30fps vs 60fps (aka console vs PC) preference?

I'm running a Nvidia Titan with an i7-4930k and 16GB of RAM. I built the thing about 3 years ago when that was a lot closer to top of the line =P

I can still maintain a pretty solid 60 FPS(a few dips down to 45-50 at times) in games like DOOM on ultra at 1440p right now which actually kind of surprised me that it still held up this well. It was only recently that I got my new monitor and before that I was running at 1024x768 on an old TV that I had lying around, so I didn't entirely know how well my rig would handle 1440p or 4k. Most games in 4k for me run at about 25-30 depending on how well optimized they are(and if I want to murder my poor video card by maxing out AA options).

Admittedly I do feel a bit less confident about ME:A because DA:I wasn't all that well optimized, but I'm holding out hope that was due to it being their first foray into the Frostbite engine and that ME:A will be better optimized.

Since I haven't run into issues at 1440p yet I doubt if I'll upgrade just yet. Probably in another year or so I'll think about making the push to get 4k @ 60 FPS

I prefer to play games at low resolution and low frame rates. The lower resolution improves the visual experience and the low frame rate is better because it's cinematic. Consoles are better for gaming because controllers are great, so much better for aiming compared to using a mouse. It's always best to use a controller, even if gaming on a pc. This is why xbox and playstation are amazing, they offer the very best gaming experience.

Mass Effect Andromeda has confirmed native controller support and you can play at low res/low fps if you want on pc.
(why does part of me feel this was sarcasm?)