inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
26,309
themikefest
15,636
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Sept 10, 2016 22:26:26 GMT
I like the drama, but I guess Hackett would do the right thing anyways. So I'm not going to argue. Hackett most likely would ignore them since he likes saying take it down/protect it no matter the cost The council had nothing to do with having the ship there. The Commander failed her duties by not getting the council to safety once onboard the destiny. Would they of listened to Shepard if there was an option to bring Shiala to the council. Or how about having a recording of the conversation between Sovereign and Shepard? I'm sure they would believe that if they believe the audio that Tali had.
|
|
inherit
Mad Hermit
870
0
Aug 11, 2016 16:33:09 GMT
2,898
straykat
2,503
Aug 10, 2016 11:00:20 GMT
August 2016
straykat
|
Post by straykat on Sept 10, 2016 22:37:58 GMT
I like the drama, but I guess Hackett would do the right thing anyways. So I'm not going to argue. Hackett most likely would ignore them since he likes saying take it down/protect it no matter the cost The council had nothing to do with having the ship there. The Commander failed her duties by not getting the council to safety once onboard the destiny. Would they of listened to Shepard if there was an option to bring Shiala to the council. Or how about having a recording of the conversation between Sovereign and Shepard? I'm sure they would believe that if they believe the audio that Tali had. Nah, Bioware were determined to make them dumbasses, no matter what. Hence, the Turian infamously mocks people in ME2, even after experiencing it.
|
|
inherit
1480
0
1,080
gothpunkboy89
2,311
September 2016
gothpunkboy89
|
Post by gothpunkboy89 on Sept 11, 2016 0:17:56 GMT
Because Shepard more then Hackett knows what the threat the Reapers are. Then there should not be an option to save the destiny, right? No there is still a choice to be made. Shepard is making a strategic call based on his superior knowledge of the Reapers compared to Hackett. Saving the largest ship created by the races of the galaxy is part of that. Not only because it could possibly help against the Reaper or at least against the Geth to keep them off the Alliance Fleet's back. But also if worst were to happen having the most powerful ship in the galaxy that isn't a Reaper would be very helpful to have in full working order.
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
26,309
themikefest
15,636
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Sept 11, 2016 0:29:03 GMT
No there is still a choice to be made. Shepard is making a strategic call based on his superior knowledge of the Reapers compared to Hackett. Like I said. Not saving the destiny is the right call to make. No reason to save it or have a choice to save it. So the destiny was not only created by the asari, but the turians, quarians, salarians, elcor and the other species as well? Didn't know that. Which it never does Which does a whole lot of nothing. I mean for a ship that is so powerful and not firing back at the enemy makes me wonder why it sticks around instead of leaving the battle to get the council to safety. Maybe its just a giant floating hunk of metal to give the illusion that it is powerful.
|
|
inherit
1480
0
1,080
gothpunkboy89
2,311
September 2016
gothpunkboy89
|
Post by gothpunkboy89 on Sept 11, 2016 3:00:16 GMT
No there is still a choice to be made. Shepard is making a strategic call based on his superior knowledge of the Reapers compared to Hackett. Like I said. Not saving the destiny is the right call to make. No reason to save it or have a choice to save it. So the destiny was not only created by the asari, but the turians, quarians, salarians, elcor and the other species as well? Didn't know that. Which it never does Which does a whole lot of nothing. I mean for a ship that is so powerful and not firing back at the enemy makes me wonder why it sticks around instead of leaving the battle to get the council to safety. Maybe its just a giant floating hunk of metal to give the illusion that it is powerful. In order 1. There is still valid reason to save it. 2. It is the largest most powerful war ship created by any race in the galaxy. 3. Actually it could. After all very odd how the 5th Fleet is left alone with Sovereign and no support from any Geth attacking and distracting them. 4. If I remember right if you choose to save it the 5th Fleet destroys at least 3-4 Geth ships. Even assuming they are only Frigates that would still be enough to cause problems. Particularly since the main cannon can only fire pointing right ahead and at that close range it would be at disadvantages. As well being the power house it would be the priority target to attack.
