Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
7959
0
Nov 21, 2024 12:33:18 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 21, 2024 12:33:18 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2017 5:20:41 GMT
She has this rich story-line, she starts the Inquisition, she has history and relationship with Varric, with Seekers, with Navarre and she can become a Divine. And she is already an advisor AND your best friend, and spared your life, and your tank, and travels with you.... That’s a huge amount of icing on one character. She is there, front and centre pm beginning to end. Blackwall gets a tiny intro cutscene and a Warden’s Memorial trail... yeah... slim pickings if you compare the material between the male main romance and the female one. Oh. You're comparing Character Importance Story Arcs, not romances. I thought we were discussing romantic quantity. which Cass lacks. Blackwall gets a Trespasser scene, for example, and Cullen gets the most scenes of all except perhaps Sera. I haven't baked her cookie, so to speak, so have yet to have personal knowledge of the romantic side vs friendship side of Sera's scene content. But just to be contrary! - She starts the Inquisition then votes to dump it in your lap. And immediately recedes to being just another background companion. Josephine replaces her at the War Table is how little she is involved with the Inquisition.
- Her relationship with Varric is irrelevant because the Player has a closer relationship with him from playing DA2 themselves. even that aside, All Cass did was interrogate him for a day or two before shit blew up. Hardly a relationship. she spared our life? Whatever. She may not be top of the Game but killing you wasn't even on the table, regardless of all the glares and yelling from Roderick or they wouldn't have bothered trying to heal you via Solas in the first place. Leliana had no intention of doing so, and Lel obviously was the Boss of that two person team at the very very start.
- Meh, Seekers. A useless organization that turned it's back on it's only job. like they had something better to do... oh ya! One leader started the MAge/Teplar war! and the other sacrificed it's minions in experiments and re started a cult!
- Blackwall and Iron Bull can also be a Tank. you also could be your own tank. And I've played 4.5 times, and Blackwall is the better tank, from my experience. Her tankiness isn't special is my point.
- I guess she is there from start to end? Solas comes in like 5 minutes after that, so that's hardly a rallying cry for special (hahaha Solas burn)
- She barely talks about Nevarra at all, because she's actually disinterested in her upbringing and her distant claim to the throne. I learned more from World of Thedas books about NEvarra than I did from her. I mean, let's compare her to Zevran who waxes on about his country so much I actually could conjure an image up about people's life and culture there, the temperature, the weather from his words.
- There is also the additional discomfort of learning that Cassandra thinks you're a prophet and she's religiously...pleased? to be banging you?
You might not like the aspects of it, but Blackwall gets nothing of the kind at all. No participation in the main story line, no past involvement, no future involvement, no belonging to any organization, no special connection to the PC. And while Cassandra might do some flawed choices, she is essentially good, and does not come with a history of duplitiosness, murder and identity theft... Cassandra is solid good and awesome, with a huge amount of story investment. There is no male character a female can romance that is like that. Dorian is, but he is only for a male PC as well. Cullen is, but only 50% of females can romance him & he is not in the party. In other words, again, they should have replaced Blackwall with Cullen or Solas or Dorian for all female PCs, and atm it is what is lacking in the romantic distribution. All it would have taken is one romance like that for the females, and I don’t understand why it was not done For the moment males have a better set up imo.
