dmc1001
N7
Biotic Booty
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Origin: ferroboy
Prime Posts: 77
Posts: 9,942 Likes: 17,687
inherit
Biotic Booty
1031
0
Nov 16, 2024 14:01:33 GMT
17,687
dmc1001
9,942
August 2016
dmc1001
Top
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
ferroboy
77
|
Post by dmc1001 on Dec 25, 2016 16:24:52 GMT
I think you should know it's pointless to argue with him. He won't let anything go, or even agree to disagree. You know I generally find that whole concept of millennial being little snow flakes who can't handle anyone disagreeing with them without upsetting them as a load of hog wash. But you seem to be for filling that stereotype fairly well. Can you really not handle me not agreeing with you without getting upset about it? Not upset (also not a millennial). It just gets pointless and a waste of time. There are plenty of people I don't agree with about things. Hell, I don't agree with themikefest about plenty of things. You don't see us having arguments, though. We're fine with not having the same opinions about stuff. I actually like that he has strong opinions about what he thinks and doesn't care if other people agree. Similarly, he doesn't force you to have his beliefs. What I find with you is that you aren't okay with other people believing differently and want to argue until either a) they give up or they concede. If anyone can't deal with disagreement, it's you.
|
|
inherit
1480
0
1,080
gothpunkboy89
2,311
September 2016
gothpunkboy89
|
Post by gothpunkboy89 on Dec 25, 2016 20:38:52 GMT
You know I generally find that whole concept of millennial being little snow flakes who can't handle anyone disagreeing with them without upsetting them as a load of hog wash. But you seem to be for filling that stereotype fairly well. Can you really not handle me not agreeing with you without getting upset about it? Not upset (also not a millennial). It just gets pointless and a waste of time. There are plenty of people I don't agree with about things. Hell, I don't agree with themikefest about plenty of things. You don't see us having arguments, though. We're fine with not having the same opinions about stuff. I actually like that he has strong opinions about what he thinks and doesn't care if other people agree. Similarly, he doesn't force you to have his beliefs. What I find with you is that you aren't okay with other people believing differently and want to argue until either a) they give up or they concede. If anyone can't deal with disagreement, it's you. Well to start Han's is perfectly capable of coming to their own conclusion. The only reason to make this post is to be passive aggressive. This is were the snow flake millennial part seems to come into play with you. You state your opinion in a public place then at least based on your post history expect people to smile nod at it and then end of story. That isn't how discussions work. It isn't you start yours then I state mine then we stop. It is the exchange of ideas and reasons back and forth until one party changes their mind or one party gives up. This is how the "bubble" BS starts to form as people only want to talk with people that agree with them and anyone who disagrees with them are just being assholes because they don't respect your opinion. It is also how safe spaces became corrupted in the general public's lexicon. Going from their original intention of being places that LGBT or really any person or group can go to not have to deal with assholes who learned their social skills from Biff Tannen's (Back to the Future) book 10 ways to be an absolutely terrible person. Into what it is typically used now by people to mean a place that people go to avoid anyone daring to question their opinions. Because that is what it has been used for and has now been popularized as. Thus corrupting the original intention and turning it from a good thing to a rather negative concept. Not to mention this forum is called Mass Effect Story, Lore and General Discussion. www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discussionDefinition of discussion 1 : consideration of a question in open and usually informal debate 2 : a formal treatment of a topic in speech or writing www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/debateDefinition of debate : a contention by words or arguments: as a : the formal discussion of a motion before a deliberative body according to the rules of parliamentary procedure b : a regulated discussion of a proposition between two matched sides Not state your opinion and then get upset when someone doesn't accept your opinion. I have a very simple rule I live by. If I ever open my gob in any form with more then 1 other person in the general vicinity to see or hear my opinion. I expect them to walk up and tell me I'm so full of shit that I have to cough into a toilet. I expect them to tell me each an every reason why my opinion has more holes in it then using a screen door on a sub. And I expect if they are willing to challenge my opinion to be able to have their opinion challenged and to exchange the reason and logic why we each think our opinion is the right one. Until one concedes or gives up the argument. This is a discussion forum and will be treated as such. If you don't like that fact then the only advice I can give you is to ask the Mods to create a new sub forum with the specific intention for people to state their opinion with no one being allowed to challenge it.
