midnight tea
Twitter Guru
gateway beverage
Posts: 8,197 Likes: 20,170
inherit
gateway beverage
109
0
20,170
midnight tea
8,197
August 2016
midnighttea
|
Post by midnight tea on Oct 9, 2020 13:41:23 GMT
LOL, I can assure you that I'm not doing that. Like - this is the silliest thing I can't NOT laugh at you being so comically wrong about this. ...And I'm also not entirely sure why you are so forceful about not just being right in your assessment of this fictional character, but making people look like they are deluded and stupid for either liking him or simply arguing that both his motivations and plans are a bit more complex than what you make them to be? Like... you seem way more emotionally invested in this than people who actually 'buy into his bullshit'...? I said "people", not "literally everyone except me". Even if you don't mean "literally everyone except you" (that doesn't make sense, because not everyone here is disagreeing with your take), your comments are clearly aimed at people whose shared characteristic is that they either like Solas or disagree with seeing Solas the way you see him. ...And you say that those people 'blindly buy into bullshit for the flimisiest of reasons' and some other unfavorable things that clearly point to you making some very negative assumptions about their own characters. It's a type of ad hominem attack. You are attacking character of people who don't share your views and allude some serious things about them as people, or - say - why they like certain things in fiction, or entertain existence of certain scenarios in fiction.
|
|
Noxluxe
N4
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
Posts: 2,024 Likes: 3,563
inherit
10359
0
Mar 14, 2019 16:10:11 GMT
3,563
Noxluxe
2,024
Jul 21, 2018 23:55:09 GMT
July 2018
noxluxe
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
|
Post by Noxluxe on Oct 9, 2020 13:42:18 GMT
Except he doesn't always spare them because of this. Even if he hates your guts he spares them because he doesn't want the chaos that he thinks this will cause. He wants the south to have peace but to my mind this is simply to make him feel better about what he is going to do. He's letting the condemned have a short period of peace and prosperity but ultimately he is still going to kill them. So? That he doesn't always spare them was never in question. The issue was whether there is a reasonable chance that talking with him is doable, which the fact that we've seen him condescend to do so for no other reason except out of a desire to be fair before certainly indicates. I do find it funny that my thoughts on Solas were kind of meh until I found out he was Fen'harel...and since I was a bit of a Fen'harel fanboy thanks to DA 2 and Masked Empire. Still imo there are far better companions in DAI so he is kinda middle of the road...which speaks to the strength of that cast if anything. Here's hoping they deliver on the promise of him being a villain. I think I liked him from the first, and found him very intriguing. The conversations where he encourages you to reflect on events and the world and look beyond just the obvious are usually pretty interesting, just like Wynne's were in DA:O until the fourth or fifth playthrough. And because he's weird and obviously doesn't fit into modern Thedas as we understand it you can't always predict how he's going to feel or react to something, which makes him feel real and three-dimensional in a way few of the other companions do. And at the same time, he's too thoughtful and compassionate and courteous not to just come off as a nice guy. And has expertise too relevant to the story to ever not feel useful. And then we find out that he's actually Fen'Harel, and had a hand in causing the game's major crisis, and is being crushed under this terrible guilt and despair that he never shared with us. And then we find out that he's still determined to upend the nature of the world to ensure his people have a chance to prosper again. Even though this promises to be terrible for us and almost everyone we care about. Even though his potential hard-earned fondness, respect and friendship for us are still perfectly real and genuine. I love Loghain, and may he continue to survive into the next game and all the games to come, but his character arc is blown way out of the water by Solas'. I don't know if I've ever read or seen a character under so much emotional pressure whose actions are so extreme in any sense of common morality, who nonetheless feels entirely believable and human and actually compassionate at his core. For a writing staff that in my opinion has been coasting on previous successes for almost a decade, I think they really hit the home-run with him.
|
|
inherit
1853
0
Oct 28, 2024 19:39:09 GMT
440
kalreegar
395
Oct 26, 2016 11:04:07 GMT
October 2016
kalreegar
|
Post by kalreegar on Oct 9, 2020 13:52:55 GMT
Those skulls in the shed are one of the main reasons I really didn't want to work with Alexius or Fiona, yet if I don't I am apparently not in favour of mage freedom. Having a right to freedom also gives you responsibility for your actions. The horrific murder of the tranquil is something they should have been held accountable for. yeah, this thing had upset me too. A lot. One of the most disturbing thing in the trilogy. Cornering Fiona in front of the trebuchets and then blowing her up during the battle of Haven was one of the highest moments of satisfaction and enjoyment of my entire playthrough. Uhm. Logically wrong. That Solas spares the Inquisitor for no reason except as a sop to common decency and mutual respect does, in fact, somewhat indicate that he would do it again. Solas, if not properly racist, is definitely a classist. A Nietzschean. He loves and appreciates exceptional individuals (like him), who stand out, who fight to save the world and people. The inquisitor is certainly exceptional, a hero, a legend, an Übermensch, and therefore worthy of respect. I would not be surprised if, the moment he destroy the veil, Solas guarantees the inquisitor (a "special safe-passage to the new world". or that if he could, he would
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
11672
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2020 14:02:49 GMT
Uhm. Logically wrong. That Solas spares the Inquisitor for no reason except as a sop to common decency and mutual respect does, in fact, somewhat indicate that he would do it again. Except he doesn't always spare them because of this. Even if he hates your guts he spares them because he doesn't want the chaos that he thinks this will cause. He wants the south to have peace but to my mind this is simply to make him feel better about what he is going to do. He's letting the condemned have a short period of peace and prosperity but ultimately he is still going to kill them. I assumed it was Alexius' people. Its the reason I execute him, personally. I was just mad I couldn't bring it up during the judgement. To my mind it is the writers who actually don't give the same importance to the tranquil. They use them in some obscene ritual to create the occulara and then force us to use them if we want to complete a quest that is actually part of the Keep, unlike many other side quests that aren't. Could they have not at least had the decency to allow us to pass judgement on someone specifically for that crime? Yes, you can assume it was Alexius who gave the order but it isn't listed in his crime sheet at his trial. I also couldn't ask Fiona if she knew about them or who was responsible either. Given that all the rebel mages knew that tranquility could be reversed, why didn't they take better care of the tranquil? Then they have Cole say he will find who was responsible, but he never does or if he did and did something to them off screen he never tells us about it. In fact, given how Cole can read everyone's memories, even Iron Bull's tamassran in Par Vollen, why could he not simply have said who was responsible when we found them? Those skulls in the shed are one of the main reasons I really didn't want to work with Alexius or Fiona, yet if I don't I am apparently not in favour of mage freedom. Having a right to freedom also gives you responsibility for your actions. The horrific murder of the tranquil is something they should have been held accountable for. I hated Fiona so much in DAI and it's one of the reasons I prefer the templar path. It really annoyed me how she was never held accountable, but also that killing her is the only option in the templar path. I still really don't like the mage/templar resolution. It held on to the worst bits of DA2 by making it black or white and no way of coming to a middle ground. I wish we could have had a geth-quarian or Dalish-werewolf conflict where if we do enough we can forge a better solution but it's very difficult.
