn't he be? The Nexus people came to settle angara planets, that's what they say they're here to do, and it's not like they ever asked the angara how they felt about their galaxy being infested by yet another bunch of aliens. You're here now, and you'll need somewhere to live, so there's nothing the angara can really do about it because even if they don't want it their military is shot to pieces. But the last first contact situation didn't go so well for the angara, as I'm sure you noticed. Then there is the fact that Sloane Kelly has already made a case for the Nexus people as untrustworthy because at first she helped the angara on Kadara, but then she installed herself as the leader and kicked out the people who couldn't pay protection fees into the badlands. So if the angara generally seem leery of you, there's one person to thank. There's reasons enough to like Evfra, if you'd like me to list some. They don't have to be your reasons, but you did ask what people see in him, so here goes: If you choose to keep the angara AI, he's actually the one who convinces the Aya mayor to keep the embassies open and trust you. You can talk to him after missions and have relatively civil and interesting conversations, and he'll even compliment you sometimes. At the end of the game, via Jaal, he says that the angara and Nexus species are lucky to have each other. If you meet that angara woman who was assaulted by Nexus people on Elaaden, she says he's talked to her and told her she's a warrior, obviously trying to help her feel worthy again, and Jaal also says one of his strengths is that he understands "a fighter's heart", so he's not just a general, but also someone who tries to keep people motivated and hopeful, even though he himself had every reason to give up hope, losing his family to the kett. If you are honest with him (for example about SAM), he will rightly commend you for that. He's the epitome of the truth that a decent person doesn't have to be a nice person, and some people don't mind that he's grumpy (also, if you like that kind of dry humour, he's arguably funny; I find sarcastic cynics on a whole much more entertaining than friendly lovely people, maybe because I am also one of the former). Now, it's completely fair to dislike him for being an asshole, but he's not an idealistic racist like Akksul, which makes him interesting to me. In fact, the game pretty much builds them up as parallels: They are both men who have suffered badly at the hands of the kett and, in response, became leaders of a paramilitary faction inside the angara. Both are described by others as inspiring leaders. Both are wary of and hostile to outsiders at first, but if you work to win Evfra's favour, he will be practical and bit by bit put more trust in the Nexus people, whereas the one thing that should win Akksul's favour (rescuing his former teacher, the Moshae) completely fails to sway him because he's way too far down his road. Evfra realises early enough that not working with the new aliens will hurt the people he's trying to protect in the long run, whether he thinks it's a risky thing to do or not; whereas Akksul blindly rushes on until he's at a point where he himself is hurting his people in some misguided effort to protect them (both literally by shooting Jaal, and figuratively by blowing up the Forge). I'm sorry, I just had to reiterate that, because the narrative mirroring of Evfra and Akksul is one of the pieces of writing in this game that actually works, in my opinion. Because compassion and tolerance are reasons in themselves? Because lumping all members of an enormous group together as a monolith is obviously foolhardy? I knew a man once who hated all members of a race because the only one he'd ever known had stolen from him. That was wrong and petty and shortsighted, however rational it might have felt to him. Victimhood provides context for prejudice, but it doesn't render it just. I did, and thank you offering a list--strangely aggressive and rant-heavy as it was for a response to an honest, non-rhetorical question.
|
|
inherit
529
0
7,815
Nightscrawl
3,266
August 2016
nightscrawl
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Neverwinter Nights, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Nightscrawl on May 10, 2017 5:28:08 GMT
I found Evfra to be an overly cautious grump, but not a racist in the way that Akksul was.
To me, it's the difference in the way a non-elf is treated by Dalish in the DA universe. There are some elves that are cautious, and for good reason, but some are just racist and will hate you regardless.
