TabithaTH
N3
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition, Dragon Age The Veilguard
Posts: 764 Likes: 1,550
inherit
10360
0
Nov 23, 2024 17:46:09 GMT
1,550
TabithaTH
764
Jul 22, 2018 12:32:26 GMT
July 2018
teatabitha
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition, Dragon Age The Veilguard
|
Post by TabithaTH on Jan 5, 2019 14:14:59 GMT
On a bit of a serious note, for a change, does anyone have any preference for the kind of tone and content they want in a romance? I'm old fashioned and boring, so I usually go for a Disney type romance. I like the whole sappy romance thing. I want to believe that my PC and their LI actually would stay together forever. But as someone else noted, it would be nice to be pursued for once, and not have to take every step myself. I still smile whenever I think of poor Alistair and his rose and his awkward "I wanna sleep with you" speeches .
|
|
inherit
4964
0
Jun 17, 2017 17:29:55 GMT
3,701
arvaarad
1,465
Mar 18, 2017 16:32:40 GMT
March 2017
arvaarad
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Jade Empire
|
Post by arvaarad on Jan 5, 2019 14:21:37 GMT
Elgar’nan, really? He’s like the one god that every source agrees on. From the library to the temple, even to Dalish myths which are usually favorable to the Creators, they all portray him as vain, with a bad temper, and an ego the size of the sun. Just means you gotta tame that bad boy. IDK, in my mind there’s a huge separation between “bad boy” and “asshole”. A bad boy is dangerous because he’s too cool/cocky in risky situations. An asshole is dangerous because he loses his shit in minor situations. They’re completely the opposite. I guess Elgar’nan’s ego would be ok if it’s earned, but having a temper is a big No for me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
584
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2019 14:27:00 GMT
I think it should be restated that the exclusive gay romance (if there is only one as per usual) should not be hidden in a dark corner-less likely to happen with Dragoh Age, but after Andromeda's launch, I don't take anything for granted.
|
|
inherit
1824
0
11,654
Davrin's boobs
#WerewolfLIforDA5 LMAO
2,689
Oct 19, 2016 19:24:39 GMT
October 2016
nickclark89
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Dragon Age The Veilguard
|
Post by Davrin's boobs on Jan 5, 2019 14:36:42 GMT
I think it should be restated that the exclusive gay romance (if there is only one as per usual) should not be hidden in a dark corner-less likely to happen with Dragoh Age, but after Andromeda's launch, I don't take anything for granted. I would love for him to have a non-apologetic "Sorry, I'm not into women" line or something, Gil's was kinda lame and you can flirt with Dorian a lot because gay best friend trope TM which it's a trope I'm totally disgusted with. Same with lesbians, I think Sera's was nice, but Suvi's erased her sexuality "we keep things professional dudebro"
|
|
inherit
1587
0
Nov 23, 2024 16:57:05 GMT
1,772
Walter Black
1,290
Sept 15, 2016 15:02:16 GMT
September 2016
walterblack
|
Post by Walter Black on Jan 5, 2019 14:51:02 GMT
On a bit of a serious note, for a change, does anyone have any preference for the kind of tone and content they want in a romance? Depends on the character, but mostly I want something that hasn't been done before:
-A proper Dwarf romance.
- An older and mature Elven woman.
-A female tal-vashoth, preferably saarebas, but any class would do.
- A commoner who wants to stay a commoner. During the romance, they say their fondest wish is settle down somewhere quite, maybe even to raise a family. No more treasure hunts, Oaths of Vengeance, revolutions or Grand Quests. Just a safe, relaxing and loving life.
-On the other hand, a ruthlessly ambitious person who wants to forge a new dynasty. It would start early, being a cat and mouse battle of wills throughout the game. If you agree, you can become the ultimate Evil Power Couple. If not, their tale can evoke the Dating Catwoman trope.
-A poly couple that invites you to join. The actual relationship, not necessarily just for sex.
-Alternatively, a love triangle where the rival is actually decent. A bittersweet tale with no heroes or villains, where both love and a broken heart happen no matter what. I don't count Aveline and Donnic, since Aveline doesn't think of Hawke that way. Nor Josephine and Adorno, since they don't end up together even if Josie wasn't romanced.
