inherit
156
0
Apr 22, 2017 19:25:27 GMT
6,498
Onecrazymonkey1
"A person of any mental quality has ideas of his own. This is common sense." Franz Liszt
2,228
August 2016
onecrazymonkey1
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Onecrazymonkey1 on Oct 25, 2022 0:05:21 GMT
So I would say I’m of two minds on the scene with Aemond and Lucerys.
On the one hand, it would’ve been kind of cool seeing Aemond go full psycho, and I somewhat feel like this robs him of his agency and makes him look the fool. If this was his version of “it was just a prank bro” then what did he expect was going to happen? He’s on a living breathing war machine that spent years killing and has a mind of its own. Most people don’t even have 100% control of their own dogs at times, especially since it seems like animals vibe off of their owner’s emotions quite a bit. On the other hand, I sort of like it because it makes Aemond a more tragic and nuanced character. Aemond is still young at this point and young people make dumb decisions all the time before they gain some wisdom. What’s going to follow with B&C in response is also going to have another layer of tragedy to it, and will probably be the lynchpin that makes him a monster.
Anyway, they don’t have complete control of their dragons and that makes sense. Baby Arrax panicking from seeing Lucerys panic, getting stalked, and suddenly lashing out at Vhagar with a fireball also makes sense. The situation was heartbreaking, I hate seeing children die and I’m always pained to see the dragons harmed, RIP Lucerys and baby Arrax; kid was too sweet for that world. On another note, child actors are usually hit or miss but this one did an excellent job, you could really see his fear and courage.
I also found Aemonds “oh shit look” after it all played out kind of funny, the memes will be glorious. Had to be a long ride home.
Mhmm, I had the same feeling I got when I watched Criston's "SIT DOWN! Oh shit I killed him." moment with Beesbury, making him look like a complete idiot when the scene was already well-set up for the guy's death or imprisonment by Otto, although the fact that it came to that point at all undermines Otto's competency as well. Even if the dragons running amok is rather more understandable, it still casts a really unflattering light on Aemond that he hounds a child through the sky while knowing that he wouldn't be able to control his dragon if something ticked it off. Might as well make it intentional and something he regrets afterwards at that point. It seems to be a theme, really, going back to the semi-ambiguity of Rhea Royce's death and Leanor Velaryon's "murder". That there's unverifiability about what actually happens during a killing that leads people to draw conclusions that lead to further conflict, regardless of what actually happened between individuals in the moment. Also makes Daemon, Otto and Larys seem even more badass for seemingly being the only people to commit murders on purpose. Wasn't a huge fan of the dragon "fight", from a logistical standpoint. The two dragons being able to spot and maneuver around other in the clouds at any given moment felt very arbitrary, and I'm really not a fan of the 'Pull up!' faces and sounds both riders make, like they're flying jet planes. Don't remember if that was a thing in the original series. My impression has always been that the riders direct the dragons who more or less listen out of loyalty and devotion, but don't actually control them, and that only very experienced riders who are truly in tune with their mounts like Daemon and Caraxes and Rhaenys and Meleys can manipulate their dragons with any finesse. In which case both Vhagar and Arrax should realize that they probably shouldn't try to fly straight into the ground or through a cliff face without needing their riders to remind them. And if the riders' control really is that perfect then it kind of undermines what happens immediately afterwards. Still not seeing Rhaenyra as queen material. Was impressed with her for giving at least a single thought to the population of her country rather than her own priorities for once and letting Daemon lay out their tactical position like a pro without interrupting him just for overshadowing her, but both were seemingly close-run things. Forbidding him from acting to secure their position while she was busy killing her unborn child in her hysterics wasn't a great look though, and Luke calling her 'perfect' while knowing first-hand how her decision-making has undermined and destabilized the kingdom, leading to this whole situation, rang very hollow. And I still don't get what Otto hopes to accomplish by approaching Dragonstone sans a dragon of his own and getting himself into a bind trying to demand that they stand down, since he seems to be making a habit of it. He's too smart not to know that he won't succeed in convincing Daemon or Rhaenyra of anything, ever, and baiting them into attacking and incriminating themselves would be all well and good if he had any hope of escaping that with his life. That map on Dragonstone felt a bit overkill, too, if it's supposed to be that elaborate. Isn't that a hundred years old at this point? How do you update something like that when borders move and names change? Yeah, it would look so unflattering for Aemond that I’m pretty sure they’re going to have him lean into the whole “I murdered him on purpose” publicly and to most of his family. Pretty sad that kinslaying/popping off a war etc. would probably be a preferable look, rather than let it be known you don’t have much control over your live nuke. In his hubris, he probably thought he would have control. I can agree that I don’t see Rhaenyra as queen material either, although I like her character. I think for me, it’s that I don’t see any of them as king/queen material but I like Rhaenyra much more than show Aegon. I might get flak for this but I wonder how Daemon would’ve handled the throne, he can be ruthless but doesn't strike me as a Joffrey or a Ramsay. At the very least I don’t think any rebellion would’ve withstood a chance under him, and the whole dance in the making that was festering for years would've probably been stomped out if he wasn't constantly sent away. I do recognize that I have a bias toward his character though and while I rather liked Viserys, felt that he was too passive and a stick his head in the sand type. idk who do you personally think would be the best fit?
Okay this made me I do hope all the accidental deaths/misunderstandings stop happening from here on out. I would like the characters to start leaning in towards their ruthlessness next season, more so than just Daemon. I can see why they might soften a few from the beginning in order to show them before a breaking point. However, I will start to feel like it’s a disservice to the characters if everything from now on still ends up being unintentional. I don’t want to see Rhaenerya (especially) whitewashed as the seasons go on, it will make her and others less interesting imo. I hope it’s not a case of the writers being afraid of making the characters too unlikable if they get their hands bloody, people can still appreciate characters who commit actions that you wouldn’t agree or approve of. From my memory, I think Daenerys made constipated faces all the time while on Drogon but I have no interest in re-watching GOT to find out. As for the Lucerys “your perfect line”, I can buy into it and almost find it sweet in the most naïve way. He seemed to be the closest to her and the one she seemed to baby. I also think there is a point in some children's lives where you're blinded and really do see your parents as perfect for a while. Rhaenerya has also been lying to them about their parentage, and he might not fully comprehend the mistakes she’s made or it might be too much for him to acknowledge at his age. idk, I was just sad to see him go. lol I didn't think about the table, now I imagine them having to keep remaking new ones every time something changes.
|
|
inherit
113
0
8,424
Hier0phant
3,795
August 2016
hier0phant
|
Post by Hier0phant on Oct 25, 2022 1:06:13 GMT
The show's writers have made the characters far more sympathetic than Martin. In B&F Alicent was a willing conspirator alongside her father, and the Greens who believed that only men not women can rule. In the show the writers ignored the Greens' argument about sex determining an heir's right to the throne which was supported by the majority of Westeros, and they made Alicent ignorant of her father's plot. Also, her mistakenly interpreting Viserys words as him wanting Aegon to be king is another attempt by the writers to make her sympathetic. Rhaenyra was more ruthless. She was the one who ordered Daemon to execute Vaemond whose body she later fed to her dragon. When she miscarried in B&F she blamed the Greens in her rage. After she was corronated by Daemon and Darklyn she refused Aegon II's terms knowing that it would mean civil war, and she didn't prattle on about keeping the kingdom united over her ambition in order to fulfill the prophecy. Aemond's portrayal was more accurate than the others until this episode. In B&F he intentionally murdered Lucerys, and Arrax after he was emasculated by Boros' ugly daughter who he rejected earlier, and gifted her Lucerys' gouged out eyes as a retort. In the show Aemond was only harassing Lucerys until the latter lost control of Arrax who attacked Vhagar who ignored Aemond's commands and went nuclear. After Vhagar ate Lucerys and Arrax like a taco Aemond looked genuinely regretful and knew he fucked up. Aegon II is a rapist, and a whoremaster who gambles on child fights but unlike Mushroom's accounts isn't a pedo... for now. In B&F he reluctantly took the crown after Alicent gaslighted him into believing Rhaenyra would kill him and his children. Not a bad episode but the writers went into overdrive with greying up the conflict. I know Luc's a kid but Rhaenyra should be blamed for sending an inexperienced kid to treat with a very important ally prospect. If it was me i would have gassed Boros' head up, and told him I'll marry his other two daughters, not the ugly one, and bring up Aegon I if he objects. If he continues to object i'll offer to marry the ugly daughter too. 
