Remki
N1
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Jade Empire
Posts: 27 Likes: 52
inherit
666
0
Sept 17, 2016 22:45:09 GMT
52
Remki
27
August 2016
remki
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Jade Empire
|
Post by Remki on Aug 8, 2016 10:30:04 GMT
The Episode VII Heroine herself came here to bash Hawkeye! Damn, my secret identity is out! 
|
|
inherit
Darth Dennis
111
0
Jul 27, 2022 16:20:32 GMT
9,146
masterwarderz
8,113
August 2016
mastermasterwarderz
19,824
|
Post by masterwarderz on Aug 8, 2016 11:10:19 GMT
What's it matter? Apparently a lot if Disney is going to steal its material, and like Lucas never mention source, thanks or etc. For that alone I'd call the dismissal of the EU as 'legends' as bullshit.
But it goes further.
Their ripoff of the EU resulted in just a plain bad movie.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
49
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2016 11:13:15 GMT
The Force Awakens is my favorite movie 
|
|
inherit
Darth Dennis
111
0
Jul 27, 2022 16:20:32 GMT
9,146
masterwarderz
8,113
August 2016
mastermasterwarderz
19,824
|
Post by masterwarderz on Aug 8, 2016 11:17:58 GMT
So you said in the first page.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
49
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2016 11:41:32 GMT
So you said in the first page. There needs to be more love for it in this thread Also  And some made Darth Vader barbies boyfriend  ... aka me They would be cute ok 
|
|
inherit
23
0
Oct 29, 2016 15:45:26 GMT
14,886
Crim
3,881
August 2016
crimsonn7
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, Mass Effect Andromeda, Anthem
CrimsonN7
17,287
13,982
|
Post by Crim on Aug 8, 2016 11:49:19 GMT
Don't know if this has been posted yet, but it should be.
|
|
inherit
Darth Dennis
111
0
Jul 27, 2022 16:20:32 GMT
9,146
masterwarderz
8,113
August 2016
mastermasterwarderz
19,824
|
Post by masterwarderz on Aug 8, 2016 12:06:40 GMT
|
|
panda5onix
N2

kawaii assassin
Prime Posts: 1234... o.o
Prime Likes: 1500... a great way to end XD
Posts: 137 Likes: 642
inherit
453
0
642
panda5onix
kawaii assassin
137
August 2016
panda5onix
1234... o.o
1500... a great way to end XD
|
Post by panda5onix on Aug 8, 2016 12:18:06 GMT
And this OT: My fav movie is probably Empire Strike Back  Uhmm I checked out a book store at a museum the other day and was surprised to see some Star Wars children's books. They are really adorable. One is called Vader's Little Princess. I was quite tempted to get them for my friend as a baby shower gift when she decides to have children (her husband is a MASSIVE Star Wars fan) XD
|
|
inherit
Darth Dennis
111
0
Jul 27, 2022 16:20:32 GMT
9,146
masterwarderz
8,113
August 2016
mastermasterwarderz
19,824
|
Post by masterwarderz on Aug 8, 2016 12:25:33 GMT
Hoth has the best quotes of any battle in the EU.
"No one ever complained about the cold on Hoth. We never felt it. Even though we were blinded by blizzards, we could see the final end of the Rebellion in our blaster sights. Was it only a mirage? Perhaps; but on that day, on that planet, our blood ran hot with dreams of victory, melting the ice that stood in our way."
"There is no tomorrow, men. Today, we crush the Rebellion, once and for all." ―Unnamed Imperial officer during the Battle of Hoth
|
|
inherit
265
0
Sept 9, 2023 18:26:36 GMT
11,980
Pounce de León
Praise the Justicat!
7,910
August 2016
catastrophy
caustic_agent
|
Post by Pounce de León on Aug 8, 2016 12:34:59 GMT
After having seen the "Force Awakens" I've given up hope seeing anything decent from that franchise anymore. At least what concerns cinema.
|
|
inherit
118
0
6,166
The Hype Himself
Proud Sponsor of Swingin' Seamen Charter Fishing: My Live Bait Will Catch Your Fish Every Time!