-Someone who already has a child or children, and you have to get along with the kid for the relationship to work. It doesn't have to be their biological child, they could be adopted, a much younger sibling, cousin or niece/nephew.
Mostly? I want more romances where we aren't their boss, creating any number of Unfortunate Implications.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
584
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2019 14:59:19 GMT
I think it should be restated that the exclusive gay romance (if there is only one as per usual) should not be hidden in a dark corner-less likely to happen with Dragoh Age, but after Andromeda's launch, I don't take anything for granted. I would love for him to have a non-apologetic "Sorry, I'm not into women" line or something, Gil's was kinda lame and you can flirt with Dorian a lot because gay best friend trope TM which it's a trope I'm totally disgusted with. Same with lesbians, I think Sera's was nice, but Suvi's erased her sexuality "we keep things professional dudebro" Making gay characters safe for straights has to end, god knows the people who yell SJW at the top of their lungs will do so no matter what anyway-so just be real. "No sir I'm a woman who loves women!" "I like men! Don't waste your time." Though it's also worth stating that I'd much rather all the romances be bisexual with LG representation characters elsewhere-lord knows there's a larger chance of people getting a romance they like without the restrictions. Also,make sure the scenes work for both genders (don't share the same assets and let one be great and the other a train wreck-Reyes and Peebee).
|
|
inherit
4223
0
7,814
caladrius
2,056
March 2017
nocte
|
Post by caladrius on Jan 5, 2019 15:26:29 GMT
Mainly I just don't want more commitment issues or another "teaching someone how to love" plot, because they're lame and cliche and done to death. Zev, Fenris, Dorian, it seems like we get one of these every time. Surely they can think of a new relationship arc beyond the character just being afraid of relationships.
|
|
inherit
1587
0
Nov 23, 2024 16:57:05 GMT
1,772
Walter Black
1,290
Sept 15, 2016 15:02:16 GMT
September 2016
walterblack
|
Post by Walter Black on Jan 5, 2019 15:33:23 GMT
On another note, I'm still baffled by the notion that a proper, purely gay or lesbian Love Interest must be mandatory and plot critical. A good role playing game is the player's story, what actions they take, who they consider important or not. Why do you even care if someone decides to dismiss a particular character, or not recruit them in the first place in their own game?
"They need to make up for the major straight characters being mandatory", you say? But two wrongs don't make a right, and making those previous straight characters untouchable was a mistake. We should have been able to kick out Alistair's whiny ass, make Aveline and Varric stay out of our lives, or fire Cassandra, Solas and/or Cullen if we wanted. Having mandatory characters of any orientation railroads players; "you will associate with this person, regardless of who you or they are, because my story is more important than your roleplaying. Also, your character is incompetent of finding any other ways of winning, or even surviving, without them".
Funny, when comparing modern western CRPGs, Obsidian never had this problem. Pretty much all of the their Companions are completely optional, and you can beat their games without recruiting a single one. I usually do recruit all of them, since they are usually so well written. Hell, Arcade Gannon is one of my personal favorites.
|
|
inherit
3852
0
Feb 26, 2017 13:09:29 GMT
2,276
Rouccoco
520
Feb 24, 2017 23:47:54 GMT
February 2017
bioticapostate
|
Post by Rouccoco on Jan 5, 2019 15:46:57 GMT
Bioware is not Obsidian, there are always some companions that are crucial to the plot and that's not changing. If DA4 does have gay and lesbian companions, it's definitely time to make them more relevant.
|
|
inherit
Elvis Has Left The Building
7794
0
Oct 31, 2020 23:57:02 GMT
8,073
pessimistpanda
3,804
Apr 18, 2017 15:57:34 GMT
April 2017
pessimistpanda
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by pessimistpanda on Jan 5, 2019 15:48:41 GMT
Mainly I just don't want more commitment issues or another "teaching someone how to love" plot, because they're lame and cliche and done to death. Zev, Fenris, Dorian, it seems like we get one of these every time. Surely they can think of a new relationship arc beyond the character just being afraid of relationships. Well there goes any chance of us ever dating.