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
26,309
themikefest
15,636
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Sept 11, 2016 3:21:32 GMT
1. There is still valid reason to save it. For you there might be. For me, no. Its an asari ship built by the asari. No other species helped in creating, as you call it, the destiny as you believe The rest of the Citadel fleet took care of the geth That's a lame excuse and you know it. It did nothing to defend itself. It should never of been in that situation to begin with.
|
|
inherit
1480
0
1,080
gothpunkboy89
2,311
September 2016
gothpunkboy89
|
Post by gothpunkboy89 on Sept 11, 2016 5:20:23 GMT
1. There is still valid reason to save it. For you there might be. For me, no. Its an asari ship built by the asari. No other species helped in creating, as you call it, the destiny as you believe The rest of the Citadel fleet took care of the geth That's a lame excuse and you know it. It did nothing to defend itself. It should never of been in that situation to begin with. No there is valid reason you want a reason why part of the 5th Fleet should be sacrificed and that is a valid strategic reason why. You are then looking back after then fact and making a call based entirely on hindsight which is 20/20. It is the equivalent of us looking back at D Day and saying well the Allies should have done X instead of Y because the Germans did A, B and C. And yet it is the largest ship in the entire galaxy that isn't a Reaper or created by the Reapers. It is also a ship allied and given to the Citadel Fleet by the Asari Government and used to maintain protection to the Council and all other client races who take part of the galactic UN set up going on. For example if the Batarians started a war with not only Humanity but Elcor as well not only would the Turian Fleets respond (least for Volus) But the Council Fleets would respond as well since it was well beyond a singular conflict between just two races. And the Destiny Ascension would be at the front of the ranks because of it's imposing size and destructive capability. Last I checked the Destiny Ascension is a part of the Citadel Fleet. While it was shown without it's help they were still capable of repelling the attack that doesn't mean it is incapable of helping. Even using a few rockets would assist to take down crippled Geth ships. But again this is all 20/20 hind sight. You already know the outcome and are now coming back and claiming a move or action is wrong. We don't actually see any of the Citadel Fleets attacking besides the couple of ships that took shots at Sovereign and were bulldozed under. In any battle you want to take out the most powerful ship first because if you leave it alone it will do serious damage to your forces. And on top of that like ME3 before it veered off course with ME 2 the first game was all about how superior synthetic were to organics. The Geth being capable of pinning and taking down the largest warship created by an organic race in that cycle just enforces that set up they were doing.
|
|
inherit
Mad Hermit
870
0
Aug 11, 2016 16:33:09 GMT
2,898
straykat
2,503
Aug 10, 2016 11:00:20 GMT
August 2016
straykat
|
Post by straykat on Sept 11, 2016 5:29:47 GMT
Yeah, screw their destiny. That's a good enough reason to ignore it. Just on symbolic terms alone, I'm not going to do it.
Just like Maelon. I'm not propping up Krogan's destiny on the work of human torture.
There's several choices like this, and as much as I like Drew K, it's because of him. I'm almost glad he's gone sometimes. He was gonna do it again in the Dark Energy ending. His whole schtick was giving Shep and Humanity an air of sacrifice. That's why he named the Normandy what it was. Even the damn Red Stripe on the N7 suit was supposed to be the "blood of humanity shed for the galaxy".
This is the kind of shit that comes from armchair generals and old ladies waving their flags, after the fact. Not warriors. Most guys who threw themselves in the fire, during WW1 or 2, never wanted to be there. And it's probably a good reason why we haven't had something as bad since. You can't control soldiers like this anymore. They learned their dignity. And this whole idea of simply dying for people was mocked by some generals, like Patton. "The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his.” You can't prevent every tragedy, but just throwing people away for that very purpose is dumb.. but especially if they did it for the ungrateful or people just as capable of defending themselves.
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
26,309
themikefest
15,636
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Sept 11, 2016 5:48:50 GMT
No there is valid reason you want a reason why part of the 5th Fleet should be sacrificed and that is a valid strategic reason why. You are then looking back after then fact and making a call based entirely on hindsight which is 20/20. It is the equivalent of us looking back at D Day and saying well the Allies should have done X instead of Y because the Germans did A, B and C. Yeah. Yeah. You can't help yourself about posting analogies can you? Whatever. I don't care about the destiny. I don't care about the council. You starting to understand now? I choose to have the fleets focus on Sovereign. If you don't like that, tough luck. I have no idea what the above has to do with anything. You posted that not only asari created, built, the destiny, but other species did as well. So what are you trying to do? You realized that your post is wrong and trying to word your way around that to make it look like that you're not wrong? Last I checked I never said it wasn't? The only time it showed repelling the attack was when the geth and Sovereign first attacked. I'm talking about when its under fire before being destroyed. It shows turian ships. So once the destiny is destroyed, the rest of the citadel fleet destroy whatever geth ships are left. In any battle you want to use that power that you have to fire at the enemy and not stand there with you tentacle up your fifth-point-of-contact like the Commander of the destiny did.
