inherit
The Pathfinder
638
0
Sept 22, 2017 23:01:09 GMT
9,422
Serza
Rendering planets viable since 2017
6,301
August 2016
serza
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
13152
|
Post by Serza on Dec 10, 2016 13:36:02 GMT
Should've kept my mouth shut. Regardless, let's keep this 100% fact, no bias, political, religious or otherwise.
|
|
inherit
Elvis Has Left The Building
244
0
Sept 26, 2016 13:29:55 GMT
19,065
Arijon van Goyen
10,446
August 2016
kaiserarian
17300
|
Post by Arijon van Goyen on Dec 10, 2016 15:41:53 GMT
When I posted the video I guessed it seems good tbh and haven't watched it yet myself.
|
|
inherit
The Pathfinder
638
0
Sept 22, 2017 23:01:09 GMT
9,422
Serza
Rendering planets viable since 2017
6,301
August 2016
serza
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
13152
|
Post by Serza on Dec 10, 2016 16:12:19 GMT
I haven't watched it, just said what I'd like.
|
|
inherit
Darth Dennis
111
0
Jul 27, 2022 16:20:32 GMT
9,146
masterwarderz
8,113
August 2016
mastermasterwarderz
19,824
|
Post by masterwarderz on Dec 11, 2016 3:54:24 GMT
''So a snaked talked and then god impregnated a virgin with himself to sacrifice himself to himself to forgive the sins he condemned us with.'' ''They must have been thinking yeah all right.''
Because African mythology makes anymore sense right? Because any cultures mythology makes anymore fucking sense? This makes sense right? Because Religions all make fucking sense. At least the Christian creation narrative provides something plausible. If anything or anyone can craft matter from nothing it'd be a God. ._. I mean I like deity creation myths in general above the more... colourful historical religions held by Pagans. Japan being created by a spear being dipped into the sea for example is a cool creation myth.
|
|
inherit
2038
0
3,353
Verro
"Ha ha ha ha ha! Did I hurt you?"
1,949
November 2016
verro
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire
|
Post by Verro on Dec 11, 2016 3:58:19 GMT
''So a snaked talked and then god impregnated a virgin with himself to sacrifice himself to himself to forgive the sins he condemned us with.'' ''They must have been thinking yeah all right.''
Because African mythology makes anymore sense right? Because any cultures mythology makes anymore fucking sense? This makes sense right? Because Religions all make fucking sense. At least the Christian creation narrative provides something plausible. If anything or anyone can craft matter from nothing it'd be a God. ._. I mean I like deity creation myths in general above the more... colourful historical religions held by Pagans.
Japan being created by a spear being dipped into the sea for example is a cool creation myth.I deleted the post because I decided it wasn't worth the effort ultimately. And you always quote me the second before I delete something. Edit: I agree with the bold part though.
|
|
inherit
Darth Dennis
111
0
Jul 27, 2022 16:20:32 GMT
9,146
masterwarderz
8,113
August 2016
mastermasterwarderz
19,824
|
Post by masterwarderz on Dec 11, 2016 4:00:58 GMT
At least the Christian creation narrative provides something plausible. If anything or anyone can craft matter from nothing it'd be a God. ._. I mean I like deity creation myths in general above the more... colourful historical religions held by Pagans. Japan being created by a spear being dipped into the sea for example is a cool creation myth. I deleted the post because I decided it wasn't worth the effort ultimately. And you always quote me the second before I delete something. This is true. Still the story of Amenonuhoko is neat.
|
|
inherit
2038
0
3,353
Verro
"Ha ha ha ha ha! Did I hurt you?"
1,949
November 2016
verro
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire
|
Post by Verro on Dec 11, 2016 5:17:50 GMT
If anything or anyone can craft matter from nothing it'd be a God. I like reading creation myths myself. This is ultimately my problem when it comes to subscribing to any creation narratives though. Sure a God can create something where there once was nothing. But if there was really nothing, where did the God come from? Did it create itself? You run into a new set of problems.
|
|
inherit
The Pathfinder
638
0
Sept 22, 2017 23:01:09 GMT
9,422
Serza
Rendering planets viable since 2017
6,301
August 2016
serza
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
13152
|
Post by Serza on Dec 11, 2016 13:01:33 GMT
...aaaaand we're arguing.
|
|
inherit
Darth Dennis
111
0
Jul 27, 2022 16:20:32 GMT
9,146
masterwarderz
8,113
August 2016
mastermasterwarderz
19,824
|
Post by masterwarderz on Dec 11, 2016 13:03:53 GMT
If anything or anyone can craft matter from nothing it'd be a God. I like reading creation myths myself. This is ultimately my problem when it comes to subscribing to any creation narratives though. Sure a God can create something where there once was nothing. But if there was really nothing, where did the God come from? Did it create itself? You run into a new set of problems. Chicken and egg school of thought. There is no answer to this.