I don't know about anyone else, but I always took the honest route with all the angara matters. I chose to tell them the truth, even when it made the Initiative look bad. I thought they would appreciate the honesty, and they did for the most part. (I guess I'd make a shit politician.)
|
|
inherit
6799
0
Jul 11, 2017 11:39:13 GMT
948
toomanyclouds
249
April 2017
toomanyclouds
|
Post by toomanyclouds on May 10, 2017 5:30:11 GMT
I find it funny how people rag on the more unfriendly angara, like Evfra and at times the Moshae, as if they have 0.01 reasons to be nice to you from the get-go. Evfra is an ass to you because why shouldn't he be? The Nexus people came to settle angara planets, that's what they say they're here to do, and it's not like they ever asked the angara how they felt about their galaxy being infested by yet another bunch of aliens. You're here now, and you'll need somewhere to live, so there's nothing the angara can really do about it because even if they don't want it their military is shot to pieces. But the last first contact situation didn't go so well for the angara, as I'm sure you noticed. Then there is the fact that Sloane Kelly has already made a case for the Nexus people as untrustworthy because at first she helped the angara on Kadara, but then she installed herself as the leader and kicked out the people who couldn't pay protection fees into the badlands. So if the angara generally seem leery of you, there's one person to thank. There's reasons enough to like Evfra, if you'd like me to list some. They don't have to be your reasons, but you did ask what people see in him, so here goes: If you choose to keep the angara AI, he's actually the one who convinces the Aya mayor to keep the embassies open and trust you. You can talk to him after missions and have relatively civil and interesting conversations, and he'll even compliment you sometimes. At the end of the game, via Jaal, he says that the angara and Nexus species are lucky to have each other. If you meet that angara woman who was assaulted by Nexus people on Elaaden, she says he's talked to her and told her she's a warrior, obviously trying to help her feel worthy again, and Jaal also says one of his strengths is that he understands "a fighter's heart", so he's not just a general, but also someone who tries to keep people motivated and hopeful, even though he himself had every reason to give up hope, losing his family to the kett. If you are honest with him (for example about SAM), he will rightly commend you for that. He's the epitome of the truth that a decent person doesn't have to be a nice person, and some people don't mind that he's grumpy (also, if you like that kind of dry humour, he's arguably funny; I find sarcastic cynics on a whole much more entertaining than friendly lovely people, maybe because I am also one of the former). Now, it's completely fair to dislike him for being an asshole, but he's not an idealistic racist like Akksul, which makes him interesting to me. In fact, the game pretty much builds them up as parallels: They are both men who have suffered badly at the hands of the kett and, in response, became leaders of a paramilitary faction inside the angara. Both are described by others as inspiring leaders. Both are wary of and hostile to outsiders at first, but if you work to win Evfra's favour, he will be practical and bit by bit put more trust in the Nexus people, whereas the one thing that should win Akksul's favour (rescuing his former teacher, the Moshae) completely fails to sway him because he's way too far down his road. Evfra realises early enough that not working with the new aliens will hurt the people he's trying to protect in the long run, whether he thinks it's a risky thing to do or not; whereas Akksul blindly rushes on until he's at a point where he himself is hurting his people in some misguided effort to protect them (both literally by shooting Jaal, and figuratively by blowing up the Forge). I'm sorry, I just had to reiterate that, because the narrative mirroring of Evfra and Akksul is one of the pieces of writing in this game that actually works, in my opinion. Because compassion and tolerance are reasons in themselves? Because lumping all members of an enormous group together as a monolith is obviously foolhardy? I knew a man once who hated all members of a race because the only one he'd ever known had stolen from him. That was wrong and petty and shortsighted, however rational it might have felt to him. Victimhood provides context for prejudice, but it doesn't render it just. I did, and thank you offering a list--strangely aggressive and rant-heavy as it was for a response to an honest, non-rhetorical question. I agree in a smaller example like you provided, but you must consider that every single alien the angara have ever met has mistreated or betrayed them in some way, including the Exiles on Kadara. They did just what the Pathfinder now proposes to do (help them with kett) only to turn around conquistador-style and push the angara out of their own homes by the rule of might makes right. Yes, if a person is racist because one person of a group stole from them, that's unhelpful, but if you have literally not had a chance to have a positive experience whatsoever after meeting hundreds and thousands of aliens, then it would be counter-intuitive to expect the angara to welcome the Nexus people with open arms. It's like saying "oh, I put my hand on two hundred switched-on ovens, but I'm sure this one is not going to burn me". Evfra is a political leader. If he makes the willy-nilly decision to trust the Nexus species because of the goodness of his heart with no single prior experience to tell him that's a smart idea, then he could very well ruin the angara entirely because the Resistance is the last military they have. And then, because of course you are right that having prejudice against people who actually help you/don't want to to hurt you is not good, Evfra does correct his opinion on you towards the end of the game. I don't really see the problem with this character arc, to be honest. Well, I do have to admit, ranty and somewhat sarcastic is my style. There is a reason I like Evfra, after all...