|
|
inherit
Friend of Red Jenny
90
0
18,922
vertigomez
5,281
August 2016
vertigomez
|
Post by vertigomez on Dec 27, 2017 5:28:21 GMT
I kind of feel like the way you're coming at this is that the only romances that are worth anything are the ones you happen to like. Not everyone has the same criteria for their romance - I could care less about whether someone can become Divine or Archon. My character didn't romance them for their title. Plenty of people enjoy NPC romances even if I personally don't get the appeal. You cite Dorian, Cullen, Solas, and Cassandra as "the most interesting romances" but that's certainly not a universal opinion. The only one of those I really enjoyed was Dorian's, and even then I enjoyed Sera and Bull's more. I pick those romances because those characters have participation in the plot narrative and link to previous games story or to the going forward narrative. At least one such romance imo would have needed to be opened to every PC. At least one... and the PCs that do not have access to these romances are more than 50% of the female PCs, while all males independently of their preferences of race and sexuality has access to the plot-important romance. Fair enough. I guess I feel like Blackwall, Sera, Bull, Josie, etc. are linked to the previous games and the world of Thedas going forward. Sera's a Jenny, and the Jennies appeared in the first game. She's from Ferelden, where the first game took place. Josephine is an old friend of Leliana's and she's from Antiva, which we heard Zevran wax poetically about all during Origins. Rainier was conscripted by Warden Blackwall and idolizes the Wardens like many Origins players do, and Bull is another thread in the Qunari plot we've been anticipating since DAO. They all feel relevant to me. Certainly as relevant as the Seekers or the Magisterium.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
7959
0
Nov 21, 2024 12:33:18 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 21, 2024 12:33:18 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2017 5:31:32 GMT
I pick those romances because those characters have participation in the plot narrative and link to previous games story or to the going forward narrative. At least one such romance imo would have needed to be opened to every PC. At least one... and the PCs that do not have access to these romances are more than 50% of the female PCs, while all males independently of their preferences of race and sexuality has access to the plot-important romance. Fair enough. I guess I feel like Blackwall, Sera, Bull, Josie, etc. are linked to the previous games and the world of Thedas going forward. Sera's a Jenny, and the Jennies appeared in the first game. She's from Ferelden, where the first game took place. Josephine is an old friend of Leliana's and she's from Antiva, which we heard Zevran wax poetically about all during Origins. Rainier was conscripted by Warden Blackwall and idolizes the Wardens like many Origins players do, and Bull is another thread in the Qunari plot we've been anticipating since DAO. They all feel relevant to me. Certainly as relevant as the Seekers or the Magisterium. None of them appear front and centre in the main game’s storyline the way Cassandra, Solas, Dorian and Cullen do. Their involvement is very tangential and only noticeable to Lore-masters. In previous games, Alistair and Morrigan were male and female plot-important characters, and Anders was open to both genders. In DAI it is not so. There is no reason whatsoever for Cullen to have exacting height standards. Iron Bull is not a continuation of the Qunari storyarc, it is a mockery of it and his romance is the worst Bio ever made. Why they had to experiment with the only male Qunari we’d likely to ever romance is beyond me. The biggest disappointment, that’s for sure.
|
|
VanSinn
N3
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
Origin: VanSinn77
Posts: 576 Likes: 1,429
inherit
2579
0
Sept 18, 2021 9:17:16 GMT
1,429
VanSinn
576
January 2017
vansinn
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
VanSinn77
|
Post by VanSinn on Dec 27, 2017 5:39:02 GMT
I kind of feel like the way you're coming at this is that the only romances that are worth anything are the ones you happen to like. Not everyone has the same criteria for their romance - I could care less about whether someone can become Divine or Archon. My character didn't romance them for their title. Plenty of people enjoy NPC romances even if I personally don't get the appeal. You cite Dorian, Cullen, Solas, and Cassandra as "the most interesting romances" but that's certainly not a universal opinion. The only one of those I really enjoyed was Dorian's, and even then I enjoyed Sera and Bull's more. I pick those romances because those characters have participation in the plot narrative and link to previous games story or to the going forward narrative. At least one such romance imo would have needed to be opened to every PC. At least one... and the PCs that do not have access to these romances are more than 50% of the female PCs, while all males independently of their preferences of race and sexuality has access to the plot-important romance. I really hope this doesn't come off as snarky or dismissive. Such is SURELY not my intent. Having a romance arc extend into some future installment or having some major relevance to the main story arc of the game itself is, in my opinion, a fairly limiting set of parameters for a writer. I'll cite the example of Sera, just because I mentioned her in an earlier post, and because she's my favorite DA:I romance, although I DID make a female Inquisitor to romance Cullen, and I started a Dorian romance playthrough (which sadly was lost in the restart roulette I'm in a committed love/hate relationship with). Sera isn't tied to the main plot in any huge way. She's got no real clear cut avenue into any future installments, either. However, to me, that gave her writer the freedom to portray her in a very independent light. The writer had very few holes to try and shoe-horn Sera into. What emerged, to me, was the most natural character Bioware has ever written. There wasn't any "oh she's here because of this plot point" or any other nonsense like that. Sera is Sera, not some preconceived notion of the "Seeker who was the Right Hand of the Divine, and reinstated the Inquisition because Divine Justinia wanted her to, to stop the mage/templar war and blah blah blah" or the former Knight Commander of the Kirkwall Circle, who just happened to be the "Ex-Templar who's going cold turkey to get over his drug addiction, and Leliana just happened to ask him of all the military leaders in Thedas to command the Inquisition's forces and blah blah blah." Please note, I'm not dissing Cassandra OR Cullen here. Both have pretty danged good romance arcs, in my opinion. And I can certainly understand why people would enjoy those romances. Dismissing Sera's romance arc, and indeed her whole character, because "she isn't tied to a previous game, or has importance enough to easily slip into a sequel, or has some other conjured up reason to be tied to the plot" is just a bit limited in vision, again in my opinion. Your opinion will disagree, because you obviously think being tied in a major way to the plot, or previous/future installments, is a large criteria to your judgement of a character, but I wouldn't dismiss Sera's romance (or Blackwall's, for that matter, although it's not to my tastes) for not meeting that criteria.
