Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
4084
0
Nov 15, 2024 19:30:58 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 15, 2024 19:30:58 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2017 4:28:15 GMT
Hey, I'm just discussing my own experiences here. I'm sure there are exceptions, just haven't met 'em. In my experience, some straight people love saying they can take criticism on queer issues, but the second you actually criticize 'em they usually just get defensive and whine about how unfair it all is. Not sure why writers would be any different. Fun fact, that's called an anecdotal fallacy Thank you, SteelBot 2000.
|
|
inherit
98
0
3,042
Steelcan
2,078
August 2016
steelcan
|
Post by Steelcan on May 28, 2017 4:29:49 GMT
Hmm, I've only heard of this novel so I'm not very familiar with it, but pessimistpanda and I are Australians, so that wasn't part of our reading list in our education (at least, it wasn't for me). (Full disclosure, I personally loathed the book) but it has been held as the part of the highest tier of novels on race relations in the US, and the South in particular, alongside any number of works written by African-Americans, the author however is Harper Lee, a white woman, I believe from Pennsylvania but don't quote me on that.
|
|
inherit
3555
0
Apr 14, 2022 23:07:25 GMT
11,193
gaycaravaggio
Oy Gay
2,940
February 2017
gaycaravaggio
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by gaycaravaggio on May 28, 2017 4:31:36 GMT
What exactly is your point with this? That her friend, Truman Capote, who was gay, helped get her foot in the door? That really doesn't have anything to do with anything. They were childhood friends; it's not the same as having the goal of helping LGBT+ authors get a foothold in the industry. My point is largely aimed at the utterly ridiculous argument that representation can only be properly achieved through the work of people who are the group in question. Then, you gotta articulate that point. Plus, I wouldn't say that To Kill a Mockingbird is the hallmark of representation.
|
|
inherit
3555
0
Apr 14, 2022 23:07:25 GMT
11,193
gaycaravaggio
Oy Gay
2,940
February 2017
gaycaravaggio
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by gaycaravaggio on May 28, 2017 4:34:13 GMT
Hmm, I've only heard of this novel so I'm not very familiar with it, but pessimistpanda and I are Australians, so that wasn't part of our reading list in our education (at least, it wasn't for me). (Full disclosure, I personally loathed the book) but it has been held as the part of the highest tier of novels on race relations in the US, and the South in particular, alongside any number of works written by African-Americans, the author however is Harper Lee, a white woman, I believe from Pennsylvania but don't quote me on that. However, at the same time, the story is through the eyes of young white Southern children, which isn't really representing a different group. It's not pretending to be a novel that represents the POV of black people about race relations and their experiences. That's not the same thing, is what I'm basically saying.
|
|
inherit
98
0
3,042
Steelcan
2,078
August 2016
steelcan
|
Post by Steelcan on May 28, 2017 4:36:34 GMT
My point is largely aimed at the utterly ridiculous argument that representation can only be properly achieved through the work of people who are the group in question. Then, you gotta articulate that point. Plus, I wouldn't say that To Kill a Mockingbird is the hallmark of representation. How so? It depicts in painful detail the injustices inflicted upon African-American people during the Jim Crow South and treats them with the respect they are due as humans. It takes the racial biases of the American public and shows how inhumane they are on regular people.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
584
0
Nov 15, 2024 19:30:58 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 15, 2024 19:30:58 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2017 4:38:27 GMT
Dead... Steelcan you posted the link to the Harper Lee book, but didn't read it or you'd know she's from Alabama. One of the few things we are famous for besides illiteracy, Meth, and having at least one church on every block.