|
|
PhroX
N2
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire
Posts: 208 Likes: 246
inherit
477
0
246
PhroX
208
August 2016
phrox
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire
|
Post by PhroX on Dec 11, 2016 20:15:25 GMT
It takes way too long to respond to individual quotes tbh and I frankly don't have the patience to continue doing it. To save time I am just going to make a list and reply to that. 1. North Africa, a fair point the two failures to breakthrough and the fall of Tripoli would indicate that the campaign would fail with or without the assistance of the Americans however that is not so due to the reinforcing done during the Tripolitania collapse, namely Tunisia and this is where I think the war would turn in the campaign without America and Canadian forces to bog them down across Algeria. But we will get to that later on in more detail, but suffice to say I think a resurgence is likely here without direct military aid from the Americans, because yes the Brits did well here but most of what they did was case an army across one desert into another, it was defeated, not destroyed. Add in the fact that Monaco, a major German staging ground in the region is still shipping in fresh troops and armor. They can rebuild. But yeah I didn't forget the British successes on ground or sea, I just didn't factor them in heavily due to them not compromising the logistical chain all that much. Wrecked the Italian navy though. 2.On Moscow and other assorted USSR bullcrap. Fair enough on the point that taking the capital will not automatically lead to the defeat of the USSR, it will not it will however deny them that as a key staging ground basically force the collapse of the eastern front of the Russian advance, it would cause issues, I will not deny that, but again I think this extension is worth because it basically forces everything westward to try to take back its prior holding, which leads to a nice defensive war, in which I think that the Japanese exploitation of the situation would come in handy. Ultimately my point about Moscow was solely in relation to how fucked the USSR was in 41 and how reliant on foreign aid they were to even push back against the Germans, namely in their armor and aircraft, due to most of their armor being charred husks again on the Polish border. Those 600 American and British tanks were quite useful that winter, but that's not something you hear much about. I also think that another critical factor here is how reliant they are on the gifts of weapons to fight via the Allies at this time frame and denying them the shipping lanes in the east to receive it can only be a good thing. It would also likely deny the British the usage of their far east fleets, but we can get into that if you want later. 3. Churchill The man being an unpopular drunkard might have helped in that regard of him not retaining power but fair enough, I am not here to argue for a fat dead politician. 4. On North African focus I don't believe it would result in that truth be told. Call me a skeptic but I think they'd bide their time and result to raiding and maybe upping their production of vessels to replace what they lost but Hewitt is sort of fucked with what he can field to safeguard the landing operation, the Atlantic Fleet is still suffering basically weekly bombings and strikings via the Italian, German air forces and submarines in transit just delivering supplies, its not as bad as it would was in 41 but its still busting up both their navy and merchant fleets. Then again I could be underestimating it, I am just looking at numbers and logistics after all, we are talking of matters of resolve and bravery. They could charge those beaches, but I don't know how Tunisia would play out truth be told. I think it would play out more or less like it did in our own timeline but I could be overlooking factors, I haven't made a study of this since I initially talked about it, Africa never was the fore point of my attention. 5. On Spain, Romania and the Middle East Its mostly reliant on them retaining control of Tunsia and retaking Tripoli and Libya tbh. Basically Iran remains a German ally, mass revolts and insurrection turn Syria and Iraq into bloodbaths for the French and British forces, forcing them to commit to putting down armed insurgency all the while the Germans are doing their damnedest to retake lost holdings, its sort of a cat and mouse game where the mouse is arming local rebels to basically act as shock troops to draw attention and bullets away. Romania is far easier, they were basically bros with Germany already come the rise of Antonescu, they were doing what I said they were doing for Germany before, why stop if the war suddenly has a massive reversal of fortune? Spain would have to be goaded into it, and as you should know Felix was planned to go down anyway due to the need for Gibraltar, I personally think that if Europe started to go the way of the Germans Franco would commit. But ultimately I do not see continued German success if they don't have it, it allows a lot of trade and troops to move through into the region and gives Germany a lot of bases and support in that part of the world, it would come in handy in repelling what would come later assuming the Americans did launch Torch, but as I said before, I'd point out that a series of uprisings in Syria, Iraq and Iran would force British attention to focus on them, in which I do think they would eventually be worn down, but overall its just a side show, smoke and mirrors, just like that entire front to begin with. Rommel had a half decent idea with that, it ate up a lot of British resources pushing that far into three separate countries while at the same time fighting the Germans, I think keeping that up is a key to victory. 6. Australia This comes from my prior point on New Guinea in which I think they'd use that to establish a long range strike base to bomb the Japanese home islands while the fleet was rebuilding which of course leads to a retasking of a sizable portion of the Japanese Navy, which I think leads to this alternative history's Leyte Gulf, just at Australia. I imagine this happening late 44 or early 45 and basically sees the shattering of what was left of the Japanese Navy and their collapse and fallback to the home islands and a restructuring for defensive war. I imagine they have more or less maintained an offensive to this point because that was all their fuel reserves allowed, more or less 25 months for full fleet operation, so either way, even if they win at this battle, their done unless if German ups its oil shipments, which actually might be a serious thing in this timeline if the Pacific and Indian go the way I picture them to go. o-o I think I have more or less a premise for a novel in just this conversation I had with a buddy a decade ago. 7. Personal musings and closing statements You have a very high opinion of the communists, I do admit that I think it overdone but its hard to argue with the horde they unleashed in 44 I suppose, I just have to remind myself that it wasn't built yet. Ultimately I think my musings back in the day were historically inspired, even somewhat plausible and based on accurate information but its mere conjecture, I think a lot of things would have to swing the Axis's way for it to survive the war, but I do think that the USSR could be