EA, let me help you, here is how you save the Mass Effect franchise.

My friend, there are so many solutions. It doesn't mean that those specific endings would play out, it wasn't fleshed out yet, but the purpose of the Reapers was a lot better than the synthetics vs organics debate. That's what I'm arguing.

We don't care too much about what will happen in billions of years because we will all be dead. The universe in real life, has anything in its favor to end someday. The Reapers simply think differently because they do live forever and they will suffer the consequences of our actions.
On the other hand, Karpyshyn himself stated that they were trying to use biotics for the same purpose of saving it. Well, that's one solution that could've worked out. Humanity saves everyone's asses again by harnessing biotic potential, maybe at the cost of a lot of species.

Maybe some players want to sacrifice humanity to save everyone else, maybe they do it. It would still make more sense for an organic to figure out a way to solve the Reapers's problem, saving the universe, rather than the bullshit the Catalyst give us, because from now on, to wherever Bioware goes with this series they are gonna have to answer: well, why synthethics haven't wiped out organics yet? How come Andromeda still supports life?

So, that billion years old super advanced star brat made a lot of calculations and got a wrong conclusion? Really? It just pisses on everything the Reapers used to mean, back when Sovereign in ME1 put fear in your heart.

Enough with the derailing, I won't argue or reply about this in this thread again. 

The original game is still riddled with glitches and graphics issues.

What made the MET series great was the totality of the story told over 3 games. This first game had some challenges and mechanics people didn't like. Bioware refined and retooled.

We will see the same thing with Andromeda, that parts that worked will continue, the parts that didn't will be reimagined. The key part which keeps getting skipped over is that Andromeda has created a LOT of fantastic new potential stories to play out. We made a lot of big decisions in this game and we haven't seen how they play out. It was actually Mass Effect 2 that made me fall totally in love with Mass Effect 1. Seeing how my decisions impacted made me go back and play EVERYTHING in ME1.

Sales of this game are fine.

EA will make money.

Bioware will improve on the glitches and graphics issues.

They will produce some great DLC and they will take the good the bad and the ugly from this game and start working on a sequel that will be awesome, exploring new stories and new characters and a new galaxy.

I hope so. I'd hate to the series share Deus Ex's fate. 

The best part of an ME3 remaster will be when Anderson tells you he was born in London; then the second best part will be when Anderson tells you he was born in London.

It needs saving? I just beat one of the best games I have played this generation and probably ever... it doesn't need a rescue team, just a party.

The game is actually pretty good. I was a little surprised.

This thread is how you kill the franchise. Not save.

I also see that amazon currently has it listed as #1 on Xbone, #7 on PS4, and #3 on PC.

The sales look to be fairly brisk.

Think you are generalizing a bit too much. 

I think everyone here loved the original trilogy and the Shepard saga, and had differing opinions on the ending. 

Those who choose to be critical of the game, are all therefore going to fall into the same category regardless of how level headed or over the top their criticism is going to be. 

There's no way this would happen. A ME Trilogy Remaster? Sure that's within the realm of possibility. Completely changing the ending of ME3's final mission and ending? No way in hell. They're not going to want to open that can of worms again. Realistically speaking if they did announce this, it would catch A LOT of attention, and would probably sell well, but there's also potential for backfire. Not to mention this would be a lot more work than you think. For example they'd have to hire back a lot of the voice actors, which won't be cheap, and seeing how this is 5 years later, they might not be able to get most of them back.

The time to change the ending was 5 years ago. That ship has sailed. Also Casey Hudson would probably decline to change the ending. He's moved on, and while we may not like the ending, it is his baby.

I honestly don't give a shit one way or the other about a MET remaster, but if you actually think they'd change the endings to give you that happy wuvy duvy fee fee moment that y'all have been crying about for the past five years... you're just setting yourselves up to be disappointed by your own deluded wishing.

The Extended Cut was the fix for the endings. If you still don't like it... it's been five years. Move the fuck on already.

OPs ideas are bad and they should feel bad. Minus five stars. Do not want.