|
|
inherit
401
0
1
Sept 27, 2023 20:38:53 GMT
39,790
DragonKingReborn
19,932
August 2016
dragonkingreborn
http://bsn.boards.net/threads/recent/143
https://i.imgur.com/1myVt9D.jpg
DragonKingReborn
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
887
590
|
Post by DragonKingReborn on Oct 25, 2022 1:16:46 GMT
The show's writers have made the characters far more sympathetic than Martin. In B&F Alicent was a willing conspirator alongside her father, and the Greens who believed that only men not women can rule. In the show the writers ignored the Greens' argument about sex determining an heir's right to the throne which was supported by the majority of Westeros, and they made Alicent ignorant of her father's plot. Also, her mistakenly interpreting Viserys words as him wanting Aegon to be king is another attempt by the writers to make her sympathetic. Rhaenyra was more ruthless. She was the one who ordered Daemon to execute Vaemond whose body she later fed to her dragon. When she miscarried in B&F she blamed the Greens in her rage. After she was corronated by Daemon and Darklyn she refused Aegon II's terms knowing that it would mean civil war, and she didn't prattle on about keeping the kingdom united over her ambition in order to fulfill the prophecy. Aemond's portrayal was more accurate than the others until this episode. In B&F he intentionally murdered Lucerys, and Arrax after he was emasculated by Boros' ugly daughter who he rejected earlier, and gifted her Lucerys' gouged out eyes as a retort. In the show Aemond was only harassing Lucerys until the latter lost control of Arrax who attacked Vhagar who ignored Aemond's commands and went nuclear. After Vhagar ate Lucerys and Arrax like a taco Aemond looked genuinely regretful and knew he fucked up. Aegon II is a rapist, and a whoremaster who gambles on child fights but unlike Mushroom's accounts isn't a pedo... for now. In B&F he reluctantly took the crown after Alicent gaslighted him into believing Rhaenyra would kill him and his children. Not a bad episode but the writers went into overdrive with greying up the conflict. I know Luc's a kid but Rhaenyra should be blamed for sending an inexperienced kid to treat with a very important ally prospect. If it was me i would have gassed Boros' head up, and told him I'll marry his other two daughters, not the ugly one, and bring up Aegon I if he objects. If he continues to object i'll offer to marry the ugly daughter too.  You're a real charmer, aren't you? With respect to the critique I haven't read the books, but my understanding is they're written in an 'in universe' style, right? A maester is the author and it is written a number of years after the people who lived it were gone?
If so - a 'strong and ruthless' Targaryen queen and a disgusting deviant of a - Green - Aegon is probably to be expected. GRRM has a number of faults as a writer (some which work to his advantage), but stereotypes or even archetypes aren't really his bag (except as a bait and switch like Eddard). So I'd be tempted to consider the characters portrayal in the show to be more accurate than the ones in the book (again, haven't read it - just following the logic breadcrumbs) since on both sides we have 'real people having real and normal reactions to horrible things'.
|
|
Noxluxe
N4
  
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
Posts: 1,921 Likes: 3,315
inherit
10359
0
Mar 14, 2019 16:10:11 GMT
3,315
Noxluxe
1,921
Jul 21, 2018 23:55:09 GMT
July 2018
noxluxe
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
|
Post by Noxluxe on Oct 25, 2022 1:40:52 GMT
Yeah, it would look so unflattering for Aemond that I’m pretty sure they’re going to have him lean into the whole “I murdered him on purpose” publicly and to most of his family. Pretty sad that kinslaying/popping off a war etc. would probably be a preferable look, rather than let it be known you don’t have much control over your live nuke. In his hubris, he probably thought he would have control.
I can agree that I don’t see Rhaenyra as queen material either, although I like her character. I think for me, it’s that I don’t see any of them as king/queen material but I like Rhaenyra much more than show Aegon. I might get flak for this but I wonder how Daemon would’ve handled the throne, he can be ruthless but doesn't strike me as a Joffrey or a Ramsay. At the very least I don’t think any rebellion would’ve withstood a chance under him, and the whole dance in the making that was festering for years would've probably been stomped out if he wasn't constantly sent away. I do recognize that I have a bias toward his character though and while I rather liked Viserys, felt that he was too passive and a stick his head in the sand type. idk who do you personally think would be the best fit?
I do hope all the accidental deaths/misunderstandings stop happening from here on out. I would like the characters to start leaning in towards their ruthlessness next season, moreso than just Daemon. I can see why they might soften a few some from the beginning in order to show them before a breaking point. However, I will start to feel like it’s a disservice to the characters if everything from now on still ends up being unintentional. I don’t want to see Rhaenerya (especially) whitewashed as the seasons go on, it will make her and others less interesting imo. I hope it’s not a case of the writers being afraid of making the characters too unlikable if they get their hands bloody, people can still appreciate characters who commit actions that you wouldn’t agree or approve of.
From my memory, I think Daenerys made constipated faces all the time while on Drogon but I have no interest in re-watching GOT to find out.
As for the Lucerys “your perfect line”, I can buy into it and almost find it sweet in the most naïve way. He seemed to be the closest to her and the one she seemed to baby. I also think there is a point in some children's lives where you're blinded and really do see your parents as perfect for a while. Rhaenerya has also been lying to them about their parentage, and he might not fully comprehend the mistakes she’s made or it might be too much to acknowledge them at his age. idk, I was just sad to see him go.
lol I didn't think about the table, now I imagine them having to keep remaking new ones every time something changes. Hmm. I expect they'll do the same thing Rhaenyra and Daemon did with Leanor, claiming innocence or self-defense or refraining from commenting, and leaving the "obvious truth" on the table for their enemies to keep in mind. But we'll see next season. The Baratheons all witnessed Jace saying he was there as a peace envoy, and Boros seemed like he at least respected that enough to be willing to testify to it, if only to cover his own ass from retaliation from the Blacks, so "Aemond executed a dirty traitor" would be a hard sell given the atmosphere up to that point. Arrax hit Vhagar square on the head and neck with a firestream, and I was honestly a little shocked that Vhagar just shrugged it off given what we've otherwise seen dragonfire do in this setting. If that left even a mark then Aemond would have some evidence to point to that it wasn't just a completely one-sided execution.
But yeah, Jace seemed like a sweet kid. His "But, if I inherit then it'll mean that all of you are dead!" was a real moment of humanity. Maybe if he'd had the backbone to approach Aemond seriously and try to resolve the undercurrent of tension before Viserys died...
I like Daemon a lot too, but do think he works much better as the ruler's ruthless right hand/husband than as the ruling monarch in his own right. Not sure I'd call Viserys too passive either, and their issues with each other were legitimate. Daemon really was out of control in those years, and Rhaenyra really did seem like the safer heir. Honestly, I think the fundamental error Viserys made was keeping her his heir after Aegon was born. She clearly hadn't risen to the responsibility he'd impressed on her by then, and returning to the "natural order" of being succeeded by his firstborn son would have satisfied most of the realm, especially Otto, and sidelined any potential conflict about the succession once he was gone. Without the impending threat of a succession crisis with their own kids and grandkids on the line I think Alicent and Otto would have been much better influences on Aegon, and there's no reason he couldn't have turned into a decent ruler. It might have cost Viserys his relationship with his daughter, but only until she grew out of being an immature entitled brat. If he explained exactly why it had to be done there wouldn't be a whole lot she could say or do to refute him, or defend her own behavior. There's a reason all the different lords expected him to make that announcement, even if it hurt her feelings. It was the obviously safest thing to do for the country. As things stand, I'd personally trust Alicent and Otto with the Seven Kingdoms before Daemon and Rhaenyra just in terms of temperament, foresight and administrative ability. Aegon isn't quite Joffrey Baratheon either, he doesn't seem to have that... uh... personal initiative yet. So if they could rule effectively through him then I think that might make the most stable and prosperous regency. At the expense of a couple of violated chambermaids and an uptick in crime and corruption in King's Landing, granted. But you can't make an omelet... ...Of course, Otto would eventually pass away and leave Alicent with a likely increasingly unstable Aegon to manage. And then we have the same kind of situation as when Tywin got fed up and left the Mad King to handle his own realm after decades of perfectly micro-managed peace, and the country imploded. Honestly have a hard time seeing Daemon/Rhaenyra as monarchs of a very stable realm, though. They're both so impulsive and temperamental, and neither ever gave a damn about learning to understand real politics. Jace seems like he's got his head on straight, at least. If the Greens conceded and Rhaenyra abdicated her crown to him when he came of age then I think that scenario might be best for everyone. But it doesn't sound like she intends to. I seem to remember plenty of shots of Dany either holding on to Drogon for dear life or looking anxiously around waiting to see exactly where he'd take her, but not her having to manually pull the brakes on him. Also liked the table when we first saw it in Dragonstone. when it looked like it was just the landmass of Westeros, which fit the idea of the Targaryens seeing it all as their claimed territory regardless of local fiefdoms and conventions. But ah well.
|
|
inherit
113
0
8,424
Hier0phant
3,795
August 2016
hier0phant
|
Post by Hier0phant on Oct 25, 2022 1:42:08 GMT
The show's writers have made the characters far more sympathetic than Martin. In B&F Alicent was a willing conspirator alongside her father, and the Greens who believed that only men not women can rule. In the show the writers ignored the Greens' argument about sex determining an heir's right to the throne which was supported by the majority of Westeros, and they made Alicent ignorant of her father's plot. Also, her mistakenly interpreting Viserys words as him wanting Aegon to be king is another attempt by the writers to make her sympathetic. Rhaenyra was more ruthless. She was the one who ordered Daemon to execute Vaemond whose body she later fed to her dragon. When she miscarried in B&F she blamed the Greens in her rage. After she was corronated by Daemon and Darklyn she refused Aegon II's terms knowing that it would mean civil war, and she didn't prattle on about keeping the kingdom united over her ambition in order to fulfill the prophecy. Aemond's portrayal was more accurate than the others until this episode. In B&F he intentionally murdered Lucerys, and Arrax after he was emasculated by Boros' ugly daughter who he rejected earlier, and gifted her Lucerys' gouged out eyes as a retort. In the show Aemond was only harassing Lucerys until the latter lost control of Arrax who attacked Vhagar who ignored Aemond's commands and went nuclear. After Vhagar ate Lucerys and Arrax like a taco Aemond looked genuinely regretful and knew he fucked up. Aegon II is a rapist, and a whoremaster who gambles on child fights but unlike Mushroom's accounts isn't a pedo... for now. In B&F he reluctantly took the crown after Alicent gaslighted him into believing Rhaenyra would kill him and his children. Not a bad episode but the writers went into overdrive with greying up the conflict. I know Luc's a kid but Rhaenyra should be blamed for sending an inexperienced kid to treat with a very important ally prospect. If it was me i would have gassed Boros' head up, and told him I'll marry his other two daughters, not the ugly one, and bring up Aegon I if he objects. If he continues to object i'll offer to marry the ugly daughter too.  You're a real charmer, aren't you? With respect to the critique I haven't read the books, but my understanding is they're written in an 'in universe' style, right? A maester is the author and it is written a number of years after the people who lived it were gone?
