midnight tea
Twitter Guru
gateway beverage
Posts: 8,271 Likes: 20,372
inherit
gateway beverage
109
0
20,372
midnight tea
8,271
August 2016
midnighttea
|
Post by midnight tea on Jan 7, 2017 23:59:44 GMT
Yeah, I'm familiar with those passages and I'm still not getting the PoC thing. You're familiar with the passages that explicitly read that she's a woman of color but you don't understand why readers of "The Masked Empire" acknowledge her as a woman of color? It's pretty simplistic. It's why a myriad of artists depict her as a woman of color based on her description in "The Masked Empire", and it's the reason why there's a mod to make Briala look like a woman of color - the way she's described in TME. Welp, I don't understand it either. It seems that the only thing that is 'simplistic' here is that some people took a few passages and decided that she's a (fairly dark) POC, even if all the book describes is only that she is 'darker' than Celene. What's more, we did see Briala in DAI - she is indeed darker than Celene, just not as dark as some may have assumed. All in all I guess Weekes' response to a question whether Briala was supposed to be darker or not, he'd likely say something akin to what JK Rowlig said about Hermione once - that her description is vague enough to leave a room for interpretation, if someone's inclined to do so.
|
|
Fen'Harel Faceman
N7
GIF Addict
Workin' so hard, to make it easy.
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
Posts: 13,331 Likes: 30,906
inherit
GIF Addict
374
0
30,906
Fen'Harel Faceman
Workin' so hard, to make it easy.
13,331
August 2016
almostfaceman
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Fen'Harel Faceman on Jan 8, 2017 0:00:14 GMT
Okay, I'm going to ask because this is bothering me. Where does it say Briala is PoC? I've read TME but I never got the impression that she was. The only description I remember is that her skin is darker than Celene's and Celene is quite pale. My sister and I are white, but she has darker skin than me. Her elven lover made soft sleeping sounds, and Celene stroked her hair absently. The black curls lightened to gray with the pre-dawn light, then slid to the light brown of cinnamon as the sun brought colour to the room.Dirt-brown, Celene had called it, when Briala had waited upon her as a girl. Horse-dung brown, an ugly shadow of Celene’s spun-gold locks. Back when they had both been children, before Celene had known the value of having a friend who could be trusted, who wasn’t a competitor in the Game. She watched Briala’s throat, where her pulse fluttered. Her skin was darker than Celene’s, though she spent most of her days inside and showed no tan lines at the bare skin around her eyes. Briala tried to ignore it, but Celene knew that she was quietly ashamed of it. Not the ears that gave her away as elven even beneath the mask, not the lovely liquid eyes, but her sun-touched skin, dotted with a spray of pretty freckles. “You could have woken me earlier.” “Burdens of the empress,” Celene said, and smiled. Her lover’s skin was dark against the creamy white satin of her nightshirt. There's more than a few reasons why a myriad of people have wondered why Briala is depicted as white in Inquisition when her description is that of a woman of color. Her description isn't exclusive to that of a black woman or whatever you're referring to as a "person of color." Here's an example:
|
|
lobselvith8
N3
Games: Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
Posts: 426 Likes: 496
inherit
581
0
496
lobselvith8
426
August 2016
lobselvith8
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by lobselvith8 on Jan 8, 2017 0:04:13 GMT
Well I got through the hellish breakup scene for my Revas Surana Lavellan. I'm wondering how did your Lavellan respond to the revelation about the vallaslin? I usually go for the sad option, but for my Surana Lavellan, I went with the neutral option because it fits with how she feels about them. The dalish have reclaimed them. Instead of slavery it means she's one of the free elves. One of those who refuse to submit to human rule and be treated like trash by them. I thought that scene was so ripe for RP and it annoys me that people try to pigeonhole it into "if you remove the vallaslin, you just do it for Solas/you're disconnecting your Lavellan from her clan and heritage". My Lavellan has been questioning her history and with the preoccupation with the past in her Dalish clan for a while. She thinks (perhaps falsely, depending on your POV) that it's what's holding them back and disconnecting them from the world around them. Everything over the course of DAI made her question the elven gods even more, and in the end the vallaslin thing was the last straw. By removing them, she's expressing her determination to stop living so hard in the past and move her and her people into the future. I personally don't believe that you can "reclaim" something if you never knew what it meant. Reclamation means you knew it was bad but moving forward, you make it your own. If the Dalish knew the truth, they'd be in a position to reclaim the marks. And some would if they knew (which presumably they may later on), and some Lavellans like yours would see it as reclamation too now that they have that knowledge. My Lavellan chose not to, and personally sees them as a symbol of being stuck in the past, though she'd never blame other Dalish for not seeing it that way. So in the end, she became a foil to Solas unintentionally. Though in the vallaslin scene, it's irritating that the writers forced a reasoning in the lines where you chose to remove them. Because what Lavellan says in the "take them away" line is not how I actually see her feeling. Usually I just ignore it when the game does that, though! I know you're speaking from the perspective of your character, but to address that particular viewpoint, it's not like the Dalish can co-existence alongside Andrastian humans when the Chantry outlawed their religion, templars pursue them for their mages, and humans are known to attack them when they stay too long in one region; it's one of the things I've never understood about the criticism of the Dalish being nomadic. It's self-preservation. The only humans who were known not to attack the Dalish outright were the Rivaini who followed the Natural Order. Gaider once said that "the Rivaini city of Llomerryn is known to have a semi-permanent Dalish encampment on its outskirts, and trade with the elves for their crafts is encouraged." What 'future' are the Dalish supposed to move towards when they're criminals because of their religious and cultural views? Even Merrill points out that if there was a new elven homeland, "half of Thedas" would likely be attacking them. Really, the Dalish way of life is one of survival in a world that fears and hates them. Given how elves are seen as "less than people" (as Duncan admits to the elven protagonist) I've also found it strange that some criticize the Dalish for being proud of their heritage. Following that mindset of loving your people even as the rest of the world wants to dehumanize you for it, it also stands to reason that a Dalish protagonist would easily point out that vallaslin doesn't mean what it meant in Arlathan - it hasn't meant that for generations, for centuries.
|
|
Fen'Harel Faceman
N7
GIF Addict
Workin' so hard, to make it easy.
