zaefkol
N3
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Jade Empire
Posts: 443 Likes: 1,352
inherit
3299
0
1,352
zaefkol
443
February 2017
zaefkol
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Jade Empire
|
Post by zaefkol on May 28, 2017 8:44:36 GMT
You are way hotter then Gil. You are welcome. This may be a stupid question but do we know how old Gil is? He looks fully 45. Maybe his biological clock is forcing him to have a boosted-batter baby? I personally think he looks closer to the 30-35 range, but that doesn't matter. Technically, Gil is more than 600 years old. Being put in stasis or not, his being has been for hundreds of years. Who knows what that does to boosted-biological-batter-clocks.
|
|
inherit
Banshee
771
0
Sept 4, 2018 23:27:21 GMT
5,053
BansheeOwnage
I was called Ryder before it was cool... ...I'd love to, you know, be social and things.
1,231
August 2016
bansheeownage
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, Mass Effect Andromeda
11290
7428
|
Post by BansheeOwnage on May 28, 2017 8:47:13 GMT
Emphasis on should, as PessimistPanda pointed out. In practice, it does not always work that way. Think of it this way: You know the situation here, where we'd like another LGBT mod (especially since the only one we have is out of commission)? Well, we aren't asking out of entitlement, otherwise we'd have demanded it since day one. No, we only started asking after it became clear that the active mods just don't understand the nuances about LGBT issues that we do. We didn't go into this situation biased, thinking they'd never get it. Hell, our first collective response was to try to help them understand our PoV. But it just didn't work. We don't think straight people can never understand us enough to moderate homophobia properly. We don't think that they can't write LGBT characters, inherently. It's just that they've failed at it too often, and we're sick of it, so we want to be Thanos. Or, well, we'd like to. But it's hard to get the right positions to be able to influence anything The metaphor of us being Thanos works really well - we've tried the other ways, and now, after all this time and effort that has been wasted in failure, the only way we can really fix the situation is to reshape reality to our whim as befits a godlike entity. Thanks, I'm glad my seemingly non-sequitur analogy worked Although it's sad that I had to use it. And why assume they don't have the same biases pretty much everyone has? It seems to me that you're putting people on a pedestal, and I get it. I really do. You want to believe they're better than they are, more self-aware than they are, more progressive than they are. I'm not saying this to be malicious or to say they are being malicious. It's just the state of the industry, in general. Bias is pretty clear among the ME:A devs to be honest. Make Sense for the Character TM, Happy with Specifics TM, Who Would Push Her TM are the clearest evidence. When you think about all of it at once, it's just... ...Nope. LGBT writer all the way. Looking at the writers of ME:A and then at lgbt characters and romance in ME:A, I find that inputs from lgbt people were sorely needed. Yeah, aside from Chee's LGBT content, it all had problems (though not all relating to the writers). Peebee's/Reyes' scenes being built for their straight paths and not working with their same-sex ones, Gil's whole situation, Hainly... Fantastic job, guys. Brilliant. This seems like a catch-22 on some levels. On the one hand, it's not ethical or legal to inquire about a person's gender, race, or sexual orientation*. I believe there have been studies that show, for example, more women are selected when it is a blind selection process. So not knowing in that case is a good thing. On the other hand, what if you are purposely trying to diversify? Not because you want to win brownie points, or because you were sued into submission, but because you truly believe that diversity is important. In the case of writing stories and characters, that diversity leads to better stories and characters. Also in consideration is the problem that you raise. STEM fields, and the modern gaming industry which uses people from STEM fields, is heavily dominated by white men. So various minorities aren't going to have the experience required, because the system is stacked against them to begin with. * I'm actually not sure what has legally been determined as far as orientation in relation to the Civil Rights Act in the US, but let's just assume that this is the case for this post. *Sigh* It sucks that a lot of people don't really realize the additional roadblocks minorities of all kinds (and hell, women) have to get around or jump over just to get the same positions