4,023
August 2016
hawkeyegod
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
|
Post by The Hype Himself on Aug 8, 2016 13:01:16 GMT
The Episode VII Heroine herself came here to bash Hawkeye! Hey Rey! You're a god-damn mary-sue and indicative of ev... I better stop before I say something I'll regret here about female protagonists...
|
|
inherit
118
0
6,166
The Hype Himself
Proud Sponsor of Swingin' Seamen Charter Fishing: My Live Bait Will Catch Your Fish Every Time!
4,023
August 2016
hawkeyegod
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
|
Post by The Hype Himself on Aug 8, 2016 13:12:11 GMT
Something else about the new Star Wars? It lacks any sort or subtlety or nuance. Good is good, just cuz, and the same with evil. The EU started doing a great job explaining the underlying philosophy of light versus dark, and how one might be different in perspective or ideology. Maybe I'm weird, but that lack of nuance is exactly why I love the classic Star Wars films, as well as the new one. It's pure fairytale escapism. Heroes vs villains. People running around with space magic and laser swords. WW2 planes in space. The whole thing is utterly stupid, but it doesn't matter cos it's fun. Adding "depth" and "nuance" to it, explaining why and how things in the setting work, trying to develop the vague concepts behind the "philosophies" and so on doesn't work for me. All doing those kinda things achieve is to break the illusion and make you realise how dumb Star Wars is. That's not so say I don't like things with subtlety and nuance, just that I'd rather not try to shoehorn them into something like Star Wars which was perfectly fine without them. I could not disagree more. I'll be upfront; I don't think the setting is stupid. I wouldn't have bothered with it if I thought it was completely mindless bullshit. It's not fun for any of the reasons you suggest (and in fact, you're making an appeal to the lowest common denominator of entertainment... while implying that I'm stupid for wanting to go in depth over something inherently 'dumb'). What it does imply is that there can't be any complexity since there isn't any to be had over the entire franchise, and that simply isn't true. What the expansions do is look at the universe through a different lens, a different interpretation. Who is hero, and who is the villain? Honestly, in many cases, I'd wager that there are no real heroes at all, though certainly megalomanial forces at play to be resisted. The whole sentiment I disagree with as well as it makes the appeal of 'it doesn't need complexity because it's all inherently stupid'. Would you apply that to any other Sci-fi? I'm going by your sentiment and suggesting yes. Would you say that any sci-fi by Terry Pratchett, or Arthur C. Clarke, or Isaac Asimov, or Neil Gaiman is, at their core stupid escapist fantasy? If no, then you'll realize why I went the extra mile for Star Wars. If yes, then we have nothing more to talk about. We wouldn't see eye to eye at all, and its useless making any more posts aimed at the other over what we perceive as drivel.
|
|
inherit
118
0
6,166
The Hype Himself
Proud Sponsor of Swingin' Seamen Charter Fishing: My Live Bait Will Catch Your Fish Every Time!
4,023
August 2016
hawkeyegod
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
|
Post by The Hype Himself on Aug 8, 2016 13:57:11 GMT
So much good was lost when they got rid of the EU. So much work and art that will ultimately amount to jack shit. ... To me, Episodes VII, VIII, and IX will always be the Thrawn Trilogy. Why does it end up amounting to "jack shit" though? I'm genuinely curious. So many people seem to draw a line between the EU/old canon and the new stuff. As if having one means you can't have the other. But the new canon doesn't go back and destroy anything-- those books, games, shows, etc. are still there, they're still going to be read and recommended to people, they're still going to be used in forming the experiences and meta of fans for decades to come. In my experience, "canon" and "non-canon" mean very little to 90% of any given audience base no matter what the fandom, and the presiding factor is whether or not they enjoy something rather than if it is wholly sanctioned by the current IP holder. So I honestly fail to understand the depth of the vitrol that seems to come with the disengagement of the EU from current franchise canon. I mean, I've been a massive KOTOR fan for ages but Karpyshyn's books for Revan were/are "canon" and I can't stand them at all-- doesn't ruin my experience of the KOTOR games though. Why does this title change (from canon to non-canon) somehow ruin the work done before it for fans and creators? I personally don't think it does but I'd like to see a better explanation than the emotional "they're changing things and I don't like it" response I've mostly seen up until now. Also I'm just almost done with the Thrawn trilogy. It's OK, but I honestly feel like it was overhyped to me, I don't see how it's supposedly groundbreaking in the EU, it feels like pretty standard mass paperback scifi fare to me, just with a Star Wars skin on it. I do love Karrde tho, I could probably read an entire series just about the exploits of him & his smuggler band. In case the icon doesn't give it away, I really enjoyed the new movie and am looking forward to Rogue One. I've been a fan of SW since I first watched my grandma's bootleg VHS tapes when I was 5. I never really felt like the new movie and the old ones were competing for which one was better-- the original trilogy has a lot of flaws, so does the new one, but I personally just enjoy it for what it is: another chance to live momentarily in a universe I really love. If its not to someone else's tastes, that's fine. Just