Come in Bioware your time is up.

And how can you prove that EA really offered Bioware more time, that they had the opportunity?
these links are just EA's words and it does not have any value.

EA also said that they were sorry for sim city 2013, that they would not do this again, that it was really a mistake, well what happens the same year? Oh yeah battlefield 4 happens, it was broken at launch. But yeah, EA really said that they were really sorry for the releases that happen earlier that year… EA words are so trustworthy…

So the sources you are bringing me does not mean anything, for the same reason I don’t believe Microsoft when they tell anything about their xbox brand, they said that the xbox one could not remove the drm from their new console :

www.dualshockers.com/major-nelson-rebrands-himself-as-switch-flipper-after-xbox-one-drm-about-face/

Well we all knew how it ended; they just removed it with a patch after too much backlash. So I don’t see why I should trust what EA says, especially with their history of releasing games when they developer asks for more time…

It's a lot safer to assume that EA checked out the game (since EA and Bioware are the same thing) and thought it was okay to release. You really have no evidence to back up your claims. 

It's a lot safer to assume that some people are living in a Scientology like bubble, and no matter what you try and tell them they won't hear.

Sinclair Networks asked on March 4th that the game be delayed until June 20th and was denied. Why were they denied? Do you think BioWare saw the game and said "yep, ready!" or that EA had that game pegged for their empty Q4 fiscal year and said "F*ck it"? Considering Sinclair was already started working on the Character Creator patch on March 20th, the one that was announced on April 4th on "The Journey Ahead" blog, the day before the game was actually released, tells me that June 2017 was what was requested by BioWare and ultimately denied by the publisher. Again, speculation but it makes sense in that BioWare has more to lose in terms of reputation than EA if the game is released 80% finished. If the 11 day window from March 21st through March 31st gives EA the unit and revenue push they need to meet the year end investor numbers, why would they care if remainder of the game's life cycle is a flaming wreckage as they have a huge amount of releases upcoming in the next financial year.

I care more about the quality of the patch more so than if it will arrive in the given timeframe, which has only recently been exceeded by what, a day? It happens. Also, this guy is becoming ridiculous.

*dislikes video* good luck with the views babe

Hmm... I think you're right 

Memes are like actors. Some just keep getting work for years to come, while others get bloated or drugged up and never come back. 

Like I said, he knows his audience.

Everyone agrees that this game should've been delayed but now people want to see them fucking up again by rushing another patch instead of taking their time with it.

But what makes me a little salty is that they're wasting time making a new romance... They should get rid of that shit in their next game.

My point still stands tho. There's far more important things to fix in this game but they're wasting time and resources with romances.

I know the detractors can be very irrational at times.