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
Posts: 13,331 Likes: 30,906
inherit
GIF Addict
374
0
30,906
Fen'Harel Faceman
Workin' so hard, to make it easy.
13,331
August 2016
almostfaceman
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Fen'Harel Faceman on Jan 8, 2017 0:08:10 GMT
You don't know what meaningful diversity is, nor did you comprehend what I wrote. Given that you used the phrase 'identity politics' when I pointed out that Sera and Solas were originally depicted as PoC and were changed to white characters, let's not pretend that your posts have anything to do with meaningful diversity. You're attacking me for pointing out that fictional characters in a fantasy game who were depicted as people of color were changed into white characters. There's nothing much more to it than that. My posts actually go to the trouble to describe meaningful diversity, which you'd know if you'd bother to read them. Your infatuation with skin pigmentation, hence your use of the term "whitewashing" repeatedly, is an example of worthless focus on meaningless diversity based on melanin content. It's just as worthless as when white people in America used pigmentation to judge black people.
|
|
midnight tea
Twitter Guru
gateway beverage
Posts: 8,271 Likes: 20,372
inherit
gateway beverage
109
0
20,372
midnight tea
8,271
August 2016
midnighttea
|
Post by midnight tea on Jan 8, 2017 0:08:29 GMT
You don't know what meaningful diversity is, nor did you comprehend what I wrote. Given that you used the phrase 'identity politics' when I pointed out that Sera and Solas were originally depicted as PoC and were changed to white characters, let's not pretend that your posts have anything to do with meaningful diversity. You're attacking me for pointing out that fictional characters in a fantasy game who were depicted as people of color were changed into white characters. There's nothing much more to it than that. As we know characters go through various iterations throughout development, therefore I don't think the accusations of 'whitewashing' Sera or Solas is valid - *especially* that in the beginning Vivienne was supposed to be white and they switched her as well (and Iron Bull initially was supposed to be a woman... oh, and have no left hand instead of no left eye). Besides... considering just how polarizing Solas is, I can already imagine the roar of people accusing BW of casting another POC as a (potentially) villainous character who may or may not have been designed to ultimately fail or be defeated. I've also seen quite a few shouts at Bioware for Sera being a lesbian AND a polarizing character herself. All in all, it only shows that neither Bioware nor anyone else really can please everyone - there will always be people who are unhappy, for valid reasons and... less so valid.
|
|
lobselvith8
N3
Games: Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
Posts: 426 Likes: 496
inherit
581
0
496
lobselvith8
426
August 2016
lobselvith8
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by lobselvith8 on Jan 8, 2017 0:09:26 GMT
You're familiar with the passages that explicitly read that she's a woman of color but you don't understand why readers of "The Masked Empire" acknowledge her as a woman of color? It's pretty simplistic. It's why a myriad of artists depict her as a woman of color based on her description in "The Masked Empire", and it's the reason why there's a mod to make Briala look like a woman of color - the way she's described in TME. Welp, I don't understand it either. It seems that the only thing that is 'simplistic' here is that some people took a few passages and decided that she's a (fairly dark) POC, even if all the book describes is only that she is 'darker' than Celene. What's more, we did see Briala in DAI - she is indeed darker than Celene, just not as dark as some may have assumed. All in all I guess Weekes' response to a question whether Briala was supposed to be darker or not, he'd likely say something akin to what JK Rowlig said about Hermione once - that her description is vague enough to leave a room for interpretation, if someone's inclined to do so. The book describes Briala as a woman of color - as someone who clearly isn't white given the repeated examples made of how she isn't white, whether it's in contrast to white attire or Celene's white skin. It's relatively simplistic to understand why people who have read their book have pointed out that she's not a white character, and it's particularly odd when you also consider that Sera and Solas were previously envisioned as people of color and were also made white in the final versions of their respective characters.