|
|
inherit
Friend of Red Jenny
90
0
18,922
vertigomez
5,281
August 2016
vertigomez
|
Post by vertigomez on Dec 27, 2017 5:39:57 GMT
Fair enough. I guess I feel like Blackwall, Sera, Bull, Josie, etc. are linked to the previous games and the world of Thedas going forward. Sera's a Jenny, and the Jennies appeared in the first game. She's from Ferelden, where the first game took place. Josephine is an old friend of Leliana's and she's from Antiva, which we heard Zevran wax poetically about all during Origins. Rainier was conscripted by Warden Blackwall and idolizes the Wardens like many Origins players do, and Bull is another thread in the Qunari plot we've been anticipating since DAO. They all feel relevant to me. Certainly as relevant as the Seekers or the Magisterium. None of them appear front and centre in the main game’s storyline the way Cassandra, Solas, Dorian and Cullen do. Their involvement is very tangential and only noticeable to Lore-masters. In previous games, Alistair and Morrigan were male and female plot-important characters, and Anders was open to both genders. In DAI it is not so. Iron Bull is not a vpvontinuation of the Qunari storyarc, it is a mockery of it. Yeah, we're just gonna have to disagree. I think Bull is one of the most well-written characters in the entire franchise and he gets me hyped for the Qunari storyline, meanwhile I mostly ignore Cassandra because she bores me and Solas because I think he's kind of a dweeb. Also I romanced Sera, Fenris, and Zevran so at the end of the day I guess I'm not fussed about my LI being essential to the plot. They're essential to my game, and that's all that matters.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
7959
0
Nov 21, 2024 12:33:18 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 21, 2024 12:33:18 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2017 5:44:15 GMT
I pick those romances because those characters have participation in the plot narrative and link to previous games story or to the going forward narrative. At least one such romance imo would have needed to be opened to every PC. At least one... and the PCs that do not have access to these romances are more than 50% of the female PCs, while all males independently of their preferences of race and sexuality has access to the plot-important romance. I really hope this doesn't come off as snarky or dismissive. Such is SURELY not my intent. Having a romance arc extend into some future installment or having some major relevance to the main story arc of the game itself is, in my opinion, a fairly limiting set of parameters for a writer. I'll cite the example of Sera, just because I mentioned her in an earlier post, and because she's my favorite DA:I romance, although I DID make a female Inquisitor to romance Cullen, and I started a Dorian romance playthrough (which sadly was lost in the restart roulette I'm in a committed love/hate relationship with). Sera isn't tied to the main plot in any huge way. She's got no real clear cut avenue into any future installments, either. However, to me, that gave her writer the freedom to portray her in a very independent light. The writer had very few holes to try and shoe-horn Sera into. What emerged, to me, was the most natural character Bioware has ever written. There wasn't any "oh she's here because of this plot point" or any other nonsense like that. Sera is Sera, not some preconceived notion of the "Seeker who was the Right Hand of the Divine, and reinstated the Inquisition because Divine Justinia wanted her to, to stop the mage/templar war and blah blah blah" or the former Knight Commander of the Kirkwall Circle, who just happened to be the "Ex-Templar who's going cold turkey to get over his drug addiction, and Leliana just happened to ask him of all the military leaders in Thedas to command the Inquisition's forces and blah blah blah." Please note, I'm not dissing Cassandra OR Cullen here. Both have pretty danged good romance arcs, in my opinion. And I can certainly understand why people would enjoy those romances. Dismissing Sera's romance arc, and indeed her whole character, because "she isn't tied to a previous game, or has importance enough to easily slip into a sequel, or has some other conjured up reason to be tied to the plot" is just a bit limited in vision, again in my opinion. Your opinion will disagree, because you obviously think being tied in a major way to the plot, or previous/future installments, is a large criteria to your judgement of a character, but I