don't really understand the depth of the negativity I've seen towards it and the fans that like it *shrugs* Because it gets set aside creatively by the franchise powers-that-be and no longer has any bearing on the plot. As I've said before, the movies were always secondary to my experience with the Universe. To me, the heart and soul of the series was in the universe, and its vast, different, and complex interpretations from various points of view that showed just how big the galaxy far, far away really is. And yes, the new canon COMPLETELY AND UTTERLY destroys every bit of canon post-Episode III. How much of the EU was left intact after Return of the Jedi? None of it! Seriously, tell me which parts of the EU were kept intact without being picked and clawed at like some vulture chewing on carrion. For that matter, how far back does the retroactive purge go? How much more in the past doesn't make the cut? Stories exist to make sense. They exist to follow a lineage set to make internal consistency within themselves, and when they can't develop or keep that consistency (especially after so much development), they lose their value. It sets aside characters, stories, events, and lore that were developed over decades of work for new characters and events of which we had no bearing or knowledge before. It takes away the purpose of the story, the exposition that it will lead somewhere, and changes it into a direction of 'but it all didn't really happen at all'. I'm not a fan of the changing of an entire universe. To you, it might be a momentary chance to live in universe you love. To me, it's not even the same universe. I've lost my connection to that universe. I have no involvement or love for it anymore, since what I have nobody I identify with anymore. All of what I like is little more than fanfiction. I don't follow 'unofficial' stories. There's no truth in them, nothing to be gleaned from the universe since the rules it was written under no longer apply. The breakthroughs, insights, developments, and changes that are brought about by the book don't have anymore but the esoteric of the esoteric value (which isn't substantial to me). By the way, they actually aren't going to be there for decades. Disney has stated that as they release each wave of novels of theirs, they're slowly going to retract the number of Legends content available and phase it out of service. Also, any non-Legends book has already been pulled (like table-top games, comics, etc). A last thing on this issue: You know something? I really think they could have continued the Legends books. They could have let that series run on its own as a 'non-canon' continuation of the old EU. The cost of making/commissioning a work isn't as expensive as one might imagine. In fact, there's even been an idea to make a series e-read only to save on material resources (getting even more returns back). I'd be fine if they continued the old universe in the shadow of their new one. They'd make a healthy buck, and they wouldn't lose a 'fan'. But instead of letting it go, run it's course, maybe quietly fade out of existence, they just stopped it in the middle of its tracks, and it was setting up for some particularly big plots to come, in the comics, post-war era, and events in the past (far past, at the formation of the Jedi order). Suffice to say, we fans of the EU didn't get any closure. We didn't get an apology, or an end to existing plots, or something to allow us to reconcile everything from the old to the new. We just got left in the dirt. As for the Thrawn trilogy, that's fine. Maybe I'm seeing through rose-tinted glasses, but I also appreciate a developing story or strategem such as how the Thrawn trilogy played out (which is ironic because prior to the cancellation of the EU, I always thought the trilogy was overrated.) Things weren't rushed. They took their time to grow and develop, and we were introduced to new characters that had complex motivations and developments. Thrawn gave us an Imperial villain who wasn't just another space-Nazi madman. He, and Gilad Pellaeon gave us a look at an Empire that might not be a bad place to live, and showed that not everyone or everything involved with the Empire was inherently evil or malicious. We had Talon Karrde, as you say, a complex man who toes the knife edge of intergalactic crime boss and legitimate businessman who's loyalties and values are always in question (is he just another mercenary/smuggler looking for a credit without a care for the balance of galactic power, or does he have some further agenda that we don't know about? Is that agenda benevolent, or is it self-serving?) We had Mara Jade, a woman who has a serious issue with Luke Skywalker, and for a time back in the 90's, a big question was whether or not Luke was going to survive the trilogy (they hinted heavily at his death, which if you've read the trilogy, you know what happens), and what role she had to play in his life and possible death. We were realistically introduced to the next generation, with the birth of Han and Leia's twins, Jacen and Jaina (both of whom are leaps and bounds better characters than Kylo and Rey, unless of course you're one the 'WOO GIRL POWUH!' fans of Rey). Episode VII just plain sucked: Rey was a mary-sue, Kylo was a whiny-emo kid, the Empire was regressed to be an lol-evil group of space supremacists (I can't say white human male supremacists, which is what they were in the EU and books (seriously, no females were really allowed in the Empire save for Daala, and they make a particular plot out of that.)) They just make a rehash of episode IV, and then Disney turns to make the series into an annual cash-cow franchise like Marvel. How long until they release 2 or 3 movies a year?
