inherit
9459
0
Nov 24, 2021 20:18:46 GMT
5,622
SirSourpuss
7,694
Oct 16, 2017 16:19:07 GMT
October 2017
sirpetrakus
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, SWTOR
|
Post by SirSourpuss on Nov 10, 2021 17:21:27 GMT
You don't understand when you have to play a Shepard that has chosen synthesis? Well, you can't play as a Shepard that chose Synthesis. You're dead. Same for Control Shepard. There's only one living Shepard. The other two endings are fail states. You died, Reapers lived, Reapers won. One is a Reaper-ocracy and the other is where everyone is a Reaper. You failed your purpose; to stop the Reapers. Just like a dead ME2 Shepard. The story simply ends and doesn't continue. There's even precedent of it, in the trilogy. Easy decision for the writers if they want to have freedom by using one starting point for all (which they should to write the best story possible). There is no best story possible. Especially when Bioware fucked the setting. Most plots do not work and pale in comparison to the questions left open by ME3's endings.
|
|
inherit
1129
0
Mar 19, 2024 19:19:28 GMT
2,051
traks
1,012
Aug 22, 2016 11:07:02 GMT
August 2016
traks
Mass Effect Trilogy, Mass Effect Andromeda
t_raks_99
|
Post by traks on Nov 10, 2021 17:27:13 GMT
You don't understand when you have to play a Shepard that has chosen synthesis? Well, you can't play as a Shepard that chose Synthesis. You're dead. Same for Control Shepard. There's only one living Shepard. The other two endings are fail states. You died, Reapers lived, Reapers won. One is a Reaper-ocracy and the other is where everyone is a Reaper. You failed your purpose; to stop the Reapers. Just like a dead ME2 Shepard. The story simply ends and doesn't continue. There's even precedent of it, in the trilogy. Easy decision for the writers if they want to have freedom by using one starting point for all (which they should to write the best story possible). There is no best story possible. Especially when Bioware fucked the setting. Most plots do not work and pale in comparison to the questions left open by ME3's endings. That was not to be taken literally. Here what I put into that post as an Edit: Of course I exaggerate, but the point is you can't just demand a game that's only possible for your Shep and just cast all the others that didn't take destroy like we both did to the side and tell them, "c'mon, why can't you just shut up and play Sir Sourpusses Shep?" That doesn't make any more sense...Won't happen.
|
|
inherit
9459
0
Nov 24, 2021 20:18:46 GMT
5,622
SirSourpuss
7,694
Oct 16, 2017 16:19:07 GMT
October 2017
sirpetrakus
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, SWTOR
|
Post by SirSourpuss on Nov 10, 2021 17:46:11 GMT
Of course I exaggerate, but the point is you can't just demand a game that's only possible for your Shep and just cast all the others that didn't take destroy like we both did to the side and tell them, "c'mon, why can't you just shut up and play Sir Sourpusses Shep?" That doesn't make any more sense... There's literally no possible story to tell, otherwise. Either you're a Reaper, which means that, should the Initiative try to connect to the Milky Way, you're going to join the Reapers to harvest them, as well, because Synthesis isn't a solution, or you enslave them in the Reaperocracy. These are endings that you can't move on from. Even with Andromeda. Unless you never do anything with the Milky Way ever again. And one thing Andromeda proved, is that it's not interesting enough, to stand on its own, because there's nothing there. It has to happen, for the franchise to have a future. If you don't want to play it, don't play it.
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
Apr 28, 2024 20:12:39 GMT
24,268
themikefest
14,812
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Nov 10, 2021 17:52:31 GMT
So what would they do? Have the next game feature the asari if she survived, and have her not show up if she did die? If they do that, just don't have the character in the game at all. Use those resources for something else in the game. By having her in the next game, Bioware is telling the player that playthrough in ME3 is invalid. So much for we respect players choice. So much for replay value. That won't please some fans. No, by choosing one starting point for all, she will likely be in everyone's game, because you put the players into one of the possible world states. ME3 is valid for the trilogy. It tells your (and my and so on) Shepard's story. If ME3 is valid for the trilogy then the playthrough with t'soni being killed by Harbinger is valid.