that the majority can get much more easily. With that said, I do kind of hope the next Bioware lesbian is also written by a woman, LGBT or no. While we're at it, can a woman direct her sex scene as well? We're sorely in need of some knowledge of female anatomy in our "lesbian" scenes of late... Well, you can't inquire about someone's sexual orientation or gender identity in a professional setting, period, most especially in a job interview. So you're gonna have to look at their sample of work. What they've worked on. And that should speak for itself. Hypothetically, if I were hiring someone and I wanted to be more inclusive of lgbt+ characters, if I find the applicant-in-question's CV involves them having created queer content, that puts them a notch up (and of course, there's quality of writing and such to consider)- regardless of their sexuality. But I wouldn't be surprised if that applicant did turn out to be lgbt+. If they are, good- it means they're more likely to have a personal stake on the matter and WANT to write good lgbt+ characters. At least, you'd hope, and I'm generalising here. It's true, this would work as a way to find LGBT writers or at least good non-LGBT writers of LGBT content without having to declare orientation on a resumé. But only if they've actually written LGBT content. It would be a start, though! How is that not illegal? It's a serious question, as I don't know how the law applies in those cases. It cuts both ways. You can't discriminate in hiring by refusing on the basis of sexual orientation for LGBTQ+ people, but it also applies to straight people as well. Just to be clear, I agree with you in principle. I don't know how it would actually work out in practice if you tried to do this. I don't know what YOUR laws are. Several Australian publishing houses have recently put out calls for open submissions specifically from minority writers. You can't screen for "gay", unfortunately, but it's pretty hard to fake being PoC or having a disability. As for discriminatory hiring policies, I know for a fact that the US has a "bona fide occupational qualification" clause that allows for cases where an individual of a specific gender, race, religion, etc is required for a specific position. It allows casting directors, for instance, to specify gender and race for particular role, and it's how Hooters gets away with only hiring a particular kind of woman for their waitressing positions.So yeah, I would feel perfectly comfortable putting out a call specifically for LGBT writers. That kind of policy is a double-edged sword for sure, for reasons like what you just stated. Yeah, it isn't like a city, but the devs still can sit down with people. Like Patrick Weekes asking people opinion on Krem. If a writer came up to me and told me they want to do justice for a particular black character in their game, I would be alright with it, especially if they're being respectful about it. Or during production, if they have enough money or people volunteer, they could ask people opinion about a LGBT character or asian character. Best way to think about it is when writers do documentaries on people. I still don't think a writer's sexuality or race shouldn't matter in a place of business. They should only be focused on their skills and previous work.One could argue that experience is a measurable skill that can be evaluated when hiring an applicant. In this case, personal experience with LGBT issues. Like how you'd be more likely to hire a writer to make a story about climbing Mount Everest if they'd actually done it. It's all made even worse because this character, and this same-sex pairing, is the only one subject to this. Is Jill saying to Suvi-mancers, "Hey, you'd better get some dick, or at least hand over some eggs, so I can do my job?" No. Is she saying to the alien-mancers, "Hey, you'd better get some hooman lovin', or donate some samples, so I can do my job?" No. For some reason, the Bioware writers decided to inflict this on the only gay male, and gay LI, in the game. Funny thing is, in addition to that, there's also Sara's "Pathfinder prerogative" (that I hear Scott doesn't have, wat) to not have kids right nao. It's almost like they actually used common sense for a second, and realized that if they said to a woman that it was her civic duty to produce children, it would be highly offensive and taken badly... and then turned their common sense off right after that thought, because apparently they couldn't imagine how that's also highly offensive to men. And arguably even more offensive to gay people. Oh, look Jill is officially this game's Scrappy aka a character with a strong hatedom instead of a fandom. Figured Tvtropes would get the memo. Bioware devs should read the Unfortunate Implications entry for ME:A, stat. It's a great summary. As much as I want to blame the writer or say hiring better writers for LGBTQ+ content would help, ME:A definitely reeks of poor leadership. Yes, absolutely. They (whoever specifically or as a group) greenlit Hainly, Gil's romance, Reyes' dance with Scott, and Peebee's sex scene with Sara, and apparently wanted Vetra to be straight and Suvi to be bi. And strangely enough everything I just mentioned meant they either didn't understand or didn't care about LGBT people. WEIRD. /Tired Salt