If so - a 'strong and ruthless' Targaryen queen and a disgusting deviant of a - Green - Aegon is probably to be expected. GRRM has a number of faults as a writer (some which work to his advantage), but stereotypes or even archetypes are really his bag (except as a bait and switch like Eddard). So I'd be tempted to consider the characters portrayal in the show to be more accurate than the ones in the book (again, haven't read it - just following the logic breadcrumbs) since on both sides we have 'real people having real and normal reactions to horrible things'. Martin's a cynic to a comical degree but it was only Mushroom's (Rhaenyra's court jester) retelling of events that were fantastical like his story of Rhaenyra's still born daughter having scales and a tail. There was some middle ground between the other historians who talked more about the actions of the historical figures than what they were thinking so it gives the show's writers some wiggle room to add to their personas. I agree with you to an extent because the characters are more fleshed out than in B&F barring Aegon whose portrayal is far less forgiving. My issue is with changes like the omission of the Greens and Alicent openly declaring a woman can't rule in order to legitimize Aegon's claim is a blatant attempt by the writers to make her character, and the Greens sympathetic to progressive viewers who would balk at such an overt display of misogyny. Contrast that to a simple change to an event like Aemond's intention to murder of Lucerys that can be written off as it's witnesses only seeing the aftermath and not what truly transpired.
|
|
Noxluxe
N4
  
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
Posts: 1,921 Likes: 3,315
inherit
10359
0
Mar 14, 2019 16:10:11 GMT
3,315
Noxluxe
1,921
Jul 21, 2018 23:55:09 GMT
July 2018
noxluxe
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
|
Post by Noxluxe on Oct 25, 2022 1:55:27 GMT
Seeing Storm's End was really awesome. I always wondered what it'd look like after hearing Stannis complain about having been forced to settle for Dragonstone. Actually, in general I'd say the locations in this show are even better and more convincing than GoT's. Hopefully it's gathered enough goodwill that the budget stays strong for the second season, assuming more varied locations, dragon CGI and battle scenes.
|
|
inherit
113
0
8,424
Hier0phant
3,795
August 2016
hier0phant
|
Post by Hier0phant on Oct 25, 2022 2:13:55 GMT
Yeah, it would look so unflattering for Aemond that I’m pretty sure they’re going to have him lean into the whole “I murdered him on purpose” publicly and to most of his family. Pretty sad that kinslaying/popping off a war etc. would probably be a preferable look, rather than let it be known you don’t have much control over your live nuke. In his hubris, he probably thought he would have control.
I can agree that I don’t see Rhaenyra as queen material either, although I like her character. I think for me, it’s that I don’t see any of them as king/queen material but I like Rhaenyra much more than show Aegon. I might get flak for this but I wonder how Daemon would’ve handled the throne, he can be ruthless but doesn't strike me as a Joffrey or a Ramsay. At the very least I don’t think any rebellion would’ve withstood a chance under him, and the whole dance in the making that was festering for years would've probably been stomped out if he wasn't constantly sent away. I do recognize that I have a bias toward his character though and while I rather liked Viserys, felt that he was too passive and a stick his head in the sand type. idk who do you personally think would be the best fit?
I do hope all the accidental deaths/misunderstandings stop happening from here on out. I would like the characters to start leaning in towards their ruthlessness next season, moreso than just Daemon. I can see why they might soften a few some from the beginning in order to show them before a breaking point. However, I will start to feel like it’s a disservice to the characters if everything from now on still ends up being unintentional. I don’t want to see Rhaenerya (especially) whitewashed as the seasons go on, it will make her and others less interesting imo. I hope it’s not a case of the writers being afraid of making the characters too unlikable if they get their hands bloody, people can still appreciate characters who commit actions that you wouldn’t agree or approve of.
From my memory, I think Daenerys made constipated faces all the time while on Drogon but I have no interest in re-watching GOT to find out.
As for the Lucerys “your perfect line”, I can buy into it and almost find it sweet in the most naïve way. He seemed to be the closest to her and the one she seemed to baby. I also think there is a point in some children's lives where you're blinded and really do see your parents as perfect for a while. Rhaenerya has also been lying to them about their parentage, and he might not fully comprehend the mistakes she’s made or it might be too much to acknowledge them at his age. idk, I was just sad to see him go.
lol I didn't think about the table, now I imagine them having to keep remaking new ones every time something changes. Hmm. I expect they'll do the same thing Rhaenyra and Daemon did with Leanor, claiming innocence or self-defense or refraining from commenting, and leaving the "obvious truth" on the table for their enemies to keep in mind. But we'll see next season. The Baratheons all witnessed Jace saying he was there as a peace envoy, and Boros seemed like he at least respected that enough to be willing to testify to it, if only to cover his own ass from retaliation from the Blacks, so "Aemond executed a dirty traitor" would be a hard sell given the atmosphere up to that point. Arrax hit Vhagar square on the head and neck with a firestream, and I was honestly a little shocked that Vhagar just shrugged it off given what we've otherwise seen dragonfire do in this setting. If that left even a mark then Aemond would have some evidence to point to that it wasn't just a completely one-sided execution.
But yeah, Jace seemed like a sweet kid. His "But, if I inherit then it'll mean that all of you are dead!" was a real moment of humanity. Maybe if he'd had the backbone to approach Aemond seriously and try to resolve the undercurrent of tension before Viserys died...
I like Daemon a lot too, but do think he works much better as the ruler's ruthless right hand/husband than as the ruling monarch in his own right. Not sure I'd call Viserys too passive either, and their issues with each other were legitimate. Daemon really was out of control in those years, and Rhaenyra really did seem like the safer heir. Honestly, I think the fundamental error Viserys made was keeping her his heir after Aegon was born. She clearly hadn't risen to the responsibility he'd impressed on her by then, and returning to the "natural order" of being succeeded by his firstborn son would have satisfied most of the realm, especially Otto, and sidelined any potential conflict about the succession once he was gone. Without the impending threat of a succession crisis with their own kids and grandkids on the line I think Alicent and Otto would have been much better influences on Aegon, and there's no reason he couldn't have turned into a decent ruler. It might have cost Viserys his relationship with his daughter, but only until she grew out of being an immature entitled brat. If he explained exactly why it had to be done there wouldn't be a whole lot she could say or do to refute him, or defend her own behavior. There's a reason all the different lords expected him to make that announcement, even if it hurt her feelings. It was the obviously safest thing to do for the country. As things stand, I'd personally trust Alicent and Otto with the Seven Kingdoms before Daemon and Rhaenyra just in terms of temperament, foresight and administrative ability. Aegon isn't quite Joffrey Baratheon either, he doesn't seem to have that... uh... personal initiative yet. So if they could rule effectively through him then I think that might make the most stable and prosperous regency. At the expense of a couple of violated chambermaids and an uptick in crime and corruption in King's Landing, granted. But you can't make an omelet... ...Of course, Otto would eventually pass away and leave Alicent with a likely increasingly unstable Aegon to manage. And then we have the same kind of situation as when Tywin got fed up and left the Mad King to handle his own realm after decades of perfectly micro-managed peace, and the country imploded. Honestly have a hard time seeing Daemon/Rhaenyra as monarchs of a very stable realm, though. They're both so impulsive and temperamental, and neither ever gave a damn about learning to understand real politics. Jace seems like he's got his head on straight, at least. If the Greens conceded and Rhaenyra abdicated her crown to him when he came of age then I think that scenario might be best for everyone. But it doesn't sound like she intends to. I seem to remember plenty of shots of Dany either holding on to Drogon for dear life or looking anxiously around waiting to see exactly where he'd take her, but not her having to manually pull the brakes on him. Also liked the table when we first saw it in Dragonstone. when it looked like it was just the landmass of Westeros, which fit the idea of the Targaryens seeing it all as their claimed territory regardless of local fiefdoms and conventions. But ah well. In the books i liked Aegon II and thought he was a more competent ruler than Rhaenyra. In the show it's the reverse for me only because the writers decided to canonize the rumors of Aegon II siring an army of bastards which has the potential to cause an even bigger civil war later on. That scenario happened during Aegon IV's rule where his bastards fought against his heir for the throne, and it was a blessing the dragons were extinct by then.
|
|
inherit
156
0
Apr 22, 2017 19:25:27 GMT
6,498
Onecrazymonkey1
"A person of any mental quality has ideas of his own. This is common sense." Franz Liszt
2,228
August 2016
onecrazymonkey1
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Onecrazymonkey1 on Oct 25, 2022 4:23:43 GMT
But yeah, Jace seemed like a sweet kid. His "But, if I inherit then it'll mean that all of you are dead!" was a real moment of humanity. Maybe if he'd had the backbone to approach Aemond seriously and try to resolve the undercurrent of tension before Viserys died...