wouldn't dismiss Sera's romance (or Blackwall's, for that matter, although it's not to my tastes) for not meeting that criteria. I do not dismiss Sera’s romance. I simply think it is incorrect that female characters do not have access to plot important romances, and therefore male characters are better off in DAI in regards to romantic options available to them. I do not want the same situation repeat in DA4 and would prefer major plot important romances to be available to all players. I do not see how opening at least ONE of those FOUR romances to all females would have destroyed BioWare’s integrity. With a female Qunari, I have to use mods to play with a romance.... It is hard for me to describe how much I outright hate everything about Iron Bull, I don’t like Sera and BW, and Josephine is nice but just not enough for me to do f/f that is a hard sell for my preferences, as I am strongly attracted to men.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
7959
0
Nov 21, 2024 12:33:18 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 21, 2024 12:33:18 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2017 5:47:00 GMT
None of them appear front and centre in the main game’s storyline the way Cassandra, Solas, Dorian and Cullen do. Their involvement is very tangential and only noticeable to Lore-masters. In previous games, Alistair and Morrigan were male and female plot-important characters, and Anders was open to both genders. In DAI it is not so. Iron Bull is not a vpvontinuation of the Qunari storyarc, it is a mockery of it. Yeah, we're just gonna have to disagree. I think Bull is one of the most well-written characters in the entire franchise and he gets me hyped for the Qunari storyline, meanwhile I mostly ignore Cassandra because she bores me and Solas because I think he's kind of a dweeb. Also I romanced Sera, Fenris, and Zevran so at the end of the day I guess I'm not fussed about my LI being essential to the plot. They're essential to my game, and that's all that matters. Well, it is good you have options that suit your taste, I want to have at least one that suits mine when I play a character of my choice. I find it really disheartening that from FOUR characters I would have liked to romance, I get... ZERO. The romances are there, perfectly fine, but they are ALL gated against my PC.
|
|
inherit
Friend of Red Jenny
90
0
18,922
vertigomez
5,281
August 2016
vertigomez
|
Post by vertigomez on Dec 27, 2017 5:50:48 GMT
Yeah, we're just gonna have to disagree. I think Bull is one of the most well-written characters in the entire franchise and he gets me hyped for the Qunari storyline, meanwhile I mostly ignore Cassandra because she bores me and Solas because I think he's kind of a dweeb. Also I romanced Sera, Fenris, and Zevran so at the end of the day I guess I'm not fussed about my LI being essential to the plot. They're essential to my game, and that's all that matters. Well, it is good you have options that suit your taste, I want to have at least one that suits mine when I play a character of my choice. I find it really disheartening that from FOUR characters I would have liked to romance, I get... ZERO. The romances are there, perfectly fine, but they are ALL gated against my PC. But you still get four romances options as a female Qunari. It's fine if you don't care for them, but... yeah. Four. Sorry you're disappointed. Better luck next game. I'm still holding out for a dwarf LI, personally.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
7959
0
Nov 21, 2024 12:33:18 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 21, 2024 12:33:18 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2017 5:54:38 GMT
Well, it is good you have options that suit your taste, I want to have at least one that suits mine when I play a character of my choice. I find it really disheartening that from FOUR characters I would have liked to romance, I get... ZERO. The romances are there, perfectly fine, but they are ALL gated against my PC. But you still get four romances options as a female Qunari. It's fine if you don't care for them, but... yeah. Four. Sorry you're disappointed. Better luck next game. I'm still holding out for a dwarf LI, personally. But the moment I click a magic button and chose an elf I can suddenly get the romances I want. Or if I convert to a man. It’s frustrating to an n-th degree, and I prefer this to be avoided. Inquisition has the most romances in all their games, but was the least satisfying as far as romances go because of that.