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
4997
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2017 10:41:12 GMT
BansheeOwnage bringing the gifs of great captains. Where does Avitus fit into all this? I am all for representation of all gay sexual proclivities, so Avitus must now be a top. Vers is fine as long as my Scottbrew and Sheplooo are surrounded by guys who are happy to top their total bottom asses You are way hotter then Gil. You are welcome. This may be a stupid question but do we know how old Gil is? He looks fully 45. Maybe his biological clock is forcing him to have a boosted-batter baby? He isnt that old. I would say late 20's/early 30's, about 10 inches
|
|
inherit
1587
0
1,772
Walter Black
1,290
Sept 15, 2016 15:02:16 GMT
September 2016
walterblack
|
Post by Walter Black on May 28, 2017 10:58:25 GMT
So if a talented straight writer applied to your team, showing a genuine desire to learn how to write LBGTQ characters and themes better and use their works to increase LBGTQ visibility and respect, you would still say no? The prospect of true progress is worth less to you than being able to "See how it feels? IT'S OUR TURN NOW!!!" I don't know what you think "true progress" is, but the best way to increase 'LGBT visibility and respect' is to listen to REAL LGBT people, not the fictional creations of straight people. In the event that I am ever in a position to do so, my goal is and will always be to help LGBT authors of Speculative Fiction to find work and/or get published. Straight people have the whole rest of the industry, they can go look there. 1. Gay critic confronts straight writer about their poor LBGTQ depictions.
2. Seeking to honestly improve, straight writer asks the critic for help in creating better LBGTQ characters.
3. Gay critic rebuffs any such notions, telling the writer that since they are straight they could never possibly understand, and have no right to even try.
4. With no support and only secondhand anecdotes for research, the writer's LGBTQ characters are slightly better, but still not good enough for the intended audience.
5. Return to point 1, rinse and repeat .
I'm sorry, but your whole position reeks of false dichotomy; the point isn't to have only one or the other, but both straight and LBGTQ writers being able to provide good stories with good characters and representation. Having more gay and lesbian writers is a fine thing, but as has been pointed out, there will always be more straight ones. How pray tell, are straight writers supposed to improve their LGBTQ content if no one helps them do it right?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
4997
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2017 11:38:15 GMT
I don't know what you think "true progress" is, but the best way to increase 'LGBT visibility and respect' is to listen to REAL LGBT people, not the fictional creations of straight people. In the event that I am ever in a position to do so, my goal is and will always be to help LGBT authors of Speculative Fiction to find work and/or get published. Straight people have the whole rest of the industry, they can go look there. 1. Gay critic confronts straight writer about their poor LBGTQ depictions.
2. Seeking to honestly improve, straight writer asks the critic for help in creating better LBGTQ characters.
3. Gay critic rebuffs any such notions, telling the writer that since they are straight they could never possibly understand, and have no right to even try.
4. With no support and only secondhand anecdotes for research, the writer's LGBTQ characters are slightly better, but still not good enough for the intended audience.
5. Return to point 1, rinse and repeat .
I'm sorry, but your whole position reeks of false dichotomy; the point isn't to have only one or the other, but both straight and LBGTQ writers being able to provide good stories with good characters and representation. Having more gay and lesbian writers is a fine thing, but as has been pointed out, there will always be more straight ones. How pray tell, are straight writers supposed to improve their LGBTQ content if no one helps them do it right?
