inherit
2137
0
Dec 18, 2021 22:02:27 GMT
1,222
dropzofcrimzon
1,391
November 2016
dropzofcrimzon
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
DropzOfCrimzon
|
Post by dropzofcrimzon on Jan 18, 2017 14:08:28 GMT
Are people still arguing that maybe we do not need armed vehicles in hostile alien planets because "insert tree hugging space hippy bs here"?
Seriously?
|
|
inherit
57
0
1
35,526
SofaJockey
Not a jockey. Has a sofa.
13,923
August 2016
sofajockey
SofaJockey
SofaJockey
6000
7164
|
Post by SofaJockey on Jan 18, 2017 14:10:18 GMT
I have every expectation that this lack or armament is a plot device, but we shall see...
|
|
inherit
2137
0
Dec 18, 2021 22:02:27 GMT
1,222
dropzofcrimzon
1,391
November 2016
dropzofcrimzon
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
DropzOfCrimzon
|
Post by dropzofcrimzon on Jan 18, 2017 14:15:33 GMT
I have every expectation that this lack or armament is a plot device, but we shall see... you mean a way for bioware to put us at a disadvantage against the Kett and have it come and bite us in the ass even tho that would not make sense if those who were planning the Andromeda initiative had ANY common sense? I find that almost insulting...
|
|
inherit
410
0
Nov 23, 2024 11:57:59 GMT
3,504
Sartoz
6,890
August 2016
sartoz
https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.hVm-5wNStlyTEXjhwDoa_wHaEK%26pid%3DApi&f=1&ipt=8f745a5f30b08f8231ddb64664df7375d23cc10878aa50d66fec54e9d570c7e2&ipo=images
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Sartoz on Jan 18, 2017 14:28:49 GMT
,.-~*´¨¯¨`*·~-.¸-(_MEA_)-,.-~*´¨¯¨`*·~-.¸
Big Snip Added to the quote, the main point is that you don't really lose anything if you have some weapons, even if your main tactic is stealth and speed. Because at some point, logically, you will likely encounter something which will ideally demand a different solution than running away. ,.-~*´¨¯¨`*·~-.¸-(_MEA_)-,.-~*´¨¯¨`*·~-.¸
Jien, like any visionary, is also restricted by funding issues. Arming the Tempest sounds easy on paper but realities have a way of biting you in the azz, like where do I rob Peter to give to Paul?
Military commanders when faced with battle missions all wish to have more of everything but realize they must do with what they have. The Initiative planned their mission with the best knowledge they had at the time.... and making sure everyone wakes up at the other end is a priority. Monies, I suggest, were directed to ensure cryonic equipment would last for 600+ years. And, if there were no more funds, then the Tempest needs to perform her missions with what it has... no armaments.
Besides, this conversation is really moot when put against the game design... which is that no mission will encounter a hostile ship or space fleet. Arming the Tempest may make one feel nice and cuddly but with no hostile ship encounter, what's the point?
|
|
pdusen
N3
Posts: 296 Likes: 974
inherit
394
0
974
pdusen
296
August 2016
pdusen
|
Post by pdusen on Jan 18, 2017 14:29:01 GMT
Are people still arguing that maybe we do not need armed vehicles in hostile alien planets because "insert tree hugging space hippy bs here"? Seriously? I don't believe many people are saying that. Mostly in this thread you see people who either don't care or expect plot details to explain why it is the way it is.
|
|
inherit
1040
0
Nov 27, 2024 12:00:20 GMT
3,228
Vortex13
2,202
Aug 17, 2016 14:31:53 GMT
August 2016
vortex13
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Jade Empire
|
Post by Vortex13 on Jan 18, 2017 14:29:08 GMT
I will wait and see how BioWare is going to handle the weaponless Tempest and Nomad, as well as hear the in-game justification for lack of armament, but in all honesty this is all about as logical as the whole "Take Back Earth" mantra in ME 3.
