inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 22, 2017 12:14:18 GMT
I don't agree with the whole "companions need x games to grow" thing. Mordin was awsome right from the start and same goes for Legion, Jack or Thane. IMO practically every character presented for the first time in ME2 was more interesting and unique than what we get in MEA, including NPC's like Illusive Man or EDI. ME1 was story driven ME2 was character driven ME3 was a successful attempt to do both (if you don't count last 20 minutes) MEA is neither. It was supposed to be "exploration driven", and it's successful at it if you're a fan of MMO-like grindy quests in a single player game. this would actually make for a good discussion in a separate thread as how people interpret characters and story can be quite diverse and subjective. I would disagree with you on ME:A though as the game did give me the feeling of exploring new environments and I'm not a fan of what people deem "MMO-like Grindy quests" For myself Legion didn't really click with me until ME3, though that may be because I normally don't get him until near the end game so I have never had him in my team for long. Samara was a bit dry (due to how she sees things as black and white) but in ME3 her character really stood out when she "flinched" as they say in game. For the other side Drack and Vetra feel very well done as I got a good sense from each of them throughout the game, my main criticism may be that the pacing is a little stilted as some events are tied to main story plots and with how open the game world is it could be some time between those moments depending on how you play the game.
|
|
inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 22, 2017 11:53:52 GMT
Animations is the only thing on this list that is a legit criticism that is being addressed. The Empty open world I call bullshit as there were several times I would look at the world maps of the different planets and need several minutes to decide on what to do because of all the quest markers, then there were a number of hidden things I found to do on the map that were not marked or never given an actual quest. The characters not being as engaging I don't know is a fair assessment because most people are comparing characters that have shown up in one game and are just starting to be fleshed out to characters we all have been with for the span of three games plus several DLC's and have been given plenty of moments to be expanded on. Even in Dragon Age the most memorable characters are the ones that have been involved in at least two games. Storytelling, like many things, is very subjective however you don't expand on it so I can't really discuss this because the way you have it just sounds like you are saying it's weak just because you say so, you need to give a reason to engage in a proper discussion (I don't accept the SJW thing as a proper discussion because, as you said, it's just something people use as a quick scapegoat. Frankly I would say the story is good in smaller chunks but it doesn't quite fit together as a whole though that may just be due to the different style of game it is compared to the previous games (open world Vs. more linear structure). If you don't agree with someone, just say you don't agree. But don't say someone's opinions isn't legit just because you don't agree with it. Never said his opinions wasn't legit (I even agreed with him on one). I just stated that some of the comparisons were not really fair and that he needed to expand on the story reason (which even the poster sorta admitted to) It would be better that people just don't assume things.
|
|
inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 22, 2017 11:33:43 GMT
This has happened to me about 50% of the time. Had instances were it returned to fullscreen without issue, but then had other times where I just hit Alt-Enter.
|
|
inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 22, 2017 11:29:38 GMT
Holy shit I can't. IF MEA sold poorly what it got criticized on was 1) animations 2) vast empty open worlds 3) a cast of characters that wasn't as engaging as previous Bioware fare 4) a weak story yet somehow that is attributable to SJWs. I suppose I shouldn't be surprised by scapegoating any more but wow. Do these people even hear themselves when they speak or is it just static? :smh: Animations is the only thing on this list that is a legit criticism that is being addressed. The Empty open world I call bullshit as there were several times I would look at the world maps of the different planets and need several minutes to decide on what to do because of all the quest markers, then there were a number of hidden things I found to do on the map that were not marked or never given an actual quest. The characters not being as engaging I don't know is a fair assessment because most people are comparing characters that have shown up in one game and are just starting to be fleshed out to characters we all have been with for the span of three games plus several DLC's and have been given plenty of moments to be expanded on. Even in Dragon Age the most memorable characters are the ones that have been involved in at least two games. Storytelling, like many things, is very subjective however you don't expand on it so I can't really discuss this because the way you have it just sounds like you are saying it's weak just because you say so, you need to give a reason to engage in a proper discussion (I don't accept the SJW thing as a proper discussion because, as you said, it's just something people use as a quick scapegoat. Frankly I would say the story is good in smaller chunks but it doesn't quite fit together as a whole though that may just be due to the different style of game it is compared to the previous games (open world Vs. more linear structure).