|
|
inherit
1923
0
6,858
Rynnju
1,417
November 2016
rynnju
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by Rynnju on Jan 8, 2017 0:13:43 GMT
I thought that scene was so ripe for RP and it annoys me that people try to pigeonhole it into "if you remove the vallaslin, you just do it for Solas/you're disconnecting your Lavellan from her clan and heritage". My Lavellan has been questioning her history and with the preoccupation with the past in her Dalish clan for a while. She thinks (perhaps falsely, depending on your POV) that it's what's holding them back and disconnecting them from the world around them. Everything over the course of DAI made her question the elven gods even more, and in the end the vallaslin thing was the last straw. By removing them, she's expressing her determination to stop living so hard in the past and move her and her people into the future. I personally don't believe that you can "reclaim" something if you never knew what it meant. Reclamation means you knew it was bad but moving forward, you make it your own. If the Dalish knew the truth, they'd be in a position to reclaim the marks. And some would if they knew (which presumably they may later on), and some Lavellans like yours would see it as reclamation too now that they have that knowledge. My Lavellan chose not to, and personally sees them as a symbol of being stuck in the past, though she'd never blame other Dalish for not seeing it that way. So in the end, she became a foil to Solas unintentionally. Though in the vallaslin scene, it's irritating that the writers forced a reasoning in the lines where you chose to remove them. Because what Lavellan says in the "take them away" line is not how I actually see her feeling. Usually I just ignore it when the game does that, though! I know you're speaking from the perspective of your character, but to address that particular viewpoint, it's not like the Dalish can co-existence alongside Andrastian humans when the Chantry outlawed their religion, templars pursue them for their mages, and humans are known to attack them when they stay too long in one region; it's one of the things I've never understood about the criticism of the Dalish being nomadic. It's self-preservation. The only humans who were known not to attack the Dalish outright were the Rivaini who followed the Natural Order. Gaider once said that "the Rivaini city of Llomerryn is known to have a semi-permanent Dalish encampment on its outskirts, and trade with the elves for their crafts is encouraged." What 'future' are the Dalish supposed to move towards when they're criminals because of their religious and cultural views? Even Merrill points out that if there was a new elven homeland, "half of Thedas" would likely be attacking them. Really, the Dalish way of life is one of survival in a world that fears and hates them. Given how elves are seen as "less than people" (as Duncan admits to the elven protagonist) I've also found it strange that some criticize the Dalish for being proud of their heritage. Following that mindset of loving your people even as the rest of the world wants to dehumanize you for it, it also stands to reason that a Dalish protagonist would easily point out that vallaslin doesn't mean what it meant in Arlathan - it hasn't meant that for generations, for centuries. I generally agree and this would be incredibly hard to overcome in real life. But this game also has an element of changing the world order and bringing disparate people together rather quickly. So wanting to move towards breaking down barriers on all sides (mostly starting with moving towards making the Chantry more progressive, like if you choose Leliana) is actually a somewhat feasible option. But like I said, that's what makes it a fantasy game. It's not that Lavellan thinks they can just waltz up and be happy and dandy with the humans, but she wants her people to be open to it if the world changes enough to where it's possible. My Lavellan mostly doesn't think clinging to the glory of the past that is revealed as not even being entirely true as the Dalish know it isn't a good way to move forward. It's not that she thinks all of their heritage and modern culture is useless. And she thinks they should focus on the history they make now, like helping to stop the Blight, and take their pride in that. She just can't glorify the elven gods and all of ancient elven culture anymore and the vallaslin remind her of doing that. That's just her point of view, though and she wouldn't fault other elves for seeing it as reclamation. However, she is purposefully played as a somewhat naive idealist so that factors in. She also personally feels a little trapped within the Dalish and that factors into how she justifies things and reacts when she learns the truth.
|
|
lobselvith8
N3
Games: Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
Posts: 426 Likes: 496
inherit
581
0
496
lobselvith8
426
August 2016
lobselvith8
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by lobselvith8 on Jan 8, 2017 0:15:16 GMT
Given that you used the phrase 'identity politics' when I pointed out that Sera and Solas were originally depicted as PoC and were changed to white characters, let's not pretend that your posts have anything to do with meaningful diversity. You're attacking me for pointing out that fictional characters in a fantasy game who were depicted as people of color were changed into white characters. There's nothing much more to it than that. My posts actually go to the trouble to describe meaningful diversity, which you'd know if you'd bother to read them. Your infatuation with skin pigmentation, hence your use of the term "whitewashing" repeatedly, is an example of worthless focus on meaningless diversity based on melanin content. It's just as worthless as when white people in America used pigmentation to judge black people. I did read your posts, which is why I know they didn't address meaningful diversity, and as you've been complaining because of a single line I originally wrote about Solas and Sera originally being depicted as people of color, you certainly don't have any right to say anyone is 'infatuated'.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
1620
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2017 0:23:28 GMT
Well I got through the hellish breakup scene for my Revas Surana Lavellan. I'm wondering how did your Lavellan respond to the revelation about the vallaslin? I usually go for the sad option, but for my Surana Lavellan, I went with the neutral option because it fits with how she feels about them. The dalish have reclaimed them. Instead of slavery it means she's one of the free elves. One of those who refuse to submit to human rule and be treated like trash by them. I thought that scene was so ripe for RP and it annoys me that people try to pigeonhole it into "if you remove the vallaslin, you just do it for Solas/you're disconnecting your Lavellan from her clan and heritage". My Lavellan has been questioning her history and with the preoccupation with the past in her Dalish clan for a while. She thinks (perhaps falsely, depending on your POV) that it's what's holding them back and disconnecting them from the world around them. Everything over the course of DAI made her question the elven gods even more, and in the end the vallaslin thing was the last straw. By removing them, she's expressing her determination to stop living so hard in the past and move her and her people into the future. I personally don't believe that you can "reclaim" something if you never knew what it meant. Reclamation means you knew it was