Before the plot changed gears during the last hour of the campaign and actually gave a valid in-universe reason to go there, the constant pushing for and recruiting for a suicide run to take back a planet with literally zero tactical significance was just ludicrous and completely at odds with the logic of the setting at the time.
|
|
inherit
410
0
Nov 23, 2024 11:57:59 GMT
3,504
Sartoz
6,890
August 2016
sartoz
https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.hVm-5wNStlyTEXjhwDoa_wHaEK%26pid%3DApi&f=1&ipt=8f745a5f30b08f8231ddb64664df7375d23cc10878aa50d66fec54e9d570c7e2&ipo=images
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Sartoz on Jan 18, 2017 14:34:09 GMT
Are people still arguing that maybe we do not need armed vehicles in hostile alien planets because "insert tree hugging space hippy bs here"? Seriously? ,.-~*´¨¯¨`*·~-.¸-(_MEA_)-,.-~*´¨¯¨`*·~-.¸
Now this area of game design is puzzling. I'd go for the Nomad being armed because as shown in past trailers, the Big Bad are out there.
I suspect the game designers felt that squad combat against local fauna is a better idea to attract players. Me? I'd prefer mission combat related to the game story and have the Nomad as backup in case of encountering unplanned heavies when exploring.
|
|
inherit
2137
0
Dec 18, 2021 22:02:27 GMT
1,222
dropzofcrimzon
1,391
November 2016
dropzofcrimzon
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
DropzOfCrimzon
|
Post by dropzofcrimzon on Jan 18, 2017 14:34:38 GMT
Are people still arguing that maybe we do not need armed vehicles in hostile alien planets because "insert tree hugging space hippy bs here"? Seriously? I don't believe many people are saying that. Mostly in this thread you see people who either don't care or expect plot details to explain why it is the way it is. you understand the plot point will be "against all common sense some superior declared we need to go in with no weapon because all we need is the power of love and flowers" right?
|
|
inherit
2701
0
Feb 15, 2023 19:19:48 GMT
5,874
sgtreed24
1,947
January 2017
sgtreed24
Bottom
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
SgtReed24
STB Sgt Reed
Over 9000
um, 17?
|
Post by sgtreed24 on Jan 18, 2017 14:38:00 GMT
Added to the quote, the main point is that you don't really lose anything if you have some weapons, even if your main tactic is stealth and speed. Because at some point, logically, you will likely encounter something which will ideally demand a different solution than running away. ,.-~*´¨¯¨`*·~-.¸-(_MEA_)-,.-~*´¨¯¨`*·~-.¸
Arming the Tempest may make one feel nice and cuddly but with no hostile ship encounter, what's the point?
To keep the audience believing that this is a believable mission. lol
|
|
The Elder King
N6
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Prime Posts: 19631
Posts: 6,370 Likes: 8,285
inherit
104
0
Nov 25, 2024 21:13:35 GMT
8,285
The Elder King
6,370
August 2016
theelderking
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
19631
|
Post by The Elder King on Jan 18, 2017 14:38:11 GMT
I don't believe many people are saying that. Mostly in this thread you see people who either don't care or expect plot details to explain why it is the way it is. you understand the plot point will be "against all common sense some superior declared we need to go in with no weapon because all we need is the power of love and flowers" right? I very much doubt it'll be anything like that, otherwise they'd have not taken weapons on Andromeda. Even if the Initiative might be more pacific and then militaristic, nobody is going to say anything close to that. I think it's more likely they severely underestimated the problems they might face, or that they decide to build up warships in Andromeda (in either case mistakes). That's if the Initiative won't have warships already, which we don't know.
|
|
The Elder King
N6
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Prime Posts: 19631
Posts: 6,370 Likes: 8,285
inherit
104
0
Nov 25, 2024 21:13:35 GMT
8,285
The Elder King
6,370
August 2016
theelderking
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
19631
|
Post by The Elder King on Jan 18, 2017 14:39:48 GMT
,.-~*´¨¯¨`*·~-.¸-(_MEA_)-,.-~*´¨¯¨`*·~-.¸
Arming the Tempest may make one feel nice and cuddly but with no hostile ship encounter, what's the point?
To keep the audience believing that this is a believable mission. lol That's the point. Even if they didn't plan battles when the Tempest will fight, they specifically decided to clarify the ship doesn't have weapons. If they didn't say anything, we could very well think it has weapons regardless if they are used or not.
|
|
pdusen
N3
Posts: 296 Likes: 974
inherit
394
0
974
pdusen
296
August 2016
pdusen
|
Post by pdusen on Jan 18, 2017 14:41:49 GMT
I don't believe many people are saying that. Mostly in this thread you see people who either don't care or expect plot details to explain why it is the way it is. you understand the plot point will be "against all common sense some superior declared we need to go in with no weapon because all we need is the power of love and flowers" right? I haven't seen any indication that this is the justification, no.
|
|
inherit
57
0
1
35,526
SofaJockey
Not a jockey. Has a sofa.