I agree with you insomuch as to say as a general statement straight writers can write gay characters. But writers often write what they know and even if you tell a writer things they can miss the heart of it. Theres a crucial emotional motivation that can cause a story beat to miss its mark. The gay dads storyline in MEA is a prime example of this. Well intentioned but the perspective was lacking. But yes again as a general statement you dont need gay writers to write gay characters but in the context of MEA it really wouldve helped since theres a lot of tonedeafness. The romantic side of the Gil romance is spot on, love is love after all. But the "gay drama" is the missed shot. And that's where sometimes talking might not be enough, just sometimes though, it would be ignorant to declare no straight writer can write gay stories.
|
|
inherit
Elvis Has Left The Building
7794
0
Oct 31, 2020 23:57:02 GMT
8,073
pessimistpanda
3,804
Apr 18, 2017 15:57:34 GMT
April 2017
pessimistpanda
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by pessimistpanda on May 28, 2017 11:56:07 GMT
I don't know what you think "true progress" is, but the best way to increase 'LGBT visibility and respect' is to listen to REAL LGBT people, not the fictional creations of straight people. In the event that I am ever in a position to do so, my goal is and will always be to help LGBT authors of Speculative Fiction to find work and/or get published. Straight people have the whole rest of the industry, they can go look there. 1. Gay critic confronts straight writer about their poor LBGTQ depictions.
2. Seeking to honestly improve, straight writer asks the critic for help in creating better LBGTQ characters.
3. Gay critic rebuffs any such notions, telling the writer that since they are straight they could never possibly understand, and have no right to even try.
4. With no support and only secondhand anecdotes for research, the writer's LGBTQ characters are slightly better, but still not good enough for the intended audience.
5. Return to point 1, rinse and repeat .
I'm sorry, but your whole position reeks of false dichotomy; the point isn't to have only one or the other, but both straight and LBGTQ writers being able to provide good stories with good characters and representation. Having more gay and lesbian writers is a fine thing, but as has been pointed out, there will always be more straight ones. How pray tell, are straight writers supposed to improve their LGBTQ content if no one helps them do it right?
1) I don't care that much about whether or not straight writers improve, I want more gay writers in the industry. That's my primary concern; the real gay people looking for work, not the fictional products of straight writers who have work. 2) You clearly haven't done any googling yourself, because there are plenty of gay people providing first-hand, free information about what they think a well-written LGBTQ character requires. Hell, you could try just reading back through this thread.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
4084
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2017 12:17:42 GMT
1. Gay critic confronts straight writer about their poor LBGTQ depictions.
2. Seeking to honestly improve, straight writer asks the critic for help in creating better LBGTQ characters.
3. Gay critic rebuffs any such notions, telling the writer that since they are straight they could never possibly understand, and have no right to even try.
4. With no support and only secondhand anecdotes for research, the writer's LGBTQ characters are slightly better, but still not good enough for the intended audience.
5. Return to point 1, rinse and repeat .
I'm sorry, but your whole position reeks of false dichotomy; the point isn't to have only one or the other, but both straight and LBGTQ writers being able to provide good stories with good characters and representation. Having more gay and lesbian writers is a fine thing, but as has been pointed out, there will always be more straight ones. How pray tell, are straight writers supposed to improve their LGBTQ content if no one helps them do it right?
1) I don't care that much about whether or not straight writers improve, I want more gay writers in the industry. That's my primary concern; the real gay people looking for work, not the fictional products of straight writers who have work. 2) You clearly haven't done any googling yourself, because there are plenty of gay people providing first-hand, free information about what they think a well-written LGBTQ character requires. Hell, you could try just reading back through this thread.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
4344
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2017 12:45:55 GMT
I find it rather amusing that we've been debating over straight writers writing lgbt+ content, when it's not exactly their favourite subject to concern themselves anyway in the first place, generally speaking. Usually, when straight writers write gay characters and or relationships, a straight guy would find it way more palatable to write f/f, and for straight women, m/m.