|
|
inherit
1439
0
Nov 23, 2024 19:50:01 GMT
13,448
witchcocktor
4,283
Sept 6, 2016 10:00:37 GMT
September 2016
witchcocktor
Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Neverwinter Nights, Mass Effect Andromeda, Dragon Age The Veilguard
|
Post by witchcocktor on Jan 5, 2019 15:50:19 GMT
On another note, I'm still baffled by the notion that a proper, purely gay or lesbian Love Interest must be mandatory and plot critical. A good role playing game is the player's story, what actions they take, who they consider important or not. Why do you even care if someone decides to dismiss a particular character, or not recruit them in the first place in their own game? "They need to make up for the major straight characters being mandatory", you say? But two wrongs don't make a right, and making those previous straight characters untouchable was a mistake. We should have been able to kick out Alistair's whiny ass, make Aveline and Varric stay out of our lives, or fire Cassandra, Solas and/or Cullen if we wanted. Having mandatory characters of any orientation railroads players; "you will associate with this person, regardless of who you or they are, because my story is more important than your roleplaying. Also, your character is incompetent of finding any other ways of winning, or even surviving, without them".Funny, when comparing modern western CRPGs, Obsidian never had this problem. Pretty much all of the their Companions are completely optional, and you can beat their games without recruiting a single one. I usually do recruit all of them, since they are usually so well written. Hell, Arcade Gannon is one of my personal favorites. Well goodness, you probably realize we are talking from the point of view that straight companions will continue being mandatory and relevant one way or another, so it would be VALID to make some of these characters bi, or just gay. Obviously, if Dragon Age 4 is a game where every companion is optional and none of them take the forefront on the story progression, then that's a whole another thing. You are really looking to fight, aren't you?
|
|
inherit
4223
0
7,814
caladrius
2,056
March 2017
nocte
|
Post by caladrius on Jan 5, 2019 15:52:20 GMT
On another note, I'm still baffled by the notion that a proper, purely gay or lesbian Love Interest must be mandatory and plot critical. A good role playing game is the player's story, what actions they take, who they consider important or not. Why do you even care if someone decides to dismiss a particular character, or not recruit them in the first place in their own game? "They need to make up for the major straight characters being mandatory", you say? But two wrongs don't make a right, and making those previous straight characters untouchable was a mistake. We should have been able to kick out Alistair's whiny ass, make Aveline and Varric stay out of our lives, or fire Cassandra, Solas and/or Cullen if we wanted. Having mandatory characters of any orientation railroads players; "you will associate with this person, regardless of who you or they are, because my story is more important than your roleplaying. Also, your character is incompetent of finding any other ways of winning, or even surviving, without them".Funny, when comparing modern western CRPGs, Obsidian never had this problem. Pretty much all of the their Companions are completely optional, and you can beat their games without recruiting a single one. I usually do recruit all of them, since they are usually so well written. Hell, Arcade Gannon is one of my personal favorites. Bioware tells stories differently than Obsidian/Bethesda. I love the Fallout series, but the characters and plot are never really as strong as Bioware's, imo, because they structure it so that you can do whatever you want whenever you want to. It's not that it's a "worse" overall storytelling medium, but there are pros and cons to both ways. I would rather Bioware kept doing Bioware and Bethesda kept doing Bethesda. The Witcher series is way more restrictive than any Bioware game in storytelling methods, though, and it's extremely popular. Obviously completely open ended role playing is not all people are looking for in an RPG.
|
|
inherit
1824
0
11,654
Davrin's boobs
#WerewolfLIforDA5 LMAO
2,689
Oct 19, 2016 19:24:39 GMT
October 2016
nickclark89
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Dragon Age The Veilguard
|
Post by Davrin's boobs on Jan 5, 2019 15:53:25 GMT
Seriously guys I dont know why you keep pay attention to this sealioning master, I have him blocked and everytime curiosity takes the best of me and open the "this post is hidden" button I see him discrediting gay narratives once again. It's not even worth it anymore.
|
|
inherit
Elvis Has Left The Building
7794
0
Oct 31, 2020 23:57:02 GMT
8,073
pessimistpanda
3,804
Apr 18, 2017 15:57:34 GMT
April 2017
pessimistpanda
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by pessimistpanda on Jan 5, 2019 15:54:25 GMT
Jesus fucking Christ, not this crap again.