|
|
inherit
Friend of Red Jenny
90
0
18,922
vertigomez
5,281
August 2016
vertigomez
|
Post by vertigomez on Dec 27, 2017 6:00:04 GMT
But you still get four romances options as a female Qunari. It's fine if you don't care for them, but... yeah. Four. Sorry you're disappointed. Better luck next game. I'm still holding out for a dwarf LI, personally. But the moment I click a magic button and chose an elf I can suddenly get the romances I want. Or if I convert to a man. It’s frustrating to an n-th degree, and I prefer this to be avoided. Inquisition has the most romances in all their games, but was the least satisfying as far as romances go because of that. I get that it's frustrating. My canon Warden is single because none of the options suited him. Zevran is my personal favorite, but he's not right for that character. I kind of had to choose between playing the character I wanted versus the romance I wanted. Not quite the same because the option was there, it just didn't work, but I get it. And I'd be bummed if Sera was only romanceable by humans and elves. Sincerely hope you get to enjoy your favorite romance as your favorite PC in the next game.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
7959
0
Nov 21, 2024 12:33:18 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 21, 2024 12:33:18 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2017 6:04:04 GMT
But the moment I click a magic button and chose an elf I can suddenly get the romances I want. Or if I convert to a man. It’s frustrating to an n-th degree, and I prefer this to be avoided. Inquisition has the most romances in all their games, but was the least satisfying as far as romances go because of that. I get that it's frustrating. My canon Warden is single because none of the options suited him. Zevran is my personal favorite, but he's not right for that character. I kind of had to choose between playing the character I wanted versus the romance I wanted. Not quite the same because the option was there, it just didn't work, but I get it. And I'd be bummed if Sera was only romanceable by humans and elves. Sincerely hope you get to enjoy your favorite romance as your favorite PC in the next game. I put the mod on, because I want to experience a PT the way that works for me. I tried with different PCs and it only makes me despise the game.
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
Nov 17, 2024 22:23:52 GMT
31,578
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Dec 27, 2017 6:06:59 GMT
But you still get four romances options as a female Qunari. It's fine if you don't care for them, but... yeah. Four. Sorry you're disappointed. Better luck next game. I'm still holding out for a dwarf LI, personally. But the moment I click a magic button and chose an elf I can suddenly get the romances I want. Or if I convert to a man. It’s frustrating to an n-th degree, and I prefer this to be avoided. Inquisition has the most romances in all their games, but was the least satisfying as far as romances go because of that. So to avoid this, you would want to deprive other players of what they want from romances to fit your strict criteria?
|
|
inherit
ღ I am a golem. Obviously.
440
0
25,604
phoray
Gotta be kiddin me
13,123
August 2016
phoray
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Dragon Age The Veilguard
|
Post by phoray on Dec 27, 2017 6:11:10 GMT
@carefull
You just hate DAI. More like, horribly disappointed. More DA2 for you!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
7959
0
Nov 21, 2024 12:33:18 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 21, 2024 12:33:18 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2017 6:15:00 GMT
But the moment I click a magic button and chose an elf I can suddenly get the romances I want. Or if I convert to a man. It’s frustrating to an n-th degree, and I prefer this to be avoided. Inquisition has the most romances in all their games, but was the least satisfying as far as romances go because of that. So to avoid this, you would want to deprive other players of what they want from romances to fit your strict criteria? I want options opened up to more PCs, not less.