|
|
wright1978
N4
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
Prime Posts: 8,116
Prime Likes: 2073
Posts: 1,632 Likes: 2,469
inherit
1492
0
2,469
wright1978
1,632
Sept 8, 2016 12:06:29 GMT
September 2016
wright1978
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
8,116
2073
|
Post by wright1978 on Nov 10, 2021 17:54:43 GMT
So what would they do? Have the next game feature the asari if she survived, and have her not show up if she did die? If they do that, just don't have the character in the game at all. Use those resources for something else in the game. By having her in the next game, Bioware is telling the player that playthrough in ME3 is invalid. So much for we respect players choice. So much for replay value. That won't please some fans. No, by choosing one starting point for all, she will likely be in everyone's game, because you put the players into one of the possible world states. ME3 is valid for the trilogy. It tells your (and my and so on) Shepard's story. Well personally i think they've got choice whether to fix all things as canon or allow players some choice in some of the things and none in others. I can't see how they can get round canonising the ending but if you are not using Shep as a character and the game is set well after shep's time then there's room to give player's a say in personal details, Was Shep in the new game(Maleshep/Femshep), (who was their significant other), their preservice background/psych profile etc.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Apr 28, 2024 20:54:07 GMT
21,883
smilesja
13,722
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Nov 10, 2021 17:57:58 GMT
The small group of Andromeda hardcore fans Go take a look at comments on Twitter, YouTube, reddit, etc. You'll see a lot of support and positive comments so definitely not a small group but not bigger than shepard obviously. Double standards always apply to fandom.
|
|
inherit
265
0
Apr 26, 2024 22:14:28 GMT
11,980
Pounce de León
Praise the Justicat!
7,910
August 2016
catastrophy
caustic_agent
|
Post by Pounce de León on Nov 10, 2021 17:59:12 GMT
Nah. I don't want to play a game that is influenced by rabid fanbois. Fan hysteria makes a bad dev, bad writer, bad artist. Ignoring the fans will make a worse game than that. ... Lol.
|
|
inherit
1129
0
Mar 19, 2024 19:19:28 GMT
2,051
traks
1,012
Aug 22, 2016 11:07:02 GMT
August 2016
traks
Mass Effect Trilogy, Mass Effect Andromeda
t_raks_99
|
Post by traks on Nov 10, 2021 18:00:03 GMT
Of course I exaggerate, but the point is you can't just demand a game that's only possible for your Shep and just cast all the others that didn't take destroy like we both did to the side and tell them, "c'mon, why can't you just shut up and play Sir Sourpusses Shep?" That doesn't make any more sense... There's literally no possible story to tell, otherwise. Either you're a Reaper, which means that, should the Initiative try to connect to the Milky Way, you're going to join the Reapers to harvest them, as well, because Synthesis isn't a solution, or you enslave them in the Reaperocracy. These are endings that you can't move on from. Even with Andromeda. Unless you never do anything with the Milky Way ever again. And one thing Andromeda proved, is that it's not interesting enough, to stand on its own, because there's nothing there. It has to happen, for the franchise to have a future. If you don't want to play it, don't play it. Lol. I just say playing again as Shepard won't happen in my estimation, because of the problems it creates, no matter how often you call or cry for it. Again: you are not the one person that knows what ME has to do. And if you are (I know you believe that), then please try to get a job there and tell them that. Your fallacy in your logic IMO is that you think that all we other destroyers also want to continue to play as Shep - thus you think that you are part of such a big group, when as far as I can tell most of us have moved on. So for many the "best story possible" as I call it is not a continuation of Shep's story, but something fresh. That you can't think of anything fresh in the ME universe doesn't mean, that a good writer can't. BTW: I am probably the least problem when it comes to the next game (for BioWare) because I go in open minded. Something I can only recommend instead of sitting in a "I am only interested in one story"-corner. I give everything a chance - continuing as Shep (as unlikely as it is), continuing as Ryder (also not that likely) or as a new character - and then I'll tell you after playing it, if they succeeded or not. So I am pretty sure that I play anything that they come up with when it comes to Mass Effect, because I am still interested.
|
|
inherit
1129
0
Mar 19, 2024 19:19:28 GMT
2,051
traks
1,012
Aug 22, 2016 11:07:02 GMT
August 2016
traks
Mass Effect Trilogy, Mass Effect Andromeda
t_raks_99
|
Post by traks on Nov 10, 2021 18:00:49 GMT
No, by choosing one starting point for all, she will likely be in everyone's game, because you put the players into one of the possible world states. ME3 is valid for the trilogy. It tells your (and my and so on) Shepard's story. If ME3 is valid for the trilogy then the playthrough with t'soni being killed by Harbinger is valid. It is. For the trilogy. Doesn't mean it has to have anything to do with the next starting point.
|
|
inherit
265
0
Apr 26, 2024 22:14:28 GMT
11,980
Pounce de León
Praise the Justicat!