Thank you for the response, you make very good points. I personally think the best way to have eased some tension would've been by Viserys himself right after the situation happened. Maybe by forcing an apology from all parties involved, ignoring the bastard rumors for the moment and then enacting some sort of punishment for Luke. Not maim him like Alicent called for but something to show that you couldn't just slash out his son's eye. As much as I loved Viserys love for Rhaenerya and understood that she was probably the last piece which reminded him of his late wife Aemma, it really seemed as if he neglected his other children at times. There is no way that wouldn't create some years of bitterness, especially on Aemond's part. I know Viserys had it rough literally falling apart in his later years but still... Would've been nice if Luke had also tried to ease tensions himself years later, but unfortunately he never received that guidance. The biggest failures from that night seemed to be all the adults imo and sadly their children suffer because of it.
|
|
Noxluxe
N4
  
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
Posts: 1,921 Likes: 3,315
inherit
10359
0
Mar 14, 2019 16:10:11 GMT
3,315
Noxluxe
1,921
Jul 21, 2018 23:55:09 GMT
July 2018
noxluxe
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
|
Post by Noxluxe on Oct 25, 2022 10:15:04 GMT
Thank you for the response, you make very good points. I personally think the best way to have eased some tension would've been by Viserys himself right after the situation happened. Maybe by forcing an apology from all parties involved, ignoring the bastard rumors for the moment and then enacting some sort of punishment for Luke. Not maim him like Alicent called for but something to show that you couldn't just slash out his son's eye. As much as I loved Viserys love for Rhaenerya and understood that she was probably the last piece which reminded him of his late wife Aemma, it really seemed as if he neglected his other children at times. There is no way that wouldn't create some years of bitterness, especially on Aemond's part. I know Viserys had it rough literally falling apart in his later years but still... Would've been nice if Luke had also tried to ease tensions himself years later, but unfortunately he never received that guidance. The biggest failures from that night seemed to be all the adults imo and sadly their children suffer because of it. Hehe, I meant more that Lucerys having a private chat with Aemond off the record and falling on his sword to smooth things over might have worked to save his life later, not that I'd actually expect that kind of gesture from any teenage boy of their own accord no matter how well-brought up. Did we even get a scene of Viserys interacting with his kids by Alicent? When he came in to clear up the mess after the childrens' fight in Driftmark he was in complete damage control mode, not a single sympathetic glance at his youngest son who'd just lost an eye. And Aegon obviously suffers from a serious lack of disciplining growing up. He didn't even address them at the 'I love you all SO dearly, please be copacetic when I'm gone' dinner either, while toasting and praising Rhaenyra's sons. Going by those things you'd be forgiven for thinking he never gave a fuck about them at all. When Aegon complains about "it" never being enough for either Alicent or "father" my mind automatically goes to Otto because we never find out if Viserys even spoke to him as an adult. Which seems ... rather out of character for the man given his motivations at the start of the show. One thing I've heard from interviews, supported by his last words, is that he spent the entire show after the first couple scenes deeply affected by what happened to his first wife and last unborn child, and that maybe the whole idea of having sons and grooming a perfect male successor turned into a painful, shameful idea to him after what he'd put the love of his life through in that pursuit? If he had a hard time seeing Aegon and Aemond as anything other than gangly half-blooded replacements for Baelon, almost insults to those crushed, idealized dreams he started out with... I mean, that'd at least explain him continuing to favor Rhaenyra that isn't just 'she'd pout if I took away her toy crown'. But really, it seems very out of character for both Viserys and Otto to let the situation stand without stepping in and getting on top of it. Alicent has probably been working hard to keep Aegon's indiscretions under wraps from both of them, but I still can't see Otto especially just assuming that his prospective heir is stable enough to carry out his plans without making sure, up to and including extreme measures to get him in line.
|
|
inherit
331
0
Sept 28, 2023 1:05:25 GMT
5,401
q5tyhj
philosophizing with a hammer
1,830
August 2016
q5tyhj
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
q5tyhj
|
Post by q5tyhj on Oct 25, 2022 15:54:11 GMT
Just read a review of the final episode - it was extremely positive; calling it the best of the season and comparing the show positively to Better Call Saul (where Game of Thrones is Breaking Bad, obviously). There were a couple of stings, though - both accurate enough to make me chuckle. The series is about the Dance of Dragons civil war - but until the final frames, no dragons danced with each other. The review exclaimed 'the House of the Dragon is over. I can't wait for the House of the Dragon to start.' But the better one was - 'If House of the Dragon was about World War 1, we would have just watched the 10 hour version of the Assassination of the Arch Duke.' The weird part is, for all their glacial pace setting up the story, other things felt extremely rushed- Harwin Strong, for instance. He gets introduced and eliminated in the same episode. That was extremely abrupt, even for the truncated version of Harwin Strong compared to the books. I'm hoping/expecting season 2 will do better with the pacing problems, after having set the stage and not needing any more time jumps after season 1, and that was the main flaw/valid criticism of the show so far. So hopefully season 2 will be even better (and season 1 was already very good, even with the pacing problems)
|
|
inherit
331
0
Sept 28, 2023 1:05:25 GMT
5,401
q5tyhj
philosophizing with a hammer
1,830
August 2016
q5tyhj
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
q5tyhj
|
Post by q5tyhj on Oct 25, 2022 16:04:09 GMT
The show's writers have made the characters far more sympathetic than Martin. In B&F Alicent was a willing conspirator alongside her father, and the Greens who believed that only men not women can rule. In the show the writers ignored the Greens' argument about sex determining an heir's right to the throne which was supported by the majority of Westeros, and they made Alicent ignorant of her father's plot. Also, her mistakenly interpreting Viserys words as him wanting Aegon to be king is another attempt by the writers to make her sympathetic. Rhaenyra was more ruthless. She was the one who ordered Daemon to execute Vaemond whose body she later fed to her dragon. When she miscarried in B&F she blamed the Greens in her rage. After she was corronated by Daemon and Darklyn she refused Aegon II's terms knowing that it would mean civil war, and she didn't prattle on about keeping the kingdom united over her ambition in order to fulfill the prophecy. Aemond's portrayal was more accurate than the others until this episode. In B&F he intentionally murdered Lucerys, and Arrax after he was emasculated by Boros' ugly daughter who he rejected earlier, and gifted her Lucerys' gouged out eyes as a retort. In the show Aemond was only harassing Lucerys until the latter lost control of Arrax who attacked Vhagar who ignored Aemond's commands and went nuclear. After Vhagar ate Lucerys and Arrax like a taco Aemond looked genuinely regretful and knew he fucked up. Aegon II is a rapist, and a whoremaster who gambles on child fights but unlike Mushroom's accounts isn't a pedo... for now. In B&F he reluctantly took the crown after Alicent gaslighted him into believing Rhaenyra would kill him and his children. Not a bad episode but the writers went into overdrive with greying up the conflict. I know Luc's a kid but Rhaenyra should be blamed for sending an inexperienced kid to treat with a very important ally prospect. If it was me i would have gassed Boros' head up, and told him I'll marry his other two daughters, not the ugly one, and bring up Aegon I if he objects. If he continues to object i'll offer to marry the ugly daughter too.  You're a real charmer, aren't you? With respect to the critique I haven't read the books, but my understanding is they're written in an 'in universe' style, right? A maester is the author and it is written a number of years after the people who lived it were gone?
If so - a 'strong and ruthless' Targaryen queen and a disgusting deviant of a - Green - Aegon is probably to be expected. GRRM has a number of faults as a writer (some which work to his advantage), but stereotypes or even archetypes aren't really his bag (except as a bait and switch like Eddard). So I'd be tempted to consider the characters portrayal in the show to be more accurate than the ones in the book (again, haven't read it - just following the logic breadcrumbs) since on both sides we have 'real people having real and normal reactions to horrible things'. In general I think this is a perfectly reasonable way to think about it... the problem is that the TV version makes no fucking sense: it requires Aemond to be completely naive and ignorant, thinking that demanding someone put out their eye and then chasing them on your giant fire-spewing death-monster will end any way other than someone getting hurt. And they've already established that Aemond hates his nephews and would love the opportunity to fight and harm them. So this is just completely implausible.