I know A Land Fit For Heroes is one example (gee, I have the trilogy sitting on my shelf, who'd've thought? Still needs to be read, though)- perhaps the ONLY example. But colour me surprised to find a straight guy gung ho on writing gay male protagonists and romances.
|
|
inherit
Elvis Has Left The Building
7794
0
Oct 31, 2020 23:57:02 GMT
8,073
pessimistpanda
3,804
Apr 18, 2017 15:57:34 GMT
April 2017
pessimistpanda
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by pessimistpanda on May 28, 2017 12:59:26 GMT
I find it rather amusing that we've been debating over straight writers writing lgbt+ content, when it's not exactly their favourite subject to concern themselves anyway in the first place, generally speaking. Usually, when straight writers write gay characters and or relationships, a straight guy would find it way more palatable to write f/f, and for straight women, m/m. I know A Land Fit For Heroes is one example (gee, I have the trilogy sitting on my shelf, who'd've thought? Still needs to be read, though)- perhaps the ONLY example. But colour me surprised to find a straight guy gung ho on writing gay male protagonists and romances. Yeah, I can't wait to read Steelcan and Walter Black's work. Do you guys have AO3 accounts or what? What M/M pairings do you like to work with?
|
|
inherit
Professional Gaylien
2664
0
8,306
Salty Drell
2,679
January 2017
wishfulpickle
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Salty Drell on May 28, 2017 13:01:47 GMT
I find it rather amusing that we've been debating over straight writers writing lgbt+ content, when it's not exactly their favourite subject to concern themselves anyway in the first place, generally speaking. Usually, when straight writers write gay characters and or relationships, a straight guy would find it way more palatable to write f/f, and for straight women, m/m. I know A Land Fit For Heroes is one example (gee, I have the trilogy sitting on my shelf, who'd've thought? Still needs to be read, though)- perhaps the ONLY example. But colour me surprised to find a straight guy gung ho on writing gay male protagonists and romances. Yeah, I can't wait to read Steelcan and Walter Black's work. Do you guys have AO3 accounts or what? What M/M pairings do you like to work with? Themselves and their 'bro'. :sure: Or each other.
|
|
inherit
3555
0
Apr 14, 2022 23:07:25 GMT
11,193
gaycaravaggio
Oy Gay
2,940
February 2017
gaycaravaggio
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by gaycaravaggio on May 28, 2017 14:23:32 GMT
Honestly, though, if you're writing an LGBT story about the LGBT Experience (tm) and you get offended at the idea that maybe you should consult LGBT people then maybe you're writing that story for the wrong reasons. Just putting that out there.
|
|
inherit
98
0
3,042
Steelcan
2,078
August 2016
steelcan
|
Post by Steelcan on May 28, 2017 14:35:37 GMT
And I'm maintaining that its not necessary, as shown in other examples of outsiders being able to deal with a situation that doesn't directly involve themselves and receive monumental and long lasting praise for it, as evidence by my reference to To Kill a MockingbirdFun Fact: But of course, you can know everything about a person's POV without ever actually engaging with them, right? When I have claimed omniscience?
|
|
inherit
98
0
3,042
Steelcan
2,078
August 2016
steelcan
|
Post by Steelcan on May 28, 2017 14:40:48 GMT
And I wish people would just be honest and quite being coy (unless there was some other page spanning argument that I somehow missed and you're referring to someone else) [inb4 I'm being defensive] When I'm honest, you get defensive. When I'm coy, you get mad that I'm not being honest. What do you want, buddy? Well I don't see how me being defensive is something wrong. As I've said this an inherently defensive position that I've taken.
|
|
inherit
98
0
3,042
Steelcan
2,078
August 2016
steelcan
|
Post by Steelcan on May 28, 2017 14:41:45 GMT
Honestly, though, if you're writing an LGBT story about the LGBT Experience (tm) and you get offended at the idea that maybe you should consult LGBT people then maybe you're writing that story for the wrong reasons. Just putting that out there. Strawmen, get your strawmen here, buy one get one free, strawmen for sale.
