inherit
2137
0
Dec 18, 2021 22:02:27 GMT
1,222
dropzofcrimzon
1,391
November 2016
dropzofcrimzon
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
DropzOfCrimzon
|
Post by dropzofcrimzon on Jan 18, 2017 15:15:36 GMT
Then there's this... at least regarding the Nomad... If they left everyone with any expectation that there were weapons on the Nomad, people would automatically just assume they would be able to shoot enemies from inside the Nomand just like we were allowed to do with the mako... and then the usable weapons weren't actually there at release, people would be screaming blue bloody murder over it because then they would have allegedly shown us something in a trailer that wasn't actually in the game. Since the Nomad does not have usable weapons... I'm glad they're making it clear to us now by showing us and telling us that the Nomad is weaponless. That they may just be extending that same sort of strategy with the weaponless Tempest is fine by me as well. People tend to get too upset when they're shown things in trailers and such that aren't "usable" in the game itself. It's, different, in my opinion. We can't control the Tempest, while we can control the Nomad, so they had to say the second is weaponless. right...so explain to me HOW one underestimates what can be found on a hostile planet's surface when anyone with access to the extranet can see videos of tuchanka. Sure the verbiage will not be what I proposed but the lack of an armed vehicle can only be explained through stupidity. Well, we technically fought on Tuchanka on foot. And they will take weapons in the Initiative. Not that I disagree, although for the Nomad I guess the reason, right or wrong, as little to do with the lore or the motivations of the Initiative. Bioware (likely) didn't want/could spend the resources to make two different game modes, on foot and on the Nomad, and balance the fights between the two. dude...separate game play from lore please. A lot of creature on tuchanka would be nearly impossible to take on on foot since one is even able to take down a reaper destroyer...
|
|
The Elder King
N6
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Prime Posts: 19631
Posts: 6,370 Likes: 8,285
inherit
104
0
Nov 25, 2024 21:13:35 GMT
8,285
The Elder King
6,370
August 2016
theelderking
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
19631
|
Post by The Elder King on Jan 18, 2017 15:17:07 GMT
The fight is a result of the problems encountered in Andromeda after arrival. It was said plenty of time that the fight for survival is something that was 'discovered' when in Andromeda, for the sudden turns of events that forced us in a more negative position that the Initiative assumes. Right or wrong they were, it doesn't matter. The Initiative, most likely, didn't except to have those problems. While it's not a justification for the stupidity of their decision, saying the slogan is about fighting is irrelevant, because it's about what we have to do after we reach the new galaxy, not what the Initiative assumed it would happen. And yet, they prepared themselves by bringing weapons for ground personnel, but not their ships. Interesting. We still don't know if the Initiative has no warships. We know only the Tempest doesn't. I'm not questions the validity of it. I don't agree with it as well. I just think it's a separate issue from the slogan of 'Fighting for home/survival/etc.' since those refers to the situation we found as we arrived, not their plans before the voyage. As for weapons for people, maybe they have them because it cost less then creating cannons and weapons for ships (that's assuming no ship will have weapons, otherwise its just a design decision they made for the scout vessel). Maybe they wanted to create warships as they arrive, for the same reason as why they didn't complete the Nexus.