Funny enough, in the conversation about what constitutes good LGBT representation, the components of a good RPG aren't really relevant.
We don't go into your sports bars and try to change the conversation to Britney's best album.
|
|
inherit
Elvis Has Left The Building
7794
0
Oct 31, 2020 23:57:02 GMT
8,073
pessimistpanda
3,804
Apr 18, 2017 15:57:34 GMT
April 2017
pessimistpanda
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by pessimistpanda on Jan 5, 2019 15:57:31 GMT
"By the way, one of my best fictional friends is gay!"
lol
|
|
inherit
4223
0
7,814
caladrius
2,056
March 2017
nocte
|
Post by caladrius on Jan 5, 2019 16:01:37 GMT
Mainly I just don't want more commitment issues or another "teaching someone how to love" plot, because they're lame and cliche and done to death. Zev, Fenris, Dorian, it seems like we get one of these every time. Surely they can think of a new relationship arc beyond the character just being afraid of relationships. Well there goes any chance of us ever dating.
|
|
inherit
4964
0
Jun 17, 2017 17:29:55 GMT
3,701
arvaarad
1,465
Mar 18, 2017 16:32:40 GMT
March 2017
arvaarad
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Jade Empire
|
Post by arvaarad on Jan 5, 2019 16:04:45 GMT
We should have been able to kick out Alistair's whiny ass So quickly Ferelden forgets the Hero of River Dane! T-T
|
|
inherit
Elvis Has Left The Building
7794
0
Oct 31, 2020 23:57:02 GMT
8,073
pessimistpanda
3,804
Apr 18, 2017 15:57:34 GMT
April 2017
pessimistpanda
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by pessimistpanda on Jan 5, 2019 16:11:44 GMT
Well there goes any chance of us ever dating. Look what you made me do.
|
|
cankiie
N3
People are too forgiving when it comes to video games, and their focus is malplaced.
Posts: 457 Likes: 281
inherit
9149
0
281
cankiie
People are too forgiving when it comes to video games, and their focus is malplaced.
457
August 2017
cankiie
|
Post by cankiie on Jan 5, 2019 16:28:31 GMT
On another note, I'm still baffled by the notion that a proper, purely gay or lesbian Love Interest must be mandatory and plot critical. A good role playing game is the player's story, what actions they take, who they consider important or not. Why do you even care if someone decides to dismiss a particular character, or not recruit them in the first place in their own game? "They need to make up for the major straight characters being mandatory", you say? But two wrongs don't make a right, and making those previous straight characters untouchable was a mistake. We should have been able to kick out Alistair's whiny ass, make Aveline and Varric stay out of our lives, or fire Cassandra, Solas and/or Cullen if we wanted. Having mandatory characters of any orientation railroads players; "you will associate with this person, regardless of who you or they are, because my story is more important than your roleplaying. Also, your character is incompetent of finding any other ways of winning, or even surviving, without them".Funny, when comparing modern western CRPGs, Obsidian never had this problem. Pretty much all of the their Companions are completely optional, and you can beat their games without recruiting a single one. I usually do recruit all of them, since they are usually so well written. Hell, Arcade Gannon is one of my personal favorites. I think I have already succesfully argued that characters like Aveline and Cassandra are not "plot relevant" romanceables or even companions. (Aveline is not even romanceable) Most if not all of the companion character has a story related to themselves, only few are actually relevant to the overall plot. Those characters being Alistair, Anders, and Solas. Most of the characters people have described, helps push the story ahead. Cassandra can essentially exist in your playthrough only to justify the creation of the Inquisiton. She is a plot-device at best, from there on out she isn't really relevant. Alistair is plot-relevant because he is connected to the Kingdom of Ferelden and the Grey Wardens, that just makes sense. Solas is plot-relevant due to his connection to the story that is to come. This obsession with 'plot relevant romanceable' is absolutely ridicolous, the term itself is absolutely ridicolous. This notion only gets even more stupid when people DEMANDS that a certain relevant character be a specific kind of sexuality like.... just what the hell? We should not care about the allegory, who in their right mind cares SO deeply about the allegory that they completely throw applicability out the window?