|
|
inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 21, 2017 23:38:55 GMT
Consumers are beta testers nowadays. Paying for a full product to test the product lol. /Facepalm Worked for No Man's Sky Worked for Destiny Worked for Street Fighter V Worked for the last Two Assassin's Creed's
|
|
inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 21, 2017 22:08:37 GMT
Although I agree it's a disappointment, you people seem to enjoy watching one of your favourite franchises get destroyed instead of trying to make it better One of the reasons I don't hang around places like this as much as I used to.... probably the same reason developers don't either.
|
|
inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 21, 2017 13:10:28 GMT
*nevermind I'm saving this for when I'm not rushing into work*
|
|
inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 21, 2017 13:00:08 GMT
So what part of the game will be looking at to accuse Bioware of rushing next? I say whenever the screen goes black when it transitions to a new scene, so lazy they could have easily put a wipe or dissolve into the next screnn but noooooooo they had to go to black, so lazy.
|
|
inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 21, 2017 12:57:51 GMT
I just find it hilarious that Bioware managed to over promote, evenly promote, and under promote an "agenda" with only one character.... everybody is happy
|
|
inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 20, 2017 11:31:15 GMT
Using United isn't really a proper example as it is comparing an entertainment product you have a choice to buy or not buy to being forceably removed from a plane against your will along with getting badly injured. EA have shown vast improvements in the last 6 months, Titanfall 2 has no Season pass and tons of free DLC. Star Wars Battlefront 2 is shaping up to be the game that the first one should have been which shows they are listening to the fans (plus the Season Pas may be left out here as well). EA has released tons of free games and DLC overthe past year but no one talks about it because they keep talking about what happenned 2-3 even 5 years ago. Which enforces the negative trope despite the fact that they are doing some positive decisions. The On the House Program they have has given out plenty of free games and DLC with no need to buy anything. The Origin/EA Access program has actually turned into a rather affordable program to get access to a lot of games ($30 for the year (when I got it) is honestly a really good deal for the amount of content that is offered. Hell many people are upset with Sony that they didn't agree to offer the program and other companies are looking into emulating it. Hell look at things with the patches for Andromeda. People are shitting on them because the patches weren't out 2 days ago but if they rush the patch out it could cause other problems which then people will just be "why the hell did you rush the patch?" despite the fact that is what the fans wanted them to do. and people are being cautious with some decisions that CDPR and GOG have been making that past few months. Many people are not happy with the GOG Galaxy Client as it may lead them to introduce a form of DRM (there were some instances were games could only be downloaded or updated in Galaxy, some people may have over-reacted but it is something to think about) this is not my thoughts on Galaxy as you do need some form of client for the Multi player components of some games. I myself am seeing people treating CDPR the way they treated Valve. they just looked the other way when Valve started doing some questionable decisions and attacked people who tried to criticize and now we have a company that open teaes there fan base with a game that will never see the light of day and an online store that is overflowing with poor quality games and asset flips for quick money and an economy based selling and reselling digital items like hats and cards and trying to turn player created content into a paid service that publishers can profit on while the fan's do all the work. Also I don't follow people on social media as it is easy for someone to react without thinking, there have been many a time where someone hit that send button and then instantly regretted it. we are human and humans can do stupid things, social media just unfairly amplifies that. You cannot force your level of tolerance onto others. Objective fact is, many got burnt in the past. EA maybe trying to do something but each individual will decide if it is good enough. If the majority dont think it is good enough then they have 2 choices: 1. Like you say stop doing anything. 2. Do better. You think that EA Access is great, I dont. DAI for example, you can play the base game but not the DLC, just cheap promotion. Why do I need EA access to play/test ME:A? You think it is okay, I think it is not because their reputation is already dirt and they need all the positive publicity. You are very forgiving and you are clearly a fan of EA/Bioware. Objectively, they get no praises from me for fixing things that should not have been broken before launch. They owe me and they are still owing me because still tons of glitches/bugs that needs fixed. I have never used or need the gog client so I wont comment on that. As for the final part, I suspect you are talking about my comments about Ian Frazier. No, he equated criticism to "gut punch" and said he does not like it in an interview. He never acknowledge the faults. Am I to believe that nobody in Bioware saw all the glitches? 