ground down as I suggested, it could batter itself apart fighting two separate wars without foreign intervention. And that to my eye is the only way Germany wins that war, it has to defeat Russia, its the only thing that frees up all the needed resources, manpower and grants them access to the industry and infrastructure they need to rebuild and rearm in time. Not to mention it keeps Japan in the game longer. Ultimately the only method I see for Axis victory is something to this effect, Japan persists and is a blood magnet as the allies push east, Germany gets a nuke, Germany wins Russia, Germany bloodies the Allies so much they relent and meet for bargaining. All four would likely result in something to this effect but ultimately I do not see a conventional victory, hence why this premise makes use of a lot of unconventional warfare, namely the whole insurgency deal in the mid east. Personally I think that Japan winning Mid Way wouldn't turn the war around in and of itself but it could be a catalyst for that reversal of fortune. PS: Are you enjoying this conversation? Sorry this isn't going to be a full response to your points (I'll try to get round to doing that at some point reasonably soon), I've been pretty busy this weekend and wanted to check some stuff on the subject. Still, I've had some general thoughts on the overall concept that looking over some dates and numbers have given me. I am enjoying the discussion though The more I look the idea of a Midway victory leading to Japanese intervention against the Soviet Union resulting in a German victory over the latter, the less I believe it's plausible. The timeline simply doesn't fit. The basic problem is that the way the Japanese are liable to behave post successful Midway simply doesn't get them to where they would need to be quick enough to prevent the disasters of late '42 which effectively cost Germany the war. Having won at Midway the Japanese proceed, as planned, with Operation FS (something Yamamoto only barely got delayed in order to carry out MI), probably in August '42. Given the priorities of both the IJA and IJN, there's no way this is getting canceled (to do so would be a divergence along the lines "what if Imperial Japan wasn't Imperial Japan?", at which point you might was well have aliens in your story). This campaign was to culminate in an invasion of New Caledonia which, by this point, has a garrison of over 15,000 allied troops, so the invasion is going to be big. And while I'm personally inclined to say that a Japanese victory here is pretty much impossible (logistics alone screw it up), whatever happens, given the size of forces involved, it's not going to be a quick battle, unless the Japanese suffer something catastrophic to make them withdraw (say, Wasp and Saratoga get an unanswered strike in on the Kido Butai while the invasion is in transit?) - in which case they're pretty going to be far more cautious about messing with the Russians given the loss of much of their margin of superiority over the US. We're probably talking something not much shorter than Guadalcanal. Even best case you're looking at least a couple more months. And any invasion of the Soviets is going to have to wait for this. While the Japanese were willing to get into a new war while fully committed to another, they did so because they believed they couldn't win the in China without the resources of the European colonies, and they couldn't take them without America intervening. Attacking the Soviet Union while involved in two wars is a whole 'nother kettle of fish, for the simple fact that they don't have any need to do so. I'm not saying that Germany wouldn't be able to convince them to help if Japan had (temporary) superiority in the Pacific, but such an intervention would have to wait until Japanese interests had been secured, and with a battle like that likely on New Caledonia happening, the answer is going to be "not yet". So, we're talking probably October if not November before a decision to invade the Soviet Union is made. Add in time to prepare both the Kwantung Army and whatever supporting naval landings are needed, and we're very late in '42. I'm not sure even the Japanese are mad enough to launch a campaign in Manchuria and Siberia in the middle of winter - and if they are, they're not going to be making massive breakthroughs against the pretty solid Soviet defenses in the region: mid '42 they had over a million soldiers in the region (a quick search didn't give me the numbers for 6 months later, but I can't see it dropping by much), with better equipment than the Japanese. The Japanese might prevail, but it will take some considerable time, and the Soviets aren't going to be rushing forces East ASAP. Even if the Japanese hit a bit faster and harder than I would expect, ultimately, the Soviets can afford to trade land for time for a few months in order to ensure a more secure position in the west. Maybe by the time the campaigning season proper starts in '43, they'll find themselves needing to start moving significant forces over to the East, but there's no reason for them to change what they did in '42. Such as launching Operation Uranus in November. And there's not enough butterflies in the West yet to reasonably justify the outcome of that, or Winterstorm differing, so Stalingrad, along with the best part of a million Axis soldiers, is lost. And that's something Germany simply can't recover from. While in this timeline the Soviets are going to be worse off in the west by mid '43 (the need for more troops in the East plus the likely loss of some of the lend-lease shipments), it's really just going to slow them down on the offensive (the real impact of lend lease was not tanks or other weapons, but trucks - most of the Red Army's supply vehicles came from America. But when you're on the defensive, you're close to your railheads so don't need trucks as much, they really come into play when advancing), and not their ability to defend. The Germans meanwhile, have very little left they can do. Small scale (by the standards of the Eastern Front) operations like Citadel are all they have left, and compared to what even a more defensive Red Army can put into the field, it's not going to work. Even a successful Citadel doesn't change the outcome of the war, it just further impedes the Soviet ability to advance in '43. The difference in forces is already too great and it's only growing. Germany can, and will, make the Soviets bleed more than they did historically, the reduced supply of trucks will slow down the Red Army's advance (we could see the war dragging well into '46, maybe even longer depending on what the Western Allies do, and the post-war map could be quite different), but by the end of '42, Germany had, in practical terms, already lost the war, and Japan simply can't impede the Soviet Union quick enough to change that. If you want to have Japan getting involved in the SU soon enough to make a difference to Germany, you basically have to go back to their decision of what to do about the US embargos. There was a plan to go north instead of south. I believe it was rejected pretty quickly as the IJA had no real desire to mess the with Soviets after Khalkhin Gol and the southern resource area was far more valuable, but if you can come up with a good justification to change that, you might be onto a winner.