|
|
inherit
3439
0
9,615
alanc9
Old Scientist Contrarian
8,030
February 2017
alanc9
|
Post by alanc9 on Dec 27, 2017 6:18:27 GMT
No, where i think the writers were wrong was to start with selecting Blackwall and Iron Bull as male characters with romances open to female PCs, that left a female Qunari or Dwarf without the access to any one of the FOUR plot-important romances with the most interesting romances: Dorian, Cullen, Solas and Cassandra. The problem is how one-sided it ended up, with males getting one type of backstories/romances, and females -the other, unless you sacrificed your freedom to chose your race. This is a bit confused. If we're going to discuss the writers' intentions we need to get the process right. The original design intent was three-and-three; one gay, one straight, and one bisexual of each gender. Solas and Cullen weren't going to be LIs at all, for anyone. They were added during the delay. (I don't know why they added two straight male LIs instead of, say, adding one male and one female. I'd have traded Cullen for Harding, myself.) Solas is race-gated because that's his character, but Cullen is only race-gated because there wasn't enough time to do all the animations. Plot-criticality doesn't seem to have been a concern doing development. (I don't see how Cullen counts as more plot-critical than Josie anyway.) Party membership is known to have not been a concern; when people asked writers about this at cons the writers did not seem to understand the question. The "four core romances" concept is your thing, not the devs' thing.
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
Nov 17, 2024 22:23:52 GMT
31,578
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Dec 27, 2017 6:19:47 GMT
So to avoid this, you would want to deprive other players of what they want from romances to fit your strict criteria? I want options opened up to more PCs, not less. Having everyone be available to both male and female will result in there being less options, not more. Bioware stated that if they kept the all bi system from DA2 and put it into DAI, there would only be 4 romances. Also, if they did this in DAI it would still result in most of the options you wanted not being available. Realistically, if they did do that route the four would be: Cassandra, Rainier, The Iron Bull, and Sera. Cullen and Solas were only added due to the time extension so wouldn't be options, and Dorian wouldn't be an option since his being gay was central to his story as well as a character David Gaider always wanted to write for personal reasons. So of the four you wanted, only Cassandra would have been available to you.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
7959
0
Nov 21, 2024 12:33:18 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 21, 2024 12:33:18 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2017 6:25:44 GMT
No, where i think the writers were wrong was to start with selecting Blackwall and Iron Bull as male characters with romances open to female PCs, that left a female Qunari or Dwarf without the access to any one of the FOUR plot-important romances with the most interesting romances: Dorian, Cullen, Solas and Cassandra. The problem is how one-sided it ended up, with males getting one type of backstories/romances, and females -the other, unless you sacrificed your freedom to chose your race. This is a bit confused. If we're going to discuss the writers' intentions we need to get the process right. The original design intent was three-and-three; one gay, one straight, and one bisexual of each gender. Solas and Cullen weren't going to be LIs at all, for anyone. They were added during the delay. (I don't know why they added two straight male LIs instead of, say, adding one male and one female. I'd have traded Cullen for Harding, myself.) Solas is race-gated because that's his character, but Cullen is only race-gated because there wasn't enough time to do all the animations. Plot-criticality doesn't seem to have been a concern doing development. (I don't see how Cullen counts as more plot-critical than Josie anyway.) Party membership is known to have not been a concern; when people asked writers about this at cons the writers did not seem to understand the question. The "four core romances" concept is your thing, not the devs' thing. I think they added Cullen and Solas because they realized that Blackwall and Bull turned out not really well. Cullen and Solas always are miles ahead in popularity over the two initial choices. If they did not have them included, I thi;k the dissatisfaction I experienced as someone who plays a female Qunari that was only able to access the unenhanced option would have been far more widespread. I feel that these two elf/human options pretty much saved it from a flop as far as romanceable males are concerned.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
7959
0
Nov 21, 2024 12:33:18 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 21, 2024 12:33:18 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2017 6:29:38 GMT
I want options opened up to more PCs, not less. Having everyone be available to both male and female will result in there being less options, not more. Bioware stated that if they kept the all bi system from DA2 and put it into DAI, there would only be 4 romances. Also, if they did this in DAI it would still result in most of the options you wanted not being available. Realistically, if they did do that route the four would be: Cassandra, Rainier, The Iron Bull, and Sera. Cullen and Solas were only added due to the time extension so wouldn't be options, and Dorian wouldn't be an option since his being gay was central to his story as well as a character David Gaider always wanted to write for personal reasons. So of the four you wanted, only Cassandra would have been available to you. Maybe, maybe not. Also, if they did those four, then they might have been different in their story involvement, with way more expanded parts. They could have transferred the leading man to Cullen and cut out BW and his story completely, and they could have made Josephine an elf or a dwarf and replaced Sera & Leliana with her, for example. And Bull could have been more like Sten... (Sigh dreamily) yep, i’d Love that. And Dorian could have been a romance in the next game on his home turf, and bi. Perfect.