13,923
August 2016
sofajockey
SofaJockey
SofaJockey
6000
7164
|
Post by SofaJockey on Jan 18, 2017 14:44:11 GMT
I have every expectation that this lack or armament is a plot device, but we shall see... you mean a way for bioware to put us at a disadvantage against the Kett and have it come and bite us in the ass even tho that would not make sense if those who were planning the Andromeda initiative had ANY common sense? I find that almost insulting... I suspect the 'happy apple pie' of the Andromeda Initiative is a starting point, and whether by lore ineptitude or a more cunning plan, finding the golden worlds less welcoming than expected has been foreseen and plotted by BioWare. Whether it is a good plot remains to be seen, and just because these craft don't have weapons at the start doesn't mean they won't have at the end, or in future games...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
2543
0
Nov 27, 2024 22:53:03 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 27, 2024 22:53:03 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2017 14:54:24 GMT
To keep the audience believing that this is a believable mission. lol That's the point. Even if they didn't plan battles when the Tempest will fight, they specifically decided to clarify the ship doesn't have weapons. If they didn't say anything, we could very well think it has weapons regardless if they are used or not. Then there's this... at least regarding the Nomad... If they left everyone with any expectation that there were weapons on the Nomad, people would automatically just assume they would be able to shoot enemies from inside the Nomand just like we were allowed to do with the mako... and then the usable weapons weren't actually there at release, people would be screaming blue bloody murder over it because then they would have allegedly shown us something in a trailer that wasn't actually in the game. Since the Nomad does not have usable weapons... I'm glad they're making it clear to us now by showing us and telling us that the Nomad is weaponless. That they may just be extending that same sort of strategy with the weaponless Tempest is fine by me as well. People tend to get too upset when they're shown things in trailers and such that aren't "usable" in the game itself.
|
|
inherit
410
0
Nov 23, 2024 11:57:59 GMT
3,504
Sartoz
6,890
August 2016
sartoz
https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.hVm-5wNStlyTEXjhwDoa_wHaEK%26pid%3DApi&f=1&ipt=8f745a5f30b08f8231ddb64664df7375d23cc10878aa50d66fec54e9d570c7e2&ipo=images
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Sartoz on Jan 18, 2017 14:56:31 GMT
I have every expectation that this lack or armament is a plot device, but we shall see... you mean a way for bioware to put us at a disadvantage against the Kett and have it come and bite us in the ass even tho that would not make sense if those who were planning the Andromeda initiative had ANY common sense? I find that almost insulting... ,.-~*´¨¯¨`*·~-.¸-(_MEA_)-,.-~*´¨¯¨`*·~-.¸
There is no disadvantage. Khet encounters are planetary or in space Vaults, requiring no intervention from the Tempest. Our squad is armed and therefore able to resist and overcome Khet attacks. Plus, not all Khet are hostile. Khet politics are layered with some/one faction being hostile (info from Bio ).