|
|
inherit
2137
0
Dec 18, 2021 22:02:27 GMT
1,222
dropzofcrimzon
1,391
November 2016
dropzofcrimzon
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
DropzOfCrimzon
|
Post by dropzofcrimzon on Jan 18, 2017 15:17:20 GMT
then please...enlighten us. What possible reason is there for a weaponless rover on hostile alien worlds? I am all ears I can't answer that without knowing what the plot details are, which would make me a BioWare writer. If I were a BioWare writer, I definitely wouldn't be hanging out here. If you're looking for speculation... in the realm of reality, the number of possible scenarios is infinite. usually if one cannot postulate a logical reason for something like this then usually the writers have resorted to something almost absurd
|
|
The Elder King
N6
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Prime Posts: 19631
Posts: 6,370 Likes: 8,285
inherit
104
0
Nov 25, 2024 21:13:35 GMT
8,285
The Elder King
6,370
August 2016
theelderking
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
19631
|
Post by The Elder King on Jan 18, 2017 15:20:04 GMT
It's, different, in my opinion. We can't control the Tempest, while we can control the Nomad, so they had to say the second is weaponless. Well, we technically fought on Tuchanka on foot. And they will take weapons in the Initiative. Not that I disagree, although for the Nomad I guess the reason, right or wrong, as little to do with the lore or the motivations of the Initiative. Bioware (likely) didn't want/could spend the resources to make two different game modes, on foot and on the Nomad, and balance the fights between the two. dude...separate game play from lore please. A lot of creature on tuchanka would be nearly impossible to take on on foot since one is even able to take down a reaper destroyer... The only creature we can't kill on foot is the gigantic thresher maw, which might be a problem for ships as well. Normal maws are killabe lorewise. I'm not saying I like the choice. But it's clearly a gameplay issue that lead to that decision for the Nomad.
|
|
inherit
2137
0
Dec 18, 2021 22:02:27 GMT
1,222
dropzofcrimzon
1,391
November 2016
dropzofcrimzon
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
DropzOfCrimzon
|
Post by dropzofcrimzon on Jan 18, 2017 15:21:26 GMT
dude...separate game play from lore please. A lot of creature on tuchanka would be nearly impossible to take on on foot since one is even able to take down a reaper destroyer... The only creature we can't kill on foot is the gigantic thresher maw, which might be a problem for ships as well. Normal maws are killabe lorewise. I'm not saying I like the choice. But it's clearly a gameplay issue that lead to that decision for the Nomad. which flies in the face of the lore and Bioware should be called out on it not given a pass
|
|
Iakus
N7
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
Posts: 21,297 Likes: 50,659
inherit
402
0
Dec 21, 2018 17:35:11 GMT
50,659
Iakus
21,297
August 2016
iakus
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
|
Post by Iakus on Jan 18, 2017 15:21:55 GMT
then please...enlighten us. What possible reason is there for a weaponless rover on hostile alien worlds? I am all ears I can't answer that without knowing what the plot details are, which would make me a BioWare writer. If I were a BioWare writer, I definitely wouldn't be hanging out here. If you're looking for speculation... in the realm of reality, the number of possible scenarios is infinite. The question isn't what that reasoner is, it's what possible reason would there be? You don't have to be a writer to speculate. Heck Bioware encourages "speculation"
|
|
inherit
2137
0
Dec 18, 2021 22:02:27 GMT
1,222
dropzofcrimzon
1,391
November 2016
dropzofcrimzon
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
DropzOfCrimzon
|
Post by dropzofcrimzon on Jan 18, 2017 15:23:25 GMT
Hey...lets get the space hippy superiors of the Andromeda Initiative to come planetside with us and try to take THIS on Not with armed vehicles but with the power of LOVE AND PEACE Goddamn fucking hippies
|
|
The Elder King
N6
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Prime Posts: 19631
Posts: 6,370 Likes: 8,285
inherit
104
0
Nov 25, 2024 21:13:35 GMT
8,285
The Elder King
6,370
August 2016
theelderking
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
19631
|
Post by The Elder King on Jan 18, 2017 15:27:48 GMT
The only creature we can't kill on foot is the gigantic thresher maw, which might be a problem for ships as well. Normal maws are killabe lorewise. I'm not saying I like the choice. But it's clearly a gameplay issue that lead to that decision for the Nomad. which flies in the face of the lore and Bioware should be called out on it not given a pass It's not lore breaking. I don't like it, and I think it's a stupid decision in game, but it doesn't break the lore. It's not about making it pass, but understanding the project doesn't have infinite resources. Something has to be cut or not implemented. Hey...lets get the space hippy superiors of the Andromeda Initiative to come planetside with us and try to take THIS on Not with armed vehicles but with the power of LOVE AND PEACE Goddamn fucking hippies I wonder how they can be hippies when they bring along weapons I understand not liking and being against the decision, and the leaders of the Initiative were obviously going clueless/stupid, but it's clear not about being hippies, so continuing to say that isn't going to help your point.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