|
|
inherit
4413
0
Nov 23, 2024 16:39:06 GMT
1,512
ellanathehamster
oh shi
532
March 2017
ellanathehamster
|
Post by ellanathehamster on Jan 5, 2019 17:01:35 GMT
I think it should be restated that the exclusive gay romance (if there is only one as per usual) should not be hidden in a dark corner-less likely to happen with Dragoh Age, but after Andromeda's launch, I don't take anything for granted. I would love for him to have a non-apologetic "Sorry, I'm not into women" line or something, Gil's was kinda lame and you can flirt with Dorian a lot because gay best friend trope TM which it's a trope I'm totally disgusted with. Same with lesbians, I think Sera's was nice, but Suvi's erased her sexuality "we keep things professional dudebro" But is it such a bad thing? I personally thinks all refusal's were done nicely =) Look at it from this perspective- if someone has a crush on you would you really have a heart to tell then- "ew, i don't like your cause you are *insert something*, so we won't work out".
|
|
inherit
1824
0
11,654
Davrin's boobs
#WerewolfLIforDA5 LMAO
2,689
Oct 19, 2016 19:24:39 GMT
October 2016
nickclark89
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Dragon Age The Veilguard
|
Post by Davrin's boobs on Jan 5, 2019 17:08:02 GMT
I would love for him to have a non-apologetic "Sorry, I'm not into women" line or something, Gil's was kinda lame and you can flirt with Dorian a lot because gay best friend trope TM which it's a trope I'm totally disgusted with. Same with lesbians, I think Sera's was nice, but Suvi's erased her sexuality "we keep things professional dudebro" But is it such a bad thing? I personally thinks all refusal's were done nicely =) Look at it from this perspective- if someone has a crush on you would you really have a heart to tell then- "ew, i don't like your cause you are *insert something*, so we won't work out". I literally explained why is a bad thing lol read again.
|
|
inherit
4964
0
Jun 17, 2017 17:29:55 GMT
3,701
arvaarad
1,465
Mar 18, 2017 16:32:40 GMT
March 2017
arvaarad
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Jade Empire
|
Post by arvaarad on Jan 5, 2019 17:23:03 GMT
This obsession with 'plot relevant romanceable' is absolutely ridicolous, the term itself is absolutely ridicolous. Sometimes people are really, really used to seeing people like themselves cast as sidekicks. So it’s nice to sometimes see them as major characters who have a big impact on the plot, instead of being on the periphery. People like feeling like they have agency in the world, and one way they can get that sensation is by seeing characters they relate to having agency in the world. To broaden to things other than sexuality, I’m half Chinese. Characters who look like me tend to be filler characters, research assistants, or monks/ninjas. Part of the reason I really enjoyed playing Jade Empire (and later, Shadowrun: Hong Kong) is because it gave me the feeling that people who looked like me actually had the ability to affect the world. They weren’t just sidekicks to someone else’s goals. And that includes villains too, by the way... as long as they’re interesting and not Generic Order of Ninjas #2347. Of course, if a game has CC, I can play a hero who looks — to various degrees — like me. But I get an even stronger warm fuzzy feeling when I’m not the only one.
|
|
inherit
4223
0
7,814
caladrius
2,056
March 2017
nocte
|
Post by caladrius on Jan 5, 2019 17:25:55 GMT
On the rejections, I think it should fit the character and it's not inherently bad to ever have a gay character skirt it in isolation, but it's questionable if only the gay characters skirt it. It's not necessarily out of character for Dorian to play along with anyone stroking his ego or for Suvi to awkwardly try to dodge the issue, but it's a problem if they make a pattern of that.