I'm not hugely optimistic about the Tevinter-Qunari resolution.
|
|
telanadas
N3
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
Posts: 317 Likes: 619
inherit
11510
0
619
telanadas
317
May 2020
mistberry
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by telanadas on Oct 9, 2020 14:33:30 GMT
For a writing staff that in my opinion has been coasting on previous successes for almost a decade, I think they really hit the home-run with him. I completely agree, the writers were pulling some serious power moves. Just the fact they were building up to that epilogue over the course of three games....I still remember the moment finishing the game for the first time and watching the epilogue and being like omfg.... WHAT. I honestly didn't notice the hints at all, over the course of my entire 100+ hr playthrough. Honestly the writing and foreshadowing in DAI really holds up, even today as a 2014 game I'm still blown away at how they managed to subtly hint at Solas being Fen'Harel the entire game. I'm not even sure that kind of game planning is viable in this day and age which is a shame. I just hope the momentum is maintained for DA4 and the veil isn't a five minute apocalypse before the status quo is restored, because there is so much they could do from here.
|
|
inherit
∯ Oh Loredy...
455
0
Oct 29, 2024 17:17:39 GMT
30,430
gervaise21
12,856
August 2016
gervaise21
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights
|
Post by gervaise21 on Oct 9, 2020 14:59:48 GMT
That he doesn't always spare them was never in question. The issue was whether there is a reasonable chance that talking with him is doable, which the fact that we've seen him condescend to do so for no other reason except out of a desire to be fair before certainly indicates. I'm puzzled why you misunderstand me here. Yes, he always spares the Inquisitor but not because he respects them. It is clear he just wanted a chat. Yet with a hostile Inquisitor it is really just an FYI. Apparently he has enough of a conscience about what he is going to do to the people of the world that he feels they ought to have some warning of it, so they can eat, drink and be merry for tomorrow we die. However, he doesn't do it with any real intent of hoping they will stop him. If that were the case then he would have told a friendly Inquisitor "why this world has to die". In fact he doesn't believe they can stop him. I very much liked Solas my first run, until he broke off with my Lavellan just before the final battle, which was appalling timing. Just throw her emotions into turmoil Solas and hope she holds it together. Then after promising to tell the truth once it was over, he pushed off and she didn't see him again for two years. Then he turns up and reveals what his plans were all along. I had her remain loyal to him simply to give me an alternative to my second run Lavellan, who feels his best friend in the Inquisition totally betrayed him. However, I do not condone his actions one bit.
|
|
inherit
∯ Oh Loredy...
455
0
Oct 29, 2024 17:17:39 GMT
30,430
gervaise21
12,856
August 2016
gervaise21
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights
|
Post by gervaise21 on Oct 9, 2020 15:10:02 GMT
I still really don't like the mage/templar resolution. It held on to the worst bits of DA2 by making it black or white and no way of coming to a middle ground. I wish we could have had a geth-quarian or Dalish-werewolf conflict where if we do enough we can forge a better solution but it's very difficult. I wish they had done this too. If I went the conscript the mages path because as the Inquisitor says they would be mad to trust them after everything they have done, you are made out to be in favour of the old style Circles and anti mage freedom. I just didn't trust Fiona as a leader, or those who encouraged her to betray the monarch and people of Ferelden after they offered them sanctuary, and through inaction and turning a blind eye if nothing else, were responsible for the attrocity against the tranquil. We should have been able to judge Fiona as well as Alexius but that was denied us. As you say, at least if you take the Templar path, you get to kill Fiona, so she is no longer leader of the mages in anything. I always disband the Templars and then Leliana frees the mages, so ultimately I feel that gives me a greater sense of justice being served than the mage path.
