No story DLC for Andromeda iteration 2. This time from Kotaku.

True, but the devs weren't reassigned two weeks after launch. Making a dlc is a lot harder without people making it.

I thought when that one BioWare tweet carefully choose their wording of "DLC/Patches" was pretty clever. Like he actually was talking about DLC.


"Ah yes, DLC. The immortal race of sentient content allegedly waiting in dark space. We have dismissed that claim."

Yet the appearance of lame, rehashed articles has put us on a cycle of 2 days...

Iteration 3: www.eurogamer.net/articles/2017-07-03-mass-effect-andromeda-single-player-dlc-hoaxers-head-into-hiding

Looks like DLC's back on the menu, boys

People that think like you do is the reason fake news work.

And you are not one :-)) Good boy, take a patty-cake from the shelf :-))

Since he was right after all, I guess the cereal-dumping festivities are off, but I still don't care much for the guy's treatment of BSN and its members. Meanwhile, over on reddit, the MP forum is in full butt-kiss mode. Sigh.

The reaction here to Schreier's articles was one of the reasons I decided to distance myself from this forum. God, some people can be so immature. It's funny to see how a few of them are still in denial even at this point. Then again, another lesson learnt about human nature, I guess.

Btw, the Division was never a trash game as some people claimed, just not living up to the hype it got (but never deserved in the first place). I've written a detailed review on Steam, the main drawback is the empty open world and lack of content, but the devs were actively pushing new contents which overall made the game much more enjoyable, also, despite the netcode is not good (and aggravated by the potato Ubi servers), the game still offers a consistent online experience in general, at least its devs are not shouting "netcode does not exist!" and calling players conspirators.

Kotaku still sucks ass, though. Them being right on this doesn't mean they aren't still a bag of dicks.

On another note, I guess it's good to know with certainty what we already knew but hoped it wasn't right. I will never be able to fully understand the gloating coming from some people, though. Despite Bioware's behaviour and many many many mistakes, I still root for them to succeed (and produce the good content we want) in the future.

Here's to hoping that they will actually look back and learn from their mistakes, and get their shit together next time.

It's always weird to see a thread that I don't remember, but it turns out that I have posted in several times.

Well, anyway, score one for indifference, I suppose. It sucks for those who had hoped for resolution to some of the storylines, but I hope they place the blame squarely where it belongs (with bioWare) and not with who wrote what article or which people weren't upset enough by the article.

I know. Still it's bad to dismiss something based on the source entirely, right? I don't agree with Jason's story 100% because somehow he blamed the overcomplexity of Frostbite engine for the failure of MEA. For real? The game literally copy-pasted 80% of its structure from DA: Inquisition, what was the real challenge in that? Yet that makes the reaction of some BSNers all the more ridiculous, because Jason obviously tried to evoke compassion towards the devs, not hate.

Oh I mean, come on, we've all been in this boat for years, of course it's not gonna be the end of the day I'll be waiting to pick up DA4 just for the lulz. As for Anthem though I'll probably pass, for I have genuine fear that my headshots or whatever won't register =P