|
|
inherit
M'lady of Fine Arts
434
0
4,610
Lady Artifice
1,835
August 2016
ladyartifice
|
Post by Lady Artifice on May 10, 2017 5:56:30 GMT
Because compassion and tolerance are reasons in themselves? Because lumping all members of an enormous group together as a monolith is obviously foolhardy? I knew a man once who hated all members of a race because the only one he'd ever known had stolen from him. That was wrong and petty and shortsighted, however rational it might have felt to him. Victimhood provides context for prejudice, but it doesn't render it just. I did, and thank you offering a list--strangely aggressive and rant-heavy as it was for a response to an honest, non-rhetorical question. I agree in a smaller example like you provided, but you must consider that every single alien the angara have ever met has mistreated or betrayed them in some way, including the Exiles on Kadara. They did just what the Pathfinder now proposes to do (help them with kett) only to turn around conquistador-style and push the angara out of their own homes by the rule of might makes right. Yes, if a person is racist because one person of a group stole from them, that's unhelpful, but if you have literally not had a chance to have a positive experience whatsoever after meeting hundreds and thousands of aliens, then it would be counter-intuitive to expect the angara to welcome the Nexus people with open arms. It's like saying "oh, I put my hand on two hundred switched-on ovens, but I'm sure this one is not going to burn me". Evfra is a political leader. If he makes the willy-nilly decision to trust the Nexus species because of the goodness of his heart with no single prior experience to tell him that's a smart idea, then he could very well ruin the angara entirely because the Resistance is the last military they have. And then, because of course you are right that having prejudice against people who actually help you/don't want to to hurt you is not good, Evfra does correct his opinion on you towards the end of the game. I don't really see the problem with this character arc, to be honest. Well, I do have to admit, ranty and somewhat sarcastic is my style. There is a reason I like Evfra, after all... I don't see the problem with his story arc either, so it's fortunate I never even came close to complaining about it. This wasn't some sneaky method of mine to frame a rhetorical rant about a character, it was genuine curiosity and a desire to understand other people's point of view.