|
|
Noxluxe
N4
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
Posts: 2,024 Likes: 3,563
inherit
10359
0
Mar 14, 2019 16:10:11 GMT
3,563
Noxluxe
2,024
Jul 21, 2018 23:55:09 GMT
July 2018
noxluxe
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
|
Post by Noxluxe on Oct 9, 2020 15:17:22 GMT
Solas, if not properly racist, is definitely a classist. A Nietzschean. He loves and appreciates exceptional individuals (like him), who stand out, who fight to save the world and people. The inquisitor is certainly exceptional, a hero, a legend, an Übermensch, and therefore worthy of respect. I would not be surprised if, the moment he destroy the veil, Solas guarantees the inquisitor (a "special safe-passage to the new world". or that if he could, he would He seems to appreciate and respect people just for being good or caring or possessing initiative. And respecting people who earn it is definitely not classicism. That's ridiculous. Even besides the fact that he used to be a revolutionary defying the rigid and corrupt power structures of his people, recruiting, training and empowering the weakest in their society and freeing slaves from their magical slave-markings on principle. And simply being someone who deserves respect is not being an Übermensch in the Nietzschean sense at all, that word refers to someone who has actually risen above humanity to the point of being able to make up their own, superior morality that isn't beholden to traditional Christian values at all because they've simply outgrown them. I would argue that that doesn't even describe Solas himself, since he pretty much does subscribe to conventional morality. He's just in such an extremely weird and fucked-up and complicated position that those standards plain aren't very helpful for deciding what's right and wrong anymore. And wanting to spare people he personally likes from destruction if there was an easy way to do so while still achieving the greater good would be perfectly natural. There's no sensible way you can take that as an indication of... anything whatsoever. Anyone anywhere would do that. I suppose it's entirely possible that he does have a streak of classicism, that he is in fact an Übermensch and that he only truly cares for exceptional individuals, but I don't see that you can conclude any of those things based on what we know of him so far. Not with any confidence. I'm puzzled why you misunderstand me here. Yes, he always spares the Inquisitor but not because he respects them. It is clear he just wanted a chat. Yet with a hostile Inquisitor it is really just an FYI. Apparently he has enough of a conscience about what he is going to do to the people of the world that he feels they ought to have some warning of it, so they can eat, drink and be merry for tomorrow we die. However, he doesn't do it with any real intent of hoping they will stop him. If that were the case then he would have told a friendly Inquisitor "why this world has to die". In fact he doesn't believe they can stop him. I very much liked Solas my first run, until he broke off with my Lavellan just before the final battle, which was appalling timing. Just throw her emotions into turmoil Solas and hope she holds it together. Then after promising to tell the truth once it was over, he pushed off and she didn't see him again for two years. Then he turns up and reveals what his plans were all along. I had her remain loyal to him simply to give me an alternative to my second run Lavellan, who feels his best friend in the Inquisition totally betrayed him. However, I do not condone his actions one bit. Are you sure I'm the one with the misunderstanding? I don't see how any of that contradicts what I've said, and I don't particularly disagree with any of it. So I guess now I'm just confused what you're trying to address. And aaaaw. My own Lavellan was a bit more of a hardass. She was really hurt and annoyed with Solas for playing games with her heart, but it never occurred to her to let that distract her from the world's impending demise. When he turned up in Tresspasser I suppose she had a tiny hope that there was something left between them, because she did have immense respect for him, but it was pretty immediately drowned out by all the horrifying things that came out of his mouth. She ended up vowing to get him to reconsider mostly to try to keep that door open in his mind for down the line if it later turned out to be the world's only hope. If given the actual opportunity she would have felt morally compelled to kill him, completely regardless of whether or not she accepted his motivations as valid. Which wouldn't be anybody's business but her own.
|
|
inherit
168
0
14,263
Rascoth
4,262
August 2016
rascoth
|
Post by Rascoth on Oct 9, 2020 16:41:48 GMT
... Hey I wonder if there will be a quest to solve Dorian's father's murder in da4 that involves Neve Gallus, private detective, from the Tevinter Nights book. That would be a fun cameo. I'd love to have that in game.
|
|
inherit
1033
0
Member is Online
35,810
colfoley
18,703
Aug 17, 2016 10:19:37 GMT
August 2016
colfoley
|
Post by colfoley on Oct 9, 2020 19:32:41 GMT
Those skulls in the shed are one of the main reasons I really didn't want to work with Alexius or Fiona, yet if I don't I am apparently not in favour of mage freedom. Having a right to freedom also gives you responsibility for your actions. The horrific murder of the tranquil is something they should have been held accountable for. yeah, this thing had upset me too. A lot. One of the most disturbing thing in the trilogy. Cornering Fiona in front of the trebuchets and then blowing her up during the battle of Haven was one of the highest moments of satisfaction and enjoyment of my entire playthrough. Uhm. Logically wrong. That Solas spares the Inquisitor for no reason except as a sop to common decency and mutual respect does, in fact, somewhat indicate that he would do it again. Solas, if not properly racist, is definitely a classist. A Nietzschean. He loves and appreciates exceptional individuals (like him), who stand out, who fight to save the world and people. The inquisitor is certainly exceptional, a hero, a legend, an Übermensch, and therefore worthy of respect. I would not be surprised if, the moment he destroy the veil, Solas guarantees the inquisitor (a "special safe-passage to the new world". or that if he could, he would you get brownie points for using the term 'Nietzschean' in polite company. Though like Nox I am a bit weary of applying the term to Solas. If anything given his rebel vaguely libertarian perspective on things I would say he is the opposite.
|
|
inherit
11247
0
1,639
Buckeldemon
Now stealin' more kidz.