|
|
inherit
376
0
Oct 17, 2016 19:19:36 GMT
3,474
opuspace
2,129
August 2016
opuspace
|
Post by opuspace on Dec 25, 2016 23:52:23 GMT
Refuse: Rocks Fall, Everyone Dies: We p*ssed off the writers for calling them on their BS, and they got passive-aggressive on us. What more is there to say? That is and always will be the single most childish statement ever made on this forum. I've listened to the Catalyst during the extended cut and hooo, was it patronizing! It went step by step as though Shepard was a moron while still failing epically to justify the reapers being analogous to fire (seriously, fire does not taunt you incessantly while burning, it's nice and quiet and crackly). If the Catalyst wasn't sounding passive aggressive, I don't know what else would. That said, I don't think it was as though they all were thinking it was great stuff. The ending just came off as unfinished- havenotsleptin48hoursbecausethebosscameintofrisbeewhateverworkwasdoneoutthedoorontothegameshelveswithnocareforquality-weirdness.
|
|
dmc1001
N7
Biotic Booty
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Origin: ferroboy
Prime Posts: 77
Posts: 9,942 Likes: 17,687
inherit
Biotic Booty
1031
0
Nov 16, 2024 14:01:33 GMT
17,687
dmc1001
9,942
August 2016
dmc1001
Top
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
ferroboy
77
|
Post by dmc1001 on Dec 26, 2016 1:46:44 GMT
Not upset (also not a millennial). It just gets pointless and a waste of time. There are plenty of people I don't agree with about things. Hell, I don't agree with themikefest about plenty of things. You don't see us having arguments, though. We're fine with not having the same opinions about stuff. I actually like that he has strong opinions about what he thinks and doesn't care if other people agree. Similarly, he doesn't force you to have his beliefs. What I find with you is that you aren't okay with other people believing differently and want to argue until either a) they give up or they concede. If anyone can't deal with disagreement, it's you. Well to start Han's is perfectly capable of coming to their own conclusion. The only reason to make this post is to be passive aggressive. See, the thing is, I don't actually have a problem with your perspective on the games. I do see where you're coming from. It just doesn't sway my opinion. So, what exactly is there to argue about? The problem is, it NEVER ends with you. I seriously believe your goal is to hammer people down until they agree with you. That also isn't discussion.
|
|
inherit
1480
0
1,080
gothpunkboy89
2,311
September 2016
gothpunkboy89
|
Post by gothpunkboy89 on Dec 27, 2016 18:33:44 GMT
That is and always will be the single most childish statement ever made on this forum. I've listened to the Catalyst during the extended cut and hooo, was it patronizing! It went step by step as though Shepard was a moron while still failing epically to justify the reapers being analogous to fire (seriously, fire does not taunt you incessantly while burning, it's nice and quiet and crackly). If the Catalyst wasn't sounding passive aggressive, I don't know what else would. That said, I don't think it was as though they all were thinking it was great stuff. The ending just came off as unfinished- havenotsleptin48hoursbecausethebosscameintofrisbeewhateverworkwasdoneoutthedoorontothegameshelveswithnocareforquality-weirdness. Debatable if the Reapers ever actually taunted you. Both Sovereign and Harbinger sound more like they are making statements then taunting. masseffect.wikia.com/wiki/Harbinger_(Collector)/Battle_Quoteswww.imdb.com/character/ch0270806/quotesNothing is really a taunt By every objective judgement Shepard is a moron compared to Catalyst. Shepard at best is looking decades into the future while the Catalyst is looking millennia into the future.
