Reviewers hands-on [post-Feb 24 story impressions] SPOILERS

Probably not, but just making a point as we're putting links to this thread around the place. 
Spoiler tags within the thread are of course unnecessary.

A couple of preview articles.

Play Station Article

IGN Canada Article

If anyone wants to peruse the articles released so far:
www.gameinformer.com/games/mass_effect_andromeda/b/playstation4/archive/2017/02/23/five-things-we-loved-about-our-hands-on-time-with-biowares-space-epic.aspx?
www.gameinformer.com/games/mass_effect_andromeda/b/playstation4/archive/2017/02/23/50-things-we-noticed-during-our-hands-on-time-with-the-game.aspx?
www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2017/02/23/selecting-commander-shepards-gender-in-mass-effect-andromeda-will-affect-the-story.aspx?
Interview with Gamble after playing: www.gameinformer.com/games/mass_effect_andromeda/b/playstation4/archive/2017/02/23/bioware-talks-mass-effects-legacy-and-what-to-expect-from-andromeda.aspx
www.gamespot.com/articles/how-mass-effect-andromedas-characters-deal-with-sc/1100-6448130/?ftag=GSS-05-10aaa0b
venturebeat.com/2017/02/23/mass-effect-andromeda-has-big-gameplay-changes-an-epic-story-and-a-new-galaxy/
www.rockpapershotgun.com/2017/02/23/mass-effect-andromeda-is-looking-good/
www.pcworld.com/article/3173271/gaming/mass-effect-andromeda-hands-on-preview-a-new-space-opera-built-on-old-ideas.html
www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1346773
www.vg247.com/2017/02/23/mass-effect-andromeda-gameplay-worth-the-wait/
www.polygon.com/2017/2/23/14708146/lost-in-space-a-confusing-90-minutes-with-mass-effect-andromeda
www.godisageek.com/2017/02/interview-with-fabrice-condominas-producer-of-mass-effect-andromeda/
www.rpgsite.net/feature/5335-mass-effect-andromeda-hands-on-finally-reassured-and-impressed-by-bioware-s-latest
www.pcgamer.com/mass-effect-andromeda-hands-on-bigger-flashier-and-very-familiar/
www.pcgamesn.com/mass-effect-andromeda/mass-effect-andromeda-shepard
metro.co.uk/2017/02/23/mass-effect-andromeda-hands-on-preview-and-interview-humility-is-a-key-part-of-the-game-6468067/#ixzz4ZWGyNMdi
www.eurogamer.net/articles/2017-02-22-four-hours-with-mass-effect-andromeda

The one spoiler I cared about most from all these articles.

36. The Nomad didn’t have any turrets or projectile-based weaponry I could use, but it sure could run enemies over.

Beware the 4 wheeled beast of Babylon.

The Nomad? Nah, son.

Call it Mr. Plow.

Yeah but the thing is ...they have to say that.
And don't get me wrong they are working for sure, and Bioware games aren't that buggy in general anyway.
But framerates issues+ cut in audio during dialogue was something happening in DAI .
I expect some performance issues , PC launch is probably going to be a tiny bit chaotic , some pc are going to handle the thing more or less fine and others won't.
People who want a 100 % smooth experience should wait a couple of month before playing.

Animations are somewhat crappy and are going to stay crappy and that's the end of the story.

One of the reviewers was... distraught... about how "sassy" Scott is.

Well this youtuber here link shows a screenshot confirming the animation bugs will be patched day 1 from Flynn. Take it as you will. I'm not worried.

Me1-Me3 were bugs galore with weird body spins and white eyeballs in romance scenes and we all got over it.

Can you post a link? I want to this.  sass is class.  

It's inquisition in space. Period.

Doesn't mean it's not a better version of Inquisition or that there's also remedies inside the game but it's still Inquisition in space.

Specifically the pcworld preview talks about this and say exactly what mirrors my opinion. The planets are pretty barren but also big, and they're cluttered with really vaguely-contextualized stuff to do in them, and the reason it's worse than ME1's "barren, empty" worlds is because at least those weren't bloated.

It's Inquisition in Space because it packs a tightly story-driven experience with something completely to the contrary all in the same game. It's the same jack of all trades master of none game design as DA:I and BioWare either haven't learned or they just couldn't change the fundamental design of ME:A late enough, or maybe their EA servers gathered player statistics that show them it's more financially secure to make games this way "with lots of content".

They also corrected people from calling DA:I open world, what's your point? That has nothing to do with what was good or bad about DA:I. It was just that the game had a certain design about it that seems to have been repeated at large, just not the "power" system and obviously other stuff instead of the war table.

It will likely have more main story content too, and I'm curious to find out what a DA:I game would feel like when I'm not forced to do side-quests at every turn, but I still think when you're just exploring minute-to-minute I'll start to get that same feeling I had when playing DA:I, where i'm sort of not enjoying myself as opposed to having more condense open areas that have a much more finite and purposeful feel to them in ME1. Noveria, The Citadel and stuff had only so much content in them, easily missable stuff too, but the more obvious stuff was sparse but great and memorable and it gave a lot of replayability by putting a lot of detail into fewer things, like a good adventure game but one with more freedom than usual. DA:I had stuff everywhere and apparently ME:A has too. It's all "content, content, content" design but then strangely coupled with BioWare's more laser-focused companion interactions that are probably not notably longer than usual and a main story.

DA:I felt like 3 different games in one, and of different genres. It lacked focus. I'm afraid this does too because there's so much talk about how we have to do resource stuff while exploring, but then there's also linear missions for the critical path and then there's the Tempest adventure-game-esque feel where you talk to crew. Dunno. I just feel they aren't really sure of their formula or just not aware of how unfocused it can be at times.