7,910
August 2016
catastrophy
caustic_agent
|
Post by Pounce de León on Nov 10, 2021 18:03:30 GMT
There's literally no possible story to tell, otherwise. Either you're a Reaper, which means that, should the Initiative try to connect to the Milky Way, you're going to join the Reapers to harvest them, as well, because Synthesis isn't a solution, or you enslave them in the Reaperocracy. These are endings that you can't move on from. Even with Andromeda. Unless you never do anything with the Milky Way ever again. And one thing Andromeda proved, is that it's not interesting enough, to stand on its own, because there's nothing there. It has to happen, for the franchise to have a future. If you don't want to play it, don't play it. Lol. I just say playing again as Shepard won't happen in my estimation, because of the problems it creates, no matter how often you call or cry for it. Again: you are not the one person that knows what ME has to do. And if you are (I know you believe that), then please try to get a job there and tell them that. Your fallacy in your logic IMO is that you think that all we other destroyers also want to continue to play as Shep - thus you think that you are part of such a big group, when as far as I can tell most of us have moved on. So for many the "best story possible" as I call it is not a continuation of Shep's story, but something fresh. That you can't think of anything fresh in the ME universe doesn't mean, that a good writer can't. BTW: I am probably the least problem when it comes to the next game (for BioWare) because I go in open minded. Something I can only recommend instead of sitting in a "I am only interested in one story"-corner. I give everything a chance - continuing as Shep (as unlikely as it is), continuing as Ryder (also not that likely) or as a new character - and then I'll tell you after playing it, if they succeeded or not. So I am pretty sure that I play anything that they come up with when it comes to Mass Effect, because I am still interested. The fallacy is to believe destroy Shepard is alive.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Apr 28, 2024 20:54:07 GMT
21,883
smilesja
13,722
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Nov 10, 2021 18:03:47 GMT
Go take a look at comments on Twitter, YouTube, reddit, etc. You'll see a lot of support and positive comments so definitely not a small group but not bigger than shepard obviously. For a AAA game its pretty damn small. Doesn't stop people from using it to demonstrate why ME: A is bad.
|
|
inherit
1129
0
Mar 19, 2024 19:19:28 GMT
2,051
traks
1,012
Aug 22, 2016 11:07:02 GMT
August 2016
traks
Mass Effect Trilogy, Mass Effect Andromeda
t_raks_99
|
Post by traks on Nov 10, 2021 18:06:35 GMT
Forgot to mention to answer what I would like the most: a new character hundreds of years after the destroy ending.
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
Apr 28, 2024 20:12:39 GMT
24,268
themikefest
14,812
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Nov 10, 2021 18:08:00 GMT
If ME3 is valid for the trilogy then the playthrough with t'soni being killed by Harbinger is valid. It is. For the trilogy. Doesn't mean it has to have anything to do with the next starting point. Sure it does. If a character is dead, it would be hard for that character to be in the next game. If Grunt were killed/not recruited in ME2 or killed in ME3, would it be ok for him to show up in the next game?
|
|
inherit
1363
0
Dec 31, 2021 19:39:42 GMT
1,233
garrusfan1
1,826
Aug 30, 2016 16:55:35 GMT
August 2016
garrusfan1
|
Post by garrusfan1 on Nov 10, 2021 18:09:01 GMT
If I played the trilogy, I wouldn't expect Shepard to return as a playable character in Will Continue. Won't happen because of the endings. If it won't happen because of the endings, then Liara shouldn't be in the next game since she can die, right? Liara dying is only possible in a very very small amount of playthroughs. In the vast majority of endings and games she can be alive. She is pretty much the only squadmate character that can't die in both ME1 and ME2. In ME3 you have to have a very low EMS to have her die and I am guessing taking her on the beam run, I never lost her. She is also one of only four characters that can have a very very long life span. And Samara was already a matriarch and Wrex was pushing a thousand by ME3 so it is very unlikely they would be alive in three or four centuries. So having Liara bridge the gap makes perfect sense.