2540
0
Nov 27, 2024 19:47:18 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 27, 2024 19:47:18 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2017 15:28:01 GMT
And yet, they prepared themselves by bringing weapons for ground personnel, but not their ships. Interesting. We still don't know if the Initiative has no warships. We know only the Tempest doesn't. I'm not questions the validity of it. I don't agree with it as well. I just think it's a separate issue from the slogan of 'Fighting for home/survival/etc.' since those refers to the situation we found as we arrived, not their plans before the voyage. As for weapons for people, maybe they have them because it cost less then creating cannons and weapons for ships (that's assuming no ship will have weapons, otherwise its just a design decision they made for the scout vessel). Maybe they wanted to create warships as they arrive, for the same reason as why they didn't complete the Nexus. And that's what I'm arguing. Fighting for your home is the obvious thing you are going to do when you encounter aliens that might be hostile to you (and they'll most likely will) if you have nothing to go back to. But yes, I used the slogan while meta-gaming, while I'm trying to say it in-game. My mistake.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
825
0
Nov 27, 2024 19:47:18 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 27, 2024 19:47:18 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2017 15:30:46 GMT
For all we know Jien could be indoctrinated, and sending everyone to Andromeda like lambs to the slaughter.
Easy pickings for the Reapers.
Still going to wait and see until I've actually played the game though...
|
|
The Elder King
N6
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Prime Posts: 19631
Posts: 6,370 Likes: 8,285
inherit
104
0
Nov 25, 2024 21:13:35 GMT
8,285
The Elder King
6,370
August 2016
theelderking
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
19631
|
Post by The Elder King on Jan 18, 2017 15:31:18 GMT
We still don't know if the Initiative has no warships. We know only the Tempest doesn't. I'm not questions the validity of it. I don't agree with it as well. I just think it's a separate issue from the slogan of 'Fighting for home/survival/etc.' since those refers to the situation we found as we arrived, not their plans before the voyage. As for weapons for people, maybe they have them because it cost less then creating cannons and weapons for ships (that's assuming no ship will have weapons, otherwise its just a design decision they made for the scout vessel). Maybe they wanted to create warships as they arrive, for the same reason as why they didn't complete the Nexus. And that's what I'm arguing. Fighting for your home is the obvious thing you are going to do when you encounter aliens that might be hostile to you (and they'll most likely will) if you have nothing to go back to. But we'd fight them anyway since the Kett are obviously a problem for our development in the cluster. Especially because it's not as resource heavy as the Initiative thought. I'm not questioning the validity of the decision, since it's pretty clear they screwed up many things, from the cluster to not possibly brining warships/bringing not many. But it's clear it was a decision from the writers to force the MW species to be in a struggle.
|
|
The Elder King
N6
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Prime Posts: 19631
Posts: 6,370 Likes: 8,285
inherit
104
0
Nov 25, 2024 21:13:35 GMT
8,285
The Elder King
6,370
August 2016
theelderking
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
19631
|
Post by The Elder King on Jan 18, 2017 15:33:25 GMT
For all we know Jien could be indoctrinated, and sending everyone to Andromeda like lambs to the slaughter. Easy pickings for the Reapers. Still going to wait and see until I've actually played the game though... Bioware confirmed there aren't Reapers in Andromeda. I doubt that the leaders would be indoctrinated, but it might explain it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
2543
0
Nov 27, 2024 19:47:18 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 27, 2024 19:47:18 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2017 15:36:31 GMT