|
|
inherit
3555
0
Apr 14, 2022 23:07:25 GMT
11,193
gaycaravaggio
Oy Gay
2,940
February 2017
gaycaravaggio
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by gaycaravaggio on May 28, 2017 14:41:52 GMT
BansheeOwnage bringing the gifs of great captains. I am all for representation of all gay sexual proclivities, so Avitus must now be a top. Vers is fine as long as my Scottbrew and Sheplooo are surrounded by guys who are happy to top their total bottom asses This may be a stupid question but do we know how old Gil is? He looks fully 45. Maybe his biological clock is forcing him to have a boosted-batter baby? He isnt that old. I would say late 20's/early 30's, about 10 inches Scott always struck me as kind of a bottom anyways.
|
|
inherit
3555
0
Apr 14, 2022 23:07:25 GMT
11,193
gaycaravaggio
Oy Gay
2,940
February 2017
gaycaravaggio
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by gaycaravaggio on May 28, 2017 14:43:47 GMT
Honestly, though, if you're writing an LGBT story about the LGBT Experience (tm) and you get offended at the idea that maybe you should consult LGBT people then maybe you're writing that story for the wrong reasons. Just putting that out there. Strawmen, get your strawmen here, buy one get one free, strawmen for sale. Not a Strawman to point out that frustration about being told as a straight person you aren't going to be the ideal voice to portray LGBT stories about being LGBT means you should self-reflect a little. Besides, you've been pulling straw all night.
|
|
inherit
529
0
7,815
Nightscrawl
3,266
August 2016
nightscrawl
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Neverwinter Nights, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Nightscrawl on May 28, 2017 14:45:24 GMT
When it comes to writing gay stories, or racial stories, perhaps the straight white people just need to take a step back and ask, Do I really need to be writing about this? (No.) Is there someone else who can do it better? (Yes.) Have there been other such stories told by straight white people that show their perspective over the minorities? (Very many.) Is there value in adding another such wok to the pile? (No.) Can I write about something else I do know about? (I sure can!) This right here is what I vehemently disagree with, in its totality. This right here is quite simply absolute horseshit. What penalties? No one here has been applying penalties to anyone just for venting about straight writers. Do you take people literally when they speak in hyperbole? I'm flattered you think we have that much power in the video game industry, but we really don't. Penalties was too harsh a word I admit. Let's take what Nightscrawl said, basically that amounts to a checklist of self censorship as well as a limit on artistic expression, things that I am not particularly in favor of. I think you're missing an important distinction in all this, which I tried to get at with my post. There is a difference between writing a character that is gay, where that is just a thing about them, even if that story features a same-sex romance, and writing about the gay experience. What does a straight person have to offer about the gay experience? Nothing at all. Let's have an example that I might consider analogous to To Kill a Mockingbird. Let's say that there is a story, written by a straight person, about what it is like to be the child in a same-sex parent household. For the first few years of this child's life, she won't think anything at all is different about her family. As she gets get older, starts going to school, sees more of the world, she may see ugly behavior directed at her and her parents. That is that child's own experience. Now let's switch it around at look at those same parents. Perhaps they have been together a long time, but were only (finally) able to get married after the Supreme Court ruling. In deciding to have a child together, they will have to contend with a legal system that isn't really equipped to deal with same-sex parents; more often than not, the biological parent is given priority in legal matters. They know that there might be times during family outings that they will get certain looks. There are probably dozens of other things that I can't even think of that these parents will have to deal with that straight people really can't comprehend. This is all on top of the usual parent type stuff. Can a straight person do justice to those parents? Possibly (I'm not going to deny that outright). But it would have more meaning, be more real, if a gay person were writing it. I have a couple of real examples. There is a woman, a mother of a gay teen, who writes pieces for the Huffington Post. These are about her own experiences in trying to be a parent (along with her husband) who is raising a well-adjusted, confident, gay young man. She isn't writing about her son's experience as a gay teen, but of her own as his mother. That is the key distinction. To turn it back toward race, after Trayvon Martin was killed, there were quite a few African American people who shared their stories of being parents, or of their own parents, and having to give "the talk" to their black child (especially if a son). How to behave in public places, what to do if confronted by police, and other similar things. I recall distinctly that white America (the non-racist people, anyway) was collectively shocked and horrified, because the very idea that this is a thing that happens, that AA parents have to deal with, was just completely foreign to a great many people. How can a white person even fathom that experience? How could they do it justice? You can write about it respectfully, but it's not the same as having lived it.