|
|
aoibhealfae
N3
The stars, the moon, they have all been blown out
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
Posts: 811 Likes: 1,190
inherit
1157
0
1,190
aoibhealfae
The stars, the moon, they have all been blown out
811
Aug 23, 2016 19:19:58 GMT
August 2016
aoibhealfae
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by aoibhealfae on Sept 11, 2016 6:07:17 GMT
Its not just part of 5th fleet, its a decision that sacrifice one-third of Alliance's fleet for a single Asari dreadnought. You effectively crippled the entire military merely to make aliens more friendlier to humanity and save several alien politicians only for them to take reaper threats lightly until it bite them in the ass.
Shepard's job isn't to save everyone, its to defeat the reapers. The councilors aren't the absolute leaders of their people, they're merely ambassadors representing their own species and government, they are replaceable. You can still have Anderson as the human councilor to give you Spectre status back. In fact, none of the new councilors bear any grudge for refusing to save former council and they still make the same choices as their counterparts in ME3. Their powers are limited and confined to their own leaders.
Destiny Ascension is an acceptable loss but 1/3 of Alliance military isn't. Collectors already harvesting humans in the outer colonies. The Alliance barely have enough resources to protect everyone and barely can't do anything without risking war with the Terminus either. Then the reaper war happened and they have to fight the reapers and Cerberus and had to try and evacuate as much as civilians as they can and build the Crucible to boot. Shepard placing humanity's interest is not a show of prejudice against other races who do the exact thing for their own species. There's no real obligation to put Council Races as priority. They've been doing just fine for thousands of years without humanity's help.
|
|
inherit
Lightning Conductor
170
0
3,653
hammerstorm
1,656
August 2016
hammerstorm
Bottom
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
Hammerst0rm
|
Post by hammerstorm on Sept 11, 2016 12:12:50 GMT
I never really understood why the council had to board the Destiny. Every competent commander would know that the enemy will try to take out the biggest threat first. So why not have the council use a small and fast ship and let the Destiny be used as it should.
|
|
inherit
Mad Hermit
870
0
Aug 11, 2016 16:33:09 GMT
2,898
straykat
2,503
Aug 10, 2016 11:00:20 GMT
August 2016
straykat
|
Post by straykat on Sept 11, 2016 12:17:14 GMT
I never really understood why the council had to board the Destiny. Every competent commander would know that the enemy will try to take out the biggest threat first. So why not have the council use a small and fast ship and let the Destiny be used as it should. Probably because they believed their own bullshit and didn't take reports of Saren's "ship" seriously. As far as they're concerned, they have the most powerful ship. And they are Masters of the Universe to boot. Ho ho.
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
26,309
themikefest
15,636
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Sept 11, 2016 13:27:47 GMT
I never really understood why the council had to board the Destiny. Every competent commander would know that the enemy will try to take out the biggest threat first. So why not have the council use a small and fast ship and let the Destiny be used as it should. There was no reason for it. When the Commander of the destiny says abandon the Citadel, I get that. Trying to lure the enemy away from the Citadel. But when she says evacuate the council, there was no need. They were not in any immediate danger. And even if they were in danger, the bodyguards or security just take them to an underground bunker to protect them. If that won't work, get them to a shuttle and fly it away from the battle. In the second scene, it shows the destiny flying away from the Citadel. I would guess the council was onboard at that time. My first thought is its flying away taking the council to safety. That never happened. The next time the destiny isseen its being attacked by the geth. Why didn't the Commander get the council to safety? Its her responsibility to get them to safety not put them in harm's way. She failed.
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
26,309
themikefest
15,636
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Sept 11, 2016 13:44:03 GMT
The destroyer on Rannoch
When its first fired on, it falls over. At that point I believe its destroyed. As soon as the player gains control of Shepard, the reaper is able to right itself. The first time Shepard paints the target, it gets hit with numerous rounds and doesn't fall over like the first time. Why? It happens again three more times. Finally when Shepard can get on her tippy-toes and kiss the thing, it falls over. Of course Shepard should be dust at that point. The reaper has its moment to tell Shepard not being able to comprehend, then shuts down. I guess the reason is Bioware wanted to have Shepard get up close and personal with the thing and then have that renegade or paragon interrupt dialogue. Of course it didn't amount to anything.