5 years and I am to believe that many of the visual issues are not seen? Glitches and crashes that plagues me I am more forgiving because I know that Bioware Montreal is a B rate studio that is inexperience and incompetent. Just say: My team sux and we are working hard to make things right. You dont see similarities between United and EA/Bioware. Yes, their actions/industry/circumstances are different but the core of the issue is that corporation like these do not respect their customers. They forgot that the customers feed them, their spouse, their children and their dogs and cats too. What difference is Ian Frazier from Oscar Munoz? Both screwed up and instead of coming out and apologize straight away, they try to deflect the problem. I can understand that some being forgiving. Unfortunately, the industry/critics/players as a whole is not. Just look at the review scores. Nobody will cut EA/Bioware any slack anymore. They either deliver excellence or continue to be grilled. People will put everything they do under a microscope and grill them for anything they can find. That is the objective fact. For me, if EA wants to redeem themselves, make a great game at the expense of their profit and throw their stupid company rules (ie, every EA game needs to use Frostbite, needs MP etc) away. Then I will wipe the past clean and assess them afresh. I'm not trying to "Force anything", I'm merely stating that EA has made some good decisions in the past few months but people are choosing to ignore those decisions to continue to dogpile hate on them. Also who said I was forgiving? Having a different experience and expectation than you does not mean I am forgiving (No SP in the first Battlefront and Titanfall was a poor choice on EA's part which they have thankfully remedied) so please don't just shoe horn me into a category to fit your argument better. Also please do not use the word objective and then contradict it with your bias opinion. Frostbite is actually a good engine when used properly, it comes down to the development team if they are able to use it (DICE games really look amazing in the engine), and just because you feel every game doesn't need MP doesn't mean everyone shares that feeling as many people got the game for the MP and really enjoyed the MP since it was added to the series, though I do agree with others that the MP should not affect the SP content.
|
|
inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 20, 2017 3:22:36 GMT
I liked how the enemies could actually attack each other, in some instances you could just hang back and let two enemy factions fight between each other then pick off the remains, or you could send in a few explosives and send them all flying.
|
|
inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 20, 2017 3:10:29 GMT
I said many games, if I said all games then you can complain, but since I said many games I am correct in this assesement. That was GOG not CDPR that offered the free copy, they are owned by the same parent company but GOG and CDPR are considered seperate entities so you can't give credit deserving to GOG to CDPR. (an example would be if EA gave away a free copy of ME2, which they have an multiple occasions, you would say thank you "EA for giving the game away for free" since Bioware had no say in that. Past practices shouldn't dictate how you react to one specific event. A person may not like a certain company but to shit on them even when they do something good (again like giving away free items) doesn't send them the right message. If you just keep shitting on them even when doing something good they could decide "Why should we give people what they want if they are just going to attack us regardless?". The opposite is just as true, if a company starts doing bad decisions but people don't call them out on it because of great things they have done in the past you can end up with a shell of what the company was and people just keep praising them because they are keeping there blinders on to the bad because they just focus on the good they used to do........ Valve is an excellent example of this. CDPR is starting to go this way as not even a few years ago they were one of the big supporters of not charging for additional content - that you should just pay once and that's it. But now they have moved to paid DLC and people are quick to defend them because of there past practices but ignoring that they were at one time against this specific practice, it's a very slippery slope that may be difficult to come back from if people keep blowing smoke up your ass. I am not saying that past practices should be used to judge current events. But trust is built on past practices and once you screwed up, whatever comes your way is payback and that is reality. "Why should I give people what they want if they are just going to attack me regardless?" Because you freaking screwed up and you have to own it by continue to win back your customers until said customer decides to forgive and forget. United Airlines is great at dragging paid customers off planes, they should not try to change now because we are going to give that company hell regardless of what they do in the near future and that is a fact. Deal with it or just remove yourself from the industry all together - reality. Paid DLC - a DLC that won Best RPG 2016. That is how the industry as a whole sees how different their "DLC" is compared to the rest. A DLC that rivals and surpasses many full game selling at full $60 in length, content and quality. They also made it very clear that these are Expansions (like expansions in the past) caliber DLC from the get go. Are people just blindly "defending" them? Have you seen and play Blood and Wine? Blindly belittling the effort and goodwill of another to defend a company that is clearly everything opposite is silly. EA/Bioware has a lot to atone for and nothing less than continuous excellence will change people's views about them. If they feel that it is unfair, well they can choose to ignore and close shop. What "did" EA/Bioware try to do right here? Ian Frazier cant even take criticism like a man. Are we blind? Even if you dont care about the clearly abysmal eyes and animation you cannot deny they exists. Does Mr. Frazier came out and apologize and try to explain to customers what went wrong from the get go? No! Still in denial today. [ If you just keep shitting on them even when doing something good they could decide "Why should we give people what they want if they are just going to attack us regardless?".] What you are suggesting is like this: "Yeah yeah we are fixing it, you people should be happy that we are doing this. If you people dont appreciate our effort in fixing our own shit, we probably wont fix our shit in the future" No! It is your freaking responsibility to fix and no gratitude can and should be expected for fixing your own mess. At best you will get is an acknowledgement. The hate Bioware is receiving today is proportional to the love and respect they enjoyed in the past. If CDPR screws up - they will suffer a fate that is more gruesome than Bioware. Using United isn't really a proper example as it is comparing an entertainment product you have a choice to buy or not buy to being forceably removed from a plane against your will along with getting badly injured. EA have shown vast improvements in the last 6 months, Titanfall 2 has no Season pass and tons of free DLC. Star Wars Battlefront 2 is shaping up to be the game that the first one should have been which shows they are listening to the fans (plus the Season Pas may be left out here as well). EA has released tons of free games and DLC overthe past year but no one talks about it because they keep talking about what happenned 2-3 even 5 years ago. Which enforces the negative trope despite the fact that they are doing some positive decisions. The On the House Program they have has given out plenty of free games and DLC with no need to buy anything. The Origin/EA Access program has actually turned into a rather affordable program to get access to a lot of games ($30 for the year (when I got it) is honestly a really good deal for the amount of content that is offered. Hell many people are upset with Sony that they didn't agree to offer the program and other companies are looking into emulating it. Hell look at things with the patches for Andromeda. People are shitting on them because the patches weren't out 2 days ago but if they rush the patch out it could cause other problems which then people will just be "why the hell did you rush the patch?" despite the fact that is what the fans wanted them to do. and people are being cautious with some decisions that CDPR and GOG have been making that past few months. Many people are not happy with the GOG Galaxy Client as it may lead them to introduce a form of DRM (there were some instances were games could only be downloaded or updated in Galaxy, some people may have over-reacted but it is something to think about) this is not my thoughts on Galaxy as you do need some form of client for the Multi player components of some games. I myself am seeing people treating CDPR the way they treated Valve. they just looked the other way when Valve started doing some questionable decisions and attacked people who tried to criticize and now we have a company that open teaes there fan base with a game that will never see the light of day and an online store that is overflowing with poor quality games and asset flips for quick money and an economy based selling and reselling digital items like hats and cards and trying to turn player created content into a paid service that publishers can profit on while the fan's do all the work. Also I don't follow people on social media as it is easy for someone to react without thinking, there have been many a time where someone hit that send button and then instantly regretted it. we are human and humans can do stupid things, social media just unfairly amplifies that.