|
|
inherit
2137
0
Dec 18, 2021 22:02:27 GMT
1,222
dropzofcrimzon
1,391
November 2016
dropzofcrimzon
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
DropzOfCrimzon
|
Post by dropzofcrimzon on Jan 18, 2017 14:58:07 GMT
you understand the plot point will be "against all common sense some superior declared we need to go in with no weapon because all we need is the power of love and flowers" right? I very much doubt it'll be anything like that, otherwise they'd have not taken weapons on Andromeda. Even if the Initiative might be more pacific and then militaristic, nobody is going to say anything close to that. I think it's more likely they severely underestimated the problems they might face, or that they decide to build up warships in Andromeda (in either case mistakes). That's if the Initiative won't have warships already, which we don't know. right...so explain to me HOW one underestimates what can be found on a hostile planet's surface when anyone with access to the extranet can see videos of tuchanka. Sure the verbiage will not be what I proposed but the lack of an armed vehicle can only be explained through stupidity.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
2540
0
Nov 27, 2024 22:53:03 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 27, 2024 22:53:03 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2017 14:59:11 GMT
Prince EWe are not scientists! We are soldiers! Armed to the teeth! Shooting - is 50% of Andromeda gameplay! And they give us unarmed vehicles, because we are "explorers". Common sense is out there! Splinter Cell is considered to be a pure spy, but Sam Fisher at least have a silent pistol if something goes wrong! And this is space-opera where any aggressive alien monster can appear! And we have to fight with him by foot because we are explorers! What the hell! Yes!! Damn, I can't believe we are still debating this. The thing is, suppose you have all these people on the expedition. Naturally, you're going to have scientists (biologists, chemists, physicians, archaeologists, etc), engineers, soldiers, civilians, etc. Now, suppose you have many teams of scientists. I wouldn't have any problem with their ships having no guns, being small in size, and letting them go out explore and discover more about the cosmos. But, they would do it AFTER we charted that region of space and established a bigger presence there. Hell, aren't there only 4 pathfinders in the entire Andromeda Initiative? Isn't their mission to make a path, to create one? Venture into the unknown before anyone else, to find a new homeworld for their species? They are their leaders! What happens if they all die fighting an alien force? How many people could replace them, then? Aren't the pathfinders supposed to be some of the very best of what the Initiative has to offer? Like the promotional videos said: "A mix of elite soldier, explorer and guide". So you are going to take this extremely valuable individual whose purpose is to chart new planets and systems in a new galaxy (that no one knows) to determine in which ones you can settle, alone with their crew, while the rest of their species hang solely on the hope of success of this mission, and you're going to put them in a ship with no offensive capabilities whatsoever because you come in peace? What the fuck is this? Aren't you there to "FIGHT FOR A NEW HOME!"? How can not having basic weapon armaments on your ship or your ground vehicle possibly make up for that? Wasn't the first Normandy blown to hell while using only stealth systems? Against an enemy they never met before? Wasn't humanity most advanced ship destruction in the news? And they launch this Initiative two years later with the mentality of "cool stealth for the pathfinders ships" solving everyone's problems?
|
|
inherit
2137
0
Dec 18, 2021 22:02:27 GMT
1,222
dropzofcrimzon
1,391
November 2016
dropzofcrimzon
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
DropzOfCrimzon
|
Post by dropzofcrimzon on Jan 18, 2017 14:59:19 GMT
you understand the plot point will be "against all common sense some superior declared we need to go in with no weapon because all we need is the power of love and flowers" right? I haven't seen any indication that this is the justification, no. then please...enlighten us. What possible reason is there for a weaponless rover on hostile alien worlds? I am all ears
|
|
inherit
2137
0
Dec 18, 2021 22:02:27 GMT
1,222
dropzofcrimzon
1,391
November 2016
dropzofcrimzon
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
DropzOfCrimzon
|
Post by dropzofcrimzon on Jan 18, 2017 15:01:07 GMT
you mean a way for bioware to put us at a disadvantage against the Kett and have it come and bite us in the ass even tho that would not make sense if those who were planning the Andromeda initiative had ANY common sense? I find that almost insulting... ,.-~*´¨¯¨`*·~-.¸-(_MEA_)-,.-~*´¨¯¨`*·~-.¸
There is no disadvantage. Khet encounters are planetary or in space Vaults, requiring no intervention from the Tempest. Our squad is armed and therefore able to resist and overcome Khet attacks. Plus, not all Khet are hostile. Khet politics are layered with some/one faction being hostile (info from Bio ).