If Kirrahe is alive in ME3 and Thane wasn't recruited or died in ME2, Kirrahe will say he's been assigned security detail for the councilor. If Thane is in ME3, Kirrahe won't make that comment. Why? How would anyone know that Thane would help the councilor during the coup? Had Kirrahe been with the councilor, the standoff with Kai Leng would've played out much differently or at least I would believe it would.
During the evac scene, if the player chooses the bottom right dialogue, Shepard will say 'you're in no condition to continue. Get to the medbay.' Now that's all fine and dandy, but when a squadmate "dies" during combat, Shepard just has to use medigel to have that squadmate continue to fight. I get that the what-the-crap evac scene is to explain how the squadmates get on the Normandy, but saying that your squadmate is in no condition to fight is not a good explanation.
During the Chronos mission, Hackett and Shepard talk to each other twice before facing Leng, but yet Shepard tells edi to get a hold of Hackett to let him know about the Citadel. Why couldn't Shepard use his/her comms?
After the coup, Traynor tells Shepard about Cerberus scientists that may help the crucible. When on the shuttle headed to the mission, Shepard will ask the squadmates if there is anymore information. All them say nearly the same thing that information is slim. Why didn't Shepard call Traynor over the comms to ask if there was anymore information?
|
|
inherit
376
0
Oct 17, 2016 19:19:36 GMT
3,474
opuspace
2,129
August 2016
opuspace
|
Post by opuspace on Sept 12, 2016 1:42:30 GMT
If Kirrahe is alive in ME3 and Thane wasn't recruited or died in ME2, Kirrahe will say he's been assigned security detail for the councilor. If Thane is in ME3, Kirrahe won't make that comment. Why? How would anyone know that Thane would help the councilor during the coup? Had Kirrahe been with the councilor, the standoff with Kai Leng would've played out much differently or at least I would believe it would. Also, why did Kirrahe just stand there cloaked in front of Leng? Why didn't he punch the guy, shoot him, knee him in the junk or something?! If Liara is the Shadow Broker, a Prothean expert for the Crucible and a combat teammate operating out in the field, how does anything get done? Actually, why are we risking her life in the first place for fighting since she's that valuable? Why did she move all her stuff on the Normandy without permission? Wouldn't she be safer with where Hackett stowed the Crucible? I say this because the Normandy has been fired at by a Reaper on Rannoch, risks its existence with the scanning, constantly heads towards the densest areas of Reaper held territory and nearly got stolen by Brooks. Why can't we send Garrus and Tali to Hackett for war assets? Why does every outfit EDI wears have to be some sort of thong? I get that fan service will exist, but even Miranda had a modest armor outfit to spare my eyes from up close butt crack shots.
|
|
dmc1001
N7
Biotic Booty
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Origin: ferroboy
Prime Posts: 77
Posts: 9,942 Likes: 17,687
inherit
Biotic Booty
1031
0
Nov 16, 2024 14:01:33 GMT
17,687
dmc1001
9,942
August 2016
dmc1001
Top
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
ferroboy
77
|
Post by dmc1001 on Sept 12, 2016 1:50:07 GMT
If Kirrahe is alive in ME3 and Thane wasn't recruited or died in ME2, Kirrahe will say he's been assigned security detail for the councilor. If Thane is in ME3, Kirrahe won't make that comment. Why? How would anyone know that Thane would help the councilor during the coup? Had Kirrahe been with the councilor, the standoff with Kai Leng would've played out much differently or at least I would believe it would. Also, why did Kirrahe just stand there cloaked in front of Leng? Why didn't he punch the guy, shoot him, knee him in the junk or something?! Why did the salaraian councilor uncloak in the first place? Not seeing the assassin can't possibly be a good enough reason given that he has been cloaked himself.
|
|
inherit
Mad Hermit
870
0
Aug 11, 2016 16:33:09 GMT
2,898
straykat
2,503
Aug 10, 2016 11:00:20 GMT
August 2016
straykat
|
Post by straykat on Sept 12, 2016 1:55:19 GMT
Also, why did Kirrahe just stand there cloaked in front of Leng? Why didn't he punch the guy, shoot him, knee him in the junk or something?! If Liara is the Shadow Broker, a Prothean expert for the Crucible and a combat teammate operating out in the field, how does anything get done? Actually, why are we risking her life in the first place for fighting since she's that valuable? Would've been nice, and gave me choices, instead of playing their movie. I'm obviously biased though, because I would've picked Jack. Liara could've been like Oracle in the DC/Batman series. They built a roster almost as large as a fighting game, but then took a shit on it...at the most crucial moment in the story.
