inherit
1086
0
Jan 25, 2017 20:52:04 GMT
2,600
nanotm
a tidy workspace is the sign of a deranged mind
3,879
Aug 20, 2016 19:53:16 GMT
August 2016
nanotm
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
nanotm
nanotm
|
Post by nanotm on Mar 15, 2018 7:42:16 GMT
yes with a standard sight this is true becasue they have a divergent sight picture, not all sights work this way..... some sights use prisms and mirrors to change the sight picture so that you are the fat end of the cone and the aim point in the thin end (hence why you have to set the zero for each range, and move the sight along the weapon) You understood absolutely nothing what I said. I'll stop here, its hopeless. Aaaaaanyway, my favorite YT channel testing a shotgun load which I have loaded and used myself. Buck & Ball! Also bearing balls made of steel! no i understand the problem is you dont seem to understand that you can utilise better optics to overcome the problems created by ballistic trajectories... something snipers do so they always achieve a kill shot at longer ranges.... most people look at the problem as if its a fixed coefficient its not if you account for the variables, which is something that amateurs never seem to get
|
|
inherit
The Pathfinder
638
0
Sept 22, 2017 23:01:09 GMT
9,372
Serza
Rendering planets viable since 2017
6,275
August 2016
serza
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
13152
|
Post by Serza on Mar 15, 2018 9:26:38 GMT
Da! Bce xopowo! Seriously, though, we never changed until BREN and 5.56. Also the battle plans for war in Europe were kind of a dick move on your country's part, to be honest... I can tell what I know, but I won't do so if it starts an argument. I'm a little curious but I'd rather not fight over it I've handled/shot 58s before and they're very nice. You could probably have just changed them to NATO ammo and still had a really good, light rifle. You know who else is a fan? Manca from Polenar Don't really know anything about the BREN, though. Looks kind of like SCAR but not overpriced. Eh, it's not that important these days anyway. Buuut... I may or may not watch Polenar frequently... It's good stuff, they don't do just eyecandy.
|
|
inherit
1301
bobgoodheart1st mattig89ch
0
8,824
mattig89ch
5,679
August 2016
mattig89ch
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire
mattig89ch
|
Post by mattig89ch on Mar 15, 2018 12:36:44 GMT
|
|
inherit
Spirit talker
764
0
16,335
Giant Ambush Beetle
9,261
August 2016
giantambushbeetle
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Giant Ambush Beetle on Mar 15, 2018 14:14:13 GMT
]no i understand the problem is you dont seem to understand that you can utilise better optics to overcome the problems created by ballistic trajectories... something snipers do so they always achieve a kill shot at longer ranges.... most people look at the problem as if its a fixed coefficient its not if you account for the variables, which is something that amateurs never seem to get Optics, trajectories and the entire hardware have nothing to do with talking about the accuracy potential you have reached. You claim to have shot a 1'' group at 500 meters which is smaller than what the record holders shoot. I tried to explain the accuracy potential you reached at various distances with MOA time and time again, but you do not even understand the simplest formulas. Let me explain it in the simplest way possible: you claim to have reached nearly twice the accuracy than the worlds best shooters, and that with vastly inferior equipment. Thats a total fairy tale if I have ever seen one. And thats it.
|
|
inherit
1301
bobgoodheart1st mattig89ch
0
8,824
mattig89ch
5,679
August 2016
mattig89ch
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire
mattig89ch
|
Post by mattig89ch on Mar 15, 2018 15:50:05 GMT
Interesting rifle:
Not sure I'd want it in a survival situation. But its still an interesting concept. If it was chambered in .22 LR hornet (I think thats the correct caliber name, basically .22 magnum), then I think that would work better.
|
|
inherit
Mr. Rump
46
0
Apr 28, 2024 20:19:57 GMT
8,986
Lavochkin
6,786
August 2016
lavochkin
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Lavochkin on Mar 15, 2018 21:19:17 GMT
Here's something that separates women from the girls, the S&W .500 magnum.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
1002
0
May 19, 2024 12:48:23 GMT
Deleted
0
May 19, 2024 12:48:23 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2018 23:58:19 GMT
I'm a little curious but I'd rather not fight over it I've handled/shot 58s before and they're very nice. You could probably have just changed them to NATO ammo and still had a really good, light rifle. You know who else is a fan? Manca from Polenar Don't really know anything about the BREN, though. Looks kind of like SCAR but not overpriced. Eh, it's not that important these days anyway. Buuut... I may or may not watch Polenar frequently... It's good stuff, they don't do just eyecandy. I admit I'm such a nerd I follow their Paetreon I love that one , though I'm still waiting to see what happens after the kompot! another hilarious one of course they do good informative stuff too.