|
|
inherit
6799
0
Jul 11, 2017 11:39:13 GMT
948
toomanyclouds
249
April 2017
toomanyclouds
|
Post by toomanyclouds on May 10, 2017 6:10:12 GMT
I agree in a smaller example like you provided, but you must consider that every single alien the angara have ever met has mistreated or betrayed them in some way, including the Exiles on Kadara. They did just what the Pathfinder now proposes to do (help them with kett) only to turn around conquistador-style and push the angara out of their own homes by the rule of might makes right. Yes, if a person is racist because one person of a group stole from them, that's unhelpful, but if you have literally not had a chance to have a positive experience whatsoever after meeting hundreds and thousands of aliens, then it would be counter-intuitive to expect the angara to welcome the Nexus people with open arms. It's like saying "oh, I put my hand on two hundred switched-on ovens, but I'm sure this one is not going to burn me". Evfra is a political leader. If he makes the willy-nilly decision to trust the Nexus species because of the goodness of his heart with no single prior experience to tell him that's a smart idea, then he could very well ruin the angara entirely because the Resistance is the last military they have. And then, because of course you are right that having prejudice against people who actually help you/don't want to to hurt you is not good, Evfra does correct his opinion on you towards the end of the game. I don't really see the problem with this character arc, to be honest. Well, I do have to admit, ranty and somewhat sarcastic is my style. There is a reason I like Evfra, after all... I don't see the problem with his story arc either, so it's fortunate I never even came close to complaining about it. This wasn't some sneaky method of mine to frame a rhetorical rant about a character, it was genuine curiosity and a desire to understand other people's point of view. Well, I understand that. I guess the difference really is in what kind of romance (or general character interaction) one likes. As I said, I do understand if one is put off by the fact that Evfra's behaviour is off-putting, lol. I have experienced other abrasive characters who I knew were probably good people underneath, too, but whose particular brand of meanie-pants made me decide that I actually don't care enough to explore deeper because I didn't have any latching-on point to start liking them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
584
0
Nov 28, 2024 15:35:07 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 28, 2024 15:35:07 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 6:17:43 GMT
Evfra's hot-so he can bark up my tree anytime. Though he's an older gent, but that doesn't bother me as long as his romance doesn't center around him being old. Cause that would be silly. I mean not like BioWare ever focus on one character idea and never leaves it...
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
Nov 17, 2024 22:23:52 GMT
31,578
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on May 10, 2017 7:04:20 GMT
Hopefully.
|
|
inherit
Banshee
771
0
Sept 4, 2018 23:27:21 GMT
5,053
BansheeOwnage
I was called Ryder before it was cool... ...I'd love to, you know, be social and things.
1,231
August 2016
bansheeownage
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, Mass Effect Andromeda
11290
7428
|
Post by BansheeOwnage on May 10, 2017 7:15:51 GMT
Hello there! No time to catch up or make a long post tonight, sadly (and then everyone secretly sighs in relief). So, all I can really say is that I hope the patch has at least something in the way of improvements in it, not just fixes, whether it be for the CC or m/m content. If they wait too long for these core features, most people will be done their playthroughs except for DLC. I don't expect this to be the fabled improvements patch, though, unfortunately. Hopefully it fixes InvisiRyder in movie night. And honestly, I'm pretty pessimistic about the m/m and CC improvements regardless. There are a lot of easy and relatively easy things they could do on both counts to make the situation better, but sadly I feel like they'll do less than modders. If I had more time, I'd rant about all of the CC features that would be really easy to add and should have been in the base game You'll just have to imagine the rant /Bane sheeDid someone mention long hair options for Scott? Why the heck didn't they give both twins all the hair options? Didn't they say they would? As long as that approach doesn't become an excuse for a lower number of overall options, it's the way to go. *Sigh* That could definitely be patched... The biggest glitch that needs to get fixed is Jaal not being a romance for Scott. Clearly an accidental and unfortunate mishap. Is that glitch related to the one that makes Suvi's romance-specific greetings not trigger? Oh, that's not a thing? Fine then Add that in DLC Bioware pls.Jokes aside, I still think that bi Jaal would be a restoration rather than a retcon. I don't know about anyone else, but I always took the honest route with all the angara matters. I chose to tell them the truth, even when it made the Initiative look bad. I thought they would appreciate the honesty, and they did for the most part. (I guess I'd make a shit politician.)In my opinion, that would make you a great politician