|
|
inherit
98
0
3,042
Steelcan
2,078
August 2016
steelcan
|
Post by Steelcan on May 28, 2017 14:52:18 GMT
Nothing you said in their disproved what I said. You're asking for white/straight people to collectively check their privilege and not write about certain things because it's not "real" enough.
Which is stupid.
|
|
inherit
3555
0
Apr 14, 2022 23:07:25 GMT
11,193
gaycaravaggio
Oy Gay
2,940
February 2017
gaycaravaggio
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by gaycaravaggio on May 28, 2017 14:52:19 GMT
When I'm honest, you get defensive. When I'm coy, you get mad that I'm not being honest. What do you want, buddy? Well I don't see how me being defensive is something wrong. As I've said this an inherently defensive position that I've taken. Because you're taking it personally and making an LGBT issue all about you. Yet again.
|
|
inherit
3555
0
Apr 14, 2022 23:07:25 GMT
11,193
gaycaravaggio
Oy Gay
2,940
February 2017
gaycaravaggio
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by gaycaravaggio on May 28, 2017 14:53:51 GMT
Nothing you said in their disproved what I said. You're asking for white/straight people to collectively check their privilege and not write about certain things because it's not "real" enough. Which is stupid. If you're so desperate to portray a particular experience and portray it well, then I think you can be humble enough to consult people who've lived through those experiences and prioritize that over your own perspective.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
4084
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on May 28, 2017 14:55:03 GMT
Fun Fact: But of course, you can know everything about a person's POV without ever actually engaging with them, right? When I have claimed omniscience?
|
|
inherit
3555
0
Apr 14, 2022 23:07:25 GMT
11,193
gaycaravaggio
Oy Gay
2,940
February 2017
gaycaravaggio
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by gaycaravaggio on May 28, 2017 14:57:28 GMT
When I have claimed omniscience? This is one of those cases when a little self-awareness can go a long way.
|
|
inherit
98
0
3,042
Steelcan
2,078
August 2016
steelcan
|
Post by Steelcan on May 28, 2017 15:01:32 GMT
Well I don't see how me being defensive is something wrong. As I've said this an inherently defensive position that I've taken. Because you're taking it personally and making an LGBT issue all about you. Yet again. How am I to take a statement such as "straight people should write gay people" as anything besides an attack. But it's true that was indeed hyperbole and I'm willing to accommodate that, even if I think it's treading a dangerous line. What I find far more troubling is the consensus here that straight people are inherently unable to write such stories well without guidance. As for the bits on hiring more LGBT writers in the industry and such, I haven't staked out a claim in there because I largely agree with it.
|
|
inherit
98
0
3,042
Steelcan
2,078
August 2016
steelcan
|
Post by Steelcan on May 28, 2017 15:02:29 GMT
Nothing you said in their disproved what I said. You're asking for white/straight people to collectively check their privilege and not write about certain things because it's not "real" enough. Which is stupid. If you're so desperate to portray a particular experience and portray it well, then I think you can be humble enough to consult people who've lived through those experiences and prioritize that over your own perspective. And that should be a personal decision, not mandated by a shrieking group saying "YOU CANT WROTE ABOUT THAT ITS NOT REAL ENOUGH"
|
|
inherit
98
0
3,042
Steelcan
2,078
August 2016
steelcan
|
Post by Steelcan on May 28, 2017 15:03:53 GMT
When I have claimed omniscience? It's so much easier to just use gifs instead of a substantive argument isn't it? I repeat, show me where I've claimed omniscience
|
|