bad but moving forward, you make it your own. If the Dalish knew the truth, they'd be in a position to reclaim the marks. And some would if they knew (which presumably they may later on), and some Lavellans like yours would see it as reclamation too now that they have that knowledge. My Lavellan chose not to, and personally sees them as a symbol of being stuck in the past, though she'd never blame other Dalish for not seeing it that way. So in the end, she became a foil to Solas unintentionally. Basically for mine, it had nothing to do with Solas or abandoning her people. This is one of those decisions where it irks me when people make it so black and white. A similar one is the Solas and Cole vs Varric and Cole situation, which I've seen so many people talk trash on. Though in a similar vein, I completely get why people are so annoyed the Dalish beliefs are essentially revealed as false while the writers have stated outright that they'll never disprove the Maker. That's one of those built in real-world religious biases that they probably didn't think about when they did it. Revas kept them. She never really believed in the elven gods. She is kind of an atheist agonistic. She will be quick to say there is no Maker if asked directly by someone she had no intentions of manipulating. She doesn't believe that there is Maker because that a human thing, but will say that she believes in the Creators because that's an elven thing. Faith and religion is nothing but politics, identity politics, and a pathway to power through manipulation to her. She never really had any faith and can't really understand it. She is focused entirely on the material world and doesn't have an ounce of spirituality in her. So she wasn't as hurt by the revelation as my past religious Lavellan was. Not much disillusionment other then "Wow, the ancient elves and Mythal are assholes who are not going to do shit for us. Fuck you all." Honestly, she doesn't really care that much about the past. They were slave markings in the past, well they're not now. She really kept her vallasline because she spent so long trying to get.Revas was a Circle mage who ran away from the Ferelden Circle Tower, crossed the Waking Seas, hiked through the wilderness, and spent nearly a decade trying to prove her elfyness so she could get her vallaslin. It means to her a rejection of the human world and the Chantry. Even before she met clan Lavellan, she had tattooed her face with supposed dalish marking, which were really just Chasind markings, all to give the middle finger to the Chantry. She's kind of the anti-Sera, they both faced discrimination for being elves, but while Sera tried mitigate this by distancing her self from anything elfy, Revas did the exact opposite. Also, even at the start of the Inquisition after she was called the Herald Of Andraste, she knew that was probably never going home again. Being believed to be the Herald of Andraste would give her some influence and power to help elves. There was no way she would not exploit that opportunity. Also there were already people in the clan who did not respect her due to her being a flat ear in their eyes, even after a decade studying the old ways they still did not fully accept her as one of them. Mostly due to her position as Keeper's First, as the majority weren't keen on having a flat ear being the leader of the clan someday. Being held as Herald of Andraste would probably encourage that sentiment.
|
|
lobselvith8
N3
Games: Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
Posts: 426 Likes: 496
inherit
581
0
496
lobselvith8
426
August 2016
lobselvith8
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by lobselvith8 on Jan 8, 2017 0:24:37 GMT
I know you're speaking from the perspective of your character, but to address that particular viewpoint, it's not like the Dalish can co-existence alongside Andrastian humans when the Chantry outlawed their religion, templars pursue them for their mages, and humans are known to attack them when they stay too long in one region; it's one of the things I've never understood about the criticism of the Dalish being nomadic. It's self-preservation. The only humans who were known not to attack the Dalish outright were the Rivaini who followed the Natural Order. Gaider once said that "the Rivaini city of Llomerryn is known to have a semi-permanent Dalish encampment on its outskirts, and trade with the elves for their crafts is encouraged." What 'future' are the Dalish supposed to move towards when they're criminals because of their religious and cultural views? Even Merrill points out that if there was a new elven homeland, "half of Thedas" would likely be attacking them. Really, the Dalish way of life is one of survival in a world that fears and hates them. Given how elves are seen as "less than people" (as Duncan admits to the elven protagonist) I've also found it strange that some criticize the Dalish for being proud of their heritage. Following that mindset of loving your people even as the rest of the world wants to dehumanize you for it, it also stands to reason that a Dalish protagonist would easily point out that vallaslin doesn't mean what it meant in Arlathan - it hasn't meant that for generations, for centuries. I generally agree and this would be true in real life. But this game also has an element of changing the world order and bringing disparate people together. So wanting to move towards breaking down barriers on all sides (mostly starting with moving towards making the Chantry more progressive, like if you choose Leliana) is actually a somewhat feasible option in this game. But like I said, that's what makes it a fantasy game. It's not that Lavellan thinks they can just waltz up and be happy and dandy with the humans, but she wants her people to be open to it if the world changes enough to where it's possible. My Lavellan mostly doesn't think clinging to the glory of the past that is revealed as not even being entirely true as the Dalish know it isn't a good way to move forward. It's not that she thinks all of their heritage and modern culture is useless. She just can't glorify the elven gods and all of ancient elven culture anymore and the vallaslin remind her of doing that. That's just her point of view, though and she wouldn't fault other elves for seeing it as reclamation. However, she is purposefully played as a somewhat naive idealist so that factors in. She also personally feels a little trapped within the Dalish and that factors into how she justifies things and reacts when she learns the truth. I understand where you're coming from. I mostly address it because (outside of the character perspective) the Dalish have changed - they aren't who they were during Arlathan, and they even evolved past what they were in the kingdom of the Dales. They've adapted to their nomadic lifestyle, to the point where even their halla have shifted to accommodate this change. Even their magic evolved to be geared around nature, as WoT reads: "Their spells have evolved to be deeply rooted in nature, manipulating earthly forces with a heavy emphasis on herbalism and healing." (page 104) Frankly, I share your character's sentiment in wanting more for the Dalish. I wish there were more options in Inquisition that made this possible. Skyhold, for example, is in the Dales - you'd think there would be a multitude of clans who might head to the southern Dales to be near a center of power for one of the most powerful Dalish elves of the Age, who has military and political power (which has been unprecedented for the People since the Dales became an occupied nation).