|
|
inherit
Darth Dennis
111
0
Jul 27, 2022 16:20:32 GMT
9,146
masterwarderz
8,113
August 2016
mastermasterwarderz
19,824
|
Post by masterwarderz on Dec 11, 2016 21:44:20 GMT
It takes way too long to respond to individual quotes tbh and I frankly don't have the patience to continue doing it. To save time I am just going to make a list and reply to that. 1. North Africa, a fair point the two failures to breakthrough and the fall of Tripoli would indicate that the campaign would fail with or without the assistance of the Americans however that is not so due to the reinforcing done during the Tripolitania collapse, namely Tunisia and this is where I think the war would turn in the campaign without America and Canadian forces to bog them down across Algeria. But we will get to that later on in more detail, but suffice to say I think a resurgence is likely here without direct military aid from the Americans, because yes the Brits did well here but most of what they did was case an army across one desert into another, it was defeated, not destroyed. Add in the fact that Monaco, a major German staging ground in the region is still shipping in fresh troops and armor. They can rebuild. But yeah I didn't forget the British successes on ground or sea, I just didn't factor them in heavily due to them not compromising the logistical chain all that much. Wrecked the Italian navy though. 2.On Moscow and other assorted USSR bullcrap. Fair enough on the point that taking the capital will not automatically lead to the defeat of the USSR, it will not it will however deny them that as a key staging ground basically force the collapse of the eastern front of the Russian advance, it would cause issues, I will not deny that, but again I think this extension is worth because it basically forces everything westward to try to take back its prior holding, which leads to a nice defensive war, in which I think that the Japanese exploitation of the situation would come in handy. Ultimately my point about Moscow was solely in relation to how fucked the USSR was in 41 and how reliant on foreign aid they were to even push back against the Germans, namely in their armor and aircraft, due to most of their armor being charred husks again on the Polish border. Those 600 American and British tanks were quite useful that winter, but that's not something you hear much about. I also think that another critical factor here is how reliant they are on the gifts of weapons to fight via the Allies at this time frame and denying them the shipping lanes in the east to receive it can only be a good thing. It would also likely deny the British the usage of their far east fleets, but we can get into that if you want later. 3. Churchill The man being an unpopular drunkard might have helped in that regard of him not retaining power but fair enough, I am not here to argue for a fat dead politician. 4. On North African focus I don't believe it would result in that truth be told. Call me a skeptic but I think they'd bide their time and result to raiding and maybe upping their production of vessels to replace what they lost but Hewitt is sort of fucked with what he can field to safeguard the landing operation, the Atlantic Fleet is still suffering basically weekly bombings and strikings via the Italian, German air forces and submarines in transit just delivering supplies, its not as bad as it would was in 41 but its still busting up both their navy and merchant fleets. Then again I could be underestimating it, I am just looking at numbers and logistics after all, we are talking of matters of resolve and bravery. They could charge those beaches, but I don't know how Tunisia would play out truth be told. I think it would play out more or less like it did in our own timeline but I could be overlooking factors, I haven't made a study of this since I initially talked about it, Africa never was the fore point of my attention. 5. On Spain, Romania and the Middle East Its mostly reliant on them retaining control of Tunsia and retaking Tripoli and Libya tbh. Basically Iran remains a German ally, mass revolts and insurrection turn Syria and Iraq into bloodbaths for the French and British forces, forcing them to commit to putting down armed insurgency all the while the Germans are doing their damnedest to retake lost holdings, its sort of a cat and mouse game where the mouse is arming local rebels to basically act as shock troops to draw attention and bullets away. Romania is far easier, they were basically bros with Germany already come the rise of Antonescu, they were doing what I said they were doing for Germany before, why stop if the war suddenly has a massive reversal of fortune? Spain would have to be goaded into it, and as you should know Felix was planned to go down anyway due to the need for Gibraltar, I personally think that if Europe started to go the way of the Germans Franco would commit. But ultimately I do not see continued German success if they don't have it, it allows a lot of trade and troops to move through into the region and gives Germany a lot of bases and support in that part of the world, it would come in handy in repelling what would come later assuming the Americans did launch Torch, but as I said before, I'd point out that a series of uprisings in Syria, Iraq and Iran would force British attention to focus on them, in which I do think they would eventually be worn down, but overall its just a side show, smoke and mirrors, just like that entire front to begin with. Rommel had a half decent idea with that, it ate up a lot of British resources pushing that far into three separate countries while at the same time fighting the Germans, I think keeping that up is a key to victory. 