[Day/Night Game] Trouble on the Citadel - round "LE Part 2: Why Cerberus Is Right For You"

Grunt's great!

Everyone tend to use the short form and forget the rest.

Update

Votes 0

Still to vote:

Fylimar
Sgtreed24
Moonae
Romice
Catilina
Gervaise21
Dragontartare
Dustyelf

Now as to my vote, it is always difficult deciding between these primitives but for the time being I shall stick with my choice in the first round. I vote for Moonae.  (Sorry Moonae, I just noticed your defence of Javik as a hero.    Still that could be a spy being helpful to throw people off - I've done the same myself.)

Votes
Moonae - 1
Romice - 1


Still to vote:
Fylimar
Sgtreed24
Moonae
Romice
Dragontartare
Dustyelf

The more I think it about it, the stranger it seems that Dragon should have cast doubt on the idea that Javik is good considering that Dragon is a former GM. It also makes me feel that it is more likely that Moonae is a genuine hero. So I change my vote from Moonae to Dragontartare

What does being a former GM have to do with anything?

As always, I like to consider all angles, and a clever ploy by the spies is always a possibility, especially after what they pulled last game.

All I said was that Javik isn't guaranteed good. I didn't say I thought Javik was a spy and I even said it helps that Grunt does know someone's identity. It seems pretty premature to jump the gun and assume I'm a spy based on that one innocuous comment.

And it seems downright suspicious for someone who voiced the same comment I did (Grunt knowing an identity being a good thing) to then turn around and vote for me.

I don't want to jump on the dragon bandwagon in case it was really an oversight.

A completely non-informed-by-anything vote for moonae.

I know you saw the rest of my post, because you quoted the whole thing:

This theory of mine relies on the assumption that Javik is a hero. Why you and gervaise both ignored this to instead glomp on to the fact that I reminded people that Javik isn't guaranteed good (even though that ended up not being relevant here) is a mystery to me. FFS.


I'm quoting this for two reasons:
1) It's a waste for the spies, maybe. (But remember Reed purposely voted out Space last round...don't rule out crazy spy tactics.) But even though I initially suggested the crazy spy tactic idea this time, I realized this particular one is impossible, because the narrative mentioned "spies" plural separately from Grunt, so assuming we have two spies, Grunt can't be one of them.

2) If someone tries to point to me "missing" this "obvious" fact as evidence that I am a spy, I can remind them that Javik missed it, too.


So...now that I've had time to actually read all the posts, I believe that gervaise is Javik (also lending credence to my theory, stated previously, that both Grunt and the spies targeted a player who tends to get picked early on), and that fylimar is either Grunt or Liara.

That means fylimar and gervaise are safe. They've chosen a ridiculous target for their votes, so I obviously can't follow them, but they are not spies themselves.

Well, saying that Javik isn't guaranteed good right after the narrative basically confirmed him as good is a bit odd. I'm also not sure what the clever ploy supposedly was other than "target someone and fail".

Still, my comment wasn't really aimed at you, but rather pointing out a fact to anyone who wasn't paying close attention and might get confused. In fact, you and Gervaise are the ones I trust, so maybe we should try to direct the conversation elsewhere?

Edit: not sure what happened with the formatting??

Actually I didn't miss it but was fishing for information. Sadly the only person who bit was you.

I don't know, with no other leads or voting patterns to go on during this round, I can see how other players would focus on any inconsistencies or oversights any other players might say.

But it is important to point out that dragon does tend to make oversights from time to time, of course this doesn't exonerate her completely, but this behavior is consistent here.

Also, yes, I do tend to also look into a player's behavior with mixed results, but relying solely on voting patterns lately tends to be a bit mixed as well due to clever spy tactics.