Mass Effect Keep

No will not be one because Bio has no interest in carrying over anything that occurred previously...including their own lore.

Yes, I think it's an inevitable solution as people change platform and devices.

Yes, I think they absolutely should implement something like the Dragon Age Keep for the Mass Effect franchise, maybe call it Mass Effect Nexus or something. They plan many games for Andromeda, enough to call it a saga, so having choices transfer would be crucial and great.

I don't like the keep so hope we don't get one for ME:A.
I would prefer something like we got in ME2 and ME3 so you can select the answers in the game.

Regardless of the Keep system, I doubt for their next Mass effect game after Andromeda they'll go with a clean or canon state. It's obvious there'll be a system that will carry the choices made from one game to another. 
I mean, there's  the chance Ryder will be the MC next game as well. There's no way they'll go for a canon set of choices to be carried in following games.

Sure. They will be doing more Andromeda games, and a Keep like system is a good way to have choices carry over with a minimal chance of errors (I'm looking at you, DA:A to DA2 imports) and compatible with a change of platform. It could be improved, sure, but for me it's good enough as is.

But I like turtles too so... :/

I would agree with Iakus in that I think the "Big world-shaking choice" that never amounts to anything is overdone in BioWare and the closest I got to feeling like it mattered was the downplayed Council vs non-council Citadel in ME2. It's all just placeholders and extended scenes with a few more camera angles, sometimes wildly different dialogue but you can always feel how the scenes are just the same as opposed to getting entirely exclusive scenarios or levels based on choices like in Witcher 2 or briefly in DA:I's early sections.

I think they should focus more on making an Alpha Protocol ideally or a KOTOR where the sequels can keep the information about player-character and his world-changing decisions as vague as possible while putting new elements into the spotlight.

On the flipside, importing my character from a previous game or hearing characters recall their history with one-another is sweet and very appealing to me. I just wish we lived in a reality where BioWare could feasibly go all-in about accounting properly for all permutations without also having to design a game for new players. That has proven a couple of times now how it undermines both default continuity and player-made canon, so, yeah, allocate the resources better in the future plz.

Yeah, we'll just get things like:

Save the colony: we meet Bob the new mayor who'll chat with us about how well the place has been doing since you last visited

Didn't save the colony: Meet Not-Bob the mayor of the new attempt to colonize the world who will tell you how well the place is doing since you're new here

I'm hoping that with this "fresh start" they'll re-examine the merits of save transfers and come to realize there's too much baggage involved. Direct sequels work better in action games where you can't really go off the rails of the story. But when you give the player agency, that agency has to be accounted for, and that leads to divergent storylines, which have to be accounted for in any sequels. This is why they can crank out sequel after sequel for Halo (everyone's Master Chief is essentially the same), but why we can't go back to the Milky Way anymore in Mass Effect.[/quote]

Assuming that they plan to make more games after ME:A....then sure, why not?

I think choices should matter in the game where they are made.  If you save a town or let it be destroyed, that should have an impact.  But they should not carry over into other games.  Expecting to see the long-term effects of your decisions is just asking for disappointment, unless you really, really want to meet Bob/Not-Bob.