The only creature we can't kill on foot is the gigantic thresher maw, which might be a problem for ships as well. Normal maws are killabe lorewise. I'm not saying I like the choice. But it's clearly a gameplay issue that lead to that decision for the Nomad. which flies in the face of the lore and Bioware should be called out on it not given a pass So... you've called them out on it... feel better? The Elder King - I agree. They probably just couldn't add the extra gameplay mode to deal with the option of having the player combat enemies both on foot and from the Nomad. That is the most likely "real world" reason combined with, as you say, not being really able to "mislead" players by showing weapons on the Nomad that would not be usable (because of there being weapons on the Mako in the ME Trilogy). I can see where you're coming from regarding the issue with the Tempest being somewhat different.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
2540
0
Nov 27, 2024 19:47:18 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 27, 2024 19:47:18 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2017 15:37:12 GMT
And that's what I'm arguing. Fighting for your home is the obvious thing you are going to do when you encounter aliens that might be hostile to you (and they'll most likely will) if you have nothing to go back to. But we'd fight them anyway since the Kett are obviously a problem for our development in the cluster. Especially because it's not as resource heavy as the Initiative thought. I'm not questioning the validity of the decision, since it's pretty clear they screwed up many things, from the cluster to not possibly brining warships/bringing not many. But it's clear it was a decision from the writers to force the MW species to be in a struggle. Ok. I agree with you. And yes, even if they planned to expand their ships after they get to Andromeda, they sure as hell should build new ships for pathfinders. And maybe that's the whole point while we complain about the Tempest. But the thing is, whoever was responsible for this Initiative didn't have a fucking clue about what he/she was doing. I can't believe we joined them. That's the worst part.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
825
0
Nov 27, 2024 19:47:18 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 27, 2024 19:47:18 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2017 15:37:27 GMT
For all we know Jien could be indoctrinated, and sending everyone to Andromeda like lambs to the slaughter. Easy pickings for the Reapers. Still going to wait and see until I've actually played the game though... Bioware confirmed there aren't Reapers in Andromeda. I doubt that the leaders would be indoctrinated, but it might explain it. I was being facetious.
|
|
inherit
2137
0
Dec 18, 2021 22:02:27 GMT
1,222
dropzofcrimzon
1,391
November 2016
dropzofcrimzon
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
DropzOfCrimzon
|
Post by dropzofcrimzon on Jan 18, 2017 15:39:24 GMT
which flies in the face of the lore and Bioware should be called out on it not given a pass It's not lore breaking. I don't like it, and I think it's a stupid decision in game, but it doesn't break the lore. It's not about making it pass, but understanding the project doesn't have infinite resources. Something has to be cut or not implemented. Hey...lets get the space hippy superiors of the Andromeda Initiative to come planetside with us and try to take THIS on Not with armed vehicles but with the power of LOVE AND PEACE Goddamn fucking hippies I wonder how they can be hippies when they bring along weapons I understand not liking and being against the decision, and the leaders of the Initiative were obviously going clueless/stupid, but it's clear not about being hippies, so continuing to say that isn't going to help your point. as others stated I would have been 100% ok with SEEING the guns on the nomad while having no occasion to use them if THAT is the reason (vehicle combat gameplay was scrapped because of resources). And I am gonna keep calling them space hippies unless we get a better answer than " we come in peace brothers and sisters from an alien womb" as per why we have no goddamn cannon on our rover. It breaks the lore in the sense that the milky way is FILLED with hostile planets inhabited by creatures that are the size of a fucking bus and able to tear through squads of people (including sentient ones like the yahg)...that knowledge is available to EVERYONE who has access to the extranet including the space hip...I mean the people who organized the Andromeda initiative and chosen to give us vehicles with no guns. It either flies in the face of the lore OR assumes the utter suicidal stupidity of people who came up with the idea AND those who went along with it. Take your pick.
|
|
inherit
2137
0
Dec 18, 2021 22:02:27 GMT
1,222
dropzofcrimzon
1,391
November 2016
dropzofcrimzon
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
DropzOfCrimzon
|
Post by dropzofcrimzon on Jan 18, 2017 15:42:00 GMT
which flies in the face of the lore and Bioware should be called out on it not given a pass So... you've called them out on it... feel better? not until Bioware can argue about it openly and either show us we were wrong or admits it made no sense But given the track record with the thermal clips they are just gonna say "it serves our purpose so we are just gonna ignore it"
|
|
inherit
57
0
1
35,524
SofaJockey
Not a jockey. Has a sofa.