no I meant as a general status not a gameplay feature
|
|
The Elder King
N6
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Prime Posts: 19631
Posts: 6,370 Likes: 8,285
inherit
104
0
Nov 25, 2024 21:13:35 GMT
8,285
The Elder King
6,370
August 2016
theelderking
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
19631
|
Post by The Elder King on Jan 18, 2017 15:02:50 GMT
That's the point. Even if they didn't plan battles when the Tempest will fight, they specifically decided to clarify the ship doesn't have weapons. If they didn't say anything, we could very well think it has weapons regardless if they are used or not. Then there's this... at least regarding the Nomad... If they left everyone with any expectation that there were weapons on the Nomad, people would automatically just assume they would be able to shoot enemies from inside the Nomand just like we were allowed to do with the mako... and then the usable weapons weren't actually there at release, people would be screaming blue bloody murder over it because then they would have allegedly shown us something in a trailer that wasn't actually in the game. Since the Nomad does not have usable weapons... I'm glad they're making it clear to us now by showing us and telling us that the Nomad is weaponless. That they may just be extending that same sort of strategy with the weaponless Tempest is fine by me as well. People tend to get too upset when they're shown things in trailers and such that aren't "usable" in the game itself. It's, different, in my opinion. We can't control the Tempest, while we can control the Nomad, so they had to say the second is weaponless. I very much doubt it'll be anything like that, otherwise they'd have not taken weapons on Andromeda. Even if the Initiative might be more pacific and then militaristic, nobody is going to say anything close to that. I think it's more likely they severely underestimated the problems they might face, or that they decide to build up warships in Andromeda (in either case mistakes). That's if the Initiative won't have warships already, which we don't know. right...so explain to me HOW one underestimates what can be found on a hostile planet's surface when anyone with access to the extranet can see videos of tuchanka. Sure the verbiage will not be what I proposed but the lack of an armed vehicle can only be explained through stupidity. Well, we technically fought on Tuchanka on foot. And they will take weapons in the Initiative. Not that I disagree, although for the Nomad I guess the reason, right or wrong, as little to do with the lore or the motivations of the Initiative. Bioware (likely) didn't want/could spend the resources to make two different game modes, on foot and on the Nomad, and balance the fights between the two.
|
|
pdusen
N3
Posts: 296 Likes: 974
inherit
394
0
974
pdusen
296
August 2016
pdusen
|
Post by pdusen on Jan 18, 2017 15:04:08 GMT
I haven't seen any indication that this is the justification, no. then please...enlighten us. What possible reason is there for a weaponless rover on hostile alien worlds? I am all ears I can't answer that without knowing what the plot details are, which would make me a BioWare writer. If I were a BioWare writer, I definitely wouldn't be hanging out here. If you're looking for speculation... in the realm of reality, the number of possible scenarios is infinite.
|
|
The Elder King
N6
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Prime Posts: 19631
Posts: 6,370 Likes: 8,285
inherit
104
0
Nov 25, 2024 21:13:35 GMT
8,285
The Elder King
6,370
August 2016
theelderking
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
19631
|
Post by The Elder King on Jan 18, 2017 15:06:31 GMT
Prince EWe are not scientists! We are soldiers! Armed to the teeth! Shooting - is 50% of Andromeda gameplay! And they give us unarmed vehicles, because we are "explorers". Common sense is out there! Splinter Cell is considered to be a pure spy, but Sam Fisher at least have a silent pistol if something goes wrong! And this is space-opera where any aggressive alien monster can appear! And we have to fight with him by foot because we are explorers! What the hell! Yes!! Damn, I can't believe we are still debating this. The thing is, suppose you have all these people on the expedition. Naturally, you're going to have scientists (biologists, chemists, physicians, archaeologists, etc), engineers, soldiers, civilians, etc. Now, suppose you have many teams of scientists, I wouldn't have any problem with their ships having no guns, being small in size, let them go explore and discover more about the cosmos. But, they would do it AFTER we charted that region of space. Hell, aren't there only 4 pathfinders in the entire Andromeda Initiative? Isn't their mission to make a path, to create one? Venture into the unknown before anyone else, to find a new homeworld for their species? They are their leaders! What happens if they all die fighting an alien force? How many people could replace them, then? Aren't the pathfinders supposed to be some of the very best of what the Initiative has to offer? Like the promotional videos said: "A mix of elite soldier, explorer and guide" So you are going to take this extremely valuable individual whose purpose is to chart new planets, systems, a new galaxy that no one knows and determine in which ones you can settle, so all the rest of their species can follow? And you're going to put them in a ship with no offensive capabilities whatsoever because you come in peace? What the fuck is this? Isn't the slogan of this game: "FIGHT FOR A NEW HOME!" How that can possibly make up for no having armaments on your ship or you ground vehicle? The fight is a result of the problems encountered in Andromeda after arrival. It was said plenty of time that the fight for survival is something that was 'discovered' when in Andromeda, for the sudden turns of events that forced us in a more negative position that the Initiative assumes. Right or wrong they were, it doesn't matter. The Initiative, most likely, didn't except to have those problems. While it's not a justification for the stupidity of their decision, saying the slogan is about fighting is irrelevant, because it's about what we have to do after we reach the new galaxy, not what the Initiative assumed it would happen.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
825
0
Nov 27, 2024 22:53:03 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 27, 2024 22:53:03 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2017 15:07:13 GMT
I think its worth pulling up, that we found out that the Tempest and Nomad would be weaponless, in an in-universe briefing video from the Andromeda Initiative. It wasn't a developer commentary or video. It was narrated by our own pilot.