|
|
inherit
1480
0
1,080
gothpunkboy89
2,311
September 2016
gothpunkboy89
|
Post by gothpunkboy89 on Dec 27, 2016 18:54:50 GMT
Well to start Han's is perfectly capable of coming to their own conclusion. The only reason to make this post is to be passive aggressive. See, the thing is, I don't actually have a problem with your perspective on the games. I do see where you're coming from. It just doesn't sway my opinion. So, what exactly is there to argue about? The problem is, it NEVER ends with you. I seriously believe your goal is to hammer people down until they agree with you. That also isn't discussion. If nothing will change your mind then why even bring up your opinions on a public forum? Particularly when you know people will disagree with you and point out why they think your opinion is wrong. If your opinion is so weak you can't handle someone putting it under scrutiny without getting upset that they won't just stop questioning it. Then maybe the opinion is wrong. I expect scrutiny of my opinions I welcome it. Because I'm sure my opinion is build on a solid foundation so people can go at it all day with hammer and chisels and expect nothing to happen. The only other assumption I could make is ego. While everyone has an ego there seems to be a correlation between how big your ego is and how frail it is. 8+ years of retail enforces this conclusion. Hence why someone can come into the store miss the giant 20 foot sign on the front door and all the other signs around entrance. Throw a hissy fit because we don't have X product or didn't put Y item on hold for them. Only to find out they were in the wrong store. And while some will apologize and accept the blame of their mess up. Others will still treat the whole ordeal like it is our fault they confused PetSmart with PetSupermarket. Or went to the wrong PetSmart store. Or admits they don't know anything about X animal and then ignores all information given to them by the people who's job it is to know these things because they think they are right. Which is who you get idiots who think the cute little Tiger Oscar will be perfectly OK in a 10 gallon tank. When full grown the guy will need a minimum of 50 gallons for a single one. And they want half a dozen. And when you suggest the 75 gallon tank to save them money in long run so they don't have to buy a 20, 29, 40, 50,then 75 gallon tank spending 3x the cost of just getting the 75 gallon. They ignore you. And insist they are correct with only a 10 gallon needed to keep 6 Tiger Oscars.
|
|
inherit
376
0
Oct 17, 2016 19:19:36 GMT
3,474
opuspace
2,129
August 2016
opuspace
|
Post by opuspace on Dec 27, 2016 19:01:54 GMT
Pft! A lot of Sovereign's dialogue was so unnecessary and time wasting that I have to question why did it deign to speak to something as insignificant as Shepard? Harbinger spent the better part of ME2 saying,"This hurts you." Fire doesn't need to make nonsensical comments on the effects it has on what it burns. My point being, the analogy the Catalyst used to portray the Reapers as distant, detached entities is contradicted so frequently by the amount of interaction done with Shepard that it's laughable. If they were akin to fire, don't even bother acknowledging Shepard the special snowflake, just burn Shepard where they stand. Psychological warfare tactics were mentioned being used in the Codex and used regularly to demoralize the alien species and all of it could have been avoided by simply nesting on the planet right from the beginning and letting indoctrination do the work instead while the races were young. It's all very sloppy work given the amount of time they had to refine it. Resistance should not even exist. As for the catalyst, I may say it sounded patronizing but that's how it sounded to me. I can't say how it sounds to others. But the logic is so poorly written that I don't see a story, I see the frazzled mess of overstressed developers. I see the cobbled attempts to patch it together while creating bigger plotholes. It could have been simplified, explained as galactic pruning. That's it. Clip the advanced races before they wipe out the younger races. No need to have synthetics be an issue because otherwise, the Catalyst was causing the whole mess in the first place. It sounds like the ending works for some because they can stay immersed in the story while someone like me is complaining because I can't suspend disbelief at this point.
|
|
Sondergaard
N3
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR
Posts: 572 Likes: 975
inherit
1505
0
Sept 27, 2024 16:57:55 GMT
975
Sondergaard
572
Sept 8, 2016 21:17:59 GMT
September 2016
sondergaard
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR
|
Post by Sondergaard on Dec 27, 2016 19:03:34 GMT
Well to start Han's is perfectly capable of coming to their own conclusion. The only reason to make this post is to be passive aggressive. See, the thing is, I don't actually have a problem with your perspective on the games. I do see where you're coming from. It just doesn't sway my opinion. So, what exactly is there to argue about? The problem is, it NEVER ends with you. I seriously believe your goal is to hammer people down until they agree with you. That also isn't discussion. No offence but you've only just realised this? His MO is walls of text and, if that doesn't work, insults. I'm more than happy to discuss things with people who hold differing opinions to mine but he isn't. Ignore to win.