|
|
inherit
Darth Dennis
111
0
Jul 27, 2022 16:20:32 GMT
9,146
masterwarderz
8,113
August 2016
mastermasterwarderz
19,824
|
Post by masterwarderz on Mar 16, 2018 0:07:54 GMT
The information here is pretty good, I personally rock a shoulder rigging so knowing how to properly and quickly free the firearm in the event of need of it is rather critical.
Much as people harp on them for catching and potentially getting the gun stuck in em, I love the quick and easy access, I personally clock the incidents as them either purchasing or constructing an ill fitting holster(this is a problem for a lot of systems, not just shoulder rigs), or otherwise user error and performing the wrong drawing motion.
|
|
inherit
Darth Dennis
111
0
Jul 27, 2022 16:20:32 GMT
9,146
masterwarderz
8,113
August 2016
mastermasterwarderz
19,824
|
Post by masterwarderz on Mar 16, 2018 0:16:17 GMT
|
|
inherit
Spirit talker
764
0
16,335
Giant Ambush Beetle
9,261
August 2016
giantambushbeetle
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Giant Ambush Beetle on Mar 16, 2018 0:33:26 GMT
If I was rich....well buying a real minigun surely beats 99% of what most of the idiot people who have access to lots of money buy.
|
|
inherit
Darth Dennis
111
0
Jul 27, 2022 16:20:32 GMT
9,146
masterwarderz
8,113
August 2016
mastermasterwarderz
19,824
|
Post by masterwarderz on Mar 16, 2018 0:42:18 GMT
If I was rich....well buying a real minigun surely beats 99% of what most of the idiot people who have access to lots of money buy. I agree, having this, along with a home custom built to my specific specifications, a private jet and a few other toys would just about have me set on the whole trappings of wealth shtick
|
|
inherit
Spirit talker
764
0
16,335
Giant Ambush Beetle
9,261
August 2016
giantambushbeetle
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Giant Ambush Beetle on Mar 16, 2018 0:49:52 GMT
If I was rich....well buying a real minigun surely beats 99% of what most of the idiot people who have access to lots of money buy. I agree, having this, along with a home custom built to my specific specifications, a private jet and a few other toys would just about have me set on the whole trappings of wealth shtick Just don't forget the private shooting range! If I had the cash one of the first things I'd do is to build a very large beautiful outdoor shooting range with dynamic stages as well as with static long range rifle courses. Also historic stages just for fun, WWI trench fights which would be a mix of out-of-trench long range silhouette shooting and close quarter dynamic trench raid stages. Heck, I'd even put a few buildings on it to simulate urban fighting. It would be a huge playground. With guns. Bah why am I not rich, my ideas totally blow those of most rich people out of the water like boats in an underwater nuclear bomb test. Me not being rich is one of the biggest flaws of this plane of existence.
|
|
inherit
3
0
13,409
Pearl
optics cuck
3,898
August 2016
pearl
Top
Mass Effect Trilogy, KOTOR, Mass Effect Andromeda
FatherOfPearl
FatherOfPearl
7,305
3,002
|
Post by Pearl on Mar 16, 2018 7:30:04 GMT
Not sure if this is a repost, but the more I see of Ian, the more I like him.