|
|
inherit
1129
0
Mar 19, 2024 19:19:28 GMT
2,051
traks
1,012
Aug 22, 2016 11:07:02 GMT
August 2016
traks
Mass Effect Trilogy, Mass Effect Andromeda
t_raks_99
|
Post by traks on Nov 10, 2021 18:11:51 GMT
It is. For the trilogy. Doesn't mean it has to have anything to do with the next starting point. Sure it does. If a character is dead, it would be hard for that character to be in the next game. If Grunt were killed/not recruited in ME2 or killed in ME3, would it be ok for him to show up in the next game? No save import. You didn't create that starting point. Or at least you don't choose which one of your Shep's did, because as far as what I know about you as a player from reading your posts, you probably have created every world state that can be there after the destroy ending (which seems the most likely spot to start).
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
Apr 28, 2024 20:12:39 GMT
24,268
themikefest
14,812
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Nov 10, 2021 18:16:52 GMT
If it won't happen because of the endings, then Liara shouldn't be in the next game since she can die, right? Liara dying is only possible in a very very small amount of playthroughs. In the vast majority of endings and games she can be alive. She is pretty much the only squadmate character that can't die in both ME1 and ME2. In ME3 you have to have a very low EMS to have her die and I am guessing taking her on the beam run, I never lost her. She is also one of only four characters that can have a very very long life span. And Samara was already a matriarch and Wrex was pushing a thousand by ME3 so it is very unlikely they would be alive in three or four centuries. So having Liara bridge the gap makes perfect sense. Looking at ME3 on youtube shortly after ME3 was released, there were a lot of people with ems low enough for the asari and other squadmates to be killed by Harbinger. If Bioware chooses to have the asari in the next game, they are telling fans they do not respect players choice, something Gamble said they do, and it reduces replay value. Having the asari in the next game makes sense to you, not for me.
|
|
wright1978
N4
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
Prime Posts: 8,116
Prime Likes: 2073
Posts: 1,632 Likes: 2,469
inherit
1492
0
2,469
wright1978
1,632
Sept 8, 2016 12:06:29 GMT
September 2016
wright1978
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
8,116
2073
|
Post by wright1978 on Nov 10, 2021 18:17:16 GMT
It is. For the trilogy. Doesn't mean it has to have anything to do with the next starting point. Sure it does. If a character is dead, it would be hard for that character to be in the next game. If Grunt were killed/not recruited in ME2 or killed in ME3, would it be ok for him to show up in the next game? Of course they can use Grunt if they want. Depends on the degree of fixed canonisation they decide to go for. My guess they may not use him if they are looking to limit the things they have to force a canon of, especially as Grunt hardly seems a character likely to live a full life even if he survives ME3. And yes just by setting the game in the Milky Way Gamble's going to end up eating his words because that's the only way forward.
|
|
inherit
♨ Retired
24
0
Apr 28, 2024 20:12:39 GMT
24,268
themikefest
14,812
August 2016
themikefest
21,655
15,426
|
Post by themikefest on Nov 10, 2021 18:19:59 GMT
Sure it does. If a character is dead, it would be hard for that character to be in the next game. If Grunt were killed/not recruited in ME2 or killed in ME3, would it be ok for him to show up in the next game? Of course they can use Grunt if they want. Depends on the degree of fixed canonisation they decide to go for. My guess they may not use him if they are looking to limit the things they have to force a canon of, especially as Grunt hardly seems a character likely to live a full life even if he survives ME3. I would take him over the asari.
|
|
inherit
1363
0
Dec 31, 2021 19:39:42 GMT
1,233
garrusfan1
1,826
Aug 30, 2016 16:55:35 GMT
August 2016
garrusfan1
|
Post by garrusfan1 on Nov 10, 2021 18:21:32 GMT
No, by choosing one starting point for all, she will likely be in everyone's game, because you put the players into one of the possible world states. ME3 is valid for the trilogy. It tells your (and my and so on) Shepard's story. Well personally i think they've got choice whether to fix all things as canon or allow players some choice in some of the things and none in others. I can't see how they can get round canonising the ending but if you are not using Shep as a character and the game is set well after shep's time then there's room to give player's a say in personal details, Was Shep in the new game(Maleshep/Femshep), (who was their significant other), their preservice background/psych profile etc.