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
584
0
Nov 28, 2024 15:35:07 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 28, 2024 15:35:07 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 7:24:44 GMT
Hello there! No time to catch up or make a long post tonight, sadly (and then everyone secretly sighs in relief). So, all I can really say is that I hope the patch has at least something in the way of improvements in it, not just fixes, whether it be for the CC or m/m content. If they wait too long for these core features, most people will be done their playthroughs except for DLC. I don't expect this to be the fabled improvements patch, though, unfortunately. Hopefully it fixes InvisiRyder in movie night. And honestly, I'm pretty pessimistic about the m/m and CC improvements regardless. There are a lot of easy and relatively easy things they could do on both counts to make the situation better, but sadly I feel like they'll do less than modders. If I had more time, I'd rant about all of the CC features that would be really easy to add and should have been in the base game You'll just have to imagine the rant /Bane sheeDid someone mention long hair options for Scott? Why the heck didn't they give both twins all the hair options? Didn't they say they would? As long as that approach doesn't become an excuse for a lower number of overall options, it's the way to go. *Sigh* That could definitely be patched... The biggest glitch that needs to get fixed is Jaal not being a romance for Scott. Clearly an accidental and unfortunate mishap. Is that glitch related to the one that makes Suvi's romance-specific greetings not trigger? Oh, that's not a thing? Fine then Add that in DLC Bioware pls.Jokes aside, I still think that bi Jaal would be a restoration rather than a retcon. I don't know about anyone else, but I always took the honest route with all the angara matters. I chose to tell them the truth, even when it made the Initiative look bad. I thought they would appreciate the honesty, and they did for the most part. (I guess I'd make a shit politician.)In my opinion, that would make you a great politician -feels honored to be chosen in the small post you made tonight-
I agree, it's a restoration of the original vision for the character, not a retcon or ruining the character (those people are just bad people that think that last one). I think it's the only realistic way to restore balance to the romance equation-honestly.
|
|
Pain Delta
N2
Go back to lesbian college to learn words
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
Posts: 74 Likes: 169
inherit
8249
0
169
Pain Delta
Go back to lesbian college to learn words
74
May 2017
bunkinbronuts
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Pain Delta on May 10, 2017 7:31:23 GMT
I hope that since this isn't the Big 2-Month Patch they at least talk about it again to reaffirm that the m/m options will be addressed, and not that the concept at all was a weird fever dream we all collectively had since it feels like it lol
|
|
Sable Rhapsody
N4
Witcher-ing
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
Origin: SableRhapsody
Posts: 1,445 Likes: 4,789
inherit
3869
0
Jun 27, 2017 20:54:48 GMT
4,789
Sable Rhapsody
Witcher-ing
1,445
February 2017
sablerhapsody
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
SableRhapsody
|
Post by Sable Rhapsody on May 10, 2017 7:33:48 GMT
I agree, it's a restoration of the original vision for the character, not a retcon or ruining the character (those people are just bad people that think that last one). I think it's the only realistic way to restore balance to the romance equation-honestly. IMO, retcons are perfectly acceptable, as long as the retcon's benefit outweighs the little break in the setting's continuity, which it usually does with BioWare's past retcons. I have no idea when the fandom got so averse to them. For games with as much continuous lore and and as many characters as DA or ME, I'd expect more retcons TBH.
|
|
ariatloak
N1
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, Mass Effect Andromeda
Posts: 45 Likes: 230
inherit
5168
0
230
ariatloak
45
March 2017
ariatloak
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by ariatloak on May 10, 2017 7:34:12 GMT
Unfortunately the same metric that would justify making jaal bi could easily be used for suvi if she also has Scott lines/models/was listed in an official guide as a romance option at one point. Frankly that's a Pandora's box I don't want bioware to open. We are vastly outnumbered by the straight men who would clamour for them to patch suvi and traynor as fuckable by their male protags and bioware definitely isn't capable of making the nuanced distinction that needs.