|
|
inherit
1480
0
1,080
gothpunkboy89
2,311
September 2016
gothpunkboy89
|
Post by gothpunkboy89 on Dec 27, 2016 20:26:51 GMT
See, the thing is, I don't actually have a problem with your perspective on the games. I do see where you're coming from. It just doesn't sway my opinion. So, what exactly is there to argue about? The problem is, it NEVER ends with you. I seriously believe your goal is to hammer people down until they agree with you. That also isn't discussion. No offence but you've only just realised this? His MO is walls of text and, if that doesn't work, insults. I'm more than happy to discuss things with people who hold differing opinions to mine but he isn't. Ignore to win. Claims they are happy to discuss things with people who have different opinions. Says the ignoring people with different opinion is best option. Interesting.
|
|
dmc1001
N7
Biotic Booty
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Origin: ferroboy
Prime Posts: 77
Posts: 9,942 Likes: 17,687
inherit
Biotic Booty
1031
0
Nov 16, 2024 14:01:33 GMT
17,687
dmc1001
9,942
August 2016
dmc1001
Top
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
ferroboy
77
|
Post by dmc1001 on Dec 27, 2016 21:00:53 GMT
See, the thing is, I don't actually have a problem with your perspective on the games. I do see where you're coming from. It just doesn't sway my opinion. So, what exactly is there to argue about? The problem is, it NEVER ends with you. I seriously believe your goal is to hammer people down until they agree with you. That also isn't discussion. If nothing will change your mind then why even bring up your opinions on a public forum? Particularly when you know people will disagree with you and point out why they think your opinion is wrong. If your opinion is so weak you can't handle someone putting it under scrutiny without getting upset that they won't just stop questioning it. Then maybe the opinion is wrong. I expect scrutiny of my opinions I welcome it. Because I'm sure my opinion is build on a solid foundation so people can go at it all day with hammer and chisels and expect nothing to happen. Thing is, the stuff you argue over are things that are opinion based rather than fact. Hence, there's no definitive conclusion to make other than "I like this, you like that". But that doesn't sit well with you. Also, I have altered my ideas about things when presented with something I consider to be real evidence that runs contrary to what I believe. Again, you haven't provided that. You're insistence that I'm "upset" rather than, actually, bored with your discussions is the mistake your making in understanding where I'm coming from. Your conversations bore me because they provide nothing to change me but you don't let things go anyway. Therefore, yes, I don't want the continued discussion.
|
|
dmc1001
N7
Biotic Booty
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Origin: ferroboy
Prime Posts: 77
Posts: 9,942 Likes: 17,687
inherit
Biotic Booty
1031
0
Nov 16, 2024 14:01:33 GMT
17,687
dmc1001
9,942
August 2016
dmc1001
Top
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
ferroboy
77
|
Post by dmc1001 on Dec 27, 2016 21:02:57 GMT
See, the thing is, I don't actually have a problem with your perspective on the games. I do see where you're coming from. It just doesn't sway my opinion. So, what exactly is there to argue about? The problem is, it NEVER ends with you. I seriously believe your goal is to hammer people down until they agree with you. That also isn't discussion. No offence but you've only just realised this? His MO is walls of text and, if that doesn't work, insults. I'm more than happy to discuss things with people who hold differing opinions to mine but he isn't. Ignore to win. No, I didn't just realize this. It just came up again. Sometimes even I get tired of the endless texts of quotes and lengthy posts that usually end up where you say - even when I'm not part of it.