1,200
July 2019
buckeldemon
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Buckeldemon on Oct 9, 2020 19:49:38 GMT
I assumed it was Alexius' people. Its the reason I execute him, personally. I was just mad I couldn't bring it up during the judgement. To my mind it is the writers who actually don't give the same importance to the tranquil. They use them in some obscene ritual to create the occulara and then force us to use them if we want to complete a quest that is actually part of the Keep, unlike many other side quests that aren't. Could they have not at least had the decency to allow us to pass judgement on someone specifically for that crime? Yes, you can assume it was Alexius who gave the order but it isn't listed in his crime sheet at his trial. I also couldn't ask Fiona if she knew about them or who was responsible either. Given that all the rebel mages knew that tranquility could be reversed, why didn't they take better care of the tranquil? Then they have Cole say he will find who was responsible, but he never does or if he did and did something to them off screen he never tells us about it. In fact, given how Cole can read everyone's memories, even Iron Bull's tamassran in Par Vollen, why could he not simply have said who was responsible when we found them? Those skulls in the shed are one of the main reasons I really didn't want to work with Alexius or Fiona, yet if I don't I am apparently not in favour of mage freedom. Having a right to freedom also gives you responsibility for your actions. The horrific murder of the tranquil is something they should have been held accountable for. My uneducated guess? Done for cheap shock value and yet another thing heaped on the mage path to make it deliberately unattractive and send the player off to Therifal. Pretty odd that they did not make a trigger/plotflag for that shed so it can come up when judging Alexius (as opposed to Denam, whose entire attempt at defense changes if called out).
Too bad this works on so many players. I have said it in the past and I'll do it again; DAI "Fiona" is OOC as a result of a lazy envy demon. Imma give BW the finger for their shitty attempt at shoehorning in a binary "greyified" choice by getting the mages regardless.
|
|
inherit
∯ Oh Loredy...
455
0
Oct 29, 2024 17:17:39 GMT
30,430
gervaise21
12,856
August 2016
gervaise21
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights
|
Post by gervaise21 on Oct 9, 2020 21:18:42 GMT
Too bad this works on so many players. I have said it in the past and I'll do it again; DAI "Fiona" is OOC as a result of a lazy envy demon. Imma give BW the finger for their shitty attempt at shoehorning in a binary "greyified" choice by getting the mages regardless Well thankfully we have the Keep going forward, so I can adjust my world state to reflect how I want it to be rather than what I got as a result of arbitrary choices made. Still, as I say, going to the Templars and disbanding them is still better for getting Leliana than conscripting the mages, so OOC Fiona can be taken down and yet mages are still free at the end of it. I like to think that decent mages with any backbone would jump ship before Corypheus takes them off the Haven. One thing that always puzzled me though is what were Fiona and Co still doing in Redcliffe in the dark future? Okay, so Alexius was shit scared of Corypheus by then because he couldn't wind back time sufficiently to change the events at the Conclave and clearly his boss didn't appreciate him losing the Herald in the ether of his time wormhole, but why didn't Corypheus turn up straight after Alexius zapped us in order to collect the mages? Then march them off to destroy the Inquisition at Haven, which without the Inquisitor was successful. Alternatively, since Leliana had successfully sneaked her troops in before we disappeared, why didn't they simply take control with or without the Herald? As the monarch turns up almost immediately after we return from the future, why didn't they take back the castle? Obviously the breach would have continued to grow without the Herald to fix it, but Alexius should have been long gone one way or another.
|
|
theascendent
N3
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
PSN: The Ascendent
Posts: 613 Likes: 812
inherit
9275
0
812
theascendent
613
Aug 28, 2017 10:17:49 GMT
August 2017
theascendent
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
The Ascendent
|
Post by theascendent on Oct 9, 2020 21:31:51 GMT
I hope we go back to the old school magic system. Spirit, Primal, Entropy and Creation. Splitting magic among the elements (only 3! Where Earth at, or is it too associated with the Titans?) always confused me. Mages biggest strength is their versatility. If you simplify among basic elemental lines it becomes a game of rock, paper, scissors (or Storm, Inferno, Winter, with Spirit as a second skill tree everyone needs). Thankfully we mages are returning to a more civilized land and not the ill-educated barbarians of the South.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
23,489
smilesja
14,326
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Oct 9, 2020 21:53:58 GMT
This. Feels like people are feigning emotional responses to individuals to avoid discussing the actual topic - Solas. I already delivered my opinion on Solas, but here you go again: he's an arrogant schmuck who wants to kill an unfathomable number of people because he's butthurt about the consequences of his own previous actions. He thinks he operates on some higher plane of existence that "ordinary people" simply can't comprehend (which isn't true and can never be true, because he is a fictional creation of ordinary people). People in here are blindly buying into his bullshit based on nothing but his own declaration that he is teh smartsest, but it's really just garden-variety bigot logic that willfully ignores the many factors that contribute to his position of privilege (eg greater access to resources and knowledge which, through HIS OWN EARLIER ACTIONS, have been denied to everyone that came after him). So in short, he took away the things that made his world so supposedly awesome, and then sneers down his nose at the people doing their best with the little he left them. He's the fantasy equivalent of a shitty old grandpa who wants to bring back the "good old days" of poodle skirts, school segregation, back-alley abortions and aspic. Well it's not like today's standards are THAT much better.
|
|
inherit
11247
0
1,639
Buckeldemon
Now stealin' more kidz.
1,200
July 2019
buckeldemon
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Buckeldemon on Oct 9, 2020 22:06:41 GMT
Well thankfully we have the Keep going forward, so I can adjust my world state to reflect how I want it to be rather than what I got as a result of arbitrary choices made. Still, as I say, going to the Templars and disbanding them is still better for getting Leliana than conscripting the mages, so OOC Fiona can be taken down and yet mages are still free at the end of it. I like to think that decent mages with any backbone would jump ship before Corypheus takes them off the Haven. I had the impression that they all end up as Venatori conscripts? Though I wonder if all of the southern circle mages would fit into Redcliffe anyway. Do we get any numbers on how many have been herded back somehow (less likely) killed just because (more likely) or slipped off the radar? What happened in other countries dominated by southern Andrastianism (Marches, Nevarra, Antiva, perhaps even Anderfels)?