And I refuse to think of the TV version as more canonical in instances where the TV adaptation makes absolutely no sense and is wildly implausible compared to the book version. Its hard to think of this change as anything other than a mistake by the TV writers, in a misguided attempt to make the Greens more sympathetic and the show more morally gray overall (as Hierophant already noted). I'm fine with both of those motivations, but the changes need to make sense. Many of the changes in the TV adaptation have been perfectly reasonable and plausible... this isn't one of them.
|
|
Noxluxe
N4
  
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
Posts: 1,921 Likes: 3,315
inherit
10359
0
Mar 14, 2019 16:10:11 GMT
3,315
Noxluxe
1,921
Jul 21, 2018 23:55:09 GMT
July 2018
noxluxe
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
|
Post by Noxluxe on Oct 25, 2022 16:28:43 GMT
In the books i liked Aegon II and thought he was a more competent ruler than Rhaenyra. In the show it's the reverse for me only because the writers decided to canonize the rumors of Aegon II siring an army of bastards which has the potential to cause an even bigger civil war later on. That scenario happened during Aegon IV's rule where his bastards fought against his heir for the throne, and it was a blessing the dragons were extinct by then. I don't know. The Targaryens have plenty of unacknowledged common-born bastard children on Dragonstone, too. That sort of thing only seems to be a true threat to the nation's stability when the line of succession is already in serious conflict and all the most obvious claimants have been whittled down, or the King is too stupid to live and makes really idiotic choices. Imagine Gendry or any of Robert's other bastards trying to stake a claim on the Iron Throne even during the War of Five Kings. The absolute best they could have hoped for would be to embarrass the ruling family somewhat while dying on the rack. From what I know of the Blackfyre Rebellions it'd be more accurate to say that they were caused by Aegon the Unworthy legitimizing all his bastards, rather than him having them in the first place. I have very strong personal feelings about men having children without intending to be a father to them but looking at it in the context of the setting that doesn't seem anywhere near as vile as what Aegon otherwise gets up to both in the show and the books. It's very hard to imagine him being king for very long without that kind of sadism and depravity leaking into his policies assuming Otto allows him much independent power at all. Meanwhile, Rhaenyra having children with someone who looks nothing like her husband and trying to pass them off as heirs to the two most powerful seats in the Seven Kingdoms over her father's firstborn son based on her own already precarious claim is an absolute recipe for disaster, and could almost only end in war and their executions. And she was certainly old enough to know that when she did it. Her having actually brought Jace and Luke up to be good kids is nice(though I guess we'll never know how much of that was actually Harwin and Leanor), but she's still a terrible mother for having endangered them from birth for her own pleasure, ego and ambition. Even true love doesn't justify that, no matter how hunky or curly-haired or handsome in armor. She should have thought better of it from the start or abdicated the Throne in favor of Aegon as soon as she became pregnant with Harwin to keep her kids safe for me to have the slightest respect for her judgement. One or the other. And her sudden concern for the welfare of the kingdom this episode felt more like a guilty homage to her dad's priorities than anything genuine to me, because she's never read as giving a damn before. As a teen she was entirely preoccupied with what she wanted and didn't care at all how that affected everyone else, and in four episodes I still haven't seen anything to suggest that she's matured one bit from that. When I read people talking about her having been wise beyond her years I keep remembering that scene of her mocking the suitors she's been privileged enough to choose freely between one after the other before encouraging little Robert Blackwood's rivals to mock him as well and turning her back on the resulting duel because it bored her instead of asserting her royal authority to stop it, resulting in one kid killing another. She never takes responsibility for a single thing throughout the entire show until that one moment of regurgitating her dad's values in episode 10. By the way, how awesome is it not to have a show with enough depth and nuance to have these kinds of conversation again?
|
|
inherit
113
0
8,424
Hier0phant
3,795
August 2016
hier0phant
|
Post by Hier0phant on Oct 25, 2022 19:53:43 GMT
In the books i liked Aegon II and thought he was a more competent ruler than Rhaenyra. In the show it's the reverse for me only because the writers decided to canonize the rumors of Aegon II siring an army of bastards which has the potential to cause an even bigger civil war later on. That scenario happened during Aegon IV's rule where his bastards fought against his heir for the throne, and it was a blessing the dragons were extinct by then. I don't know. The Targaryens have plenty of unacknowledged common-born bastard children on Dragonstone, too. That sort of thing only seems to be a true threat to the nation's stability when the line of succession is already in serious conflict and all the most obvious claimants have been whittled down, or the King is too stupid to live and makes really idiotic choices. Imagine Gendry or any of Robert's other bastards trying to stake a claim on the Iron Throne even during the War of Five Kings. The absolute best they could have hoped for would be to embarrass the ruling family somewhat while dying on the rack. From what I know of the Blackfyre Rebellions it'd be more accurate to say that they were caused by Aegon the Unworthy legitimizing all his bastards, rather than him having them in the first place. I have very strong personal feelings about men having children without intending to be a father to them but looking at it in the context of the setting that doesn't seem anywhere near as vile as what Aegon otherwise gets up to both in the show and the books. It's very hard to imagine him being king for very long without that kind of sadism and depravity leaking into his policies assuming Otto allows him much independent power at all. Meanwhile, Rhaenyra having children with someone who looks nothing like her husband and trying to pass them off as heirs to the two most powerful seats in the Seven Kingdoms over her father's firstborn son based on her own already precarious claim is an absolute recipe for disaster, and could almost only end in war and their executions. And she was certainly old enough to know that when she did it. Her having actually brought Jace and Luke up to be good kids is nice(though I guess we'll never know how much of that was actually Harwin and Leanor), but she's still a terrible mother for having endangered them from birth for her own pleasure, ego and ambition. Even true love doesn't justify that, no matter how hunky or curly-haired or handsome in armor. She should have thought better of it from the start or abdicated the Throne in favor of Aegon as soon as she became pregnant with Harwin to keep her kids safe for me to have the slightest respect for her judgement. One or the other. And her sudden concern for the welfare of the kingdom this episode felt more like a guilty homage to her dad's priorities than anything genuine to me, because she's never read as giving a damn before. As a teen she was entirely preoccupied with what she wanted and didn't care at all how that affected everyone else, and in four episodes I still haven't seen anything to suggest that she's matured one bit from that. When I read people talking about her having been wise beyond her years I keep remembering that scene of her mocking the suitors she's been privileged enough to choose freely between one after the other before encouraging little Robert Blackwood's rivals to mock him as well and turning her back on the resulting duel because it bored her instead of asserting her royal authority to stop it, resulting in one kid killing another. She never takes responsibility for a single thing throughout the entire show until that one moment of regurgitating her dad's values in episode 10. By the way, how awesome is it not to have a show with enough depth and nuance to have these kinds of conversation again? My issue with Aegon's bastards isn't with their existence but with the implied number of them which seems to be in the dozens like Aegon IV. All you need is one bastard with delusions of grandeur to inspire the others who are also backed by a group of disgruntled houses (Blacks) and the result is a proto Battle of the Bastards. Aegon's heir might have to go full Cersei like when she assassinated Robert's bastards, but this scenario can't happen despite the writers laying the groundwork for it because they will be taking away material from a potential show about the Blackfyre Rebellions. I wish the writers will ease up on Aegon II like they did with Aemond. It seems like he's been designated as the villain and could potentially see him devolve into a meme alongside Larys because the writers think they need someone to serve as a focal point for the audience's scorn like GoT's Joffrey or Ramsey. With the direction Aegon's character is being taken to i wouldn't be surprised if there's a scene that involves Alicent interrupting his orgy with all the widows of King's Landing. I agree about Rhaenyra, she could have chosen to marry someone she liked (Harwin?) and have legitimate heirs but like a Machiavellian she settled for Laenor due to his family's influence. Rhaenyra having empathy, and suddenly caring about a potential civil war's impact on the commoners is another example of the writers' attempt to make one of the two main heroines sympathetic, and it seemed like an unconvincing attempt at moral posturing in an effort to claim superiority over her war council. After Amazon's Rings of Power happened it is refreshing to have in-depth convos about the fallibility of characters instead of in-depth critiques about offensively mediocre writing.
|
|
inherit
401
0
1
Sept 27, 2023 20:38:53 GMT
39,790
DragonKingReborn
19,932
August 2016
dragonkingreborn
http://bsn.boards.net/threads/recent/143
https://i.imgur.com/1myVt9D.jpg
DragonKingReborn
Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
887
590
|
Post by DragonKingReborn on Oct 25, 2022 20:05:29 GMT
You're a real charmer, aren't you? With respect to the critique I haven't read the books, but my understanding is they're written in an 'in universe' style, right? A maester is the author and it is written a number of years after the people who lived it were gone?
If so - a 'strong and ruthless' Targaryen queen and a disgusting deviant of a - Green - Aegon is probably to be expected. GRRM has a number of faults as a writer (some which work to his advantage), but stereotypes or even archetypes aren't really his bag (except as a bait and switch like Eddard). So I'd be tempted to consider the characters portrayal in the show to be more accurate than the ones in the book (again, haven't read it - just following the logic breadcrumbs) since on both sides we have 'real people having real and normal reactions to horrible things'. In general I think this is a perfectly reasonable way to think about it... the problem is that the TV version makes no fucking sense: it requires Aemond to be completely naive and ignorant, thinking that demanding someone put out their eye and then chasing them on your giant fire-spewing death-monster will end any way other than someone getting hurt. And they've already established that Aemond hates his nephews and would love the opportunity to fight and harm them. So this is just completely implausible.