|
|
inherit
1480
0
1,080
gothpunkboy89
2,311
September 2016
gothpunkboy89
|
Post by gothpunkboy89 on Dec 27, 2016 21:50:20 GMT
Pft! A lot of Sovereign's dialogue was so unnecessary and time wasting that I have to question why did it deign to speak to something as insignificant as Shepard? Harbinger spent the better part of ME2 saying,"This hurts you." Fire doesn't need to make nonsensical comments on the effects it has on what it burns. My point being, the analogy the Catalyst used to portray the Reapers as distant, detached entities is contradicted so frequently by the amount of interaction done with Shepard that it's laughable. If they were akin to fire, don't even bother acknowledging Shepard the special snowflake, just burn Shepard where they stand. Psychological warfare tactics were mentioned being used in the Codex and used regularly to demoralize the alien species and all of it could have been avoided by simply nesting on the planet right from the beginning and letting indoctrination do the work instead while the races were young. It's all very sloppy work given the amount of time they had to refine it. Resistance should not even exist. As for the catalyst, I may say it sounded patronizing but that's how it sounded to me. I can't say how it sounds to others. But the logic is so poorly written that I don't see a story, I see the frazzled mess of overstressed developers. I see the cobbled attempts to patch it together while creating bigger plotholes. It could have been simplified, explained as galactic pruning. That's it. Clip the advanced races before they wipe out the younger races. No need to have synthetics be an issue because otherwise, the Catalyst was causing the whole mess in the first place. It sounds like the ending works for some because they can stay immersed in the story while someone like me is complaining because I can't suspend disbelief at this point. I feel like you are taking a to literal approach to the fire comment. They are a kin to fire because when fire destroys it only does so because that is it's purpose. The Reapers are the same way their harvest of each cycle happens because that is what they were created to do. I don't know why people keep trying to take the most literal possible interpenetration of that statement. Yes the entire point of the husks, marauders, cannibals, etc are all physiological warfare. With hints that each husk isn't a bland copy paste but actually retains features of their human self. We only see that because of game play reasons. The problem with indoctrination is that the end result is mental break down. Saren and TIM were both capable of their own rationalization of events and actions because their indoctrination were just a light touch. And in the end both were capable of realizing and fighting the indoctrination. Ending with them killing themselves rather then allow themselves to keep being manipulated. The stronger the hold the less mental capabilities the person has. They could in theory indoctrinate races when they are young but all that would do is create a race of shambling dull eye species that wouldn't even be capable of breeding on their own. The Reapers could also wipe out all life in the galaxy they have the capability to turn every planet into a barren wasteland until the heat death of the universe. They don't because both options doesn't actually solve the problem. The fastest and or easiest way is not always the correct way to go. You think it creates bigger plot holes? I disagree. It is established the only reason the Quarians survived the Morning War is because the Geth let them leave though the Mass Relay. The Quarians then relied on other races for fuel, ships, etc to survive. No Reapers means no Mass Relay Network. Which also means the Qurains would be forced to travel thought he void of space with no other race to to use their fuel distribution infrastructure. No other race to buy ships/ship parts for. No scrap metal to salvage or odd jobs to do to get credits to buy new ships/ship parts. Without that then the Quarians would have died off in space. No Reapers means no mutual enemy to forcibly fuse the Geth and Quarians together. Heck no Reapers and even the chance at the Krogan becoming anything more then thugs is removed because no way in hell the Turians or Salarians would allow cure of Genophage other wise.
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
Member is Online
Nov 26, 2024 12:38:10 GMT
26,299
themikefest
15,635
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Dec 27, 2016 22:55:15 GMT
I always choose destroy. The game gives me no reason to choose the others.
The thing says the chaos will return by destroying the reapers. Yeah. So what? Let the galaxy solve its own problems without the reapers. Had the reapers not interfered, the quarians would've destroyed the geth. In Javik's time, they were doing well against the machines until the reapers made an appearance. I wouldn't be surprised if the same happened in previous cycles.
When destroy is chosen, the geth are destroyed. So what? No big loss. Rebuild the things if you really want to. Since I let the quarians destroy them, it doesn't matter. Why should I let the geth upload reaper code? I have no idea what will happen. How do I know they won't continue to attack the quarians and any other organic? That's not a chance I'm willing to take.