What would mostly avoid that is having jaal be bi in mea2 if he's still a squadmate (or mea3) but again, they would probably do the same with suvi were that to happen. They're both the only romance options who don't explicitly cite sexuality when turning you down, so they're equally fair game. Not to mention they really hammered home jaal's attraction to women at every possible opportunity. Personally I would rather bioware create an exclusively gay male alien squadmate for the next game. Preferably a quarian! Really sold on that idea for some reason.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
584
0
Nov 28, 2024 15:35:07 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 28, 2024 15:35:07 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 7:39:03 GMT
Unfortunately the same metric that would justify making jaal bi could easily be used for suvi if she also has Scott lines/models/was listed in an official guide as a romance option at one point. Frankly that's a Pandora's box I don't want bioware to open. We are vastly outnumbered by the straight men who would clamour for them to patch suvi and traynor as fuckable by their male protags and bioware definitely isn't capable of making the nuanced distinction that needs. What would mostly avoid that is having jaal be bi in mea2 if he's still a squadmate (or mea3) but again, they would probably do the same with suvi were that to happen. They're both the only romance options who don't explicitly cite sexuality when turning you down, so they're equally fair game. Not to mention they really hammered home jaal's attraction to women at every possible opportunity. Personally I would rather bioware create an exclusively gay male alien squadmate for the next game. Preferably a quarian! Really sold on that idea for some reason. That reasoning isn't sound though since straight men have 3 squad mates and 2 other romances on top of that. Gay men have 1 crew romance and 1 unique romance..both having very little content.
Making Suvi Bisexual takes away the ONLY lesbian character in the whole game. The 2 situations could not be more different.
|
|
Pain Delta
N2
Go back to lesbian college to learn words
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
Posts: 74 Likes: 169
inherit
8249
0
169
Pain Delta
Go back to lesbian college to learn words
74
May 2017
bunkinbronuts
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Pain Delta on May 10, 2017 7:40:30 GMT
Unfortunately the same metric that would justify making jaal bi could easily be used for suvi if she also has Scott lines/models/was listed in an official guide as a romance option at one point. Frankly that's a Pandora's box I don't want bioware to open. We are vastly outnumbered by the straight men who would clamour for them to patch suvi and traynor as fuckable by their male protags and bioware definitely isn't capable of making the nuanced distinction that needs. What would mostly avoid that is having jaal be bi in mea2 if he's still a squadmate (or mea3) but again, they would probably do the same with suvi were that to happen. They're both the only romance options who don't explicitly cite sexuality when turning you down, so they're equally fair game. Not to mention they really hammered home jaal's attraction to women at every possible opportunity. Personally I would rather bioware create an exclusively gay male alien squadmate for the next game. Preferably a quarian! Really sold on that idea for some reason. That reasoning isn't sound though since straight men have 3 squad mates and 2 other romances on top of that. Gay men have 1 crew romance and 1 unique romance..both having very little content.
Making Suvi Bisexual takes away the ONLY lesbian character in the whole game. The 2 situations could not be more different.
I don't think she is arguing that they are the same or even similar, but that she don't trust Bioware to make that distinction which is understandable. EDIT: An edit to simply add that I think making Jaal bi is worth the risk and it is largely placing my unfounded trust into Bioware that I completely understand not having lol
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
584
0
Nov 28, 2024 15:35:07 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 28, 2024 15:35:07 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 7:43:47 GMT
That reasoning isn't sound though since straight men have 3 squad mates and 2 other romances on top of that. Gay men have 1 crew romance and 1 unique romance..both having very little content.
Making Suvi Bisexual takes away the ONLY lesbian character in the whole game. The 2 situations could not be more different.
I don't think she is arguing that they are the same or even similar, but that she don't trust Bioware to make that distinction which is understandable. I seriously doubt even BioWare would not understand such simple concepts. If they made Suvi Bi it wouldn't be because they thought it was fair.
