[Spoilers] Depiction, or lack thereof, of slavery in the Tevinter Imperium during the events of Drag

So here's the thing because there can be some vagueness on this general topic I suppose and it depends on how far one wants to go down the slavery rabbit hole and whether or not we want to include things like just straight up normal tyranny. Like intellectually I know that slavery, specifically, is not that big of a focus in Veilguard or Veilguard's plot so I can never logically make the claim that it is. 

However, if we are to only include slavery specifically for Veilguard then what about the rest of Dragon Age? A single conversation in Inquisition, a single quest chain in 2, and a single quest in Origins. Again as I have mentioned we can talk about matters of degree till we are blue in the face but the bottom line is that Veilguard talks about slavery about as much as the previous DA games. But then what DA has always done has been to deal with more generalized and subtle forms of tyranny and to always have conversations about them. DAs writers tend to be very smart about how such things as normal. We, as the audience, can rightfully go on about how horrible the Qun is and how horrible Tevinter slavery is...but then look at the issue of the Chantry and tranquils? And, for me, DA has not lost that edge. That ability to discuss these things. It can be one quest, it can be ten, the quantity never matters, but the quality does.
Now this is nonsense. The game goes very far to show how bad and dangerous Dock Town is and Tevinter society is for everyone, not just Elves, and its hardly a tourist trap. We see the Venatori using mental manipulation on people to get there way, repeatedly, and we see the average Tevinter citizen be worried about gang warfare between the Venatori and Shadow Dragons. Also we see members of the Shadow Dragons who exist as ex-slaves who also happen to be Elves (the same Elves that Loghain sold into slavery in the first place). 

And its just like... again one of DAs strengths is its always punted these social issues down the road. How much reform did we actually see in the Orlesian Empire in Inquisition? Or the Circle System? The game always gives us the ability to make grandiose philosophical choices in theory but we rarely see them in practice because the games plots are always centered around dealing with whatever crisis/ big bad has risen up. The epilogue slides in each game usually makes some vague and flowery promise about what might happen, but we also know that they have retconned such things before because it didn't work long term. Now this is bad writing of course but it also speaks to something realistic since reform often does not stick. Same thing in Veilguard. We see people fighting in the revolution, we see us participate in it, especially as an SD Rook with Neve, but what kind of long term change will result from our actions is something that may, or may not, be touched on in the next game. 

Also I don't need to say this but::

Previous games doesn't feature Minrathous.

This one is.

Slavery supposed to be "Normal".

Show us.

I'm gonna say what I said about Bioshock Infinite back in the day: If you put controversial, uncomfortable topics in your games and don't have the balls to commit, don't put them in. The fact that the medium of gaming is this old but we can't have the gaming equivalent of Django or Roots or any other hard hitting, heavy topic movie is ridiculous.

we partipate directly in that gang war. Telling and showing like all good writing.