And I refuse to think of the TV version as more canonical in instances where the TV adaptation makes absolutely no sense and is wildly implausible compared to the book version. Its hard to think of this change as anything other than a mistake by the TV writers, in a misguided attempt to make the Greens more sympathetic and the show more morally gray overall (as Hierophant already noted). I'm fine with both of those motivations, but the changes need to make sense. Many of the changes in the TV adaptation have been perfectly reasonable and plausible... this isn't one of them. I guess it makes enough sense to me because I came at it from the angle of the Targaryen's have a culture that has grown around them - both internally and externally - of being near divine, and certainly ordained by 'on high'. If the living nuke responds to you, and you alone, maybe you come to believe that you have total control over it. From that perspective, it follows quite easily that Aemond believed he could scare the shit out of Luke while holding short of killing him. He probably even believed it after Luke lost control of his own dragon (because he considers himself to be a true Targaryen and Lucerys to not be). It's reasonable to think that Alicent also gave firm instructions to her son about violence, like Rhaenyra did. If we believe that she truly believes Viserys changed his mind and that she was truly surprised and upset by the plot having been constructed without her knowledge then it follows she might still hold out hope that war can be averted. So while Aemond would absolutely have loved to have harmed Luke - he may have realised that by killing him, he 'done fucked up'. So the other interpretation of his anguished expression is "yes, I meant to do this...but now I realise that Mum is going to be super pissed and there will be serious ramifications for the realm and my House later on". Whatever faults he may have, he is significantly better suited to rule than his older brother. So regret from a stupid act (assuming he intended for Luke to die) is plausible, as well. Anyway - that's my rationale - no issue if you see it differently, of course.
|
|
inherit
331
0
Sept 28, 2023 1:05:25 GMT
5,401
q5tyhj
philosophizing with a hammer
1,830
August 2016
q5tyhj
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
q5tyhj
|
Post by q5tyhj on Oct 25, 2022 20:10:06 GMT
... I agree about Rhaenyra, she could have chosen to marry someone she liked (Harwin?) and have legitimate heirs but like a Machiavellian she settled for Laenor due to his family's influence. Rhaenyra having empathy, and suddenly caring about a potential civil war's impact on the commoners is another example of the writers' attempt to make one of the two main heroines sympathetic, and it seemed like an unconvincing attempt at moral posturing in an effort to claim superiority over her war council... Which is explicitly out of character for her; when Daemon took teenage Rhaenyra to Flea Bottom and they were watching the play, Daemon pointed out that the commoners didn't like her and Rhaenyra retorted that what they want doesn't matter. So now all of a sudden she's some socialist pro-labor activist concerned with the common person's well-being? Why? Rhaenyra doesn't need to be made more sympathetic at this point in the story, she's the chosen heir who has been usurped simply because she's female, and so the initial presumption of favor or sympathy is strongly in her favor.
Otoh, you can understand the writers motivations to justify Aemond and Alicent's actions by inserting really flimsy changes into the story- Vhagar killing Lucerys against Aemond's wishes (as if that hadn't been the reason he was chasing him on dragon-back in the first place), and Alicent only supporting Aegon as king because she misunderstood Viserys talking about the prophecy (as if being his mother, not to mention disliking/distrusting Rhaenyra and Daemon, wasn't motivation enough on its own)- as a way to balance out this asymmetry in which side is more sympathetic... but probably a better way is how its done in the books, where the Blacks become less sympathetic for doing evil shit (like arranging the death of Aegon's son, i.e. the Blood and Cheese incident). But that stuff doesn't come til later, and apparently the writers are really invested in trying to keep the two sides equally sympathetic and equally morally complicated, even if it comes at the expense of believability or consistency.
|
|
inherit
331
0
Sept 28, 2023 1:05:25 GMT
5,401
q5tyhj
philosophizing with a hammer
1,830
August 2016
q5tyhj
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
q5tyhj
|
Post by q5tyhj on Oct 25, 2022 20:25:29 GMT
In general I think this is a perfectly reasonable way to think about it... the problem is that the TV version makes no fucking sense: it requires Aemond to be completely naive and ignorant, thinking that demanding someone put out their eye and then chasing them on your giant fire-spewing death-monster will end any way other than someone getting hurt. And they've already established that Aemond hates his nephews and would love the opportunity to fight and harm them. So this is just completely implausible.
And I refuse to think of the TV version as more canonical in instances where the TV adaptation makes absolutely no sense and is wildly implausible compared to the book version. Its hard to think of this change as anything other than a mistake by the TV writers, in a misguided attempt to make the Greens more sympathetic and the show more morally gray overall (as Hierophant already noted). I'm fine with both of those motivations, but the changes need to make sense. Many of the changes in the TV adaptation have been perfectly reasonable and plausible... this isn't one of them. I guess it makes enough sense to me because I came at it from the angle of the Targaryen's have a culture that has grown around them - both internally and externally - of being near divine, and certainly ordained by 'on high'. If the living nuke responds to you, and you alone, maybe you come to believe that you have total control over it. From that perspective, it follows quite easily that Aemond believed he could scare the shit out of Luke while holding short of killing him. He probably even believed it after Luke lost control of his own dragon (because he considers himself to be a true Targaryen and Lucerys to not be). Only if we're expected to believe he's the biggest fool in Westeros... when you chase someone on dragonback, and your dragon is significantly bigger and fiercer than the other guy's dragon (that other guy actually being a child), there are about a million ways that ends with someone getting harmed and maybe 1 or 2 ways it doesn't. What if Lucerys fell off his dragon? Or they crashed into a cliff or something? The scene only makes sense if Aemond is a complete and utter idiot, or if he is intending to cause Lucerys harm... which he explicitly is, based on their exchange at Storm's End.
So no, I don't see how this change made even a lick of sense, its about as unequivocal a mistake as you can get when it comes to art or media: it actively made that scene worse than it would have been otherwise. Aemond is already set up to be a villain. So, let him be a villain. Better to be a villain than a hapless idiot, which is what they tried to make him into.
But you're right that the thing with Alicent makes perfect sense- my problem there isn't that it doesn't make sense, but that its completely unnecessary: Aegon is Alicent's son. That's all the motivation she needs. And she also dislikes and distrusts both Rhaenyra and Daemon. So she had no need whatsoever for additional motivation, and so this change didn't actually accomplish anything that wasn't there already. And the fact that they've invented this fictional prophecy for Viserys and Rhaenyra to be concerned with is beyond stupid.
I think what other posters have theorized is correct; the writers are trying to make the Greens more sympathetic. But the Blacks and Rhaenyra are still going to be more sympathetic at this point in the story no matter what you do, so why fight it? Let the bad guys be bad guys at this point in the story, and introduce moral complexity down the road (like some of the heinous shit the Blacks get up to in the books, like the absolutely brutal Blood and Cheese incident). But don't get me wrong, I really like the show and so these are ultimately nitpicks. But they're also entirely self-inflicted errors, without which the show would have been even better, so I can't help but regret them missing that opportunity a little bit.
|
|
inherit
113
0
8,424
Hier0phant
3,795
August 2016
hier0phant
|
Post by Hier0phant on Oct 25, 2022 20:43:57 GMT
... I agree about Rhaenyra, she could have chosen to marry someone she liked (Harwin?) and have legitimate heirs but like a Machiavellian she settled for Laenor due to his family's influence. Rhaenyra having empathy, and suddenly caring about a potential civil war's impact on the commoners is another example of the writers' attempt to make one of the two main heroines sympathetic, and it seemed like an unconvincing attempt at moral posturing in an effort to claim superiority over her war council... Which is explicitly out of character for her; when Daemon took teenage Rhaenyra to Flea Bottom and they were watching the play, Daemon pointed out that the commoners didn't like her and Rhaenyra retorted that what they want doesn't matter. So now all of a sudden she's some socialist pro-labor activist concerned with the common person's well-being? Why? Rhaenyra doesn't need to be made more sympathetic at this point in the story, she's the chosen heir who has been usurped simply because she's female, and so the initial presumption of favor or sympathy is strongly in her favor.
Otoh, you can understand the writers motivations to justify Aemond and Alicent's actions by inserting really flimsy changes into the story- Vhagar killing Lucerys against Aemond's wishes (as if that hadn't been the reason he was chasing him on dragon-back in the first place), and Alicent only supporting Aegon as king because she misunderstood Viserys talking about the prophecy (as if being his mother, not to mention disliking/distrusting Rhaenyra and Daemon, wasn't motivation enough on its own)- as a way to balance out this asymmetry in which side is more sympathetic... but probably a better way is how its done in the books, where the Blacks become less sympathetic for doing evil shit (like arranging the death of Aegon's son, i.e. the Blood and Cheese incident). But that stuff doesn't come til later, and apparently the writers are really invested in trying to keep the two sides equally sympathetic and equally morally complicated, even if it comes at the expense of believability or consistency. Massive spoiler for non-book readers, you have been warned. I'm serious turn back... Based on the pattern so far, Daemon hiring Blood and Cheese behind Rhaenyra's back to alleviate her character of moral wrongdoing seems like a possible scenario. Hopefully the writers mirror F&B in this because this display of ruthlessness from Rhaenyra would go a long way in justifying her attempted assassination of Nettles for allegedley sleeping with Daemon. If not they'll have to make Rhaeneyra ignorant of the assasination plot or justify it by making her think Nettles/Daemon's a traitor. This also makes me curious about how they will portray her incompetent ruling of King's Landing that led to her ouster by the common people if they continue to make her a more sympathetic character.
|
|
inherit
113
0
8,424
Hier0phant
3,795
August 2016
hier0phant
|
Post by Hier0phant on Oct 25, 2022 21:07:52 GMT
he 'done fucked up'. So the other interpretation of his anguished expression is "yes, I meant to do this...but now I realise that Mum is going to be super pissed and there will be serious ramifications for the realm and my House later on". Mfw i just remembered my mother's birthday was yesterday and i don't know what gift to send her. 