I could honestly never understood the focus (obsession for some?) to put down Fiona, even before I was made aware of Bioware's (deliberate?) writing fuck-up. I mean, we got an army commander who might have personally killed... how many mages during an objectively utterly unjustified R.o.A. and might have ordered/signed even more atrocities during his 6-7 year stint as Meredith's second-in-command. Yet we cannot even breach that topic and instead have to justify ourselves against this dude's prejudices. I'm honestly pretty sick of BW's writing attempting to dismiss most mage characters who are not Chantry loyalists as "unresonable", "irresponsible", "emotially compromised", "insane" or "crazy". That can make sense from the POV of certain people in universe - the templars basically do such a framing all the time, but it gets kinda annoying. Paiting dissenters as "mentally challenged" is pretty much an RL tactic. One thing that always puzzled me though is what were Fiona and Co still doing in Redcliffe in the dark future? Okay, so Alexius was shit scared of Corypheus by then because he couldn't wind back time sufficiently to change the events at the Conclave and clearly his boss didn't appreciate him losing the Herald in the ether of his time wormhole, but why didn't Corypheus turn up straight after Alexius zapped us in order to collect the mages? Then march them off to destroy the Inquisition at Haven, which without the Inquisitor was successful. Alternatively, since Leliana had successfully sneaked her troops in before we disappeared, why didn't they simply take control with or without the Herald? As the monarch turns up almost immediately after we return from the future, why didn't they take back the castle? Obviously the breach would have continued to grow without the Herald to fix it, but Alexius should have been long gone one way or another. Fiona was made a lyrium planter. Did Corypheus discard the entire "faction" and to Therinfal as well? Leliana apparently got herself captured, so her attack failed (How many troops did she bring in anyway?). Regarding the royals... I wonder who contacted them and when, regardless of timeline. Did they get blown up by that fireship plot? Came to Redcliffe only to get defeated by Alexius? Eaten by a group of Rage demons along the way? Eh, yeah, Corypheus' non-action doesn't make much sense, except for him keeping Alexius steaming in his own fear while playing around with Solas' orb and possibly what's left of Orlais... or a Qunari invasion?
Which one do you want to have? The discussed wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey ball or blatant example of cutscene stupidity (Inquisitor getting too close to suspiciously back-turned Lucius to be grabbed) and gratuitous pointless throat-slitting? Plus Ferelden having "wanna rule-the-world" templars lurking in their territory, with the Inquisition then bringing in a bunch of orlesian nobles to ... impress (?) God-Emperor Lord Seeker Fake!Lucius Demonhead Corin.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
11672
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 9, 2020 22:11:27 GMT
Too bad this works on so many players. I have said it in the past and I'll do it again; DAI "Fiona" is OOC as a result of a lazy envy demon. Imma give BW the finger for their shitty attempt at shoehorning in a binary "greyified" choice by getting the mages regardless Well thankfully we have the Keep going forward, so I can adjust my world state to reflect how I want it to be rather than what I got as a result of arbitrary choices made. Still, as I say, going to the Templars and disbanding them is still better for getting Leliana than conscripting the mages, so OOC Fiona can be taken down and yet mages are still free at the end of it. I like to think that decent mages with any backbone would jump ship before Corypheus takes them off the Haven. One thing that always puzzled me though is what were Fiona and Co still doing in Redcliffe in the dark future? Okay, so Alexius was shit scared of Corypheus by then because he couldn't wind back time sufficiently to change the events at the Conclave and clearly his boss didn't appreciate him losing the Herald in the ether of his time wormhole, but why didn't Corypheus turn up straight after Alexius zapped us in order to collect the mages? Then march them off to destroy the Inquisition at Haven, which without the Inquisitor was successful. Alternatively, since Leliana had successfully sneaked her troops in before we disappeared, why didn't they simply take control with or without the Herald? As the monarch turns up almost immediately after we return from the future, why didn't they take back the castle? Obviously the breach would have continued to grow without the Herald to fix it, but Alexius should have been long gone one way or another. Time travel narratives rarely make good sense. There's always the argument of 'once X figured out Y event was bad, they could have gone back again and changed it.' I loathe time travel narratives as they either expect the audience to keep tally of events or they assume the audience is too stupid to keep tally and lead events toward the intended ending.
|
|
theascendent
N3
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
PSN: The Ascendent
Posts: 613 Likes: 812
inherit
9275
0
812
theascendent
613
Aug 28, 2017 10:17:49 GMT
August 2017
theascendent
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
The Ascendent
|
Post by theascendent on Oct 9, 2020 22:44:18 GMT
Indeed, avoiding Time Travel shenanigans is one of the major reasons I always went for the Templars. It also added nicely into the personal story of my Inquisitor. Seeing how corrupt the Inquisition could potentially become was one of the major reasons I disbanded in Trespasser, that and minimising the risk of infiltration, sabotage, abuse of Inquisition resources and that and not becoming a hypocrite after dealing with the corruption of Templars, Seekers, Grey Wardens, the Chantry, the Orlesian Empire, etc.