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
Nov 17, 2024 22:23:52 GMT
31,578
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Dec 27, 2017 6:32:22 GMT
Having everyone be available to both male and female will result in there being less options, not more. Bioware stated that if they kept the all bi system from DA2 and put it into DAI, there would only be 4 romances. Also, if they did this in DAI it would still result in most of the options you wanted not being available. Realistically, if they did do that route the four would be: Cassandra, Rainier, The Iron Bull, and Sera. Cullen and Solas were only added due to the time extension so wouldn't be options, and Dorian wouldn't be an option since his being gay was central to his story as well as a character David Gaider always wanted to write for personal reasons. So of the four you wanted, only Cassandra would have been available to you. Maybe, maybe not. Also, if they did those four, then they might have been different in their story involvement, with way more expanded parts. They could have transferred the leading man to Cullen and cut out BW and his story completely, and they could have made Josephine an elf or a dwarf and replaced Sera & Leliana with her, for example. And Bull could have been more like Sten... (Sigh dreamily) yep, i’d Love that. So like I said, to fit your criteria you would deprive other players of what they want from romances and make less options. I know I'd certainly be screwed over by your lineup.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
7959
0
Nov 21, 2024 12:33:18 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 21, 2024 12:33:18 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2017 6:37:54 GMT
Maybe, maybe not. Also, if they did those four, then they might have been different in their story involvement, with way more expanded parts. They could have transferred the leading man to Cullen and cut out BW and his story completely, and they could have made Josephine an elf or a dwarf and replaced Sera & Leliana with her, for example. And Bull could have been more like Sten... (Sigh dreamily) yep, i’d Love that. So like I said, to fit your criteria you'd deprive other players of what they want from romances. I know I'd certainly be screwed over by your lineup. Well, the way it is, I am screwed. I can’t see many people being upset with Cullen romancing Qunari and Dwarves or bi Cassandra. Yes, I know, it gets people upset deeply if Dorian story was amended a little to be open to both genders, and I understand why. But I also do not want to play male, and a bi character is a fair and convenient compromise. I also think if Solas was released romancing all races and genders, everyone would have been okay with that.
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
Nov 17, 2024 22:23:52 GMT
31,578
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Dec 27, 2017 6:41:17 GMT
So like I said, to fit your criteria you'd deprive other players of what they want from romances. I know I'd certainly be screwed over by your lineup. Well, the way it is, I am screwed. I van’t see many people being upset with Cullen romancing Qunari and Dwarves. Yes, I know, it gets people upset deeply if Dorian story was amended a little to be open to both genders, and I understand why. But I also do not want to play male, and a bi character is an even-handed compromise. No it's not. A compromise involves both sides giving part of something they want up to reach a result where both sides get at least some of what they want. Having Dorian made bi is not a compromise since only one side is having to sacrifice something while the other side(in this case you) gives up nothing.