|
|
inherit
The Pathfinder
638
0
Sept 22, 2017 23:01:09 GMT
9,372
Serza
Rendering planets viable since 2017
6,275
August 2016
serza
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
13152
|
Post by Serza on Mar 16, 2018 7:33:20 GMT
Eh, it's not that important these days anyway. Buuut... I may or may not watch Polenar frequently... It's good stuff, they don't do just eyecandy. I admit I'm such a nerd I follow their Paetreon I love that one , though I'm still waiting to see what happens after the kompot! another hilarious one of course they do good informative stuff too. Presumably, he will rush B. I very much like their videos on handgun malfunctions. Informative, though in the tactical sense only. If I told an instructor during license tests that I'm gonna tap rack bang on a malfunction, he'd tell me to piss off. But in a fight, you won't have thirty seconds to keep the firearm pointed in a safe direction and wait for a potential delayed shot. You need to get that thing up and running in as few seconds as possible. The information here is pretty good, I personally rock a shoulder rigging so knowing how to properly and quickly free the firearm in the event of need of it is rather critical. Much as people harp on them for catching and potentially getting the gun stuck in em, I love the quick and easy access, I personally clock the incidents as them either purchasing or constructing an ill fitting holster(this is a problem for a lot of systems, not just shoulder rigs), or otherwise user error and performing the wrong drawing motion. I can see an advantage of a shoulder holster, actually. Hip and index carry both have the weapon in weird locations you would keep little else than a gun in. Shoulder holsters, on the other hand, has you reach in a place a pocket with a wallet could easily be, retaining the element of surprise that much longer, IMHO. And we all know that element of surprise is a great thing to have. I sure love the thing.
|
|
inherit
1301
bobgoodheart1st mattig89ch
0
8,824
mattig89ch
5,679
August 2016
mattig89ch
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire
mattig89ch
|
Post by mattig89ch on Mar 16, 2018 14:46:33 GMT
The information here is pretty good, I personally rock a shoulder rigging so knowing how to properly and quickly free the firearm in the event of need of it is rather critical. Much as people harp on them for catching and potentially getting the gun stuck in em, I love the quick and easy access, I personally clock the incidents as them either purchasing or constructing an ill fitting holster(this is a problem for a lot of systems, not just shoulder rigs), or otherwise user error and performing the wrong drawing motion. I can see an advantage of a shoulder holster, actually. Hip and index carry both have the weapon in weird locations you would keep little else than a gun in. Shoulder holsters, on the other hand, has you reach in a place a pocket with a wallet could easily be, retaining the element of surprise that much longer, IMHO. And we all know that element of surprise is a great thing to have. I sure love the thing. If I ever get to carry, I'd prefer a shoulder holdster. I just prefer the look. IMO hip holsters are like trying to re-capture the old west. Shoulder holsters are the more modern, and I think more sleek too. Also: A lesser known, but still up and coming channel.
|
|
inherit
Mr. Rump
46
0
Apr 28, 2024 20:19:57 GMT
8,986
Lavochkin
6,786
August 2016
lavochkin
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Lavochkin on Mar 16, 2018 17:21:51 GMT
I usually have my LCP2 in my right thigh pocket in my cargo pants when I conceal carry (or in my waist pocket if the pants im wearing don't have those) with my spare mags in my left rump pocket. My G19 OTOH goes holstered on my right hip.
|
|
inherit
Darth Dennis
111
0
Jul 27, 2022 16:20:32 GMT
9,146
masterwarderz
8,113
August 2016
mastermasterwarderz
19,824
|
Post by masterwarderz on Mar 16, 2018 18:45:11 GMT
I agree, having this, along with a home custom built to my specific specifications, a private jet and a few other toys would just about have me set on the whole trappings of wealth shtick Just don't forget the private shooting range! If I had the cash one of the first things I'd do is to build a very large beautiful outdoor shooting range with dynamic stages as well as with static long range rifle courses. Also historic stages just for fun, WWI trench fights which would be a mix of out-of-trench long range silhouette shooting and close quarter dynamic trench raid stages. Heck, I'd even put a few buildings on it to simulate urban fighting. It would be a huge playground. With guns. Bah why am I not rich, my ideas totally blow those of most rich people out of the water like boats in an underwater nuclear bomb test. Me not being rich is one of the biggest flaws of this plane of existence. That would of course be a portion of my private dream home, it would be a three story manor based off a classic alpine villa. The backyard would of course be a portion of the estate assigned for range shooting. Along with a lovely indoor range in the second story basement sub-level. ...I admit my dream home would probably resemble something out of 60s James Bond >_>
|
|
inherit
1301
bobgoodheart1st mattig89ch
0
8,824
mattig89ch
5,679
August 2016
mattig89ch
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire
mattig89ch
|
Post by mattig89ch on Mar 16, 2018 18:51:10 GMT
If nobody minds, I'm just going to leave this here:
<iframe src="https://www.facebook.com/plugins/video.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fyaliberty%2Fvideos%2F10155449307660197%2F&show_text=0&width=476" width="476" height="476" style="border:none;overflow:hidden" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" allowFullScreen="true"></iframe>
|
|
inherit
1086
0
Jan 25, 2017 20:52:04 GMT
2,600
nanotm
a tidy workspace is the sign of a deranged mind
3,879
Aug 20, 2016 19:53:16 GMT
August 2016
nanotm
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
nanotm
nanotm
|
Post by nanotm on Mar 16, 2018 18:54:12 GMT