It would be nice to have some gay rejections like Liam, where he put it out there right away that he was straight, but was super chill about it at the same time. I think basically just that feeling that there's no obfuscation at all about the character's sexuality, but also that it's a nonissue that the rejection had to happen. Of course, it's not always in character for more awkward types to play it off that cool, but they could at least write it that way for the gay romances sometimes.
|
|
inherit
4223
0
7,814
caladrius
2,056
March 2017
nocte
|
Post by caladrius on Jan 5, 2019 17:48:16 GMT
On another note, I'm still baffled by the notion that a proper, purely gay or lesbian Love Interest must be mandatory and plot critical. A good role playing game is the player's story, what actions they take, who they consider important or not. Why do you even care if someone decides to dismiss a particular character, or not recruit them in the first place in their own game? "They need to make up for the major straight characters being mandatory", you say? But two wrongs don't make a right, and making those previous straight characters untouchable was a mistake. We should have been able to kick out Alistair's whiny ass, make Aveline and Varric stay out of our lives, or fire Cassandra, Solas and/or Cullen if we wanted. Having mandatory characters of any orientation railroads players; "you will associate with this person, regardless of who you or they are, because my story is more important than your roleplaying. Also, your character is incompetent of finding any other ways of winning, or even surviving, without them".Funny, when comparing modern western CRPGs, Obsidian never had this problem. Pretty much all of the their Companions are completely optional, and you can beat their games without recruiting a single one. I usually do recruit all of them, since they are usually so well written. Hell, Arcade Gannon is one of my personal favorites. I think I have already succesfully argued that characters like Aveline and Cassandra are not "plot relevant" romanceables or even companions. (Aveline is not even romanceable) Most if not all of the companion character has a story related to themselves, only few are actually relevant to the overall plot. Those characters being Alistair, Anders, and Solas. Most of the characters people have described, helps push the story ahead. Cassandra can essentially exist in your playthrough only to justify the creation of the Inquisiton. She is a plot-device at best, from there on out she isn't really relevant. Alistair is plot-relevant because he is connected to the Kingdom of Ferelden and the Grey Wardens, that just makes sense. Solas is plot-relevant due to his connection to the story that is to come. This obsession with 'plot relevant romanceable' is absolutely ridicolous, the term itself is absolutely ridicolous. This notion only gets even more stupid when people DEMANDS that a certain relevant character be a specific kind of sexuality like.... just what the hell? We should not care about the allegory, who in their right mind cares SO deeply about the allegory that they completely throw applicability out the window? I mean, you argued it in the most semantic and obtuse way possible. lol That you can go out of your way to avoid Cassandra is irrelevant to the fact that she's a huge part of the game for anyone playing without the intent purpose of actively avoiding her. It doesn't change that not ignoring her adds a lot more to the game than not ignoring Iron Bull, or Fenris, or Zevran does. That's the case with several straight romances. Not wanting to do Morrigan's ritual, or caring about Mythal/elven lore, or Morrigan's continued role in the series doesn't make that huge bulk of material disappear as an option for those that do care about it. When people say they want plot relevant gay romances, they mean they want romances with options like Morrigan's ritual, or Alistair's royal wedding, or other instances that can substantially change the story of your individual character if you choose that romance. It's obtuse to say Morrigan's ritual, lore inclusion, continued presence in the game and larger bulk of dialog in comparison to Zevran means nothing because you don't have to activate her dialog or do her ritual. Nobody is saying the gay characters have to exist in a way that the entire story is about them and their romance. We want romances like Morrigan that give us the option to substantially change how our individual story plays out through interaction with them.
|
|
Lulupab
N2
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition
Posts: 95 Likes: 133
inherit
2141
0
May 18, 2023 16:57:29 GMT
133
Lulupab
95
November 2016
lulupab
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition
|
Post by Lulupab on Jan 5, 2019 18:00:15 GMT
I think we experienced some relevancy with Dorian in Trespasser. He was more relevant than a none-divine Cassandra. If Cassandra is not divine, she basically does nothing in Trespasser. She is just a member of Inquisition.
However I do see the validity of the claim that there have been no plot relevant gay/lesbian LIs. Not even Bisexual ones. And given my experience with Dorian, which only gave a glimpse of relevance, I'd love a better version of it in DA4.
|
|