[Day/Night Game] Trouble on the Citadel - round "LE Part 2: Why Cerberus Is Right For You"

Hmmm....if I'm interpreting dusty's hint correctly that means my suspicion about her being a Hero is probably right...

To me, it does make you look guilty. You are challenging what is probably the strongest role claim we have in this game (gervik), and yet you are not claiming to be that same role. Think about it. If gervaise weren't Javik, then both the real Javik and the real Grunt had an opportunity to say something. Why wouldn't they? The only players who have motivation to claim roles that aren't their own are the spies and the clone. So if potentially two players know that gervaise isn't who they claim, then those two players ought to be voting for gervaise, at the very least.


You're trusting Catilina's vote off of a feeling, yet you doubt gervaise's claim even though there is pretty strong evidence for their role?


Sorry, dusty. I don't want to vote off Jack, but I don't think you're really Jack, due to the suspicious claims you are making, as I've described.

Votes
Romice - 3
Dragontartare - 1
Dustyelf - 4

Day Two - votes confirmed are red locked
01] fylimar
02] Pelassarias - Karin Chakwas
03] sgtreed24
04] Moonae
05] romice  - vote change over 1
06] Catilina
07] Gervaise21 - vote locked
08] dragontartare
09] dustyelf

@dustyelf , confirm vote lock.

It has nothing to do with believing us and everything to do with following the evidence. If gervaise's claim is false, then the real Javik AND the real Grunt have both decided to not only keep quiet about it, but also to not vote for the person they would know is a liar.

If you really are Jack, then you are distracting us from finding a spy by arguing against some pretty solid evidence.

Obsidian Gryphon, I suppose my vote is locked since dustyelf has nothing further to add, and no one else seems inclined to chime in, either.

Votes
Romice - 3
Dragontartare - 1
Dustyelf - 4

Day Two - votes confirmed are red locked
01] fylimar
02] Pelassarias - Karin Chakwas
03] sgtreed24
04] Moonae
05] romice - vote change over 1
06] Catilina
07] Gervaise21 - vote locked
08] Dragontartare - vote locked
09] Dustyelf - vote locked

Players to confirm their vote and set on course of no return; five. 

Since for now there are no other suspects, my vote can be locked

Votes
Romice - 3
Dragontartare - 1
Dustyelf - 4

Day Two - votes confirmed are red locked
01] fylimar
02] Pelassarias - Karin Chakwas
03] sgtreed24
04] Moonae - vote locked
05] Romice - vote locked
06] Catilina
07] Gervaise21 - vote locked
08] Dragontartare - vote locked
09] Dustyelf - vote locked

Players to confirm their vote and set on course of no return; three.

I assume this was your clue, unfortunately given after I had used up my last vote. Well my comment still applies. If you are telling the truth and the 3 people who are still to vote lock are heroes, then they can save you, since I will grant that your character is guaranteed good.

Romice also changed her vote before your clue but everyone would seem to have vote locked after it. So I really don't know what to make of that since they could quite easily have changed to someone else.

So I suppose all I can do is apologise for changing my vote too quickly and stare hard at Reed, Dragon and Romice for not changing theirs when you revealed who you were (unless their excuse is that you are impersonating their character in which case the truth will be revealed on elimination).

I must also say, that I find neither romice nor dusty suspicious. But if dusty really is, who she claims, she is, maybe she deserves a chance and that unfortunately means, that I have to vote for romice to create a tiebreaker. Sorry romice, especially since you are right to trust me

gervaise21 For the last fucking time, I was not trying to cast suspicion on you. You seem to believe, at least for the moment, that I'm a hero, so it would be great if you'd stop accusing me of that. It was one passing comment, which was immediately followed by a theory that depended on Javik being good (which you continue to ignore).

You say you only switched your vote away from me due to Moon's support of me, which means you actually find my one brief comment more damning than dusty's continued insistence on your guilt. That makes no sense.

As for this:

You might as well stare hard at yourself, too, and to all the people who are refusing to participate in this discussion. You were hasty even with your third vote. I thought maybe my reasoning had convinced you that dusty is a spy, but you say now that that isn't the case. So why did you not wait to see what dusty had to say in response before using your last vote change?

I asked several times for dusty, or anyone, to provide an alternate target with evidence. All I got was vague trust in catilina (why?) along with finger pointing at catilina's chosen target. I'd love to know what catilina was thinking as well, but he has ignored requests for comment, so I really don't know what you expect me to do.

Also, I have explained my reasons for suspecting dusty in detail. I invite you to reread them carefully because I'm sick if rehashing them. I am not claiming to be Jack, I just think dusty made up a role to claim as a last act of desperation when his previous comments drew suspicion to him.

If you have now decided dusty is innocent, then you ought to start looking for an alternate target and convince the three remaining players to vote for that person.

Sorry. I'll try to chill out.

I apologize for freaking out at you. Apparently I read your post completely differently than you intended. You're right, at least we're both trying to figure it out. The end of this round will give us more information to go on, even if the wrong person gets eliminated.