Developer tweets to the contrary, since for this particular issue they are within keeping of what we've seen from the AI video, the whole peace stance and whatnot.
Given that all these briefings are before we actually set off for Andromeda, and again given what we see in the trailer (ships being attacked) I think it may be a little premature to write off the game yet. Plus what's with all the swearing at the moment, is that really necessary?
This is the first thread I've really come across here where some people are getting very angry and reactionary about this whole issue.
|
|
The Elder King
N6
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Prime Posts: 19631
Posts: 6,370 Likes: 8,285
inherit
104
0
Nov 25, 2024 21:13:35 GMT
8,285
The Elder King
6,370
August 2016
theelderking
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
19631
|
Post by The Elder King on Jan 18, 2017 15:08:16 GMT
I think its worth pulling up, that we found out that the Tempest and Nomad would be weaponless, in an in-universe briefing video from the Andromeda Initiative. It wasn't a developer commentary or video. It was narrated by our own pilot. Developer tweets to the contrary, since for this particular issue they are within keeping of what we've seen from the AI video, the whole peace stance and whatnot. Given that all these briefings are before we actually set off for Andromeda, and again given what we see in the trailer (ships being attacked) I think it may be a little premature to write off the game yet. Plus what's with all the swearing at the moment, is that really necessary? This is the first thread I've really come across here where some people are getting very angry and reactionary about this whole issue. There were at least other two threads, it's not really that uncommon.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
2540
0
Nov 27, 2024 22:53:03 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 27, 2024 22:53:03 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2017 15:09:04 GMT
Yes!! Damn, I can't believe we are still debating this. The thing is, suppose you have all these people on the expedition. Naturally, you're going to have scientists (biologists, chemists, physicians, archaeologists, etc), engineers, soldiers, civilians, etc. Now, suppose you have many teams of scientists, I wouldn't have any problem with their ships having no guns, being small in size, let them go explore and discover more about the cosmos. But, they would do it AFTER we charted that region of space. Hell, aren't there only 4 pathfinders in the entire Andromeda Initiative? Isn't their mission to make a path, to create one? Venture into the unknown before anyone else, to find a new homeworld for their species? They are their leaders! What happens if they all die fighting an alien force? How many people could replace them, then? Aren't the pathfinders supposed to be some of the very best of what the Initiative has to offer? Like the promotional videos said: "A mix of elite soldier, explorer and guide" So you are going to take this extremely valuable individual whose purpose is to chart new planets, systems, a new galaxy that no one knows and determine in which ones you can settle, so all the rest of their species can follow? And you're going to put them in a ship with no offensive capabilities whatsoever because you come in peace? What the fuck is this? Isn't the slogan of this game: "FIGHT FOR A NEW HOME!" How that can possibly make up for no having armaments on your ship or you ground vehicle? The fight is a result of the problems encountered in Andromeda after arrival. It was said plenty of time that the fight for survival is something that was 'discovered' when in Andromeda, for the sudden turns of events that forced us in a more negative position that the Initiative assumes. Right or wrong they were, it doesn't matter. The Initiative, most likely, didn't except to have those problems. While it's not a justification for the stupidity of their decision, saying the slogan is about fighting is irrelevant, because it's about what we have to do after we reach the new galaxy, not what the Initiative assumed it would happen. And yet, they prepared themselves by bringing weapons for ground personnel during the trip, but not their ships. Interesting. And that's exactly the problem. How the Initiative didn't assume conflict would happen if they brought soldiers along with them, and even escorts for the arks? You are going to another galaxy where life is much expected to exist, probably invade someone else's territory, take soldiers and specialists with you, but don't give the most important person responsible for finding a new homeworld weapons on their ships or recon vehicles. And yes, it's relevant because fight for survival is the most obvious thing that's going to happen when you take a big number of people to start a new civilization far away from everything when all they have to defend them is you. You are not there to just explore and have fun doing science with your team alone, you are there with everyone of your species counting on you to find them someplace else to live. You fail and 20.000 might perish. Sure as hell I wanna arm to the teeth whoever responsible for doing this.
|
|