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
26,309
themikefest
15,636
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Sept 12, 2016 2:19:01 GMT
Also, why did Kirrahe just stand there cloaked in front of Leng? Why didn't he punch the guy, shoot him, knee him in the junk or something?! The same reason why Thane didn't shoot Leng when he had the chance Glyph does all the work. I don't care about risking her life. Better question is why couldn't Shepard ask her who said it was ok to put that crap in Miranda's office. This goes back to what I ask in this thread. Why isn't Shepard able to ask questions in the trilogy? It would be better to send her to Hackett. She should've been sent there after Mars. Its funny that Ashley/Kaidan can be sent to Hackett, but not her. What could those two contribute that the asari couldn't for her not to be sent? They're ME1 characters. A better thing for Garrus is give Shepard the option to have him on the Normandy or not. He stays on Menae to help his species. As is, he contributes nothing to ME3. Tali is required to make peace though she didn't have to be on the roster for that too happen. Why couldn't Shepard have the option to tell the hologram to go back as a hologram or risk being thrown out the airlock? The reason why is so the clown can smile and he can bake a cake
|
|
inherit
1480
0
1,080
gothpunkboy89
2,311
September 2016
gothpunkboy89
|
Post by gothpunkboy89 on Sept 12, 2016 4:01:04 GMT
Well the entire logic you are using is based on knowledge of how events will unfold and basing it on that. Which isn't the same as someone not knowing what will happen and making choices on that. On top of the fact this is a game and unlike life is severely limited to what your choices can actually do. Choices can lead down a near infinite number of roads. In games you are pretty well restricted to a handful due to them having to program them.
And you don't have to like the council but don't complain about it not making sense because you choose to have a very narrow view of it.
Actually everything. Because I said it was the largest ship created by organic races in the galaxy. And like any number of debates involving gun control we have to go off on a 5 minute tangent because I dared to let it slip and call a rifle and assault rifle. And now you even though you are aware of what I mean must now go on a 5 minute complaint how it wasn't specific proper terminology. And so some how that singular slip up some how causes everything else said to be some how invalidated.
I think there is a reason for that but I won't go into it here but you seem to be falling into the same set up.
So you were not nit picking when I made the generalized statement that the Destiny Ascension was the largest warship created by organics? Oh wait based on your posts you were. Because I know you are familiar enough with the game to understand what I meant but you still felt the need to go out of the way and attempt to correct me.
Yes and that is a pretty big plot hole that the 5th Fleet completely ignores the Geth. They blow up the largest ship then magically the Citadel Fleet. That was previously being spanked like an unwanted red headed step child in walmart is capable of magically turning the tides and preventing that same Geth fleet from attacking the Alliance Fleet and preventing them from taking on Sovereign.
How ever the Alliance Fleet attacking the Geth and saving the Density Ascension it actually makes more logical sense how the Citadel Fleet could rally enough to push back the Geth Fleet and leave the remaining Alliance Fleet able to fully engage Sovereign without fear of the Geth attacking their rear.
Well to start we have no idea the actual number of Geth ships in initial attack. Secondly we have no idea how many ships were taken down between the initial fight and when Shepard gets the chance to unlock the Relay to call in the 5th Fleet. Even if it was only 30 minutes between the time the attack was launched and Shepard finally reached the Council Chambers a lot can happen. Third the entire set up of ME 1 was that the Geth were clearly superior to Organics. They for filled every Skynet trope possible. They were created by an organic race. Developed far faster then anticipated. When the plug was attempted to be pulled they rebelled and nearly wiped out the larger force of organics. Within the set up of ME 1 the Destiny Ascension having trouble with Geth ships is perfectly logical because how they set it up.
They didn't shift the Geth from evil AI uprising to misunderstood beings till ME 2.