|
|
inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 20, 2017 2:50:28 GMT
The problem with your poll is that it is based on your opinion that the game is bad which goes against what a lot of people feel about the game as the overall consensus is that it is a good game which has a few issues holding it back from being a great game. The choices you give in the poll don't allow for people who see the game more positively then you do. The overall consensus is that the game is not good, it's meh. Good would mean a lot more people including myself would have bought or would have enjoyed the game. I'm still baffled that people in this thread don't think the game needs redemption? Regardless if you think the game is great as many of you do, the general consensus is the game isn't good it's meh and and I'm sure EA and Bioware would love to bring out a DLC where everyone said, wow, I'm actually enjoying the game now or the game is better. Once again, yes you love the game but don't be blinkered in thinking it doesn't need redemption because outside of your bubble it needs some big wins. EA and Bioware are not happy with the way the game is viewed by the wider gaming community and this does mean a lot to them even though money is still what they want. I don't think A DLC would change my opinion on the game unless it was complete separate and you could start from level one and the reviews were gushing. They could call it ME2? I have looked around and based on critics and fan response from many outlets the game lands in the good but with some problems with those that don't like it but at the same time there are people who love it. The critic and contributer average on open critic is about 72% which is a score for a good game (I don't use meta critic due to all the people giving 0's because of SJW or other stupids reasons) If yo didn't like the game that is fine, it is your right to like or not like something based on your own experience. But there are a lot of people that do like and enjoy the game based on there experience and the overall feeling is that most people feel it is a good game with some problems that once fixed could elevate the game. We also have to keep in mind that a lot of people who are saying the games sucks etc are just trolls (many who have not even played the game as they normally go for the easy because rather than giving a critique that is uniquely there own)
|
|
inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 20, 2017 2:31:30 GMT
The problem with your poll is that it is based on your opinion that the game is bad which goes against what a lot of people feel about the game as the overall consensus is that it is a good game which has a few issues holding it back from being a great game. The choices you give in the poll don't allow for people who see the game more positively then you do.
|
|
inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 20, 2017 2:29:03 GMT
I actually have a tendency to forget about the profiles system. I think I've only actually used it once or twice.
|
|
inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 20, 2017 2:26:35 GMT
I probably heard most of those reasons too. I was quite literal when I said everything has been repeated. A month has already passed, there isn't much I haven't seen. Well...there is the glowing pussy thread.... I can actually see that getting picked up by Fox News.
|
|
inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 20, 2017 2:25:30 GMT
I doubt we will see any companion characters dying in future Bioware games any time soon due to fan complaints, I don't think they want to deal with that again.
|
|
inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 20, 2017 2:12:15 GMT
Just a thing about those 16 DLC's, many of them are small things like New Game+ which many games normally ship standard and the rest is so small if any other company did that people would just accused them of cutting content out to put back in later for free praise and goodwill. New Game+ which many games normally ship with? What? Even DA:I does have NG+ when I last played it. For the other 15 DLC, you do realize that Bioware has been actually selling such things right - like costumes. So CDPR said that due to popular demand, they will put resources into making NG+ and people believe them why? (It is more convincing now seeing how mess up the quest bugs are in ME:A NG+)Because they have earned consumer's trust. Bought TW1/TW2 on steam and are tired of DRM, come to GOG.com and we will give u a DRM free copy for free your purchase you made... N years ago with Steam and maybe paid 1.99 for while it is on sale. We have now an enhanced edition, dont worry, you still a free upgrade because you supported our product. Why do people " accuse" some other companies? It is not rocket science, just look at their past practices of said companies and how they treat their customers and the answer will be clear as day. I said many games, if I said all games then you can complain, but since I said many games I am correct in this assesement. (Inquisition dose have the Golden Nug which transfers tons of schematics and Skyhold decorations so that is a really nice alternative to New Game+) That was GOG not CDPR that offered the free copy, they are owned by the same parent company but GOG and CDPR are considered seperate entities so you can't give credit deserving to GOG to CDPR. (an example would be if EA gave away a free copy of ME2, which they have an multiple occasions, you would say thank you "EA for giving the game away for free" since Bioware had no say in that. Past practices shouldn't dictate how you react to one specific event. A person may not like a certain company but to shit on them even when they do something good (again like giving away free items) doesn't send them the right message. If you just keep shitting on them even when doing something good they could decide "Why should we give people what they want if they are just going to attack us regardless?". The opposite is just as true, if a company starts doing bad decisions but people don't call them out on it because of great things they have done in the past you can end up with a shell of what the company was and people just keep praising them because they are keeping there blinders on to the bad because they just focus on the good they used to do........ Valve is an excellent example of this. CDPR is starting to go this way as not even a few years ago they were one of the big supporters of not charging for additional content - that you should just pay once and that's it. But now they have moved to paid DLC and people are quick to defend them because of there past practices but ignoring that they were at one time against this specific practice, it's a very slippery slope that may be difficult to come back from if people keep blowing smoke up your ass.