]no i understand the problem is you dont seem to understand that you can utilise better optics to overcome the problems created by ballistic trajectories... something snipers do so they always achieve a kill shot at longer ranges.... most people look at the problem as if its a fixed coefficient its not if you account for the variables, which is something that amateurs never seem to get Optics, trajectories and the entire hardware have nothing to do with talking about the accuracy potential you have reached. You claim to have shot a 1'' group at 500 meters which is smaller than what the record holders shoot. I tried to explain the accuracy potential you reached at various distances with MOA time and time again, but you do not even understand the simplest formulas. Let me explain it in the simplest way possible: you claim to have reached nearly twice the accuracy than the worlds best shooters, and that with vastly inferior equipment. Thats a total fairy tale if I have ever seen one. And thats it.just so you dont totally miss the problems of your argument there are consistent records of people killing with single shots at distances in excess of 2000 meters with standard issue weapons, according to your logic these people consistently hitting targets the size of a human head (around 10") are performing at better than 0.5" moa, in spite of the fact the weapons they use are declared as 0.8" moa at 100 meters, and lets totally ignore the fact that someone performed a "one shot one kill" level of efficiency twice in under a minute at a range of 2474meters in combat with one of these designated 0.8" moa rifles...... how is it possible that someone is achieving consistent results of fairy tale accuracy ???? oh perhaps its a combination of innate ability familiarity with the hardware and ballistic compensation to mitigate known factors that generate the arc from flat that you seem to think is mitigatable and thus means theres no way to have accuracy of 1" over a 500 meter distance with a designated marksman weapon....... lets totally ignore a few of the key factors effecting anyone moving to a competition range .. location, direction, flux field density differential (proximity to lay lines), change in elevation, atmospheric change, area composition change....all of which effect performance on the day far more so than most people think they do
|
|
inherit
Spirit talker
764
0
16,335
Giant Ambush Beetle
9,261
August 2016
giantambushbeetle
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Giant Ambush Beetle on Mar 16, 2018 21:23:00 GMT
just so you dont totally miss the problems of your argument there are consistent records of people killing with single shots at distances in excess of 2000 meters with standard issue weapons. according to your logic these people consistently hitting targets the size of a human head (around 10") are performing at better than 0.5" moa, in spite of the fact the weapons they use are declared as 0.8" moa at 100 meters, Yes, and there are even record shots at over 4000 yards. And many have one thing in common: it took those people several shots to get even close to the target, making one or two hits. The funny thing is, at 2000 meters you barely see anything even with the best optics, let alone human targets, and you cant really shoot at anything you cant see. You'd know this if you had any kind of experience with precision optics. Get a good optic and try to spot people at those ranges, the cross hair itself is bigger than a human at those ranges. Have fun making a well aimed shot if your reticle covers the target entirely. Those shooters always admit they were firing in the general area where they suspected the target, or shot into a large crowd of people because they could not really see individuals, and one of several shots fired eventually hit something. The Canadian sniper who took out the machine gunner at over one Mile shot at a crowd of enemies and didn't even know that he knocked out the insurgent until the Marines told him he hit him. He simply could not see shit at that distance with his optics, he even ran out of adjustment and used a crude guess of a holdover. It took him 10 shots if I recall correctly. There are many more cases where none of those shots hit, but you never hear of them, you only hear of the few lucky ones, its all over the news. For a reason, they rarely ever happen. And this has nothing to do with consistent accuracy, accuracy is being able to hit a single target constantly and reliably at any given circumstances. Like shooting very small groups after groups. Lobbing several rounds at ridiculous distances at multitudes of targets and eventually hitting one of them after 10 or more shots is not really accuracy. And 2 shots is not consistent in any kind or form. I once managed to split a dandelion at 100 meters, and hit a fly that was sitting on my target, if such accuracy was achievable reliably I would win every competition ever which requires me to shoot groups of 5-12 rounds per target. But in this case it was just the right cartridge, under perfect conditions - in other words, luck met skill. Even if I was the best shooter in the world, such accuracy is mechanically not achievable, not repeatedly. There is a reason you have to shoot several groups at competitions, everyone manages to make an incredible shot once in a while, but this has nothing to do with accuracy. Thats why we shoot groups, to prove that we weren't just lucky but that we are able to shoot repeatedly such small groups. Yes you are right, the shooting conditions of the record holders were way better than those more unpredictable conditions you fired your world record level 1'' group at. But how does this help to prove your point, when in fact it makes your claim even more ridiculous? I say it again, your 1'' group at 500 is completely ridiculous as it is beyond world record holder level, allegedly achieved with far inferior equipment. If instead of a group you hit a very small target at that distance I'd say you are a very good shot and had a lot of luck that day, awesome! - but to claim to have made repeated hits at that distance into a 1'' circle is a complete and utter fairy tale.