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
26,309
themikefest
15,636
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Sept 12, 2016 5:02:28 GMT
And you don't have to like the council but don't complain about it not making sense because you choose to have a very narrow view of it. You're the one with the narrow view not realizing that folks have a different opinion from yours. Like others have proven, you're wrong Yes. You're wrong in what you posted. There you go. Trying to make it look like the other guy is wrong to cover up your mistake. That's just it. You weren't generalizing. You were posting something as fact when you are wrong in what you posted. So for people that understand what you meant, its ok for you to keep posting stuff that is wrong as long as others understand what you meant? Yeah. Sure. Is there a reason why you posted that? Ok. And if the Commander did her job, the council would not of been put in harms way This has to do with what?
|
|
inherit
Mad Hermit
870
0
Aug 11, 2016 16:33:09 GMT
2,898
straykat
2,503
Aug 10, 2016 11:00:20 GMT
August 2016
straykat
|
Post by straykat on Sept 12, 2016 5:11:21 GMT
Letting the soldiers die for the Council is basically announcing that the nearly ghetto status newcomers are the "everyone's bitch" race, who fall on their swords, for people far more experienced, fortunate, and capable than they are. There's no reason for it at all, other than moral ones. Not logical ones. And shaky moral reasons at that. You're falling on your sword for people who haven't even made the Volus a Council race all this time -- when they discovered the Citadel not long after the Asari. The very Asari who maintain dominance and keep Prothean secrets from everyone else to boot. Dyng for them is like being the battered girlfriend, who goes out of their way to defend some abusive idiot.
Hell, in the case of some, like Xilthra, it's not moral at all. It's for them to roleplay their hatred of humanity and headcanon some bizarre Asari dominance thing, which doesn't really have much to do with the game. I almost respect this more, since it's funny at least.
Unlike the Bible, the meek do not inherit the earth here. And if Drew K had fully gotten his way, the Meek would have inherited nothing at all. The whole human race would have gotten wiped out in his original ending, "for the good of all".
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
26,309
themikefest
15,636
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Sept 12, 2016 5:29:05 GMT
After the arms to the Citadel are opened, Hackett is heard saying Shepard. Shepard's response is 'what do you need me to do?'. Don't know why he/she would say that. Why not have Shepard say. "I read you Admiral' or 'Shepard here'?
Since Cerberus was trying to kill the female krogan, why didn't they use grenades along with shooting the container?
What was messed up about Shepard dying at the end of ME2, it required 2 squadmates to live. Why? It only takes one to help Shepard get into the ship. The other thing is if all squadmates are dead, and only the crew remains, why can't one of them help Shepard?
|
|
inherit
Mad Hermit
870
0
Aug 11, 2016 16:33:09 GMT
2,898
straykat
2,503
Aug 10, 2016 11:00:20 GMT
August 2016
straykat
|
Post by straykat on Sept 12, 2016 5:35:13 GMT
On a sidenote, what are those colony buildings called? It's on the tip of my tongue. Are they "pre-fabs"?
In any case, that's what I mean by ghetto status. We play a race who still uses prefabs. Yet we're required to do these grand acts of sacrifice and be major players. Give me a break.
|
|
aoibhealfae
N3
The stars, the moon, they have all been blown out
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
Posts: 811 Likes: 1,190
inherit
1157
0
1,190
aoibhealfae
The stars, the moon, they have all been blown out
811
Aug 23, 2016 19:19:58 GMT
August 2016
aoibhealfae
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by aoibhealfae on Sept 12, 2016 6:37:25 GMT
Prefab colonies are like Eden Prime, Feros, Horizon and Benning. Mindoir was a prefab colony when the Batarians raided it in 2170. Although in ME1, even if Eden Prime is in ruins, you can still see a lot of Arcology in the distance. (its easier to explain if you play Simcity :/) I imagine it somewhat like Ceres in The Expanse. Kinda reminds me of the HDB flats in Singapore except more futuristic. I wouldn't say it was ghetto since these area per space are expensive shit...
|
|
inherit
Mad Hermit
870
0
Aug 11, 2016 16:33:09 GMT
2,898
straykat
2,503
Aug 10, 2016 11:00:20 GMT
August 2016
straykat
|
Post by straykat on Sept 12, 2016 8:08:11 GMT
Kinda reminds me of the HDB flats in Singapore except more futuristic. I wouldn't say it was ghetto since these area per space are expensive shit... At least relatively ghetto, right? I mean, look at Illium. It's as nice as Thessia. It sparks envy even from Miranda. It seems like something humans aren't capable of quite yet.
|
|