6. Australia This comes from my prior point on New Guinea in which I think they'd use that to establish a long range strike base to bomb the Japanese home islands while the fleet was rebuilding which of course leads to a retasking of a sizable portion of the Japanese Navy, which I think leads to this alternative history's Leyte Gulf, just at Australia. I imagine this happening late 44 or early 45 and basically sees the shattering of what was left of the Japanese Navy and their collapse and fallback to the home islands and a restructuring for defensive war. I imagine they have more or less maintained an offensive to this point because that was all their fuel reserves allowed, more or less 25 months for full fleet operation, so either way, even if they win at this battle, their done unless if German ups its oil shipments, which actually might be a serious thing in this timeline if the Pacific and Indian go the way I picture them to go. o-o I think I have more or less a premise for a novel in just this conversation I had with a buddy a decade ago. 7. Personal musings and closing statements You have a very high opinion of the communists, I do admit that I think it overdone but its hard to argue with the horde they unleashed in 44 I suppose, I just have to remind myself that it wasn't built yet. Ultimately I think my musings back in the day were historically inspired, even somewhat plausible and based on accurate information but its mere conjecture, I think a lot of things would have to swing the Axis's way for it to survive the war, but I do think that the USSR could be ground down as I suggested, it could batter itself apart fighting two separate wars without foreign intervention. And that to my eye is the only way Germany wins that war, it has to defeat Russia, its the only thing that frees up all the needed resources, manpower and grants them access to the industry and infrastructure they need to rebuild and rearm in time. Not to mention it keeps Japan in the game longer. Ultimately the only method I see for Axis victory is something to this effect, Japan persists and is a blood magnet as the allies push east, Germany gets a nuke, Germany wins Russia, Germany bloodies the Allies so much they relent and meet for bargaining. All four would likely result in something to this effect but ultimately I do not see a conventional victory, hence why this premise makes use of a lot of unconventional warfare, namely the whole insurgency deal in the mid east. Personally I think that Japan winning Mid Way wouldn't turn the war around in and of itself but it could be a catalyst for that reversal of fortune. PS: Are you enjoying this conversation? and if they are, they're not going to be making massive breakthroughs against the pretty solid Soviet defenses in the region: mid '42 they had over a million soldiers in the region This is basically the only point I actually wanted to get to in this post because to be frank I am tired and as you said you'd do a more detailed response anyway. Yeah, they had a lot of troops and positions in the region, but you seem to ignore that at the very least in the case of Siberia transit through that is reliant on a single key point, the rail system there, which makes their response utterly predictable and even you gave the Japanese credit for being able to exploit the shit out of that sort of situation. Sure I am not saying this is going to be an easy or quick fight, in fact I only argue they'd be there to stop the Russians from transferring forces back to the West. Pushing more of their limited armor and air power to the East is really just more then I am expecting here to begin with personally. That said I disagree with the timetable a little bit because I think F would be abandoned regardless of the assertion otherwise because you had detractors of it because of Coral Sea just months prior, notably Nagumo, there is a reason I actually like this fellow, and while his position didn't get much steam beforehand I think he would be paid a hell of a lot more heed if Mid Way went the other direction, anyway back to the point, I think you could see a successful landfall in Russia at the earliest via September because they are going to have to retask and regroup their navy, and put together the army for the invasion and its supply convoy, and I expect you will have the Brits trying to stop them or at the least harry them part of the journey. Admittedly this by this point is pure fucking conjecture on my part, I just think that the Japanese could exploit the situation and use it to make a bit of annoyance of themselves. Furthermore I think this would stop a lot of those forces in Siberia from being transferred back which of course leads to an interesting situation where the Russians don't have the numbers in this alternative history to simply overwhelm the opposition like they did in our timeline in late 42 and early 43 as you said. I am not expecting a massive counter offensive to begin out of nowhere mind you, as I said originally this is just so Germany can turn its elite units around and get them back into the fight, not to mention hopefully get some of their fucking armor out of Romania where it is rotting for the retreat back to Germany in two years like in our timeline Of course this is basically just a forgotten army(its a broken one admittedly but its still roughly 300,000 soldiers by this point that are just sitting in Romania) Its factors like these, being the reinforcing of the front and the relief from the full fury of the Soviets that I think will prove the most advantage to the German advance. It at the very least gives them an operational timetable to reverse the situation because it puts the Union in a precarious position where it can no longer reliably ship in levy troops and armor at whim when required and has to make do with what limited equipment it has. Also I knew about the trucks, remember how I said that the Ruskies didn't have the mech in mechanized infantry earlier? I just get a small chuckle out of those poor land lease tanks that no one even remembers where there anymore.
|
|
inherit
2038
0
3,353
Verro
"Ha ha ha ha ha! Did I hurt you?"
1,949
November 2016
verro
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire
|
Post by Verro on Dec 12, 2016 1:29:41 GMT
...aaaaand we're arguing. We are?
|
|
inherit
2038
0
3,353
Verro
"Ha ha ha ha ha! Did I hurt you?"