|
|
Noxluxe
N4
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
Posts: 2,024 Likes: 3,563
inherit
10359
0
Mar 14, 2019 16:10:11 GMT
3,563
Noxluxe
2,024
Jul 21, 2018 23:55:09 GMT
July 2018
noxluxe
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
|
Post by Noxluxe on Oct 9, 2020 23:29:43 GMT
Indeed, avoiding Time Travel shenanigans is one of the major reasons I always went for the Templars. It also added nicely into the personal story of my Inquisitor. Seeing how corrupt the Inquisition could potentially become was one of the major reasons I disbanded in Trespasser, that and minimising the risk of infiltration, sabotage, abuse of Inquisition resources and that and not becoming a hypocrite after dealing with the corruption of Templars, Seekers, Grey Wardens, the Chantry, the Orlesian Empire, etc. Not that I particularly admire the way it's written, but the time travel shenanigans still stick out in my mind as being a really good introductory quest for Dorian, showing that he's knowledgeable, useful, reliable and can keep his head and guide you out of the most ridiculous and mind-bendy situation imaginable, while having shared an incredible adventure just the two of you. It's hard to credit him involving you in his parental difficulties if you don't have the chance to build that foundation of trust. I don't have nearly the same feeling of being on the same page with Cole and him having my back after Therinfal. And Cole turning up out of nowhere as this mysterious spirit-boy that knows things it shouldn't, working to help you save what you can in your darkest hour when Haven is being overrun works way better than Dorian barging in and joining your team moments before disaster because that's just how his schedule turned out. And while you only have Cassandra's word that the Templars' general hostility and self-absorption is out of character, the Inquisitor is actually invited to Redcliffe sees first-hand that there's something really fishy going on with the mages. Plus, by helping the mages you get the option to claim them as indentured workers, and the opportunity to show Thedas that they can be used and controlled both responsibly and semi-humanely with a firm hand. And to my mind, being one of the only factions on the continent with a substantial amount of mages at their beck and call should help the Inquisition build a terrifying and mysterious reputation. Calpernia is definitely a way more interesting nemesis, and suitable lieutenant for Corypheus, than Samson is, though.
|
|
inherit
Scribbles
185
0
31,574
Hanako Ikezawa
22,991
August 2016
hanakoikezawa
|
Post by Hanako Ikezawa on Oct 10, 2020 0:11:49 GMT
I liked how the time travel showed us what would happen if we fail, really driving it home more than just being told like in the Templar version and serving as a good driving force for the Inquisitor to seal the Breach and stop those responsible.
|
|
inherit
Elvis Has Left The Building
7794
0
Oct 31, 2020 23:57:02 GMT
8,073
pessimistpanda
3,804
Apr 18, 2017 15:57:34 GMT
April 2017
pessimistpanda
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by pessimistpanda on Oct 10, 2020 1:36:03 GMT
I said "people", not "literally everyone except me". Even if you don't mean "literally everyone except you" (that doesn't make sense, because not everyone here is disagreeing with your take), your comments are clearly aimed at people whose shared characteristic is that they either like Solas or disagree with seeing Solas the way you see him. ...And you say that those people 'blindly buy into bullshit for the flimisiest of reasons' and some other unfavorable things that clearly point to you making some very negative assumptions about their own characters. It's a type of ad hominem attack. You are attacking character of people who don't share your views and allude some serious things about them as people, or - say - why they like certain things in fiction, or entertain existence of certain scenarios in fiction. No? I'm approaching Solas and his actions from a moral perspective, not from the perspective of what I think would be best for the story. From a perspective of what I would like to see in the story, I have been pretty vocal in the forum on multiple occasions about wanting the Veil to come down at the very start of the game, and not be restored.
|
|
inherit
Elvis Has Left The Building
7794
0
Oct 31, 2020 23:57:02 GMT
8,073
pessimistpanda
3,804
Apr 18, 2017 15:57:34 GMT
April 2017
pessimistpanda
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by pessimistpanda on Oct 10, 2020 1:37:56 GMT
I already delivered my opinion on Solas, but here you go again: he's an arrogant schmuck who wants to kill an unfathomable number of people because he's butthurt about the consequences of his own previous actions. He thinks he operates on some higher plane of existence that "ordinary people" simply can't comprehend (which isn't true and can never be true, because he is a fictional creation of ordinary people). People in here are blindly buying into his bullshit based on nothing but his own declaration that he is teh smartsest, but it's really just garden-variety bigot logic that willfully ignores the many factors that contribute to his position of privilege (eg greater access to resources and knowledge which, through HIS OWN EARLIER ACTIONS, have been denied to everyone that came after him). So in short, he took away the things that made his world so supposedly awesome, and then sneers down his nose at the people doing their best with the little he left them. He's the fantasy equivalent of a shitty old grandpa who wants to bring back the "good old days" of poodle skirts, school segregation, back-alley abortions and aspic. Well it's not like today's standards are THAT much better. Make Thedas Great Again.
|
|
inherit
1033
0
Member is Online
35,810
colfoley
18,703
Aug 17, 2016 10:19:37 GMT
August 2016
colfoley
|
Post by colfoley on Oct 10, 2020 1:54:46 GMT
To my mind it is the writers who actually don't give the same importance to the tranquil. They use them in some obscene ritual to create the occulara and then force us to use them if we want to complete a quest that is actually part of the Keep, unlike many other side quests that aren't. Could they have not at least had the decency to allow us to pass judgement on someone specifically for that crime? Yes, you can assume it was Alexius who gave the order but it isn't listed in his crime sheet at his trial. I also couldn't ask Fiona if she knew about them or who was responsible either. Given that all the rebel mages knew that tranquility could be reversed, why didn't they take better care of the tranquil? Then they have Cole say he will find who was responsible, but he never does or if he did and did something to them off screen he never tells us about it. In fact, given how Cole can read everyone's memories, even Iron Bull's tamassran in Par Vollen, why could he not simply have said who was responsible when we found them? Those skulls in the shed are one of the main reasons I really didn't want to work with Alexius or Fiona, yet if I don't I am apparently not in favour of mage freedom. Having a right to freedom also gives you responsibility for your actions. The horrific murder of the tranquil is something they should have been held accountable for. My uneducated guess? Done for cheap shock value and yet another thing heaped on the mage path to make it deliberately unattractive and send the player off to Therifal. Pretty odd that they did not make a trigger/plotflag for that shed so it can come up when judging Alexius (as opposed to Denam, whose entire attempt at defense changes if called out).
