What is your Shepard's morality?

Disagree about the conversations. There are many examples where they have a backbone. For example straight up telling Sloane, a pirate queen who would have no problem killing you, how to run Kadara.

PS: Also actions speak louder than words.

Is that the asari's girlfriend, who was trying to kill Ryder, only because Ryder failed to scan the robot for any foreign objects? It must be that I don't care attitude. Don't need a backbone to shoot someone who is trying to kill you regardless of the scene.

Who is this raging subordinate you're referring to?

Had the little one better explained the situation, the suits might have given Ryder permission to go with the plan.

You are forgetting the scourge. Take that away, Archie would have defeated that unarmed fleet with ease. The same for when the tempest first encountered Archie's ship. If it wasn't for the scourge, the ship would likely have been destroyed.

Where's the backbone to get in the asari's face for being knockdown? Where was the backbone to question the asari as to why she should be on the roster after having admitted she's not a team player and for knocking Ryder to the ground? Where was the backbone to give the asari a verbal beating for the crap she did with the escape pod? Where was the backbone to give a verbal beating for what Kosta did? It all comes back to the I don't care attitude. Ryder doesn't care, therefore doesn't have to have a backbone.

I believe no matter what explanation Shepard gave, the council would have locked the SR1 instead of Udina.

Yes it takes a backbone to face an an enemy unarmd, but it's also stupid at the same time. What happens the next time Ryder faces the kett? Look around hoping the scourge is nearby to save her/his sorry a**? 

Shepard never faced overwhelming odds? I guess Shepard leading all the fleets against the reapers never happened. 
Why can't Ryder say no to having her on the ship? As far as taken her on that planet? Did Ryder foresee that stuff happening? Did you foresee that stuff on your first playthrough?

Really? Can you post a link showing Ryder reprimanding the asari

I always find these "backbone" arguments a little hard to take seriously. Why does Ryder have to be so insecure that he needs to play dominance games all the time?

Don't have time for idiots. My Shepard knows he's right and now that he doesn't have to tolerate them, he's not going to let people who are wrong get in his way.

It's probably a little bit about kitsch, but my main playthrough includes a Shepard that this song goes with, Brave Heart. Probably this Shepard would be called a disgusting Paragon. But that's a matter of perspective, especially in ME2.
If the LE is worth buying, I will replay my main character there again to have a save game with said one.

At times I do find it...funny I guess IS the best word...but I also tend to view "Paragde" or "Renegon" in terms of what sounds better. For instance even when my Shepard is more Renegade then Paragon I still tend to refer to her as 'Paragade' too...though there are times I am tempted to switch because I think 'Renegon' actually sounds better.

Neat poll, I am a mixed Paragade, probably 65/35.

Nothing is that cut and dry, and only the Sith deal in absolutes.

Regarding ME2 renegade interrupts for Thane and Garrus recruitment - kill them funny, or kill them with a bullet to the head. They are going to try and stop me one way or another, so in these cases I appreciate the humor but my Shepard is also a pragmatist. Less enemies in a firefight is better for my squads chances, so I will take every gimme every time.

Mostly Paragon. I would say, however, that the decisions I have that are "Rengeade" aren't really Renegade, but pragmatic.

I kill Wrex, but that's because this is a serious mission and I'm not in the mood for him to ruin it. Ashley kills him because that is her job. I am supportive, not because I wanted Wrex dead, but I believe that good work is to be encouraged. As they say, incentivize the behavior you want.

Most of the ME1 quests are resolved Paragon, I Charm Talitha and let her take the medicine herself: That's actually going to be very helpful to her recovery.

In ME2, I destroy the geth on Legion's sidequest because if they've been hacked once with a virus, they can be hacked again. Nothing stops the Reapers from making another virus.

On Jacob's mission, I leave him to the feral males. I can accept the initial decision of giving them the toxic food, but the second the radio was active, it should've sent a signal. Ronald deserves no pity.

I destroy the geophage research because people who know much more about this show us the krogan population boom results in war. Wreav and all those people (hell, even Wrex) show us they'll just take whatever they want. So no cure.

Kelly Chambers is told to change her identity because she needs to understand Cerberus isn't playing around. Thanks to Reaper tech, it's not her grandma's Cerberus, and that needs to be accepted.

Hmm? I'm not sure how destroying the cure gets your more resources.