Which Fraternity are your Mage Characters?

Amell was a Libertarian Resolutionist (in my head), because she was one of the few times I've ever played an "evil" character in games. She happily killed Uldred, but only because he was fool who tipped his hand too early.

My only mage Inquisitor was Dalish, so "none of the above"? But chose Isolationist for the basic ideology.

I see my Amell as an Aequitarian, due to the influence of Irving and later of Wynne. My Surana was a Libertarian (and my only blood mage).

Regarding my Inquisitors, my female Trevelyan was an Aequitarian although by the end she wanted more freedom for the mages and my male Trevelyan was a Lucrosian (i see him as someone that love living in luxury and having influence, and despite having been sent to the Circle he still considered himself a noble). My other mage was a Lavellan that was all in favor of mage freedom so i guess she would fit with the Libertarian mindset.

There's actually a layer of truth to this. The resolutionist codex entry all but explicitly states that the Chantry allowed the libertarian fraternity to continue because it could point out troublemakers. And that level of political strong-arming/manipulation is something that the Chantry always tried to maintain in order to control its mages. All done through their templars. Did you see what WoT vol. 1 said about First Enchanter positions?

To quote: "He or she retains the right to choose a successor, taking into consideration the "strong suggestion" of the templars. Only in recent years, amid increasing friction have First Enchanters denied templar choices for succession."

But as seen in Asunder, and even a bit before in the games, the mages do have some legal power over their own fate. All the mages had to do was exercise it, regardless of what the Chantry tried to push them into. It's why the election of the Grand Enchanter Fiona was such a big deal. The mages were pushing back. But not only were they pushing back, they were pushing back through the proper channels (and improper channels, but they were radicals). While Fiona's election was controversial, it was completely legitimate. Hell, even thier initial vote to secede from the Chantry seemed legally sound. But for the Chantry, that was exactly the problem.

Amell considers herself an Aequitarian though she has never had any dealings with Circle politics since she never actually became an Enchanter. Surana is in the same boat but considers himself a Libertarian. Trevelyan was an Enchanter and an Aequitarian though he favored alliance with the Libertarians and vocally disapproved of the traditional Aequitarian/Loyalist alliance.

Neria Surana: Lucrosian.  She wanted to be Alistair's mistress and secret power behind the scenes.  She did not care about Circle politics or liberation.  She just wanted power and influence.
Marian Hawke: Libertarian Resolutionist.  Marian Hawke was 100% bought in on Mages' liberation from the Circle.  She believed that the Southern mages had to forcefully overthrow the Templars, even if it means leaving the Chantry.  
Ellana Lavallan: Dalish...I guess Lucrosian if you have to fit her in a box.  Ellana Lavallan just wanted to safeguard her clan and eventually become the Keeper.  However, because events threw her into the Inquisition's Herald of Andraste, she now eyes personal power in order for a Dalish restoration (with her as the ruler of said empire).