|
|
Sable Rhapsody
N4
Witcher-ing
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
Origin: SableRhapsody
Posts: 1,445 Likes: 4,789
inherit
3869
0
Jun 27, 2017 20:54:48 GMT
4,789
Sable Rhapsody
Witcher-ing
1,445
February 2017
sablerhapsody
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
SableRhapsody
|
Post by Sable Rhapsody on May 10, 2017 7:44:39 GMT
Unfortunately the same metric that would justify making jaal bi could easily be used for suvi if she also has Scott lines/models/was listed in an official guide as a romance option at one point. Frankly that's a Pandora's box I don't want bioware to open. We are vastly outnumbered by the straight men who would clamour for them to patch suvi and traynor as fuckable by their male protags and bioware definitely isn't capable of making the nuanced distinction that needs. What would mostly avoid that is having jaal be bi in mea2 if he's still a squadmate (or mea3) but again, they would probably do the same with suvi were that to happen. They're both the only romance options who don't explicitly cite sexuality when turning you down, so they're equally fair game. Not to mention they really hammered home jaal's attraction to women at every possible opportunity. Personally I would rather bioware create an exclusively gay male alien squadmate for the next game. Preferably a quarian! Really sold on that idea for some reason. That reasoning isn't sound though since straight men have 3 squad mates and 2 other romances on top of that. Gay men have 1 crew romance and 1 unique romance..both having very little content.
Making Suvi Bisexual takes away the ONLY lesbian character in the whole game. The 2 situations could not be more different.
When has unsound reasoning ever stopped anybody from making an argument? Especially on the Internet! And if enough people make it loudly enough...well... I think that was ariatloak's point. I don't want to go back to the playersexual model of romances for various reasons, but as long as there was relative gender parity in the LIs, that model would sidestep some of the problems that led to ME:A's situation.
|
|
Pain Delta
N2
Go back to lesbian college to learn words
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
Posts: 74 Likes: 169
inherit
8249
0
169
Pain Delta
Go back to lesbian college to learn words
74
May 2017
bunkinbronuts
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Pain Delta on May 10, 2017 7:47:32 GMT
I don't think she is arguing that they are the same or even similar, but that she don't trust Bioware to make that distinction which is understandable. I seriously doubt even BioWare would not understand such simple concepts. If they made Suvi Bi it wouldn't be because they thought it was fair. Maybe not initially, but do you not think that sort of community would not react to making Jaal bi and make the connection, and then protest just as hard as we did for Suvi? Do you think Bioware, or EA, would risk that audience by not satiating their demands as well? This is the infinite problem of trying to appeal to two extremely different communities at once imo
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
584
0
Nov 28, 2024 15:35:07 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 28, 2024 15:35:07 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 7:51:28 GMT
That reasoning isn't sound though since straight men have 3 squad mates and 2 other romances on top of that. Gay men have 1 crew romance and 1 unique romance..both having very little content.
Making Suvi Bisexual takes away the ONLY lesbian character in the whole game. The 2 situations could not be more different.
When has unsound reasoning ever stopped anybody from making an argument? Especially on the Internet! And if enough people make it loudly enough...well... I think that was ariatloak's point. I don't want to go back to the playersexual model of romances for various reasons, but as long as there was relative gender parity in the LIs, that model would sidestep some of the problems that led to ME:A's situation. They are gonna need to come up with something besides randomly giving one straight gender the bulk of the romance options and everyone else scraps. That is clearly not a good solution.
I like the idea of 4 or 6 bisexual romances with an even split of genders. It's fair and everyone gets at least one important character romance. The whole has to make sense system has been used to give the worst content to gay males over and over again.
|
|
Sable Rhapsody
N4
Witcher-ing
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
Origin: SableRhapsody
Posts: 1,445 Likes: 4,789
inherit
3869
0
Jun 27, 2017 20:54:48 GMT
4,789
Sable Rhapsody
Witcher-ing
1,445
February 2017
sablerhapsody
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
SableRhapsody
|
Post by Sable Rhapsody on May 10, 2017 7:55:06 GMT
I seriously doubt even BioWare would not understand such simple concepts. If they made Suvi Bi it wouldn't be because they thought it was fair. Maybe not initially, but do you not think that sort of community would not react to making Jaal bi and make the connection, and then protest just as hard as we did for Suvi? Do you think Bioware, or EA, would risk that audience by not satiating their demands as well? This is the infinite problem of trying to appeal to two extremely different communities at once imoAnd to top it off, one of those communities is partially illusory. I seriously doubt that the stereotype of homophobic straight white gamerbros is generally true. It's the vocal minority who give that impression. Unfortunately, even a vocal minority of a sizeable majority can feel like an awful lot of people, so the game industry overreacts accordingly Most of the guys who fit that majority demographic for ME:A probably don't give a rat's ass one way or the other. At worst, they'd prioritize fixes that directly affect them (like animation and gameplay glitches) over m/m content which doesn't affect them, but that doesn't mean they'll break out in hives at a gay character or anything.