|
|
midnight tea
Twitter Guru
gateway beverage
Posts: 8,271 Likes: 20,372
inherit
gateway beverage
109
0
20,372
midnight tea
8,271
August 2016
midnighttea
|
Post by midnight tea on Jan 8, 2017 0:26:24 GMT
Welp, I don't understand it either. It seems that the only thing that is 'simplistic' here is that some people took a few passages and decided that she's a (fairly dark) POC, even if all the book describes is only that she is 'darker' than Celene. What's more, we did see Briala in DAI - she is indeed darker than Celene, just not as dark as some may have assumed. All in all I guess Weekes' response to a question whether Briala was supposed to be darker or not, he'd likely say something akin to what JK Rowlig said about Hermione once - that her description is vague enough to leave a room for interpretation, if someone's inclined to do so. The book describes Briala as a woman of color - as someone who clearly isn't white given the repeated examples made of how she isn't white, whether it's in contrast to white attire or Celene's white skin. It's relatively simplistic to understand why people who have read their book have pointed out that she's not a white character, and it's particularly odd when you also consider that Sera and Solas were previously envisioned as people of color and were also made white in the final versions of their respective characters. I have to ask - is anyone who is not alabaster white is POC for you? Because I live in a country that is - sadly, due to our tumultuous history - 99% homogeneous and white and I know many people who fit Briala's description like a glove, and some of them have about the color of skin they chose for SOME concept arts for Solas and Sera (like my brother in law - has a skin color about the same as concept Sera). Yet they're all caucasian, so do many even more dark-skinned folks from southern Europe. I'm sorry, but I have to say that for me the whole situation seems quite forced.
|
|
Fen'Harel Faceman
N7
GIF Addict
Workin' so hard, to make it easy.
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
Posts: 13,331 Likes: 30,906
inherit
GIF Addict
374
0
30,906
Fen'Harel Faceman
Workin' so hard, to make it easy.
13,331
August 2016
almostfaceman
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Fen'Harel Faceman on Jan 8, 2017 0:26:42 GMT
My posts actually go to the trouble to describe meaningful diversity, which you'd know if you'd bother to read them. Your infatuation with skin pigmentation, hence your use of the term "whitewashing" repeatedly, is an example of worthless focus on meaningless diversity based on melanin content. It's just as worthless as when white people in America used pigmentation to judge black people. I did read your posts, which is why I know they didn't address meaningful diversity, and as you've been complaining because of a single line I originally wrote about Solas and Sera originally being depicted as people of color, you certainly don't have any right to say anyone is 'infatuated'. No, you also thought Briala was whitewashed, which highlighted your focus on skin melanin content. "Nuh - uh" is not an argument against my description of diversity. Carrying on a conversation about a disagreement isn't infatuation. Even if I were infatuated, that in no way prohibits me from accurately pointing out your infatuation. In fact, there's nothing inherently wrong with being infatuated... the problem merely resides in with what you're infatuated. In this case you're infatuated with a meaningless diversity.
|
|
inherit
1923
0
6,858
Rynnju
1,417
November 2016
rynnju
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by Rynnju on Jan 8, 2017 0:30:42 GMT
I generally agree and this would be true in real life. But this game also has an element of changing the world order and bringing disparate people together. So wanting to move towards breaking down barriers on all sides (mostly starting with moving towards making the Chantry more progressive, like if you choose Leliana) is actually a somewhat feasible option in this game. But like I said, that's what makes it a fantasy game. It's not that Lavellan thinks they can just waltz up and be happy and dandy with the humans, but she wants her people to be open to it if the world changes enough to where it's possible. My Lavellan mostly doesn't think clinging to the glory of the past that is revealed as not even being entirely true as the Dalish know it isn't a good way to move forward. It's not that she thinks all of their heritage and modern culture is useless. She just can't glorify the elven gods and all of ancient elven culture anymore and the vallaslin remind her of doing that. That's just her point of view, though and she wouldn't fault other elves for seeing it as reclamation. However, she is purposefully played as a somewhat naive idealist so that factors in. She also personally feels a little trapped within the Dalish and that factors into how she justifies things and reacts when she learns the truth. I understand where you're coming from. I mostly address it because (outside of the character perspective) the Dalish have changed - they aren't who they were during Arlathan, and they even evolved past what they were in the kingdom of the Dales. They've adapted to their nomadic lifestyle, to the point where even their halla have shifted to accommodate this change. Even their magic evolved to be geared around nature, as WoT reads: "Their spells have evolved to be deeply rooted in nature, manipulating earthly forces with a heavy emphasis on herbalism and healing." (page 104) Frankly, I share your character's sentiment in wanting more for the Dalish. I wish there were more options in Inquisition that made this possible. Skyhold, for example, is in the Dales - you'd think there would be a multitude of clans who might head to the southern Dales to be near a center of power for one of the most powerful Dalish elves of the Age, who has military and political power (which has been unprecedented for the People since the Dales became an occupied nation). Yep, and with a Dalish elf being the Inquisitor and making such a big change, there's more chance for a new world order and brighter future for the Dalish than ever before. I also think it will eventually be an option to reclaim the Dales as a Dalish nation, though possibly not until the last game. And if that means interacting with humans and other races and being more in the fore alongside them, my Lavellan wants her people to be ready for and accept that despite them having ample reason to dislike the idea. She's more idealist about it than she should be, though. And what I mean by her thinking their heritage and culture is still worthwhile is exactly about what you said. She's proud of who they are now, not of the past they glorify. She takes pride in their nomadic culture despite its sad origin and likes moving from place to place, she thinks their particular magic is great and loves the connection with nature, etc. It's just the preoccupation with Arlathan that she wants to move past, and the vallaslin still represent that to her, much more than they represent slavery. She also doesn't like the looking down on city elves and connects that to preoccupation with the past too, so that's another factor.