|
|
inherit
60
0
628
Warrick
454
August 2016
warrick
|
Post by Warrick on Aug 8, 2016 14:11:27 GMT
After having seen the "Force Awakens" I've given up hope seeing anything decent from that franchise anymore. At least what concerns cinema. Ewoks are the epitome of cinematography, with that battlefield scene where a furry knocks out an armoured soldier by throwing a stone at him rivaling those in The Bridge on the River Kwai and Battleship Potemkin.
|
|
inherit
265
0
Sept 9, 2023 18:26:36 GMT
11,980
Pounce de León
Praise the Justicat!
7,910
August 2016
catastrophy
caustic_agent
|
Post by Pounce de León on Aug 8, 2016 14:24:18 GMT
After having seen the "Force Awakens" I've given up hope seeing anything decent from that franchise anymore. At least what concerns cinema. Ewoks are the epitome of cinematography, with that battlefield scene where a furry knocks out an armoured soldier by throwing a stone at him rivaling those in The Bridge on the River Kwai and Battleship Potemkin. Pretty silly, isn't it. But it's small scale stuff. David - Goliath material. And tbh: That armour is just for show anyway. Force Awakens takes it just a tad too far with - no not a death star battlestation - now it's a whole death planetary body. After a point, grandeur just becomes unbelievable. Especially when some splinter group tops the efforts of a galactic imperium with some plot device. Yes, there were no gungans and it wasn't a fucking kid story wasting a whole episode, I'll give credit for that. But how you gonna top that? Hurling suns through the galaxy? Mr Villain physically eating the galaxy?
|
|
inherit
Darth Dennis
111
0
Jul 27, 2022 16:20:32 GMT
9,146
masterwarderz
8,113
August 2016
mastermasterwarderz
19,824
|
Post by masterwarderz on Aug 8, 2016 14:27:47 GMT
._. The Empire had plenty of women in it.
Just not in largely visible capacities like a frigging Admiral.
Half of the most powerful people in the Empire though, officially or unofficially were women though, hell post Endor you had Ysanne Isard basically acting as Regent post Sate Prestige's assassination(which she orchestrated) Sure the Imperial Navy was a boy's club but that isn't to say you didn't have important women.
o_o Sure there weren't any female Grand Admirals but those positions were booked up as soon as the rank was made.
Which reminds me.
The EU also had a Grand General, dude was a bad ass turning Coruscant into fucking Stalingrad for the Rebels during their attempted seizure of the Imperial Center.
