New Squadmates

You know the game you are playing and it is intellectually dishonest of you to do so,things are not always meant to be taken so literally so here is a copy past from Webster's book of wordage 

viler or eviller; evilest or evillest

1

a

: morally reprehensible : SINFUL, WICKED

an evil impulse

b

: arising from actual or imputed bad character or conduct

a person of evil reputation

2

a

archaic : INFERIOR

b

: causing discomfort or repulsion : OFFENSIVE

an evil odor

c

: DISAGREEABLE

woke late and in an evil temper

3

a

: causing harm : PERNICIOUS

the evil institution of slavery

b

: marked by misfortune : UNLUCKY

As you can see many different definitions all of which can be open to interpretation to varying degrees.
Hence i mentioned your juvenile use of whataboutism to further your argument.

They don't agree with you at all,if someone does an act with no malicious intent while morally wrong it occupies a grey area, where a Bureaucrat can cause more death and destruction with a single pen stroke than a crazy axe maniac striking down women and children.
I find it interesting in other articles you employ a shades of grey mentality until it works against your interests and then you act like black and white absolutism is the way ahead.
The thing about your namesake i mixed it up with a similarly spelt anime character who has the power to delete memories but looking at the spelling i see its a different character.

Focusing solely this, excluding any other potential factors, the use of sad music strongly indicates the game wants you to perceive this happening as a sad thing because the game tries to portray it as a sad thing by deliberately using sad music to score this scene. The music indicates an intent. 

Despite what you've said, you still don't understand what it means when we're talking about how a story portrays something or what it means to source arguments in textual evidence from said story. 

There's no merit to this discussion if you don't understand those things because they're essential to be able to discuss this, so I'm ending my side in this discussion.

<reads threads last two pages>

"whataboutism"....

ObnoxiousUK keeps accusing whataboutism, and then proceeds to use whataboutism to excuse Cerberus actions.

"It's not whataboutism when I do it. Whataboutism for me not for thee."

I can't. Don't feed the obvious, and not very smart, troll.

Meh. If Cerberus is evil so is everyone else. Everyone does shady shit in the ME franchise.

You forgot the batarians, salarians, geth and the quarians.

Edit: oh, I also forgot the turians.

That's only true for Tevos, right? Since I've never saved the council, I get the replacements. The replacement asari knew about the artifact.

Yes, Irissa knew about the artifact since she’s one of the top Asari Matriarchs. Tevos meanwhile you can hear in her voice and her body language that this was all new to her and was still processing it.

I like how they added those subtle differences for the two Councilors.

She's an idiot regardless. Her "we don't wish to upset the balance of power" is pure bull. Do like every race is forced to do and make the findings of the Prothean artifact available to all. The asari were the perfect example of "Rules for thee but not for me".

Ah yes, the balance of power. It means we want to remain top dog even if it means the other species are wiped out. Good thing the reapers came knocking on their backdoor to force them to come clean with their dirty little secret. That's why I like to have an ME4. To see the aftermath of the reaper war. What punishment would be handed to the asari? I doubt anything will happen since Bioware doesn't want anything happening to the precious.