|
|
inherit
3439
0
9,615
alanc9
Old Scientist Contrarian
8,030
February 2017
alanc9
|
Post by alanc9 on Dec 27, 2017 6:47:45 GMT
I think they added Cullen and Solas because they realized that Blackwall and Bull turned out not really well. Cullen and Solas always are miles ahead in popularity over the two initial choices. If they did not have them included, I thi;k the dissatisfaction I experienced as someone who plays a female Qunari that was only able to access the unenhanced option would have been far more widespread. I feel that these two elf/human options pretty much saved it from a flop as far as romanceable males are concerned. Blackwall I can see. On paper he looks fine. I'm not really sure why he didn't work all that well in the end. (That's sort of how I feel about NWN/HotU's Nathyrra.) I think TIB works fine, but he's awfully specialized; that's just not going to be to everyone's taste
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
7959
0
Nov 21, 2024 12:33:18 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 21, 2024 12:33:18 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2017 6:54:10 GMT
Well, the way it is, I am screwed. I van’t see many people being upset with Cullen romancing Qunari and Dwarves. Yes, I know, it gets people upset deeply if Dorian story was amended a little to be open to both genders, and I understand why. But I also do not want to play male, and a bi character is an even-handed compromise. No it's not. A compromise involves both sides giving part of something they want up to reach a result where both sides get at least some of what they want. Having Dorian made bi is not a compromise since only one side is having to sacrifice something while the other side(in this case you) gives up nothing. Well, in practice, I sacrifice the cutscene quality in order to enjoy the PT I want. In theory, I would have sacrificed the additional romances if I was given the choice. Farewell, Blackwall, my exclusive straight guy! Seriously, I am very much in favor of 4 bi solution. They did it so well. Whatever they would have done in DAI, whomever they would have picked, I would not have complained if they did it that way. You only perceive loss because it was not done that way, and now it will never be done.
|
|
inherit
1439
0
13,433
witchcocktor
4,278
Sept 6, 2016 10:00:37 GMT
September 2016
witchcocktor
Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Neverwinter Nights, Mass Effect Andromeda, Dragon Age The Veilguard
|
Post by witchcocktor on Dec 27, 2017 7:03:33 GMT
No it's not. A compromise involves both sides giving part of something they want up to reach a result where both sides get at least some of what they want. Having Dorian made bi is not a compromise since only one side is having to sacrifice something while the other side(in this case you) gives up nothing. Well, in practice, I sacrifice the cutscene quality in order to enjoy the PT I want. In theory, I would have sacrificed the additional romances if I was given the choice. Farewell, Blackwall, my exclusive straight guy! Seriously, I am very much in favor of 4 bi solution. They did it so well. Whatever they would have done in DAI, whomever they would have picked, I would not have complained if they did it that way. You only perceive loss because it was not done that way, and now it will never be done. First you want to remove the only gay man from the game, then you want to remove the best boy Blackwall? You are a monster! :srs:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
7959
0
Nov 21, 2024 12:33:18 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 21, 2024 12:33:18 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 27, 2017 7:09:28 GMT
I think they added Cullen and Solas because they realized that Blackwall and Bull turned out not really well. Cullen and Solas always are miles ahead in popularity over the two initial choices. If they did not have them included, I thi;k the dissatisfaction I experienced as someone who plays a female Qunari that was only able to access the unenhanced option would have been far more widespread. I feel that these two elf/human options pretty much saved it from a flop as far as romanceable males are concerned. Blackwall I can see. On paper he looks fine. I'm not really sure why he didn't work all that well in the end. (That's sort of how I feel about NWN/HotU's Nathyrra.) I think TIB works fine, but he's awfully specialized; that's just not going to be to everyone's taste Blackwall does not work because he is overloaded with conspicuous negatives. His crime is real and despicable; that is not offset by the rest of his package. He does not do attractive martyrdom, neither he has some angst justification, mistake or whatnot. He is not offered a “save” like the babies actually survived. He then acts non-heroically. He assumes an identity, and this identity is not particularly attractive. He does not drink of the Darkspawn blood hoping to die... and well, by the look of it he was hiding that misdeed for twenty-odd years as he looks to be at least forty. And while he is hiding he commits the gravest sin of all. He is boring. His dialogues lack spark. Just like Iron Bull, he lectures rather than converses (something Dorian, Cassandra or Sera actually do well, deliver an illusion of listening and responding to the pc, not spouting their info at them) and he is not brilliant at lecturing - that what Solas manages, and Varric at times. He also almost immediately suggests that romance is a bad idea. And on top of all that, he is not a looker. That’s why it does not work. And how anyone could have thought it would work is a mystery to me. Iron Bull is so far out from what you coveted after Sten, Ketjan and Arishok, the high drama characters. He is “casual” when you want a high romance. And with a side of very unusual and unpleasant sexual stuff that most people are not going to want to explore in a fairily high fantasy video-game... he is all wrong and too much of a tee-hee! Not what you expected, eh? Gotcha!
|
|