|
|
inherit
550
0
1,258
Teabaggin Krogan
365
August 2016
teabagginkrogan
|
Post by Teabaggin Krogan on Aug 8, 2016 14:37:29 GMT
Maybe I'm weird, but that lack of nuance is exactly why I love the classic Star Wars films, as well as the new one. It's pure fairytale escapism. Heroes vs villains. People running around with space magic and laser swords. WW2 planes in space. The whole thing is utterly stupid, but it doesn't matter cos it's fun. Adding "depth" and "nuance" to it, explaining why and how things in the setting work, trying to develop the vague concepts behind the "philosophies" and so on doesn't work for me. All doing those kinda things achieve is to break the illusion and make you realise how dumb Star Wars is. That's not so say I don't like things with subtlety and nuance, just that I'd rather not try to shoehorn them into something like Star Wars which was perfectly fine without them. I could not disagree more. I'll be upfront; I don't think the setting is stupid. I wouldn't have bothered with it if I thought it was completely mindless bullshit. It's not fun for any of the reasons you suggest (and in fact, you're making an appeal to the lowest common denominator of entertainment... while implying that I'm stupid for wanting to go in depth over something inherently 'dumb'). What it does imply is that there can't be any complexity since there isn't any to be had over the entire franchise, and that simply isn't true. What the expansions do is look at the universe through a different lens, a different interpretation. Who is hero, and who is the villain? Honestly, in many cases, I'd wager that there are no real heroes at all, though certainly megalomanial forces at play to be resisted. The whole sentiment I disagree with as well as it makes the appeal of 'it doesn't need complexity because it's all inherently stupid'. Would you apply that to any other Sci-fi? I'm going by your sentiment and suggesting yes. Would you say that any sci-fi by Terry Pratchett, or Arthur C. Clarke, or Isaac Asimov, or Neil Gaiman is, at their core stupid escapist fantasy? If no, then you'll realize why I went the extra mile for Star Wars. If yes, then we have nothing more to talk about. We wouldn't see eye to eye at all, and its useless making any more posts aimed at the other over what we perceive as drivel.  It's subjective dude, just because someone considers something stupid doesn't mean that it is inherently moronic. To quote someone, a thing is a thing, not what is said of that thing. People appreciate and find value in things differently especially in something as subjective as art or entertainment. I might not laugh at the same jokes as you do but that doesn't make the joke bad now does it? Also star wars isn't exactly sci-fi, it's more of a fantasy setting mixed with some cool space stuff Imo. So to compare it to the likes of Isaac Asimov or Arthur C. Clarke is kinda weird in that their works are different and have different aims.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Deleted
inherit
guest@proboards.com
49
0
Deleted
0
January 1970
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2016 14:48:59 GMT
I think my only complaint about The Force Awakens is C3PO and R2D2... ... I found them cheesy and kinda... like they shouldnt be there in a way??? I mean cheesy things always happen in star wars thats ok but their dialogue was very... um... weird... fake-sounding in a way... I think it would have been better without them in it 
|
|
inherit
60
0
628
Warrick
454
August 2016
warrick
|
Post by Warrick on Aug 8, 2016 14:50:22 GMT
I wrote some impressions about episode VII after leaving the cinema. Pasting them here: Last night I went with a friend to see the new star wars movie. I will now talk about it in depth because I'm that big of a nerd. First, a note on the series in general: Star Wars is space adventures for the whole family. It contains values for children. Good versus evil. Sorting out differences to overcome obstacles. The Force is faith. Or, if you're not religious (Lucas is), trust and confidence. Or love. Whatever you believe we all share and brings us together, that's what the Force represents. And yes, the Empire are simply Space Nazis. They still are here. With this standard in mind, the new movie is definitely Star Wars.
I think the new main characters are the best thing about the movie. Rey, Finn, and Ren are all multi-layered characters and there is chemistry between them. They look good together and interact in interesting ways. They often play with tropes and subvert them, the dialogue is tight. I like these people.
Rey is blunt as it corresponds to a loner from a desert who yanks parts off abandoned ships for a living. Still she longs for something else. We see this in a moment when she puts on a pilot's helmet. She fantasizes about the events of the old trilogy, which are legendary a generation later. She also has unlikely beliefs keeping her stuck on the desert planet. A parallel with Luke.
Finn is a wimp with a strong sense of responsibility. A weak hero. Indeed, he loses every single fight he takes part in because he goes up against people with superior skills and training. Esentially he's just a normal guy like us. He can tell right from wrong but has no superpowers or any kind of special training. I find him compelling and easy to identify with.
(Something nice about Rey and Finn is that they become friends with no hint of romance. I think it's refreshing, to see a young man and a young woman being good friends. It's possible! For example, during an attack by the Space Nazis, they're separated and each one sees the other getting captured. In 99% of movies, they would have kissed when they meet again. Here, they hug. That's highly unusual and very cool.)