|
|
Noxluxe
N4
  
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
Posts: 1,921 Likes: 3,315
inherit
10359
0
Mar 14, 2019 16:10:11 GMT
3,315
Noxluxe
1,921
Jul 21, 2018 23:55:09 GMT
July 2018
noxluxe
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
|
Post by Noxluxe on Oct 25, 2022 21:24:50 GMT
I wish the writers will ease up on Aegon II like they did with Aemond. It seems like he's been designated as the villain and could potentially see him devolve into a meme alongside Larys because the writers think they need someone to serve as a focal point for the audience's scorn like GoT's Joffrey or Ramsey. With the direction Aegon's character is being taken to i wouldn't be surprised if there's a scene that involves Alicent interrupting his orgy with all the widows of King's Landing. They haven't made him a pedophile yet, and his self-awareness about being an ill-suited ruler and begging his brother to essentially take his crown instead frame him as being fairly sympathetic... for a charmless rapist bully rich kid.  Really though, the coronation scene did a lot to paint him as another victim in all this, and there are worse things than suddenly finding meaning in your people's admiration. That doesn't necessarily have to be narcissism. I could imagine the second season giving us a young King who'd learned to fill the hole in his heart through the fulfillment of his responsibilities and the appreciation thereof, having abandoned some of his old ways. That'd be a pretty nice Henry V character arc, and more in line with what you liked about him from the books without quite making him a nice guy. Rhaenyra having empathy, and suddenly caring about a potential civil war's impact on the commoners is another example of the writers' attempt to make one of the two main heroines sympathetic, and it seemed like an unconvincing attempt at moral posturing in an effort to claim superiority over her war council. Oh, I'd be willing to grant that it was an earnest moment of trying to emulate her father's respect for peace rather than virtue signaling. She did love him and promise to honor his legacy, and knew that he cared deeply about the realm. But it definitely felt more like her suddenly remembering that she was supposed to care about this and making a token effort rather than her actually caring about it. The gesture didn't seem out of character, it just didn't seem rooted in her own values or like a true sign that she'd suddenly turned into a good queen. So now all of a sudden she's some socialist pro-labor activist concerned with the common person's well-being? Why? Rhaenyra doesn't need to be made more sympathetic at this point in the story, she's the chosen heir who has been usurped simply because she's female, and so the initial presumption of favor or sympathy is strongly in her favor. I'm actually a little puzzled that the show can make such a big point of pre-modern childbirth being very dangerous for women without ever connecting that dot to why succession has traditionally followed the male line. You know, the gender that could semi-reliably create heirs without risking their own lives and potentially just leaving a power vacuum instead in the process. I don't find her particularly sympathetic just because Viserys bent tradition to cut her into the succession where she wouldn't otherwise have been and accidentally started a war because others wouldn't go along with it when the time came, not helped by her own philandering. That's what happens when you create more than one precedent for who can legally succeed you. It naturally splits the realm between the people who'd benefit from each, and who do and don't respect the King enough to follow his personal reasoning. The reason we mostly tried to stick to one simple rule, namely the first-born son inheriting, throughout history was that on average it left the least amount of doubt and ambiguity and, in lieu of democracy, lead to the least amount of conflict every time someone died. Messing around with that tended to create issues like we see on the show, even when it seemed like a really good idea at the time. If Rhaenyra had shown herself to be any kind of promising ruler up to this point I might feel bad for her for having been arbitrarily passed over. But since she enthusiastically did the exact opposite right from the start the only thing I admire about her motivation is not wanting her sons' heads cut off for her and her father's mistakes and other people's ambition. Which seems natural enough, if rather belated of her.
|
|
inherit
156
0
Apr 22, 2017 19:25:27 GMT
6,498
Onecrazymonkey1
"A person of any mental quality has ideas of his own. This is common sense." Franz Liszt
2,228
August 2016
onecrazymonkey1
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by Onecrazymonkey1 on Oct 25, 2022 21:37:05 GMT
Which is explicitly out of character for her; when Daemon took teenage Rhaenyra to Flea Bottom and they were watching the play, Daemon pointed out that the commoners didn't like her and Rhaenyra retorted that what they want doesn't matter. So now all of a sudden she's some socialist pro-labor activist concerned with the common person's well-being? Why? Rhaenyra doesn't need to be made more sympathetic at this point in the story, she's the chosen heir who has been usurped simply because she's female, and so the initial presumption of favor or sympathy is strongly in her favor.
Otoh, you can understand the writers motivations to justify Aemond and Alicent's actions by inserting really flimsy changes into the story- Vhagar killing Lucerys against Aemond's wishes (as if that hadn't been the reason he was chasing him on dragon-back in the first place), and Alicent only supporting Aegon as king because she misunderstood Viserys talking about the prophecy (as if being his mother, not to mention disliking/distrusting Rhaenyra and Daemon, wasn't motivation enough on its own)- as a way to balance out this asymmetry in which side is more sympathetic... but probably a better way is how its done in the books, where the Blacks become less sympathetic for doing evil shit (like arranging the death of Aegon's son, i.e. the Blood and Cheese incident). But that stuff doesn't come til later, and apparently the writers are really invested in trying to keep the two sides equally sympathetic and equally morally complicated, even if it comes at the expense of believability or consistency. Massive spoiler for non-book readers, you have been warned. I'm serious turn back... Based on the pattern so far, Daemon hiring Blood and Cheese behind Rhaenyra's back to alleviate her character of moral wrongdoing seems like a possible scenario. Hopefully the writers mirror F&B in this because this display of ruthlessness from Rhaenyra would go a long way in justifying her attempted assassination of Nettles for allegedley sleeping with Daemon. If not they'll have to make Rhaeneyra ignorant of the assasination plot or justify it by making her think Nettles/Daemon's a traitor. This also makes me curious about how they will portray her incompetent ruling of King's Landing that led to her ouster by the common people if they continue to make her a more sympathetic character. I hope she's not absolved from B&C it's the one thing the writers could do with her character that would really irritate me.
|
|
inherit
331
0
Sept 28, 2023 1:05:25 GMT
5,401
q5tyhj
philosophizing with a hammer
1,830
August 2016
q5tyhj
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
q5tyhj
|
Post by q5tyhj on Oct 25, 2022 22:42:02 GMT
Which is explicitly out of character for her; when Daemon took teenage Rhaenyra to Flea Bottom and they were watching the play, Daemon pointed out that the commoners didn't like her and Rhaenyra retorted that what they want doesn't matter. So now all of a sudden she's some socialist pro-labor activist concerned with the common person's well-being? Why? Rhaenyra doesn't need to be made more sympathetic at this point in the story, she's the chosen heir who has been usurped simply because she's female, and so the initial presumption of favor or sympathy is strongly in her favor.
Otoh, you can understand the writers motivations to justify Aemond and Alicent's actions by inserting really flimsy changes into the story- Vhagar killing Lucerys against Aemond's wishes (as if that hadn't been the reason he was chasing him on dragon-back in the first place), and Alicent only supporting Aegon as king because she misunderstood Viserys talking about the prophecy (as if being his mother, not to mention disliking/distrusting Rhaenyra and Daemon, wasn't motivation enough on its own)- as a way to balance out this asymmetry in which side is more sympathetic... but probably a better way is how its done in the books, where the Blacks become less sympathetic for doing evil shit (like arranging the death of Aegon's son, i.e. the Blood and Cheese incident). But that stuff doesn't come til later, and apparently the writers are really invested in trying to keep the two sides equally sympathetic and equally morally complicated, even if it comes at the expense of believability or consistency. Massive spoiler for non-book readers, you have been warned. I'm serious turn back... Based on the pattern so far, Daemon hiring Blood and Cheese behind Rhaenyra's back to alleviate her character of moral wrongdoing seems like a possible scenario. Hopefully the writers mirror F&B in this because this display of ruthlessness from Rhaenyra would go a long way in justifying her attempted assassination of Nettles for allegedley sleeping with Daemon. If not they'll have to make Rhaeneyra ignorant of the assasination plot or justify it by making her think Nettles/Daemon's a traitor. This also makes me curious about how they will portray her incompetent ruling of King's Landing that led to her ouster by the common people if they continue to make her a more sympathetic character. That's all true, and Fire and Blood is ambiguous about how aware of the specifics of the Blood and Cheese plot Rhaenyra was- it doesn't say explicitly that she's aware of it, but it doesn't explicitly deny that she was aware of it either- all we're told is that she received a message from Daemon (who was already in Harrenhal at this point in the story in the books) saying something to the effect of "a son for a son, Lucerys will be avenged", and so it didn't specify if it was going to be Aegon's son, rather than, say, Aegon himself (since he is Alicent's son). So its totally plausible that that's a change they could make, in this ongoing quest to make sure everyone is equally sympathetic and equally morally compromised.
I will point out, though, that Rhaenyra only loses her shit over Daemon being with Nettles after she had suffered several betrayals (and lost several loved ones) and had basically lost her mind from fear and paranoia- for a while after Rhaenyra and Daemon were married and were together in King's Landing, Daemon was sleeping around (including still hooking up with Mysaria) and Rhaenyra was not only aware of it but was OK with it, and may have even explicitly given him permission.