|
|
inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 20, 2017 2:01:53 GMT
Saves are locked to the system you are playing on.
|
|
inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 20, 2017 2:00:57 GMT
Martin Anward @martin_AnwardAlso: If you find bugs in 1.5/Utopia, please report them at our bug forums on paradoxplaza. Twitter isn't a good platform to report issues! Different scifi game, but funny because of obvious reasons Been telling people to do that since 2013....... they refuse to.
|
|
inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 20, 2017 1:58:33 GMT
Overlord has a good finish, but damn I hate that stupid Hammerhead. Thank the spirits the reapers destroyed it. I liked the Hammerhead, it could actually get over vertical inclines unlike the Mako which would flip over and get turned around after hitting a pebble.
|
|
inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 20, 2017 1:54:38 GMT
Just a thing about those 16 DLC's, many of them are small things like New Game+ which many games normally ship standard and the rest is so small if any other company did that people would just accused them of cutting content out to put back in later for free praise and goodwill. Also you can't really compare the DLC's because CDPR never had to release DLC on 360 or PS3 which has size restrictions/caps on there DLC which limited what developers could do, they later found workarounds by splitting the DLC into parts but that is more expensive since they need to certify each part. Once we got into PS4/XOne territory DLC had the file size restrictions were removed allowing for larger DLC Packs. Didn't BW not make DLC for the old console generation? They made DLC for Dragon Age: Origins, DA2, Mass Effect 1-3, all made during the old generation (Inquisition was also released for the older generation as well and didn't get all of the DLC). CDPR only had Witcher 2 on 360 but no DLC was released digitally.
|
|
inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 20, 2017 1:31:15 GMT
Sorry guys I'm just devestated at how garbage this game turned out. Thinking about killing myself Well then you must have a really sad life if all you have to live for is video games. May I suggest going outside? I heard the graphics are great with plenty of social interaction options and side games.
|
|
inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 20, 2017 1:29:15 GMT
You know, CDPR actually released 16 DLCs for free and 2 paid DLCs with a lot of content? I mean A LOT of content. Not just one or two hour but actually 20-25 hours of gametime content with actual story. Just a thing about those 16 DLC's, many of them are small things like New Game+ which many games normally ship standard and the rest is so small if any other company did that people would just accused them of cutting content out to put back in later for free praise and goodwill. Also you can't really compare the DLC's because CDPR never had to release DLC on 360 or PS3 which has size restrictions/caps on there DLC which limited what developers could do, they later found workarounds by splitting the DLC into parts but that is more expensive since they need to certify each part. Once we got into PS4/XOne territory DLC had the file size restrictions were removed allowing for larger DLC Packs.
|
|
inherit
283
0
647
wolfsite
350
August 2016
wolfsite
|
Post by wolfsite on Apr 20, 2017 1:21:13 GMT
If we removed all the threads like this one..... how many pages would this board actually have on it?
|
|