Along comes the green. The thing says its the ideal solution. For it, not for me. It says it can't be forced, but with Shepard there, it won't be forced because the organics are ready. Mmm. Shepard is doing the forcing no matter what. I doubt anyone would like their dna altered.. I would like to know exactly how the crucible will change everyone's dna. Not some vague answer, but a full detailed answer. That is another reason why I don't pick the green. The thing says the green is the final evolution of all life. How does the thing know that? Did the magic crucible genie tell the thing that? IN the epilogue it shows a reaper walking down Jones street while the rebuilding is happening. Its going to be hard to rebuild buildings if the reapers are shaking the ground. Another reason to destroy them
If the green was intended to be the best ending, I can't stop laughing while typing that, Bioware should've made it available no matter the ems. I wonder if the green ending was made for comedians to use for their opening act to give the audience a good laugh?
The blue ending. When it says it will be forced to accept Shepard taking over, it hesitates for a brief moment when saying that. Why? It sounds like it doesn't want to be replaced. It wants to continue to play with its toys. The reapers will remain and help the many. Really? I wouldn't be surprised if folks walk out their front door looking over their shoulder wondering when/if the beam of doom will be fired. The former human known as Shepard will be in charge. What guarantee is there the thing won't decide that what catalyst number 1 was doing was the right thing to do? What would the thing do if the organics decide to build another crucible to deal with the reapers thinking the first one failed especially since they knew there was enough energy to destroy them? In one of the slides, capital ships are seen near London. So if there's a crime being committed, Officer reaper ship #3707 deals with it by using its beam of doom?
In both the green and blue the reapers are still around. That's a no go. If I was to see my family members killed, my neighbors killed and community destroyed, I would want the giant looking robots destroyed. I wouldn't give a second thought about merging with them or controlling them.
Refuse. It makes Shepard look like an idiot. Talks big then fails to do anything. What a loser. I do wonder if Shepard dies there or is picked up and taken to the Normandy. I would be curious what answer he/she would give when asked what happened on the Citadel and why the crucible didn't fire.
|
|
inherit
738
0
4,633
Link"Guess"ski
3,882
August 2016
linkenski
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Mass Effect Andromeda
Linkenski
asblinkenski
Linkenski
|
Post by Link"Guess"ski on Dec 28, 2016 0:23:30 GMT
I've always disliked the common perception of Control as a "fake renegade" option. It's not red while Control is blue to "trick you", it's red becuase Destroy is renegade. It's not about "free will" and it's not about heroic sacrifice by killing all synthetics. It's about saying that the end justifies the means, and the end has always been "destroy the Reapers" since ME1's ending but the means are subverted here because we are subjecting entire species to imposed destruction by our decision. It is the single most unheroic choice you can pick.
Control is the heroic self-sacrifice but still not ideal because you can't trust, even as Shepard, that taking on the control will make you change the Reapers for the better to not harm or oppress others but this is where the paragon vs renegade distinction helps this ending thematically. Synthesis is morally ambiguous because the concept is insane and the premise for choosing it is also nonsensical becuase we assume that synthetics will always destroy all organics if we don't act which is simply impossible to say to such a degree of certainty.
|
|
Sondergaard
N3
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR
Posts: 572 Likes: 975
inherit
1505
0
Sept 27, 2024 16:57:55 GMT
975
Sondergaard
572
Sept 8, 2016 21:17:59 GMT
September 2016
sondergaard
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR
|
Post by Sondergaard on Dec 28, 2016 13:57:37 GMT
No offence but you've only just realised this? His MO is walls of text and, if that doesn't work, insults. I'm more than happy to discuss things with people who hold differing opinions to mine but he isn't. Ignore to win. Claims they are happy to discuss things with people who have different opinions. Says the ignoring people with different opinion is best option. Interesting. Wow.
|
|
inherit
1480
0
1,080
gothpunkboy89
2,311
September 2016
gothpunkboy89
|
Post by gothpunkboy89 on Dec 28, 2016 15:15:55 GMT
Claims they are happy to discuss things with people who have different opinions. Says the ignoring people with different opinion is best option. Interesting. Wow. I know right
|
|