Too bad this works on so many players. I have said it in the past and I'll do it again; DAI "Fiona" is OOC as a result of a lazy envy demon. Imma give BW the finger for their shitty attempt at shoehorning in a binary "greyified" choice by getting the mages regardless. What's wrong with 'morally gray choices'? After all pretty much every single other choice in the game was designed as such and they even took down another popular organization a peg or two. And in universe this choice does make a certain degree of sense. 1. Fiona was desperate, and Alexius kind of cheated to do so but they were backed up against a wall...and really what other choices was there at the time based on how things were going down? They made a bad choice, but then most people do make bad choices when their life is on the line. 2. The choice from a purely practical point of view is pretty value neutral, and this makes sense via the set up and the lore. Both organizations are just as capable of using their natural talents to help the Inquisitor close the breach. 3. Part of the beauty of the choice is you really aren't going to either one to just approve of them or support them or ally with them. You can quite literally break each organization to your will if you so choose, which is part of the appeal of it. My Inquisitor would not want to work with the Templars, but fortunatley she don't have to. Also, I suppose as an aside I do also find it a real fun role playing decision that my pro mage, pro mage freedom Inquisitor was so disgusted by Fiona and co that he decided to shackle them to the Inquisition fully expecting to grant them their freedom after they proved their good worth, but it was quite annoying for him getting himself patted on the back for it. Meanwhile my female who was anti Templar took to disbanding the organization with a lot of glee. As far as the Ocularum was concerned their creation never really entered my head one way or the other. There was more then enough stuff on Alexius to judge him without going there and I do wonder if Fiona 'knew' about them. And well...I am actually growing more confident in the need to say this as I re read your post and absorb the tone ... they had to make the Templars at least somewhat appealing as a choice so the choice would be an actual choice and not the stupid little good/evil paragon/ renegade angelic/muhaha choice which plagues far too many RPGs. Basically the only reason you would 'go after the Templars' would be to be a dick or to make the 'evil' choice, which I know that is what some people are into but personally I do prefer nuance to my choices. Indeed, avoiding Time Travel shenanigans is one of the major reasons I always went for the Templars. It also added nicely into the personal story of my Inquisitor. Seeing how corrupt the Inquisition could potentially become was one of the major reasons I disbanded in Trespasser, that and minimising the risk of infiltration, sabotage, abuse of Inquisition resources and that and not becoming a hypocrite after dealing with the corruption of Templars, Seekers, Grey Wardens, the Chantry, the Orlesian Empire, etc. All of this. My Inquisitor was in a very similar head space.
|
|
inherit
∯ Oh Loredy...
455
0
Oct 29, 2024 17:17:39 GMT
30,430
gervaise21
12,856
August 2016
gervaise21
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights
|
Post by gervaise21 on Oct 10, 2020 7:49:36 GMT
1. Fiona was desperate, and Alexius kind of cheated to do so but they were backed up against a wall...and really what other choices was there at the time based on how things were going down? They made a bad choice, but then most people do make bad choices when their life is on the line. That was a nonsense. Why was she desperate? The monarch of Ferelden had offered them sanctuary, quite possibly even before the Conclave was called. They had been subject to trade sanctions by Starkhaven as a result and yet still didn't back down. They persuaded a leading noble to offer them greater security by giving them the run of his Castle, one of the most defensible locations in Ferelden, so even had the Templars attacked them there, they would be in a strong position to repel them until the monarch could turn up and deal with the assailants causing trouble. There was no suggestion that after the explosion at the Conclave the monarch had asked the mages to leave. Then Alexius, a foreign national from the one power everyone in southern Thedas fears, rolls up and offers them indentured servitude as an alternative, right after the explosion at the Conclave (highly suspicious in itself). Why would Fiona see this an acceptable alternative to digging in and staying independent? Particularly since in order to get to Ferelden in the first place, her rebel "army" had to leave another defensible location on the border of Tevinter. If things were going so badly for them, why not simply cross the border and throw themselves on the mercy of Tevinter then, not accept the offer of sanctuary by a nation state in the south, travel across half of Thedas to get there and then sell out that ruler at the first sign of trouble? Then they kick the noble and his family out of their castle and stay there with their new master. Did not Fiona ask when they were going to leave? If they were going to stay on in the Castle regardless, then why surrender your autonomy to Alexius at all? I feel that Buckledemon was right in that it was never intended to be a grey choice. Because they knew people had a tendency to sympathise with the mages in previous games, they rigged the entire plot line to make going to the Templars the sensible (and moral) choice and to make it seem as though people in the south were right to be prejudiced against mages because the moment they are given the chance they sell out to Tevinter. Then on top of that, if you do a search of Redcliffe village, you discover the shed with the skulls in it. Forget all the time travel nonsense. Those are essentially the facts when you turn up to potentially do a deal with the mages. Yet in order for Fiona to have acted in this way towards the people of Ferelden and not realised the tranquil were constantly disappearing she had to be deaf, blind and stupid. She had been an appalling leader and if we do decide to take a chance on the mages because it is clear there are those in the rank and file who are unhappy with her decision, we are forced into having to continue having her as the leader of the free mages, although at least if you conscript them she has to answer to the PC. By the epilogue to Trespasser it is clear that Fiona continues to be a hopeless leader of the College of Enchanters because they are shit scared of Vivienne no matter who is Divine. At least the Bright Hand of formerly conscripted mages have a bit more backbone and stand up to her, likely because they ditched Fiona as their mouthpiece. If they had wanted a truly grey choice they should have dropped the time travel explanation for Fiona's behaviour, which as I say still doesn't explain the logic of it, and have Alexius controlling her with blood magic. So you now have a valid reason for wanting to rescue the mages from his control, rather than simply walking into an obvious trap, but at the same time it might still seem expedient to deal with the Breach first by going to the Templars for help. The problem is having an either or choice in the first place and then trying to give the illusion that it is grey. Then tying in consequences down the line to this choice, rather than letting you state why you are taking the action you are. See below. Also, I suppose as an aside I do also find it a real fun role playing decision that my pro mage, pro mage freedom Inquisitor was so disgusted by Fiona and co that he decided to shackle them to the Inquisition fully expecting to grant them their freedom after they proved their good worth, but it was quite annoying for him getting himself patted on the back for it. Meanwhile my female who was anti Templar took to disbanding the organization with a lot of glee. Yes, you can do this but so far as the game is concerned, this makes you pro-Circles and greatly increases the chances of getting Vivienne or Cassandra as Divine. So it is preferable to go to the Templars and disband them because you are still on track to get Leliana that way and you have the best of both worlds in that scenario, the mages are officially free (all those mages who never sold out to Tevinter) and the Templar Order is officially no more. Of course all this is knowledge you have in hindsight. When you go to the Templars you don't know there is going to be the option of disbanding them, any more than you know that if you opt for the mages you are not totally condoning their actions. At the time you don't know you can rig things in this way and doing anything other than allying with the mages is presented by the game as you not being in favour of free mages.
