Will Mass Effect ever get a cuckold romance?

Try harder

It had women treated equally and in positions of power. It had LGBT+ people shown in a positive light. Those are SJW things so not really "hardly". 
So it is only pandering if it goes against the lore? Okay then, but then by that rule how does the SJW pandering go against the lore in ME3 and MEA? 

Nice try, I'm not the one who keeps changing the subject. If its not period-related butthurt, maybe look here: www.medicinenet.com/buttock_pain/symptoms.htm

Again, having women in power is not SJW pandering. You had Qun, which saw women as nothing more than stay in the kitchen and be silent which provided contrast. In fact I'd be fine with them being accepting, if they were that from the start. 

As for ME, the pandering and projecting personal politics took premise over writing a good story. Trans characters with no personality traits other than being trans, whose dialogue can be summarised with "I'm trans, get it, just in case I didn't mention it enough, also nice to meet you for the first time"

Jacob was a good character because he was a character primarily. Boring, dull and uninteresting, but that was his personality. He wasn't there just to have a black person. He was a nice guy. Not a black guy. In ME:A characters serve to fill a quota. 

Loses (just gives up) argument, cries, reports... Better luck next time snowflake

Sten was the representative of the Qunari in the first game, suggested to have become the chief figure among them by now, and he was rather clearly amused at the idea that women would want to be anything other than women. I exagarated with the stay in the kitchen, but their views of social roles are strict. You are what you are, there's no changing it. Why would a smith want to become a peasant, why would a peasant want to become a warrior, and why would a woman want to be a man. That's their viewpoint. 
Come DAI and all of a sudden Qunary are some of the most tolerating people when it comes to societal and gender roles. That's pandering.

Bioware fixed it due to the outrage it caused. Pushing identity politics is idiotic, protecting Manweer Heir and keeping him working, Hiring SJW animators for sake of their beliefs and then having them fuck it all up. List keeps on going. 

He is Arishok now, but the Arishok isn't the chief of the Qunari. The Arishok is the military leader, while the Arigena leads the civilians, and the Ariqun leads the religion. The three lead together as the Triumvirate, the Arishok representing the body, the Arigena the mind, and the Ariqun the soul. Arishok is always male, Arigena always female, and Ariqun can be male or female. I wouldn't say Sten was amused by it, but more confused hence asking the female Warden about it. Under the Qun the female Warden wouldn't be seen as a woman but as a man and yet the Warden still identifies as a woman creating a paradox for Sten. Meanwhile with Krem there is no issue since Krem identifies as a man thus him being in a male profession doesn't create a paradox.

Where was it pushed other than a minor character that you never even have to talk to? 
Bioware fired Manveer Heir actually. 
How can animation be SJW? 
Also you never answered my question about what characters other than Hainly are there to fill a quota? 

That doesn't have anything to do with animation or characters filling quotas though(at least not in the same vein as what you were saying earlier like with Hainly and Jacob), so how are those things SJW? What is "SJW theory of male gaze"? 

The qunari perspective didn't change, people just don't get it.

The Qun sees everyone as a cog in a greater whole, you best serve society in a specific role. The role you would best fulfill take into consideration things like your natural skill set, inclination, intelligence, physical strength etc all factor in to what the priests (or was it teachers?) think your best role would be. Now, over time sex would have been broadly tied to occupation (ie males are larger and stronger, as a result they are consistently more suited for the army, over time we assume army = male) and the Qun's rigidity makes it easier to change how they view someone's gender (change on a micro level) than it is broaden the idea of roles (macro level). Role first, gender second. If the Qun decides you would best serve as a warrior despite being female you would and because the idea of warrior is male you would be seen as male regardless of your actual sex, because the role is gendered rather than you necessarily.

So Sten's confusion is with the Warden insisting that she is a woman and a warrior, instead of simply warrior which would automatically imply male in his mind.

You can still object ofc because people get exceedingly spastic about sjws but this explanation makes much more sense when you consider the macro and highly pragmatic stance the Qun takes. If a female is built like a semi and really enjoys punching things they aren't going to waste a valuable tool in the role of cook just cuz of her sex. 

TC, do you also think people are "SJWs" if they object to a romance novel about a Jewish concentration camp inmate falling in love with a Nazi commandant and converting to Christianity?