|
|
inherit
1086
0
Jan 25, 2017 20:52:04 GMT
2,600
nanotm
a tidy workspace is the sign of a deranged mind
3,879
Aug 20, 2016 19:53:16 GMT
August 2016
nanotm
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
nanotm
nanotm
|
Post by nanotm on Mar 16, 2018 22:01:30 GMT
just so you dont totally miss the problems of your argument there are consistent records of people killing with single shots at distances in excess of 2000 meters with standard issue weapons. according to your logic these people consistently hitting targets the size of a human head (around 10") are performing at better than 0.5" moa, in spite of the fact the weapons they use are declared as 0.8" moa at 100 meters, Yes, and there are even record shots at over 4000 yards. And many have one thing in common: it took those people several shots to get even close to the target, making one or two hits. The funny thing is, at 2000 meters you barely see anything even with the best optics, let alone human targets, and you cant really shoot at anything you cant see. You'd know this if you had any kind of experience with precision optics. Get a good optic and try to spot people at those ranges, the cross hair itself is bigger than a human at those ranges. Have fun making a well aimed shot if your reticle covers the target entirely. Those shooters always admit they were firing in the general area where they suspected the target, or shot into a large crowd of people because they could not really see individuals, and one of several shots fired eventually hit something. The Canadian sniper who took out the machine gunner at over one Mile shot at a crowd of enemies and didn't even know that he knocked out the insurgent until the Marines told him he hit him. He simply could not see shit at that distance with his optics, he even ran out of adjustment and used a crude guess of a holdover. It took him 10 shots if I recall correctly. There are many more cases where none of those shots hit, but you never hear of them, you only hear of the few lucky ones, its all over the news. For a reason, they rarely ever happen. And this has nothing to do with consistent accuracy, accuracy is being able to hit a single target constantly and reliably at any given circumstances. Like shooting very small groups after groups. Lobbing several rounds at ridiculous distances at multitudes of targets and eventually hitting one of them after 10 or more shots is not really accuracy. And 2 shots is not consistent in any kind or form. I once managed to split a dandelion at 100 meters, and hit a fly that was sitting on my target, if such accuracy was achievable reliably I would win every competition ever which requires me to shoot groups of 5-12 rounds per target. But in this case it was just the right cartridge, under perfect conditions - in other words, luck met skill. Even if I was the best shooter in the world, such accuracy is mechanically not achievable, not repeatedly. There is a reason you have to shoot several groups at competitions, everyone manages to make an incredible shot once in a while, but this has nothing to do with accuracy. Thats why we shoot groups, to prove that we weren't just lucky but that we are able to shoot repeatedly such small groups. Yes you are right, the shooting conditions of the record holders were way better than those more unpredictable conditions you fired your world record level 1'' group at. But how does this help to prove your point, when in fact it makes your claim even more ridiculous? I say it again, your 1'' group at 500 is completely ridiculous as it is beyond world record holder level, allegedly achieved with far inferior equipment. If instead of a group you hit a very small target at that distance I'd say you are a very good shot and had a lot of luck that day, awesome! - but to claim to have made repeated hits at that distance into a 1'' circle is a complete and utter fairy tale. yeah of course you must be right because you cannot achieve a good result.... never mind that some folks (even really good top of the line competition shooters) admit that they can regularly score way better in practice at home than wherever they happen to be doing a competition at....