1,949
November 2016
verro
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire
|
Post by Verro on Dec 12, 2016 6:24:55 GMT
I like reading creation myths myself. This is ultimately my problem when it comes to subscribing to any creation narratives though. Sure a God can create something where there once was nothing. But if there was really nothing, where did the God come from? Did it create itself? You run into a new set of problems. Chicken and egg school of thought. There is no answer to this. Chicken or the egg does have an answer though. If smart-ass answers are acceptable. Anyway, I don't want to derail this thread anymore than I already have. If you want to discuss this more shoot me a message.
|
|
inherit
The Pathfinder
638
0
Sept 22, 2017 23:01:09 GMT
9,422
Serza
Rendering planets viable since 2017
6,301
August 2016
serza
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
13152
|
Post by Serza on Dec 12, 2016 7:24:15 GMT
Whatever. Y'all have fun, I'm done here.
|
|
inherit
Elvis Has Left The Building
244
0
Sept 26, 2016 13:29:55 GMT
19,065
Arijon van Goyen
10,446
August 2016
kaiserarian
17300
|
Post by Arijon van Goyen on Dec 13, 2016 6:24:16 GMT
Something interesting
|
|
inherit
Elvis Has Left The Building
244
0
Sept 26, 2016 13:29:55 GMT
19,065
Arijon van Goyen
10,446
August 2016
kaiserarian
17300
|
Post by Arijon van Goyen on Dec 14, 2016 7:15:14 GMT
You might be interested in this movie:
|
|
inherit
Darth Dennis
111
0
Jul 27, 2022 16:20:32 GMT
9,146
masterwarderz
8,113
August 2016
mastermasterwarderz
19,824
|
Post by masterwarderz on Dec 14, 2016 7:28:50 GMT
You might be interested in this movie: o.o Hurtgen huh? My granddaddy, the who actually lived through the war was there, I went on a fairly in depth discussion about it back on TSG. Mostly it was just stuff I remember from what he told me of it, and information from his journals and what I read about the battle itself. I was slightly drunk however while I wrote it.
|
|
inherit
Elvis Has Left The Building
244
0
Sept 26, 2016 13:29:55 GMT
19,065
Arijon van Goyen
10,446
August 2016
kaiserarian
17300
|
Post by Arijon van Goyen on Dec 14, 2016 17:18:41 GMT
China used to be a major source of technological innovations (until 17th century when they started going downhill). This video is about their ancient technologies. Very impressive.
|
|
inherit
Darth Dennis
111
0
Jul 27, 2022 16:20:32 GMT
9,146
masterwarderz
8,113
August 2016
mastermasterwarderz
19,824
|
Post by masterwarderz on Dec 14, 2016 17:55:21 GMT
-Copied from the post I made on April 1st-2nd 2016 on TSG thread: Storytime with Warder
Part One
Alright let's down to the brass tacks, I haven't really started drinking yet so my command of the keyboard and memory is still good, that will likely change as the evening goes on though.
Anyway our story starts back in the year of 1944 in the closing months of World War Two. The series of battles mentioned here tonight are part of what is known as the West Wall Offensive or Siegfried Line Offensive. See back after the landing at Normandy, you had the Americans, Brits, Canadians, whatever coming in towards Germany right? They actually breach the border but before they can cruise into Berlin, they run into the Siegfried Line, a defensive measure that Hitler had built ages before the war even started. This all goes back to Aachen though, the history buffs among you will know that this historically the first German city to fall, so what do the Americans do? They set up a defensive position to prevent any German reinforcements, smart right? Well here comes my granddaddy's part of this tale Field Marshal Model was coming up from the Rur River with Army Group B, which if I recall correctly was made up of 7th army, 5th Panzer and a few other note worthy divisions, a few days ago the name of Osgiliath was dropped in relation to Winnipeg or Detroit, ironically this is quite apt for the battle of Hurtgen.
This would be the last major German victory of the war.
Model's final victory.
With the Siegfried Line already in place the Germans prepared for the push that would come as soon as the Americans and their allies could land enough forces. My grand father wrote this in his journal, he had a few but ultimately, very little of the war written here, but Hurtgen did warrant attention on September 25th when the Aachen Gap was hit by the American 1st infantry, apparently his division was laying mines and anti tank traps as ordered when they came under assault by a American patrol, looking for the forces that were harassing their units outside of the city. Thus this were his thoughts according to my understanding of his terrible handwriting. "Was shot at today, Americans attacking our position, held them off until we able call in artillery." This is a crucial detail, while the rest of the account dribbles off into inconsequential bullshit like thoughts of family, the shitty food etc, he mentions one of the key advantages of the line. Its mile after mile of inbuilt gunports, artillery trenches and barbed wire, concrete, steel and bulllets awaited anyone who tried to that that series of fortifications.
Basically all they had to do when the superior numbered Americans attacked was? Basically calling in a position to the spotters and watch as artillery bursts dropped from the line, that was it, later on it would become more hectic, the battles more intensive and bloody. But this was the prelude of what would be a battle that ultimately cost tens of thousands of lives on both sides, my Grand Father thankfully not among them. Anyway moving along, these skirmishes became increasingly more and more common until October rolled around the Americans committed fully, before this they had tried a few times to breach the line, get around it and destroy their logistical chains but they failed and and the terrain favored the defenders and it was mined all to hell to boot.
In October my grandfather was part of a detachment sent to hold nearby locations against the Americans as they tried to slog through the countryside and circumvent the defensive, his unit suffered moderate causalities and he seemed deeply disturbed by the fact the Americans kept coming regardless of how many of them were killed. Anyway a few tank battalions are sent up and on October 5th he is sent out to skirmish the Americans, and call in their positions for artillery, they pin down what I think was 9th infantry, but that's speculation on my part as records for both sides of this engagement are absolute shit. Anyway after fragging a few Shermans, and cutting up a few squads of huddling soldiers, they retreat back to their own defenses just as the Americans sent in the next wave, and this would go on for fucking months, they kept trying and trying to breach, but you can't circumvent some defenses, air strikes were implausible due to the dense tree coverage, bad weather and anti aircraft guns, tanks were ill suited for the terrain and the Germans had enough heavy munitions to scrap em anyway.