|
|
ariatloak
N1
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, Mass Effect Andromeda
Posts: 45 Likes: 230
inherit
5168
0
230
ariatloak
45
March 2017
ariatloak
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by ariatloak on May 10, 2017 7:55:44 GMT
I don't think she is arguing that they are the same or even similar, but that she don't trust Bioware to make that distinction which is understandable. I seriously doubt even BioWare would not understand such simple concepts. If they made Suvi Bi it wouldn't be because they thought it was fair. I mean, the issue here is that it is a very simple concept to say "if changing one character's sexuality is okay, changing sexuality is okay in general". It's complicated to say "there's a huge difference between making a straight character bi and a gay character bi". That's why you see people making bi Dorian and bi sera mods defending themselves by bringing up bi Cassandra and bi Cullen mods. Those people aren't just playing dumb, to understand that those things are not the same and one is homophobic and one is not requires an understanding of homophobia bioware absolutely can't be trusted to have at this point IMO, considering they saw no issue with no gay squadmate in the first place, or gil's romance being all about being chided into procreation, etc. I think we're dealing with the absolute bare minimum here. That said, at the very least I think bioware is aware opening this box would lead to incessant requests about changing XYZ chr so I think they will never do it. Kaidan is a unique example I think where it became truly indefensible that they had no gay options for male Shepard, but they obviously didn't put a lot of effort into having any dialogue about kaidan not realising he was into men until later or anything that would have explained it within canon. Just shoved it at us and washed their hands with it. I don't think they'll do that again, they were clearly reluctant and felt their hand was forced by how BLATANT the homophobia was. M!Ryder can still be gay - with two people! So I really don't think they're gonna understand the specific importance of bi jaal any time soon, nor seek to usurp any elements of their game for it.
|
|
Sable Rhapsody
N4
Witcher-ing
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
Origin: SableRhapsody
Posts: 1,445 Likes: 4,789
inherit
3869
0
Jun 27, 2017 20:54:48 GMT
4,789
Sable Rhapsody
Witcher-ing
1,445
February 2017
sablerhapsody
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
SableRhapsody
|
Post by Sable Rhapsody on May 10, 2017 7:59:39 GMT
I like the idea of 4 or 6 bisexual romances with an even split of genders. It's fair and everyone gets at least one important character romance. The whole has to make sense system has been used to give the worst content to gay males over and over again. If the characters got implemented as bisexual--genuinely bisexual--I'd be totally down for that too. The problem is that in the past, bisexuality has often been implemented as "playersexual," where the character's sexuality doesn't seem to exist or be referred to outside the PC romance, and the character being bisexual is a convenient narrative tool to improve romance access. I'm...kinda meh on that, personally.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
584
0
Nov 28, 2024 15:35:07 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 28, 2024 15:35:07 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2017 8:00:52 GMT
I seriously doubt even BioWare would not understand such simple concepts. If they made Suvi Bi it wouldn't be because they thought it was fair. Maybe not initially, but do you not think that sort of community would not react to making Jaal bi and make the connection, and then protest just as hard as we did for Suvi? Do you think Bioware, or EA, would risk that audience by not satiating their demands as well? This is the infinite problem of trying to appeal to two extremely different communities at once imo Honestly the people who would demand Suvi be bi are already in full force, and will not gain any more steam regardless. There's always going to be people like that.
The difference is BioWare wouldn't take away the only lesbian character in the game, but giving one bisexual squadmate to the group with the least options-is the right thing to do.
|
|