|
|
inherit
98
0
3,042
Steelcan
2,078
August 2016
steelcan
|
Post by Steelcan on May 28, 2017 4:40:01 GMT
(Full disclosure, I personally loathed the book) but it has been held as the part of the highest tier of novels on race relations in the US, and the South in particular, alongside any number of works written by African-Americans, the author however is Harper Lee, a white woman, I believe from Pennsylvania but don't quote me on that. However, at the same time, the story is through the eyes of young white Southern children, which isn't really representing a different group. It's not pretending to be a novel that represents the POV of black people about race relations and their experiences. That's not the same thing, is what I'm basically saying. Its told through the eyes of a young white southerner, but Scout isn't the main character, her struggles are not the central struggle of the book. Christ I'm starting to sound like an English teacher.... Anyways. The book is indeed representing another group, African-Americans and their plight in the South. The fact that it is seen through the eyes of someone else outside of that group I don't think is particularly relevant. That doesn't change the central conflict of the book. Unless you happen to think Scout's anxiety over her school play is the central theme.
|
|
inherit
98
0
3,042
Steelcan
2,078
August 2016
steelcan
|
Post by Steelcan on May 28, 2017 4:42:00 GMT
Dead... Steelcan you posted the link to the Harper Lee book, but didn't read it or you'd know she's from Alabama. One of the few things we are famous for besides illiteracy, Meth, and having at least one church on every block. I did say not to quote me on her origin. (also Alabama has football, Forrest Gump, and making SC look good going for it as well)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
4344
0
Nov 15, 2024 19:30:58 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 15, 2024 19:30:58 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2017 4:42:45 GMT
Hmm, I've only heard of this novel so I'm not very familiar with it, but pessimistpanda and I are Australians, so that wasn't part of our reading list in our education (at least, it wasn't for me). (Full disclosure, I personally loathed the book) but it has been held as the part of the highest tier of novels on race relations in the US, and the South in particular, alongside any number of works written by African-Americans, the author however is Harper Lee, a white woman, I believe from Pennsylvania but don't quote me on that. Ah, now I get your point. Personally, if a straight person really wanted to write lgbt+ characters and such, and did their research by consulting lgbt+ people for their feedback, there shouldn't be an issue. And there will always be platforms for straight people to publish their work featuring lgbt+ protagonists and romances. That's not going away. What's being argued here is that opening up a platform for lgbt+ writers to showcase their work AND earning money for it shouldn't be such an issue. I'm only talking in terms of publishing, but if it's an open submissions call for lgbt+ writers, allies would understand- at least, I hope.
|
|
inherit
98
0
3,042
Steelcan
2,078
August 2016
steelcan
|
Post by Steelcan on May 28, 2017 4:44:37 GMT
(Full disclosure, I personally loathed the book) but it has been held as the part of the highest tier of novels on race relations in the US, and the South in particular, alongside any number of works written by African-Americans, the author however is Harper Lee, a white woman, I believe from Pennsylvania but don't quote me on that. Ah, now I get your point. Personally, if a straight person really wanted to write lgbt+ characters and such, and did their research by consulting lgbt+ people for their feedback, there shouldn't be an issue. And there will always be platforms for straight people to publish their work featuring lgbt+ protagonists and romances. That's not going away. What's being argued here is that opening up a platform for lgbt+ writers to showcase their work AND earning money for it shouldn't be such an issue. I'm only talking in terms of publishing, but if it's an open submissions call for lgbt+ writers, allies would understand- at least, I hope. well that doesn't really sound to me like what Pessimist Panda was calling for, but hey I'm not omniscient
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
4084
0
Nov 15, 2024 19:30:58 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 15, 2024 19:30:58 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2017 4:46:01 GMT
Then, you gotta articulate that point. Plus, I wouldn't say that To Kill a Mockingbird is the hallmark of representation. How so? It depicts in painful detail the injustices inflicted upon African-American people during the Jim Crow South and treats them with the respect they are due as humans. It takes the racial biases of the American public and shows how inhumane they are on regular people.Are the American Public and Regular People 2 different mutually exclusive groups? Fun Fact: What I'm doing here is called Logic Chopping (also known as: quibbling, nit-picking, smokescreen, splitting-hairs, trivial objections). Using the technical tools of logic in an unhelpful and pedantic manner by focusing on trivial details instead of directly addressing the main issue in dispute. See how that can be irritating?