It would get worse in November when Model actually used his own armor, employing the 5th Panzer division to basically send entire divisions that were already overextended, exhausted and dying from constant machine gunfire, artillery bursts and small arms, with the American lines crumbling and the German's preparing for a major counter offensive, the Americans fell back on what always worked for them, numeric superiority and firepower. That would be the second phase of Operation Queen did I mention that? Oh it was a operation the Americans did to capture the banks of the Rhine and Rur and prevent reinforcement to the German heartland and splinter its defenders.
It was a colossal fuck up in my eye, mainly because of this very battle.
Anyway, I am going to cut off here, I await commentary while I munch on bacon, read these notes and sip my Jim Beam.
Feel no obligation however, I will continue my story time telling in perhaps a hour with or without commentary.
Part Two
Anyway picking up where I left off...now that my stomach issues have been resolved-We were at November and the Allies being pushed back by armor, well suffice to say the Americans were slightly peeved at the mounting losses and the fact that they were meeting much larger and more organized resistance then anything they had encountered since Normandy. Well to continue the story in November, first we need to look back and observe the state of the field as it were, under Model the 7th army at this time roughly at around 70,000 or so folks comprised primary into three infantry divisions, their assorted units and a paratrooper unit that was on loan from...I forget where, but anywho they were facing off against the rather well known Omar Bradley, whom I could dedicate entire threads to if I wanted to, but suffice to say the man was a decent general who commanded a much larger force in Germany then what Model had to counter with but due to the defensive nature of these conflicts, the numerics of the situation are ultimately worthless.
You could hold the Siegfried Line indefinitely with a well supplied force, but Omar knew this going into the conflict, after the severe losses taken trying to either cut around it to make the entire defensive wall pointless or splinter the germans by mounting mass attacks resulted in failure, Bradley had enough, he was going to move on to more critical areas and force the the entire structure to be irrelevant, this would begin the Roer dams offensive, which coincidentally where were also a viable path further into Germany, if they could secure those bridges across the river, they would be too far inland to be counter by the Siegfried line and they'd basically have a straight shot to Berlin with only a handful of other divisions in their way.
This would be where the Hurtgen campaign entered into its deadliest phase, Model knew exactly what Omar wanted, how he was going to do it, and how to negate it entirely, by positioning infantry divisions across the surrounding countryside, he created a emplacement of easily supportable outposts, in the nearby towns and cities, when the Americans tried to bypass the line and strike at the dams as ordered, they were engaged, and thus this heralded the bogging down of the campaign that is so well known in history, it is also good to note that at the start of this engagement, you only had sparse defense of the walls, and before Model's arrival it was likely that that numerically superior Americans could have taken the entire Siegfried Line without major losses, however those few defenders held on long enough for reinforcements under Model to arrive(this was before my Granddad got there note, he popped up with the repurposed 122nd infantry now the 85th infantry under Bechler who was a adjutant of Model for the campaign.
I'd like to say that my granddad was not new to war, by this point he had been actively fighting off and on for nearly four years, he took part in the invasion of Russia, was at Leningrad and only came to Germany when the Russian Offensive fell apart, Leningrad wasn't as...'graphic' as Stalingrad but it was still immensely heavy fighting that you can find volumes written about if you are so inclined, but anyway I just wanted to establish mentality, its far easier to write this sober I find anyway.
Moving back to the story of Hurtgen, I think sufficient context has been established-The Americans are still trying to bypass the primary defenses, German reinforcements are incoming, Omar is getting frustrated by his own logistical and supply train breaking down behind him leaving him in a uneviable position. Picture it in your head if you will, its fall, in southern germany, the rain is coming almost daily, there is a chill in the air, its muddy and grimy and miserable. Now add in combat to that, the smell of burning wood and gun powder, cooking flesh and blood, the rot of corpses, do you have that internal image yet? Visualize the carnage and apply the situation to your mind.
Good, that's as close to what you will ever get to this situation here, My grand was shifted around a lot due to his position in infantry, the Germans were doing Model's favorite kind of warfare, a kind that almost saw success at Kursk, a highly mobile and defensive action, they would set up positions, engage the enemy in surprise flanking or skirmishing actions and then pull back to reinforced lines, the Americans either had to pursue them into their well laid killzones ands ambushes or pull back, either way this tactic was seeing success, for every infantry unit sent into the gap, another unit would be pulled out missing the majority of its compliment. As it got further and further into November, the winter set in, frostbite, trenchfoot, pneumonia, illness affected both sides in the worsening conditions, as anyone who has studied world war two even a little bit can tell you...the Battle of the Bulge was fought in one of the worst winters in German history, and this was the prelude to that.
With mounting losses and no real headway being made on the offensive Bradley had no choice but to keep committing troops to the grinder, by November 20th the line had still yet to fall, no progress was being made, it was bogging down into the same trench based attrition warfare that the Great War is infamous for, but with German losses far lower then their own, and their own logistical chain actually supporting them better then the Americans for a change, it was a recipe for a perfect storm of death. All Model had to do was keep doing what he was doing, using emplaced guns, armor and artillery he carved into any American expedition into the forests, all the while this was giving the German military as a whole a much needed breather, while Patton's 3rd was rampaging further South, they ran into their own issues and the entire Western Offensive actually stalled outright.