13,923
August 2016
sofajockey
SofaJockey
SofaJockey
6000
7164
|
Post by SofaJockey on Jan 18, 2017 15:43:58 GMT
I very much doubt it'll be anything like that, otherwise they'd have not taken weapons on Andromeda. Even if the Initiative might be more pacific and then militaristic, nobody is going to say anything close to that. I think it's more likely they severely underestimated the problems they might face, or that they decide to build up warships in Andromeda (in either case mistakes). That's if the Initiative won't have warships already, which we don't know. right...so explain to me HOW one underestimates what can be found on a hostile planet's surface when anyone with access to the extranet can see videos of tuchanka. Sure the verbiage will not be what I proposed but the lack of an armed vehicle can only be explained through stupidity. When the game is released we will know if it is by clever stupidity, or otherwise, I think it's too early to call.
|
|
inherit
2137
0
Dec 18, 2021 22:02:27 GMT
1,222
dropzofcrimzon
1,391
November 2016
dropzofcrimzon
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age Inquisition, Baldur's Gate, Mass Effect Andromeda
DropzOfCrimzon
|
Post by dropzofcrimzon on Jan 18, 2017 15:46:14 GMT
right...so explain to me HOW one underestimates what can be found on a hostile planet's surface when anyone with access to the extranet can see videos of tuchanka. Sure the verbiage will not be what I proposed but the lack of an armed vehicle can only be explained through stupidity. When the game is released we will know if it is by clever stupidity, or otherwise, I think it's too early to call. we said that about the thermal clips remember?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
825
0
Nov 27, 2024 19:47:18 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 27, 2024 19:47:18 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2017 15:46:25 GMT
Is this thread a discussion about the Tempest overall, or just about the no weapons thing? It'd be neat for the general discourse of the discussion to cover other things about the Tempest we've seen in the briefing video. Besides the penthouse cabin being too large and no weapons thing. Or just keep debating. I don't even know anymore
|
|
inherit
57
0
1
35,524
SofaJockey
Not a jockey. Has a sofa.
13,923
August 2016
sofajockey
SofaJockey
SofaJockey
6000
7164
|
Post by SofaJockey on Jan 18, 2017 15:46:32 GMT
Hey...lets get the space hippy superiors of the Andromeda Initiative to come planetside with us and try to take THIS on Not with armed vehicles but with the power of LOVE AND PEACE Goddamn fucking hippies I would nuke that entire site from orbit -- it's the only way to be sure...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
825
0
Nov 27, 2024 19:47:18 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 27, 2024 19:47:18 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2017 15:47:23 GMT
When the game is released we will know if it is by clever stupidity, or otherwise, I think it's too early to call. we said that about the thermal clips remember? People got angry about the thermal clips?
|
|
inherit
57
0
1
35,524
SofaJockey
Not a jockey. Has a sofa.
13,923
August 2016
sofajockey
SofaJockey
SofaJockey
6000
7164
|
Post by SofaJockey on Jan 18, 2017 15:50:18 GMT
Is this thread a discussion about the Tempest overall, ... [?] Please do widen the conversation if you wish... The Tempest is not simply a weapons platform...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
2543
0
Nov 27, 2024 19:47:18 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 27, 2024 19:47:18 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2017 15:52:12 GMT
So... you've called them out on it... feel better? not until Bioware can argue about it openly and either show us we were wrong or admits it made no sense But given the track record with the thermal clips they are just gonna say "it serves our purpose so we are just gonna ignore it" You see... that's where we differ. At this point in time - two months before I'll even consider deciding whether or not to buy the game... I do feel better just trying to theorize about what their plot might be. It's that discussion... about what sort of plot device this might be... that has made this thread even halfway enjoyable for me to read. As you admit, people have been trying to "call out" Bioware on a number issues for many years now. It just doesn't appear to be working for them... not sure why I'd start to believe it would work for them this time around.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
2540
0
Nov 27, 2024 19:47:18 GMT
Deleted
0
Nov 27, 2024 19:47:18 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2017 15:52:28 GMT
Is this thread a discussion about the Tempest overall, ... [?] Please do widen the conversation if you wish... The Tempest is not simply a weapons platform... I still wanna cry, though.
|
|