|
|
inherit
Spirit talker
764
0
16,335
Giant Ambush Beetle
9,261
August 2016
giantambushbeetle
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Giant Ambush Beetle on Mar 16, 2018 23:06:24 GMT
yeah of course you must be right because you cannot achieve a good result.. HAH, I've been shooting precision rifles for over 10 years now, I'm not amazing but good. Here is some pictures of my groups from various rifles, because you know, they really happened. At 100 meters: 5 shots 100 meters, 300WM 240 grain SMK (High because this was actually an hand load ammo test). This is 0.5 MOA. And this is a group. Fun shots at various small objects, a coke bottle lid with the CZ 452 .22lr, at 100 meters. Again the .22lr 452 CZ at 100 meters, 0.7 MOA group: .300 WM ammunition test, 190 grain SMK, 150 meters, 5 shots, my own handload .22lr 452 against coins, I think it was 90 meters. Even recovered one bullet from the dirt. Left coin is from Iceland BTW. Troy Par .223 at 150 meters, 20mm group. And I have tons more. Practice at home? Precision shooters shoot at several hundred meters, that must be big home. Competition shooters usually have very similar results at the competition as in practice, at that accuracy level there is not much variation as keeping variation as small as possible is the name of the game. If you have suddenly vastly better results in practice than in competition something is very off, or you are a beginner. Its like with formula 1 race drivers, in practice they do not have vastly different lap times than in the actual race, and if they do they are either rookies or there is something wrong with the car. To wrap it up, you are just angry that somebody called out on your BS. I already turned a blind eye on you when you claimed to have deadlifted 250kg without any kind of formal training, which you said was a '' typo'' later. Yeah right. Weight lifting and precision shooting are hobbies I have been rigorously performing for a long time, so don't even try to BS me in those areas. Have some dignity and give it a rest
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
9520
0
May 19, 2024 12:48:23 GMT
Deleted
0
May 19, 2024 12:48:23 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2018 0:19:08 GMT
Just good? I'd love to see your definition of amazing. Those groups are nothing short of spectacular. Lets just say I would be mightily afraid of you in a gun fight.
|
|
inherit
Spirit talker
764
0
16,335
Giant Ambush Beetle
9,261
August 2016
giantambushbeetle
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Giant Ambush Beetle on Mar 17, 2018 1:12:48 GMT
Just good? I'd love to see your definition of amazing. Those groups are nothing short of spectacular. Lets just say I would be mightily afraid of you in a gun fight. Thanks! Well, who knows if I was still good in the heat of battle! Here is one of my precise particle accelerators, this is my .300 Winchester Magnum Savage 110 BA, not a recent pic though, I changed the scope to a Leupold. This is still with the old Meopta R1. Savage makes excellent rifles which are on par with many of the more expensive manufacturers. I highly recommend them. I'm also very happy with the caliber, despite being a belted cartridge the 300WM is surprisingly easy to load for. I tried multiple hand loads and all of them were really good right from the start, its not a diva at all! Many of my buddies had a much harder time to find a good load in their 6.5's, 7mm's and .338's. Or maybe the rifle is very forgiving?
|
|
vometia
N2
Argh my head
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
Origin: vometia
XBL Gamertag: vometia
Posts: 111 Likes: 194
inherit
9012
0
Mar 31, 2018 11:59:20 GMT
194
vometia
Argh my head
111
Jul 15, 2017 19:26:21 GMT
July 2017
vometia
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
vometia
vometia
|
Post by vometia on Mar 18, 2018 10:57:51 GMT
There's a great mod for Fallout 4 that features that beauty. Oddly enough I have never actually fired anything with the magazine in the back like that. Definitely want to fire off a few rounds with something featuring that. The main difference is that you really feel the action working and cycling right under your head, it gets transferred through your cheek, you feel the springs working. And one more thing you have to be careful about is to press the stock into your shoulder, since more weight is in the butt of the rifle as in normal layout rifles it slips more easily when firing. Other than that, they are short, handy, swing faster which works better for quick target acquisition / leading a moving target. Bullpups are el neato. I haven't fired anything in that layout either. Pity, I think I'd probably get on quite well with it as I never got on with the forward centre of gravity and long barrel swaying about. Closest I've come to that is a Sterling SMG where the mag is right above the trigger guard which, combined with the comparatively short barrel, was a much more agreeable weight-distribution and layout for me. I dare say I would've been a better shot with e.g. an SA80 than the likes of the SLRs and Lee Enfields I actually used. Well let's face it, I couldn't've been much worse.
|
|