This as everyone would know is where the seeds for Germany's last great offensive would be sewn, but that is enough for one installment into story time with Warder.
Feel free to ask questions, offer corrections, bleh bleh, I don't claim to know everything I just know what I have been told, what I have read, and what I have seen.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
2073
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2016 19:34:07 GMT
|
|
Heimdall
N6
∯ Interjector in Chief
Staff Mini-Profile Theme: Heimdall
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Anthem, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Origin: HeimdallX
Posts: 5,696 Likes: 12,995
inherit
∯ Interjector in Chief
279
0
1
12,995
Heimdall
5,696
August 2016
heimdall
Heimdall
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Anthem, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
HeimdallX
|
Post by Heimdall on Dec 14, 2016 19:58:16 GMT
If anything or anyone can craft matter from nothing it'd be a God. I like reading creation myths myself. This is ultimately my problem when it comes to subscribing to any creation narratives though. Sure a God can create something where there once was nothing. But if there was really nothing, where did the God come from? Did it create itself? You run into a new set of problems. As I understand it the dedicated theologians in Christianity at least concluded that our world is the temporal realm (bound by time) while the spiritual realm in which God and Jesus reign is not. I guess when you toss linear time out the window you don't really need to answer the "but where did God come from?" question.
|
|
inherit
2038
0
3,353
Verro
"Ha ha ha ha ha! Did I hurt you?"
1,949
November 2016
verro
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire
|
Post by Verro on Dec 15, 2016 7:01:34 GMT
I like reading creation myths myself. This is ultimately my problem when it comes to subscribing to any creation narratives though. Sure a God can create something where there once was nothing. But if there was really nothing, where did the God come from? Did it create itself? You run into a new set of problems. As I understand it the dedicated theologians in Christianity at least concluded that our world is the temporal realm (bound by time) while the spiritual realm in which God and Jesus reign is not. I guess when you toss linear time out the window you don't really need to answer the "but where did God come from?" question. They came up with this theory how exactly? You don't have to write me a book, just link a wiki page or something.
|
|
Heimdall
N6
∯ Interjector in Chief
Staff Mini-Profile Theme: Heimdall
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Anthem, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Origin: HeimdallX
Posts: 5,696 Likes: 12,995
inherit
∯ Interjector in Chief
279
0
1
12,995
Heimdall
5,696
August 2016
heimdall
Heimdall
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Anthem, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
HeimdallX
|
Post by Heimdall on Dec 15, 2016 9:55:29 GMT
As I understand it the dedicated theologians in Christianity at least concluded that our world is the temporal realm (bound by time) while the spiritual realm in which God and Jesus reign is not. I guess when you toss linear time out the window you don't really need to answer the "but where did God come from?" question. They came up with this theory how exactly? You don't have to write me a book, just link a wiki page or something. Honestly, my knowledge of this comes chiefly from a research paper I wrote a few years ago about the 14th century Italian scholar Marsilius of Padua's work, Defensor Pacis "The Defender of Peace", considered by some to be the most revolutionary political treatise of the time, in which he consistently refers to this world, and anything related to it, as the "temporal" realm distinct from the spiritual realm as a matter of accepted theological fact. My professor at the time indicated that this was the accepted view, that God was not bound by time, but I'm afraid I did not research it further. The chief focus of his work was political really, he was trying to use scripture to argue against the power of the papacy and that the pope had no "temporal" power because Jesus had not laid claim to "temporal" authority, indeed he argued that the church should be subordinate to the state in both secular and spiritual matters not the other way around. His themes and ideas about authority in the church arising from the whole body of the faithful and praise for democratic systems were quite influential on the Reformation. In context, his arguments related to a current power struggle between the Pope John XXII and Louis of Bavaria, the future Holy Roman Emperor Louis IV. The Pope felt that Louis' policies in northern Italy threatened the sovereignty of the Papal States and claimed broad papal authority over the empire. John XXII had excommunicated Louis and demanded that he relinquish his claim to the Holy Roman crown (He didn't, he largely ignored John, invaded Italy and appointed his own "antipope" to get his way) Unsurprisingly, Marsilius too was excommunicated. EDIT: John XXII, not XII. Also, Louis welcomed Marsilius into his court and appointed him imperial vicar, where he got to spend his days persecuting the papist supporters of John XXII to his heart's content and was ultimately made the archbishop of Milan, so it worked out well for him.
|
|
Princess Trejo
N3
A new hope, fool!
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
Posts: 457 Likes: 407
inherit
1927
0
Nov 15, 2016 21:25:56 GMT
407
Princess Trejo
A new hope, fool!
457
November 2016
halfdanthemenace
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
|
Post by Princess Trejo on Dec 15, 2016 18:59:58 GMT
|
|
inherit
Darth Dennis
111
0
Jul 27, 2022 16:20:32 GMT
9,146
masterwarderz
8,113
August 2016
mastermasterwarderz
19,824
|
Post by masterwarderz on Dec 15, 2016 19:36:06 GMT
|
|