So why would she be OK with Daemon hooking up with prostitutes in Kings Landing, but feel like his relationship with Nettles was somehow over the line? I think the explanation has to be that her views on his infidelity had changed in the meantime, due to the losses and betrayals she had suffered by then.
|
|
inherit
331
0
Sept 28, 2023 1:05:25 GMT
5,401
q5tyhj
philosophizing with a hammer
1,830
August 2016
q5tyhj
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
q5tyhj
|
Post by q5tyhj on Oct 25, 2022 22:58:49 GMT
I'm actually a little puzzled that the show can make such a big point of pre-modern childbirth being very dangerous for women without ever connecting that dot to why succession has traditionally followed the male line. You know, the gender that could semi-reliably create heirs without risking their own lives and potentially just leaving a power vacuum instead in the process. Sure, but on the other hand, the show also (implicitly) makes an argument for the converse: with all the questions of infidelity and parentage raised by Rhaenyra's children with Harwin Strong, especially as it pertains to succession, the fact that motherhood is the only parental relation one can know with certainty also makes a pretty compelling argument for a matrilineal succession.
But either way, the tradition Viserys was breaking in naming Rhaenyra his heir was sexist and arbitrary, so its really hard to regard that as a bad thing (and after all, traditions have to start somewhere, what is traditional now was novel and unusual when it first began). So there's a massive disparity/asymmetry in audience sympathy unavoidably baked into the story at this point (for just about anyone other than MRAs or people with weird/reactionary views on women and women's rights, at any rate), just based on the mere fact that Rhaenyra was the acknowledged and official heir and Aegon wasn't.
And their attempts to mitigate this by giving Alicent additional motivation for backing her son and by making Aemond less responsible for the death of Lucerys are, imo, misguided and ultimately insufficient to balance the scales anyways. The Blacks were always going to be more sympathetic at this point in the show, unless they pretty much re-wrote the entire story. So why not just let it be that way? Especially since this is likely to change in future seasons, with the shady shit the Blacks get up to later on in the story? That's exactly what happened in Game of Thrones/ASOIAF- Jaime and Cersei were pretty obviously and unequivocally villains earlier on in the show/books, but get additional complexity and become more sympathetic (Jaime more so than Cersei, obviously) later on once they become viewpoint characters and we finally see things from their perspective. So why not do the same with the Greens?
|
|
inherit
113
0
8,424
Hier0phant
3,795
August 2016
hier0phant
|
Post by Hier0phant on Oct 26, 2022 0:35:04 GMT
Massive spoiler for non-book readers, you have been warned. I'm serious turn back... Based on the pattern so far, Daemon hiring Blood and Cheese behind Rhaenyra's back to alleviate her character of moral wrongdoing seems like a possible scenario. Hopefully the writers mirror F&B in this because this display of ruthlessness from Rhaenyra would go a long way in justifying her attempted assassination of Nettles for allegedley sleeping with Daemon. If not they'll have to make Rhaeneyra ignorant of the assasination plot or justify it by making her think Nettles/Daemon's a traitor. This also makes me curious about how they will portray her incompetent ruling of King's Landing that led to her ouster by the common people if they continue to make her a more sympathetic character. That's all true, and Fire and Blood is ambiguous about how aware of the specifics of the Blood and Cheese plot Rhaenyra was- it doesn't say explicitly that she's aware of it, but it doesn't explicitly deny that she was aware of it either- all we're told is that she received a message from Daemon (who was already in Harrenhal at this point in the story in the books) saying something to the effect of "a son for a son, Lucerys will be avenged", and so it didn't specify if it was going to be Aegon's son, rather than, say, Aegon himself (since he is Alicent's son). So its totally plausible that that's a change they could make, in this ongoing quest to make sure everyone is equally sympathetic and equally morally compromised.
I will point out, though, that Rhaenyra only loses her shit over Daemon being with Nettles after she had suffered several betrayals (and lost several loved ones) and had basically lost her mind from fear and paranoia- for a while after Rhaenyra and Daemon were married and were together in King's Landing, Daemon was sleeping around (including still hooking up with Mysaria) and Rhaenyra was not only aware of it but was OK with it, and may have even explicitly given him permission.
So why would she be OK with Daemon hooking up with prostitutes in Kings Landing, but feel like his relationship with Nettles was somehow over the line? I think the explanation has to be that her views on his infidelity had changed in the meantime, due to the losses and betrayals she had suffered by then. Rhaenyra knew what Daemon intended even though she didn't know the specifics of his plot, and there was no mention of her being conflicted or remorseful. If the writers maintain course with her character she'll be like "Oh noes Daemon i didn't want another mother to suffer the loss a child too oh cruel world, boo hoo." Hopefully i'm wrong about this potentially happening. Mind you i don't dislike Rhaenyra but her being made out to be an empathetic pacifist woobie flies in the face of her character.
I do agree about Rhaenyra's paranoia but it's self inflicted and she should have seen the betrayals coming after she ignored Daemon's recommendations for rewards in response to Ulf's, and Hammer's heroics on multiple occasions. She denied them lordship over enemy kingdoms like Storm's End and marriages to ladies of established houses while only granting them simple knighthood. These guys were the backbone of her war effort and were responsible for major victories. Prince Daeron who they defected to was less than half of her age but he had the foresight to reward them with titles in order to secure their loyalty. This isn't all on her because she took Corlys' (Ned Stark lite) and Mysaria's advice over Daemon's while her father just didn't properly prep her for the throne despite her being his declared heir.
|
|
Noxluxe
N4
  
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
Posts: 1,921 Likes: 3,315
inherit
10359
0
Mar 14, 2019 16:10:11 GMT
3,315
Noxluxe
1,921
Jul 21, 2018 23:55:09 GMT
July 2018
noxluxe
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR
|
Post by Noxluxe on Oct 26, 2022 0:43:22 GMT
Sure, but on the other hand, the show also (implicitly) makes an argument for the converse: with all the questions of infidelity and parentage raised by Rhaenyra's children with Harwin Strong, especially as it pertains to succession, the fact that motherhood is the only parental relation one can know with certainty also makes a pretty compelling argument for a matrilineal succession. Nah. Remember, it's comparatively easy for a man of any serious means (and therefore resources at stake upon his death, inviting conflict) to control a medieval woman's body, which other men she's in contact with, where she goes and what she's allowed to do.  A bit harder to make her promise to survive childbirth just because the stability of the realm depends on it. Point goes to the patriarchy. At least in terms of staving off war. Not so much on the individual freedom of half the population. But sometimes you just have to prioritize. But either way, the tradition Viserys was breaking in naming Rhaenyra his heir was sexist and arbitrary, so its really hard to regard that as a bad thing (and after all, traditions have to start somewhere, what is traditional now was novel and unusual when it first began). So there's a massive disparity/asymmetry in audience sympathy unavoidably baked into the story at this point (for just about anyone other than MRAs or people with weird/reactionary views on women and women's rights, at any rate), just based on the mere fact that Rhaenyra was the acknowledged and official heir and Aegon wasn't. In the context of a medieval setting, playing around with the succession inherently invites debate and conflict when the time comes to actually act it out, as we see on the show, which puts thousands of lives in jeopardy not just on this occasion but on all future occasions when someone might exploit the precedent you set to undermine a peaceful transfer of power for their own ends. So yeah. Objectively I'd call Viserys bending tradition for Rhaenyra a short-sighted decision even though she seemed like a much better heir than Daemon at the time. In that instance he really didn't have a lot of choice, given the cards he'd been dealt. But not reversing the decision when doing so would streamline the succession again and ensure peace to protect her completely unearned sense of entitlement was really dumb. You're definitely right that a lot of people will probably see the whole issue through that projected 'eeek, sexism victim' lens though, and that that probably accounts for a lot of Rhaenyra's and Rhaenys' popularity at present.
|
|
inherit
331
0
Sept 28, 2023 1:05:25 GMT
5,401
q5tyhj
philosophizing with a hammer
1,830
August 2016
q5tyhj
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda
q5tyhj
|
Post by q5tyhj on Oct 26, 2022 1:44:33 GMT
Rhaenyra knew what Daemon intended even though she didn't know the specifics of his plot, and there was no mention of her being conflicted or remorseful. If the writers maintain course with her character she'll be like "Oh noes Daemon i didn't want another mother to suffer the loss a child too oh cruel world, boo hoo." Hopefully i'm wrong about this potentially happening. Mind you i don't dislike Rhaenyra but her being made out to be an empathetic pacifist woobie flies in the face of her character. I mean, there is a pretty significant moral difference depending on whether the plan was to kill Aegon (who is an adult, or close to it- I forget how old he's supposed to be when Viserys dies and he takes the throne, but I think its around 20 or so) or to kill one of Aegons very young children. But I think you're right that they're having some problems with consistency with Rhaenyra's character/personality. I was actually just thinking about this the other day, about how Rhaenyra doesn't really have any consistent distinguishing character traits- if someone asked me to describe Rhaenyra's personality, I'm not sure what I'd say because her words and actions tend to be all over the place and often mutually-contradictory.
I imagine part of the problem might be that Fire and Blood doesn't say much about Rhaenyra's personality or character until later on in the Dance (compared to other characters, like Daemon or Viserys), where she has become suspicious and vengeful and so forth. So the show writers don't have much to go on, wrt Rhaenyra's character. But I suspect that in future seasons she'll not only be developed more consistently, she'll also just play a smaller role with less screen time overall since new characters will be introduced, and because Rhaenyra was never involved in or present for any of the actual fighting/battles that constituted the Dance.
|
|