Should bioware do one final shepard game?

Hence me saying "to paraphrase the Catalyst" in my post. And syre I guess you could say it was influencing organics, the same way a lawyer influences a jury by presenting facts. 

Why would the Reapers do that? They were on the verge of fulfilling their harvest of this cycle, needing only to finish destroying the last attack we could muster. But then instead of doing that, the moment they are hit by the Crucible wave they stop their very reason for being and instead start doing the exact opposite. Sure some people might think what you are saying, but eventually most people would come to the rational conclusion that there is a connection and that this was genuine. 

Because if they did it wouldn't be much of a video game. 
Now how about you actually answer my question? 

And?

I did answer your questions. I agree those things are stupid why they didn't, but I understand that they had to have the Idiot Ball in order for the games to work as such. 
Okay, so you have no actual answer why the Reapers would do what you are saying. Figured as much. In the end it doesn't matter, because the game proves me right and you wrong on this. 

So that begs the question: why trust something that's main strategy is deception?

Wasn't their something about dark matter.

Nope.

The Reapers always talked about Shepard submitting to them, joining their cause. If you accept the Reaper's solutions at the end, you join their cause.

How are you going to move products if you don't appease your customers? Like trying to sell yogurt that causes butt hole inflammation. As good as your yogurt is, nobody wants butt hole inflammation. I mean, okay, chances are some people will, but those people aren't enough to sustain your yogurt business. The problem is, even if you change your product, how many people will return to taste your next yogurt? What if the new yogurt, instead of butt hole inflammation, causes urine infection? You probably didn't develop your next yogurt with that in mind, but maybe it will? And how can you sell it to people with assurances that it won't cause anything this time? Or what if they found a different yogurt that they are satisfied with, in the meantime?

Now I know what you're going to say; "food analogy". Fine, change yogurt for a weed whacker that kills your grass, after trimming it or causes parasite infestations. I don't care. It's all interchangeable and it's not the point. The point is customer satisfaction and trust between the customer and the company and now both of these are at an all time low for Bioware. In my business, when our image is hurt in a similar way, I have to, figuratively, perform oral favours to restore our image and relationship. This is standard practice for all companies across the board. EA and their studios stubbornly refuse to do anything of the sort, receive backlash and then hope through whatever other means to fix their image. Currently, DICE is hurting with Battlefield V development crumbling in a way similar to Anthem's, though far later in their roadmap than Anthem did. Battlefield V is currently in a steady decline, as evident by the game's subreddit and various media outlets reporting on it. And this is on top of Battlefront 2's debacle. Bioware faced similar uproar back when ME3 was released and has fallen to worse times in recent years. Do you think people will be lining up for the next Bioware title, after all this, without figuratively performing oral favours to the fanbase? And how do you do that? By giving them the same thing that failed them last time? No, they're going to think "urine infection". You'll need to give them something that has pull, you need a hook. The only hook they have is Shepard. They can choose not to do that, but they will not benefit from it.