I guess they can say that in control and synthesis the reapers either left the galaxy or went into the sun or something so they won't have them in it. The biggest problem is with the geth. You have the option of wiping them out completely in ME3 during the quarian geth war. So even if you said the star kid was wrong and the geth didn't die in destroy you still have the possibility of them being wiped out in a world state even if you cannonized the endings. The same could be said for the krogan since it was unlikely that they could survive in great numbers after the beating they took in ME3 without the genophage cure. So you already have two big races that could be wiped out. So could the quarians for that matter so three big races. I really don't see how they could have ME5 be in the milkyway without making several things cannon or excluding krogans,quarians, and geth from the next game and since that teaser showed a geth body and a krogan in that crater I am guessing they aren't doing that. So inevitably they are gonna have to make some things cannon. This was the reason they made andromeda take place in a seperate galaxy despite the fact that the codex in the trilogy said that only one percent of the milky way had been explored.
|
|
inherit
9459
0
Nov 24, 2021 20:18:46 GMT
5,622
SirSourpuss
7,694
Oct 16, 2017 16:19:07 GMT
October 2017
sirpetrakus
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, SWTOR
|
Post by SirSourpuss on Nov 10, 2021 18:26:07 GMT
There's literally no possible story to tell, otherwise. Either you're a Reaper, which means that, should the Initiative try to connect to the Milky Way, you're going to join the Reapers to harvest them, as well, because Synthesis isn't a solution, or you enslave them in the Reaperocracy. These are endings that you can't move on from. Even with Andromeda. Unless you never do anything with the Milky Way ever again. And one thing Andromeda proved, is that it's not interesting enough, to stand on its own, because there's nothing there. It has to happen, for the franchise to have a future. If you don't want to play it, don't play it. Lol. I just say playing again as Shepard won't happen in my estimation, because of the problems it creates, no matter how often you call or cry for it. Again: you are not the one person that knows what ME has to do. Ah, yes, the far sniffing approach. Superior opinion through advanced intellect. You are being dismissive. You resort to personal attacks and claim yourself the victor. This was never a conversation in good faith and I am not inclined to read further into your BS. Have a good day.
|
|
inherit
1363
0
Dec 31, 2021 19:39:42 GMT
1,233
garrusfan1
1,826
Aug 30, 2016 16:55:35 GMT
August 2016
garrusfan1
|
Post by garrusfan1 on Nov 10, 2021 18:30:41 GMT
Liara dying is only possible in a very very small amount of playthroughs. In the vast majority of endings and games she can be alive. She is pretty much the only squadmate character that can't die in both ME1 and ME2. In ME3 you have to have a very low EMS to have her die and I am guessing taking her on the beam run, I never lost her. She is also one of only four characters that can have a very very long life span. And Samara was already a matriarch and Wrex was pushing a thousand by ME3 so it is very unlikely they would be alive in three or four centuries. So having Liara bridge the gap makes perfect sense. Looking at ME3 on youtube shortly after ME3 was released, there were a lot of people with ems low enough for the asari and other squadmates to be killed by Harbinger. If Bioware chooses to have the asari in the next game, they are telling fans they do not respect players choice, something Gamble said they do, and it reduces replay value. Having the asari in the next game makes sense to you, not for me. If they make ME5 take place in the milky way they are gonna have to make some things cannon. We saw in that crater photo that they had a krogan and a geth body and both races can be wiped out in ME3. Even if they say starkid lied about the geth and edi dying in destroy ending the geth can still die in the geth quarian war. I imagine more people killed off the geth,quarians, or didn't cure the genophage then the amount of people who took liara on a low ems beam run. So either they stick with andromeda or make some choices cannon. Their is just too many possible scenarios at the end of ME3 to do otherwise. If they make some choices cannon then it makes sense to go with the outcomes that are much more common and whether you like her or hate her Liara is the easiest character to keep alive in the trilogy and thus would be alive in the vast majority of outcomes. Personally I would prefer they keep the game in andromeda so they could avoid this problem but since we saw Liara I am guessing they are going back to the milky way.