|
|
inherit
98
0
3,042
Steelcan
2,078
August 2016
steelcan
|
Post by Steelcan on May 28, 2017 4:47:25 GMT
How so? It depicts in painful detail the injustices inflicted upon African-American people during the Jim Crow South and treats them with the respect they are due as humans. It takes the racial biases of the American public and shows how inhumane they are on regular people.Are the American Public and Regular People 2 different mutually exclusive groups? Fun Fact: What I'm doing here is called Logic Chopping (also known as: quibbling, nit-picking, smokescreen, splitting-hairs, trivial objections). Using the technical tools of logic in an unhelpful and pedantic manner by focusing on trivial details instead of directly addressing the main issue in dispute. See how that can be irritating? Yes, I'm sure that the archtects of Jim Crow considered black people regular people and part of the normal American public.
|
|
inherit
3555
0
Apr 14, 2022 23:07:25 GMT
11,193
gaycaravaggio
Oy Gay
2,940
February 2017
gaycaravaggio
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by gaycaravaggio on May 28, 2017 4:49:08 GMT
However, at the same time, the story is through the eyes of young white Southern children, which isn't really representing a different group. It's not pretending to be a novel that represents the POV of black people about race relations and their experiences. That's not the same thing, is what I'm basically saying. Its told through the eyes of a young white southerner, but Scout isn't the main character, her struggles are not the central struggle of the book. Christ I'm starting to sound like an English teacher.... Anyways. The book is indeed representing another group, African-Americans and their plight in the South. The fact that it is seen through the eyes of someone else outside of that group I don't think is particularly relevant. That doesn't change the central conflict of the book. Unless you happen to think Scout's anxiety over her school play is the central theme. Just because they're depicted doesn't mean it's really from their POV, though, is what I'm getting at. If someone made an LGBT movie about conversion therapy but depicted it from a straight person's POV, I wouldn't consider that necessarily to be meaningful representation of my group.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
4344
0
Nov 15, 2024 19:30:58 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 15, 2024 19:30:58 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2017 4:50:50 GMT
Ah, now I get your point. Personally, if a straight person really wanted to write lgbt+ characters and such, and did their research by consulting lgbt+ people for their feedback, there shouldn't be an issue. And there will always be platforms for straight people to publish their work featuring lgbt+ protagonists and romances. That's not going away. What's being argued here is that opening up a platform for lgbt+ writers to showcase their work AND earning money for it shouldn't be such an issue. I'm only talking in terms of publishing, but if it's an open submissions call for lgbt+ writers, allies would understand- at least, I hope. well that doesn't really sound to me like what Pessimist Panda was calling for, but hey I'm not omniscient I'm assuming that's in case of a hypothetical indie gaming jam project, so I don't know how calls for lgbt+ writers would work, other than how I would imagine it would be like for a publishing house. If a straight writer did apply anyway (edit; not that I would know they were anyway), I'd think they would've misread that it was meant for lgbt+ writers. Otherwise, I'd have questions.
|
|
inherit
98
0
3,042
Steelcan
2,078
August 2016
steelcan
|
Post by Steelcan on May 28, 2017 4:52:16 GMT
Its told through the eyes of a young white southerner, but Scout isn't the main character, her struggles are not the central struggle of the book. Christ I'm starting to sound like an English teacher.... Anyways. The book is indeed representing another group, African-Americans and their plight in the South. The fact that it is seen through the eyes of someone else outside of that group I don't think is particularly relevant. That doesn't change the central conflict of the book. Unless you happen to think Scout's anxiety over her school play is the central theme. Just because they're depicted doesn't mean it's really from their POV, though, is what I'm getting at. If someone made an LGBT movie about conversion therapy but depicted it from a straight person's POV, I wouldn't consider that necessarily to be meaningful representation of my group. Well I think that is too restrictive of a definition on what constitutes representation.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
4084
0
Nov 15, 2024 19:30:58 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 15, 2024 19:30:58 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2017 4:52:51 GMT
Are the American Public and Regular People 2 different mutually exclusive groups? Fun Fact: What I'm doing here is called Logic Chopping (also known as: quibbling, nit-picking, smokescreen, splitting-hairs, trivial objections). Using the technical tools of logic in an unhelpful and pedantic manner by focusing on trivial details instead of directly addressing the main issue in dispute. See how that can be irritating? Yes, I'm sure that the archtects of Jim Crow considered black people regular people and part of the normal American public. Oh, I'm sorry, I thought that was you making that statement, not the Jim Crow Architects. I stand corrected. Carry on.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
584
0
Nov 15, 2024 19:30:58 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 15, 2024 19:30:58 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2017 4:53:12 GMT
I've only watched the movie, but from that point of view it told a very important and powerful story of how fucked the justice system was then (and still is in many many ways). I can also not say for sure if the story wouldn't have been better had it been told by a black author or not, but it certainly would have been more about that. As much of the story is actually about the kids and their own personal stories of summer hijinks.