|
|
lobselvith8
N3
Games: Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
Posts: 426 Likes: 496
inherit
581
0
496
lobselvith8
426
August 2016
lobselvith8
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by lobselvith8 on Jan 8, 2017 0:32:25 GMT
I did read your posts, which is why I know they didn't address meaningful diversity, and as you've been complaining because of a single line I originally wrote about Solas and Sera originally being depicted as people of color, you certainly don't have any right to say anyone is 'infatuated'. No, you also thought Briala was whitewashed, which highlighted your focus on skin melanin content. "Nuh - uh" is not an argument against my description of diversity. Carrying on a conversation about a disagreement isn't infatuation. Even if I were infatuated, that in no way prohibits me from accurately pointing out your infatuation. In fact, there's nothing inherently wrong with being infatuated... the problem merely resides in with what you're infatuated. In this case you're infatuated with a meaningless diversity. For those of us who understand what it's like to see the marginalization and erasure of people like us, it's not meaningless for there to be diversity - like there is in the real world. Djimon Hounsou once talked about diversity and said: "It's about time! It's absolutely great news to have a hero that Black folks can identify with. Could you imagine my misfortune when my son told me, 'I want to be light-skinned so I can climb the walls like Spider-Man' — just because he has seen Spider-Man and Batman and all these superheroes who were all white? The minute he said it, I was like, 'Damn.' My whole self was shattered." Simply put, diversity isn't meaningless.
|
|
Fen'Harel Faceman
N7
GIF Addict
Workin' so hard, to make it easy.
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
Posts: 13,331 Likes: 30,906
inherit
GIF Addict
374
0
30,906
Fen'Harel Faceman
Workin' so hard, to make it easy.
13,331
August 2016
almostfaceman
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Fen'Harel Faceman on Jan 8, 2017 0:40:16 GMT
No, you also thought Briala was whitewashed, which highlighted your focus on skin melanin content. "Nuh - uh" is not an argument against my description of diversity. Carrying on a conversation about a disagreement isn't infatuation. Even if I were infatuated, that in no way prohibits me from accurately pointing out your infatuation. In fact, there's nothing inherently wrong with being infatuated... the problem merely resides in with what you're infatuated. In this case you're infatuated with a meaningless diversity. For those of us who understand what it's like to see the marginalization and erasure of people like us, it's not meaningless for there to be diversity - like there is in the real world. Djimon Hounsou once talked about diversity and said: "It's about time! It's absolutely great news to have a hero that Black folks can identify with. Could you imagine my misfortune when my son told me, 'I want to be light-skinned so I can climb the walls like Spider-Man' — just because he has seen Spider-Man and Batman and all these superheroes who were all white? The minute he said it, I was like, 'Damn.' My whole self was shattered." Simply put, diversity isn't meaningless. Your definition of diversity is meaningless and if you continue to dwell on skin color, as Djimon Hounsou obviously does (and obviously didn't teach his child to not focus on), then we'll never achieve the dream of Martin Luther King Jr. who dreamt of a world where people will "not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character." If we're looking at each other's humanity, we're not focused on skin color. Thus, children will stop noticing if Spider Man is white, black, yellow, or purple.
|
|
lobselvith8
N3
Games: Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
Posts: 426 Likes: 496
inherit
581
0
496
lobselvith8
426
August 2016
lobselvith8
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by lobselvith8 on Jan 8, 2017 0:40:57 GMT
I understand where you're coming from. I mostly address it because (outside of the character perspective) the Dalish have changed - they aren't who they were during Arlathan, and they even evolved past what they were in the kingdom of the Dales. They've adapted to their nomadic lifestyle, to the point where even their halla have shifted to accommodate this change. Even their magic evolved to be geared around nature, as WoT reads: "Their spells have evolved to be deeply rooted in nature, manipulating earthly forces with a heavy emphasis on herbalism and healing." (page 104) Frankly, I share your character's sentiment in wanting more for the Dalish. I wish there were more options in Inquisition that made this possible. Skyhold, for example, is in the Dales - you'd think there would be a multitude of clans who might head to the southern Dales to be near a center of power for one of the most powerful Dalish elves of the Age, who has military and political power (which has been unprecedented for the People since the Dales became an occupied nation). Yep, and with a Dalish elf being the Inquisitor and making such a big change, there's more chance for a new world order and brighter future for the Dalish than ever before. I also think it will eventually be an option to reclaim the Dales as a Dalish nation, though possibly not until the last game. And if that means interacting with humans and other races and being more in the fore alongside them, my Lavellan wants her people to be ready for and accept that despite them having ample reason to dislike the idea. She's more idealist about it than she should be, though. And what I mean by her thinking their heritage and culture is still worthwhile is exactly about what you said. She's proud of who they are now, not of the past they glorify. She takes pride in their nomadic culture despite its sad origin and likes moving from place to place, she thinks their particular magic is great and loves the connection with nature, etc. It's just the preoccupation with Arlathan that she wants to move past, and the vallaslin still represent that to her, much more than they represent slavery. While I know Felassan and Solas seem to criticize the Dalish over Arlathan, that never really seems to come up for the People. The fall of Arlathan is referenced in their history as a 'legend' that may not even be real, and by their own admission, little is even known about it. The goal of the People seems to mostly be about having an autonomous nation where they can be their own masters. Even Ilen seems to talk about the Dalish welcoming Andrastian elves into a hypothetical nation, where the two people can learn from one another - with hahren Paivel having suggested in Origins that the Dalish can share with them all the knowledge that was lost over the generations, while the Arlathan elves can help them learn to live with shemlen in peace (although the purges of the alienages - like the massacre of the Denerim Alienage orphanage - and the burning of Halamshiral would suggest this wouldn't necessarily be the case).