|
|
inherit
∯ Oh Loredy...
455
0
Oct 29, 2024 17:17:39 GMT
30,430
gervaise21
12,856
August 2016
gervaise21
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights
|
Post by gervaise21 on Oct 10, 2020 8:37:07 GMT
As far as the Ocularum was concerned their creation never really entered my head one way or the other. There was more then enough stuff on Alexius to judge him without going there and I do wonder if Fiona 'knew' about them. Clearly you were never that bothered by them then. The tranquil never left my head. I kept waiting for them to be brought up or perhaps a side quest or even a War Table mission to deal with those responsible but there was nothing. So it was simply something added for shock value by the writers and then totally ignored thereafter. Except I couldn't ignore it when those wretched skulls kept reminding me of their presence. First run I think I had used one of them wondering what they were for before I went to Redcliffe, so that automatically activated the Temple of Solassan area. I think I had even travelled there before going to Redcliffe. Then I discovered the means of creating the occulara and I was horrified. However, thinking it might be important to resolving the game successfully, or at least without some negative consequences (I was thinking of ME2) and the fact it was recorded in the Keep, I continued on and collected all the shards, only to discover that it had no significance to the plot in DAI whatsoever. It wasn't even clear what lore was being revealed in the final chamber. So my next run I resolved not to use the skulls at all on the basis that my Lavellan found them abhorrent, knowing how they had been created. Everywhere I went, though, they reminded me of their presence I kept yelling at my screen "shut up, shut up, shut up" every time I heard that ringing noise. Which made me even more incensed that I could not call anyone to account for them. By the way, I don't just blame Alexius and Fiona but everyone connected with the Chantry, which as an organisation was ultimately responsible for their safety. Cassandra, Leliana, Giselle, Vivienne and every other cleric was guilty of their death by neglect. So may be that is why the writers realised it was something of a hot potato. Still, why not put it on the charge sheet and then have Alexius (or whoever) say precisely that. The tranquil may lack emotions but they are still people. Just because their presence makes you feel uncomfortable, doesn't mean they aren't deserving of justice like everyone else. I think Minaeve is the only one who actually cared about what happened to them but even she didn't care enough to get someone to answer for the murder of the ones she couldn't save.
|
|
theascendent
N3
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
PSN: The Ascendent
Posts: 613 Likes: 812
inherit
9275
0
812
theascendent
613
Aug 28, 2017 10:17:49 GMT
August 2017
theascendent
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
The Ascendent
|
Post by theascendent on Oct 10, 2020 9:25:12 GMT
Indeed, avoiding Time Travel shenanigans is one of the major reasons I always went for the Templars. It also added nicely into the personal story of my Inquisitor. Seeing how corrupt the Inquisition could potentially become was one of the major reasons I disbanded in Trespasser, that and minimising the risk of infiltration, sabotage, abuse of Inquisition resources and that and not becoming a hypocrite after dealing with the corruption of Templars, Seekers, Grey Wardens, the Chantry, the Orlesian Empire, etc. Not that I particularly admire the way it's written, but the time travel shenanigans still stick out in my mind as being a really good introductory quest for Dorian, showing that he's knowledgeable, useful, reliable and can keep his head and guide you out of the most ridiculous and mind-bendy situation imaginable, while having shared an incredible adventure just the two of you. It's hard to credit him involving you in his parental difficulties if you don't have the chance to build that foundation of trust. I don't have nearly the same feeling of being on the same page with Cole and him having my back after Therinfal. And Cole turning up out of nowhere as this mysterious spirit-boy that knows things it shouldn't, working to help you save what you can in your darkest hour when Haven is being overrun works way better than Dorian barging in and joining your team moments before disaster because that's just how his schedule turned out. And while you only have Cassandra's word that the Templars' general hostility and self-absorption is out of character, the Inquisitor is actually invited to Redcliffe sees first-hand that there's something really fishy going on with the mages. Plus, by helping the mages you get the option to claim them as indentured workers, and the opportunity to show Thedas that they can be used and controlled both responsibly and semi-humanely with a firm hand. And to my mind, being one of the only factions on the continent with a substantial amount of mages at their beck and call should help the Inquisition build a terrifying and mysterious reputation. Calpernia is definitely a way more interesting nemesis, and suitable lieutenant for Corypheus, than Samson is, though. Yeah, Calpernia was a major deciding factor for me. Saw enough of Samson in DA2.
|
|