|
|
inherit
98
0
3,042
Steelcan
2,078
August 2016
steelcan
|
Post by Steelcan on May 28, 2017 4:54:38 GMT
Yes, I'm sure that the archtects of Jim Crow considered black people regular people and part of the normal American public. Oh, I'm sorry, I thought that was you making that statement, not the Jim Crow Architects. I stand corrected. Carry on. *snip* Within the context of what I was talking about, I thought that what I said was clear, if its not, I hope I've cleared it up.
|
|
inherit
98
0
3,042
Steelcan
2,078
August 2016
steelcan
|
Post by Steelcan on May 28, 2017 4:56:01 GMT
I've only watched the movie, but from that point of view it told a very important and powerful story of how fucked the justice system was then (and still is in many many ways). I can also not say for sure if the story wouldn't have been better had it been told by a black author or not, but it certainly would have been more about that. As much of the story is actually about the kids and their own personal stories of summer hijinks. I'm not sure how you can back this statement up though.
|
|
inherit
3555
0
Apr 14, 2022 23:07:25 GMT
11,193
gaycaravaggio
Oy Gay
2,940
February 2017
gaycaravaggio
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by gaycaravaggio on May 28, 2017 4:56:52 GMT
Just because they're depicted doesn't mean it's really from their POV, though, is what I'm getting at. If someone made an LGBT movie about conversion therapy but depicted it from a straight person's POV, I wouldn't consider that necessarily to be meaningful representation of my group. Well I think that is too restrictive of a definition on what constitutes representation. The thing is, what I think everyone here has been trying to get at is that LGBT people aren't given as many opportunities as straight people to write about you know, what it means to be LGBT. When we're misrepresented, we're not often given the chance to be able to put out our own stuff into the world to counter those missteps due to how many barriers there are to get gay stuff published/released in the first place. So we want more LGBT writers to be given those opportunities. And in general, a lot of people seem to be ... idk, hurt by this? As if the industry couldn't use more LGBT voices despite wanting games to get asspats for including any LGBT content at all. If you think it's fine to have LGBT content, then having another LGBT voice shouldn't be a problem, right? I guess people are okay with LGBT stuff if it's obviously not meant for us.
