#SAVETHEQUARIANS - DLC Support Hub

And it can easily be justified, geth can exist outside of their synthetic bodies, so they could easily have infiltrated in one of the computers or whatever and hided there.

Looks like an Idea for a companion in future instalments...

I was scared the title was going to be "Why bioware should go back to the milky way..." something that would piss me off if bioware did that.

No, I think you're hearing what he said. The minute someone say's "NDA", man, there's a reason to be hopeful.

Guys. Ian Frazier can neither confirm nor deny anything. To say he can't confirm... OR DENY usually means "Yeah, there's something, but I can't talk about it" And that's before he mentions the mere EXISTENCE of a Non-Disclosure Agreement.


I thought about it. And there si considerable amount of evidence that DLC is indeed coming. Of course, he can neither confirm nor deny this, but think about it. He can't... deny... it.

Usually, but nonetheless the only thing you can objectively take from this is that he can't say one way or the other.

What you can do is rationally compare the track record of Bioware under EA against the sources that unequivocally state that there is no DLC coming, which so far only appear to be represented by a certain Kotaku journalist.

Given his behaviour in recent weeks, and the fact that his sources sound suspiciously similar to the hoax company that were saying the same thing, I'm not really willing to believe that EA are going to make such a drastic course change at this stage. I'm ready to stand corrected but that's how it appears from the facts that we know.

From the wording in the Eurogamer just seems to be confirming the same source as Kotaku.  Regardless of whether that single source is or is not related to the hoax, if the source "familiar with Bioware" is mistaken as to EA's plans or if EA's plans changed subsequent to the leak, then both articles will be "wrong."  Even the Kotaku article acknowledges that the plans to cancel could subsequently change.  What gets me is people who are so locked into that article won't even believe it when it itself basically says the decision wasn't final at that point; but would rather instead continually imply that people (like jaegerbane ) who are clearly acknowledging that the DLC could still go either way are somehow believing in a lie.  Open your eyes to reality, please and stop trying to stir up a hornet's nest here.

Sources as shaky as the ones claimed in either article give people reasonable doubt as to the credibility of claims made therein, especially with the overall lack of credibility in the media in its entirety these days.

More to the point, I can't help but shake the feeling that your only point in posting in this thread is to take a shit in the kettle...

I wouldn't word it like that. I just wanted to point out that I find it... weird that in one topic I saw a huge circlejerk of fans bashing Kotaku and gaming journalist as a whole and saying how they are just lying and just want clicks and are certainly lying. And in another we have one topic that wouldn't exist if people didn't give credit for that very same journalist. 

This whole situation is a mess. 

Bioware employees seem to be under NDA. Reporters say that they got that info from "related" source, so that means someone at bioware would violate NDA anyway, which seems unrealistic tbh. Just the short logic trail I follow when those articles are brought up. I think there's no better way to tell than to wait and see now.

There is a group of people out there in the wilderness that harbor a near pathological hate for ME:A and BioWare in general. Those would be the people taking Jason and Kotaku at face value.

The other group are people who like ME:A to some degree and have a healthy dose of skepticism in regards to a notoriously bad "journalist" from a notoriously bad "journalistic outlet."

A mess? certainly, but to take whatever the media shovels down one's gullet at face value and not question it at all is asinine at best.