|
|
inherit
1923
0
6,858
Rynnju
1,417
November 2016
rynnju
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by Rynnju on Jan 8, 2017 0:42:03 GMT
Er, these kinds of arguments can go on for pages and pages if we let them and almost always get heated. Maybe we should tone it down a bit?
|
|
inherit
1923
0
6,858
Rynnju
1,417
November 2016
rynnju
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by Rynnju on Jan 8, 2017 0:45:22 GMT
Yep, and with a Dalish elf being the Inquisitor and making such a big change, there's more chance for a new world order and brighter future for the Dalish than ever before. I also think it will eventually be an option to reclaim the Dales as a Dalish nation, though possibly not until the last game. And if that means interacting with humans and other races and being more in the fore alongside them, my Lavellan wants her people to be ready for and accept that despite them having ample reason to dislike the idea. She's more idealist about it than she should be, though. And what I mean by her thinking their heritage and culture is still worthwhile is exactly about what you said. She's proud of who they are now, not of the past they glorify. She takes pride in their nomadic culture despite its sad origin and likes moving from place to place, she thinks their particular magic is great and loves the connection with nature, etc. It's just the preoccupation with Arlathan that she wants to move past, and the vallaslin still represent that to her, much more than they represent slavery. While I know Felassan and Solas seem to criticize the Dalish over Arlathan, that never really seems to come up for the People. The fall of Arlathan is referenced in their history as a 'legend' that may not even be real, and by their own admission, little is even known about it. The goal of the People seems to mostly be about having an autonomous nation where they can be their own masters. Even Ilen seems to talk about the Dalish welcoming Andrastian elves into a hypothetical nation, where the two people can learn from one another - with hahren Paivel having suggested in Origins that the Dalish can share with them all the knowledge that was lost over the generations, while the Arlathan elves can help them learn to live with shemlen in peace (although the purges of the alienages - like the massacre of the Denerim Alienage orphanage - and the burning of Halamshiral would suggest this wouldn't necessarily be the case). Perhaps not Arlathan itself, but the knowledge about the elven gods (which doesn't quite count because they're true gods as far as the Dalish believe. Only now do we know otherwise), their former glory, and the knowledge of that past is still the Dalish's main source of pride and a sticking point of theirs against the elves who live among humans and haven't retained that knowledge. Not all, of course, but it's a bias that was focused on before.
|
|
midnight tea
Twitter Guru
gateway beverage
Posts: 8,271 Likes: 20,372
inherit
gateway beverage
109
0
20,372
midnight tea
8,271
August 2016
midnighttea
|
Post by midnight tea on Jan 8, 2017 0:45:45 GMT
Er, these kinds of arguments can go on for pages and pages if we let them and almost always get heated. Maybe we should tone it down a bit? I agree. Even at this point this is just running around in circles.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
1620
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 8, 2017 0:46:50 GMT
Maybe create a new thread for this debate.
|
|
lobselvith8
N3
Games: Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
Posts: 426 Likes: 496
inherit
581
0
496
lobselvith8
426
August 2016
lobselvith8
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by lobselvith8 on Jan 8, 2017 0:47:10 GMT
For those of us who understand what it's like to see the marginalization and erasure of people like us, it's not meaningless for there to be diversity - like there is in the real world. Djimon Hounsou once talked about diversity and said: "It's about time! It's absolutely great news to have a hero that Black folks can identify with. Could you imagine my misfortune when my son told me, 'I want to be light-skinned so I can climb the walls like Spider-Man' — just because he has seen Spider-Man and Batman and all these superheroes who were all white? The minute he said it, I was like, 'Damn.' My whole self was shattered." Simply put, diversity isn't meaningless. Your definition of diversity is meaningless and if you continue to dwell on skin color, as Djimon Hounsou obviously does (and obviously didn't teach his child to not focus on), then we'll never achieve the dream of Martin Luther King Jr. who dreamt of a world where people will "not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character." If we're looking at each other's humanity, we're not focused on skin color. Thus, children will stop noticing if Spider Man is white, black, yellow, or purple. Actually, Martin Luther King Jr. encouraged diversity in television, which is why he was a fan of the original Star Trek and encouraged Nichelle Nichols (who played Lieutenant Uhura) not to quit the show. “He said, ‘Don’t you understand what this man [Roddenberry] has achieved? For the first time on television, we will be seen as we should be seen every day, as intelligent, quality, beautiful people who can sing and dance, yes, but who can go into space, who can be lawyers and teachers, who can be professors — who are in this day, yet you don’t see it on television until now.'” Diversity in entertainment wasn't something that King dismissed like you're suggesting.
|
|
Fen'Harel Faceman
N7
GIF Addict
Workin' so hard, to make it easy.
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
Posts: 13,331 Likes: 30,906
inherit
GIF Addict
374
0
30,906
Fen'Harel Faceman
Workin' so hard, to make it easy.