|
|
inherit
98
0
3,042
Steelcan
2,078
August 2016
steelcan
|
Post by Steelcan on May 28, 2017 5:00:37 GMT
Well I think that is too restrictive of a definition on what constitutes representation. The thing is, what I think everyone here has been trying to get at is that LGBT people aren't given as many opportunities as straight people to write about you know, what it means to be LGBT. When we're misrepresented, we're not often given the chance to be able to put out our own stuff into the world to counter those missteps due to how many barriers there are to get gay stuff published/released in the first place. So we want more LGBT writers to be given those opportunities. And in general, a lot of people seem to be ... idk, hurt by this? As if the industry couldn't use more LGBT voices despite wanting games to get asspats for including any LGBT content at all. If you think it's fine to have LGBT content, then having another LGBT voice shouldn't be a problem, right? I guess people are okay with LGBT stuff if it's obviously not meant for us. I think the issue is people saying that straight people cannot understand these issues and thus cannot or should not write about them. It implies either a lack of empathy or intelligence on the part of straight writers and I don't think either is a particularly rosy option. To my knowledge, no one has come in here and said "all LGBT stories should be written by straight people"
|
|
Foelhe
N2
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire
Posts: 165 Likes: 586
inherit
1859
0
586
Foelhe
165
October 2016
foelhe
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire
|
Post by Foelhe on May 28, 2017 5:01:30 GMT
It's pretty hilarious that Walter's post - the one that kicked off this whole mess - involved hiring a straight person who could eventually learn how to write LGBT folks, instead of hiring a LGBT writer who probably already knew how. Most jobs I've heard of try to hire people they won't have to train too much over the folks they will... but if it's straight people, we're willing to bend over backwards to help them eventually become almost as competent as a gay guy already is, because hiring a gay guy who already understands gay guys makes the baby Jesus cry or something.
|
|
inherit
98
0
3,042
Steelcan
2,078
August 2016
steelcan
|
Post by Steelcan on May 28, 2017 5:03:51 GMT
It's pretty hilarious that Walter's post - the one that kicked off this whole mess - involved hiring a straight person who could eventually learn how to write LGBT folks, instead of hiring a LGBT writer who probably already knew how. Most jobs I've heard of try to hire people they won't have to train too much over the folks they will... but if it's straight people, we're willing to bend over backwards to help them eventually become almost as competent as a gay guy already is, because hiring a gay guy who already understands gay guys makes the baby Jesus cry or something. Do you know if BioWare reached out to any gay writers? Do you know if any applied for this spot and were turned down?
|
|
inherit
3555
0
Apr 14, 2022 23:07:25 GMT
11,193
gaycaravaggio
Oy Gay
2,940
February 2017
gaycaravaggio
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by gaycaravaggio on May 28, 2017 5:06:43 GMT
The thing is, what I think everyone here has been trying to get at is that LGBT people aren't given as many opportunities as straight people to write about you know, what it means to be LGBT. When we're misrepresented, we're not often given the chance to be able to put out our own stuff into the world to counter those missteps due to how many barriers there are to get gay stuff published/released in the first place. So we want more LGBT writers to be given those opportunities. And in general, a lot of people seem to be ... idk, hurt by this? As if the industry couldn't use more LGBT voices despite wanting games to get asspats for including any LGBT content at all. If you think it's fine to have LGBT content, then having another LGBT voice shouldn't be a problem, right? I guess people are okay with LGBT stuff if it's obviously not meant for us. I think the issue is people saying that straight people cannot understand these issues and thus cannot or should not write about them. It implies either a lack of empathy or intelligence on the part of straight writers and I don't think either is a particularly rosy option. To my knowledge, no one has come in here and said "all LGBT stories should be written by straight people" I never said that they should not write about them. I've said before in this thread, that I'd be fine with straight people writing LGBT content in situations where they get their shit together. Especially if they collaborate with an LGBT writer. No, no one has directly said "all LGBT stories should be written by straight people," but if your response to "I wish there were more LGBT writers because they often capture the LGBT experience better," is "straight writers can be just as good or better!!" and acting like we're banning straight people or thinking lowly of straight people then you've missed the point. And I would love to see more empathetic straight people writing our stories, but, from certain responses today, I can't say I'm any more confident about straight people's ability to empathize with our experiences. And, for once, I'm not trying to be mean but trying to be honest about this.
|
|
Foelhe
N2
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire
Posts: 165 Likes: 586
inherit
1859
0
586
Foelhe
165
October 2016
foelhe
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire
|
Post by Foelhe on May 28, 2017 5:07:19 GMT
Given all the brotastic rumors we've heard coming out of BioWare Montreal? Very much doubt it, and wouldn't surprise me.
Edit: And that'll teach me to quote. Responding to Steelcan.
|
|