|
|
inherit
1363
0
Dec 31, 2021 19:39:42 GMT
1,233
garrusfan1
1,826
Aug 30, 2016 16:55:35 GMT
August 2016
garrusfan1
|
Post by garrusfan1 on Nov 10, 2021 18:36:18 GMT
Sure it does. If a character is dead, it would be hard for that character to be in the next game. If Grunt were killed/not recruited in ME2 or killed in ME3, would it be ok for him to show up in the next game? Of course they can use Grunt if they want. Depends on the degree of fixed canonisation they decide to go for. My guess they may not use him if they are looking to limit the things they have to force a canon of, especially as Grunt hardly seems a character likely to live a full life even if he survives ME3. And yes just by setting the game in the Milky Way Gamble's going to end up eating his words because that's the only way forward. Exactly. We already saw a krogan and a geth body in that crater in that picture. Both races can be killed in ME3 and it happens in alot more playthroughs then a low ems liara dies outcome. Either they stick with andromeda or people will have to have some choices made cannon even if they jump a thousand years into the future.
|
|
inherit
1129
0
Mar 19, 2024 19:19:28 GMT
2,051
traks
1,012
Aug 22, 2016 11:07:02 GMT
August 2016
traks
Mass Effect Trilogy, Mass Effect Andromeda
t_raks_99
|
Post by traks on Nov 10, 2021 18:46:35 GMT
Lol. I just say playing again as Shepard won't happen in my estimation, because of the problems it creates, no matter how often you call or cry for it. Again: you are not the one person that knows what ME has to do.Ah, yes, the far sniffing approach. Superior opinion through advanced intellect. You are being dismissive. You resort to personal attacks and claim yourself the victor. This was never a conversation in good faith and I am not inclined to read further into your BS. Have a good day. That sentence is simply a reaction of mine to your constant arguing that there is only one way forward as if you WERE the one person that knows what BioWare has to do with ME. In the part after I tried to tell you what I think is your fallacy. I don't do that to attack, but - as a player that usually probably makes a lot of the same decisions in the trilogy, that probably agrees in a lot of plot discussions, that probably likes a lot of the same things and characters in the trilogy - I try to change your perspective. As a producer or even as a fan showing empathy for the other fans you can't look at ME out of a "there is only one correct ME way"-angle. You can't dismiss all the other fans, no matter how bad you think those other plot choices that you and I would probably never take are. They are all canon, they are all valid for the trilogy in their own way and now it is about finding a starting spot in one of the thousand alternative universes that the trilogy created - if you want to return to the Milky Way that is - that not all players have to like at first (because their Shep might not have created it), but that the most players can agree on being an intriguing setting for the next story in the ME universe. That's the challenge. And in that challenge I don't believe BioWare will put us in the foots of a Shep we didn't play. That's all I wanted to make clear. If you felt attacked, I apologize and hope that you understand better where I'm coming from now.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Apr 28, 2024 20:54:07 GMT
21,883
smilesja
13,722
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Nov 10, 2021 18:48:07 GMT
Lol. I just say playing again as Shepard won't happen in my estimation, because of the problems it creates, no matter how often you call or cry for it. Again: you are not the one person that knows what ME has to do. Ah, yes, the far sniffing approach. Superior opinion through advanced intellect. You are being dismissive. You resort to personal attacks and claim yourself the victor. This was never a conversation in good faith and I am not inclined to read further into your BS. Have a good day.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
12121
0
Apr 28, 2024 21:43:54 GMT
Deleted
0
Apr 28, 2024 21:43:54 GMT
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2021 18:58:59 GMT
Exactly. We already saw a krogan and a geth body in that crater in that picture. Both races can be killed in ME3 and it happens in alot more playthroughs then a low ems liara dies outcome. Either they stick with andromeda or people will have to have some choices made cannon even if they jump a thousand years into the future. Is this true? at what point can the Krogan be extermianted as a race in ME3? As for the Geth, the could be rebuild close enough, sure they wouldn't be same Geth as before but the existing platforms could be loaded with a new form of AI based on similar programming. Generally, I don't think it's strictly necessary tot canonize an ending or playthrough, there's plenty of leeway or nuances to be exploited in order to preserve player decisions from the trilogy.
|
|