13,331
August 2016
almostfaceman
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Fen'Harel Faceman on Jan 8, 2017 0:47:57 GMT
Er, these kinds of arguments can go on for pages and pages if we let them and almost always get heated. Maybe we should tone it down a bit? I agree. Even at this point this is just running around in circles. But... circles are pretty.
|
|
lobselvith8
N3
Games: Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
Posts: 426 Likes: 496
inherit
581
0
496
lobselvith8
426
August 2016
lobselvith8
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by lobselvith8 on Jan 8, 2017 0:56:54 GMT
While I know Felassan and Solas seem to criticize the Dalish over Arlathan, that never really seems to come up for the People. The fall of Arlathan is referenced in their history as a 'legend' that may not even be real, and by their own admission, little is even known about it. The goal of the People seems to mostly be about having an autonomous nation where they can be their own masters. Even Ilen seems to talk about the Dalish welcoming Andrastian elves into a hypothetical nation, where the two people can learn from one another - with hahren Paivel having suggested in Origins that the Dalish can share with them all the knowledge that was lost over the generations, while the Arlathan elves can help them learn to live with shemlen in peace (although the purges of the alienages - like the massacre of the Denerim Alienage orphanage - and the burning of Halamshiral would suggest this wouldn't necessarily be the case). Perhaps not Arlathan itself, but the elven gods, their former glory, and the knowledge of that past is still the Dalish's main source of pride and a sticking point of theirs against the elves who live among humans and haven't retained that knowledge. Not all, of course, but it's a bias that was focused on before. True, some have issues with Andrastian elves, but there are plenty of cases of the Dalish caring about Andrastian elves as well; Aneirin was rescued when they found him as a boy on the verge of death, Lanaya was rescued and they offered to return her to her city or a human settlement if she so wished, and the City Elf Origin makes reference to the Dalish specifically leaving an Andrastian elf alone during a confrontation with other Andrastians. Even Merrill chastised Fenris (who is as foreign to the alienage as a Tevinter elf as she is as a Dalish elf) when she felt he didn't seem to care about the Andrastian elves, and outright referred to them as "our people".
|
|
inherit
1923
0
6,858
Rynnju
1,417
November 2016
rynnju
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by Rynnju on Jan 8, 2017 1:01:22 GMT
Perhaps not Arlathan itself, but the elven gods, their former glory, and the knowledge of that past is still the Dalish's main source of pride and a sticking point of theirs against the elves who live among humans and haven't retained that knowledge. Not all, of course, but it's a bias that was focused on before. True, some have issues with Andrastian elves, but there are plenty of cases of the Dalish caring about Andrastian elves as well; Aneirin was rescued when they found him as a boy on the verge of death, Lanaya was rescued and they offered to return her to her city or a human settlement if she so wished, and the City Elf Origin makes reference to the Dalish specifically leaving an Andrastian elf alone during a confrontation with other Andrastians. Even Merrill chastised Fenris (who is as foreign to the alienage as a Tevinter elf as she is as a Dalish elf) when she felt he didn't seem to care about the Andrastian elves, and outright referred to them as "our people". Of course we see a lot of examples otherwise, but the game makes it clear that it's a common bias and a disconnect between the two elven cultures, and that the Dalish feel superior for their knowledge of the past and "retaining" the old ways and language. Though like the preoccupation with Arlathan, I think a lot of the time it falls in the realm of the game/supplementary material telling us instead of showing us.
|
|
lobselvith8
N3
Games: Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
Posts: 426 Likes: 496
inherit
581
0
496
lobselvith8
426
August 2016
lobselvith8
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion
|
Post by lobselvith8 on Jan 8, 2017 1:10:37 GMT
True, some have issues with Andrastian elves, but there are plenty of cases of the Dalish caring about Andrastian elves as well; Aneirin was rescued when they found him as a boy on the verge of death, Lanaya was rescued and they offered to return her to her city or a human settlement if she so wished, and the City Elf Origin makes reference to the Dalish specifically leaving an Andrastian elf alone during a confrontation with other Andrastians. Even Merrill chastised Fenris (who is as foreign to the alienage as a Tevinter elf as she is as a Dalish elf) when she felt he didn't seem to care about the Andrastian elves, and outright referred to them as "our people". Of course we see a lot of examples otherwise, but the game makes it clear that it's a common bias and a disconnect between the two elven cultures, and that the Dalish feel superior for their knowledge of the past and "retaining" the old ways and language. Though like the preoccupation with Arlathan, I think a lot of the time it falls in the realm of the game/supplementary material telling us instead of showing us. There's a schism between the two cultures because they don't really connect, which is why some City elves think the Dalish are 'savages' or even a 'myth' (according to the City Elf Origin). Some elves living in the alienages also have disdain for any elves who leave the Alienage and refer to them as 'flat ears' as well. "Here, we're among family. We look out for each other. Here, we do what we can to remember the old ways. The flat-ears who have gone out there, they're stuck. They'll never be human, and they've gone and thrown away being elven, too. So where does that leave them? Nowhere." As for the Dalish, I don't see it as a preoccupation with Arlathan. There seems to be continued references to them simply having their own nation - their own kingdom. It comes across as a matter of wanting autonomy for themselves. Taniel, a hunter, once wrote: "The keeper says that one day the Dalish will find a home that we can call our own. But why? Why should we tie ourselves to stone constructions like the humans and the dwarves? What is wrong with the life we have now? We owe nothing to anyone, we have no master but ourselves, and we go where the halla and the gods take us. There is nothing more wonderful than sitting on an aravel as it flies through the forest, pulled by our halla. We are truly free, for the first time in our people's history. Why should we change this?"
|
|