Kylo Ren is an edgy teenager. A brat who wants to look hardcore in front of his friends but secretly cries watching The Sound of Music. His idol is uber badass Darth Vader so he made himself a similar mask to look like a badass. Sometimes he pulls it off. But he's not quite there yet. He's very insecure, unstable, and easy to manipulate. Like a teenager basically. His sword has a nice detail in it that the blade is unstable, like him. Nice touch.
That's that for the characters. Now, we must talk about nostalgia. Everything old in this movie adds little value. This includes the Millennium Falcon, Han Solo, Chewbacca, Leia, and the new Death's Star. In my opinion, the only old thing that should have appeared in the movie is Luke's sword. Rey's discovery would have had more impact that way. But since the movie has been bombarding us with "LOOK, REMEMBER THIS? YOU LIKE THIS, RIGHT? THIS IS VERY STARWARSY. AND WHAT ABOUT THIS? COOL HUH?", we kinda expect it.
Also I found the action boring, but then I always find the action boring in movies (except for the fight scene in the Godfather, which is hysterical). The scene with Han and the alien octopus monster things are a waste of time. Other than that, nothing wrong with it. Planes flight around, things explode, etc. Blowing up the Death's Star this time lacks the tension of the original, when an extremely precise shot was required. This time they shoot it in a very large weak point until it explodes. Ok.
In terms of plot, this movie plays it safe by pretty much repeating the plot of the original movie. Nothing new here.
Overall, I think the characters have passed the test and they can be trusted to carry the torch of Star Wars so we don't need to rely so heavily on nostalgia. I hope the next movie develops a new plot we haven't seen before while maintaining the good chemistry between these three main characters.
|
|
inherit
118
0
6,166
The Hype Himself
Proud Sponsor of Swingin' Seamen Charter Fishing: My Live Bait Will Catch Your Fish Every Time!
4,023
August 2016
hawkeyegod
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
|
Post by The Hype Himself on Aug 8, 2016 14:56:18 GMT
I could not disagree more. I'll be upfront; I don't think the setting is stupid. I wouldn't have bothered with it if I thought it was completely mindless bullshit. It's not fun for any of the reasons you suggest (and in fact, you're making an appeal to the lowest common denominator of entertainment... while implying that I'm stupid for wanting to go in depth over something inherently 'dumb'). What it does imply is that there can't be any complexity since there isn't any to be had over the entire franchise, and that simply isn't true. What the expansions do is look at the universe through a different lens, a different interpretation. Who is hero, and who is the villain? Honestly, in many cases, I'd wager that there are no real heroes at all, though certainly megalomanial forces at play to be resisted. The whole sentiment I disagree with as well as it makes the appeal of 'it doesn't need complexity because it's all inherently stupid'. Would you apply that to any other Sci-fi? I'm going by your sentiment and suggesting yes. Would you say that any sci-fi by Terry Pratchett, or Arthur C. Clarke, or Isaac Asimov, or Neil Gaiman is, at their core stupid escapist fantasy? If no, then you'll realize why I went the extra mile for Star Wars. If yes, then we have nothing more to talk about. We wouldn't see eye to eye at all, and its useless making any more posts aimed at the other over what we perceive as drivel. It's subjective dude, just because someone considers something stupid doesn't mean that it is inherently moronic. To quote someone, a thing is a thing, not what is said of that thing. People appreciate and find value in things differently especially in something as subjective as art or entertainment. I might not laugh at the same jokes as you do but that doesn't make the joke bad now does it? Also star wars isn't exactly sci-fi, it's more of a fantasy setting mixed with some cool space stuff Imo. So to compare it to the likes of Isaac Asimov or Arthur C. Clarke is kinda weird in that their works are different and have different aims. That's exactly my point, it is subjective. The sentiment I was stating was that this person was implying that it was inherently moronic, and I was calling said person out on expressing the same sentiment you're accusing me of. That's art, no? The stories are different within each other, making any inherent comparison nil - to which I was never doing. Space Fantasy, Sci-fi lite, whatever you want to call it, my point is that the quoted person is making a claim that there is no need for any kind of internal literary/thematic development, or expansion of the lore. You're getting hung up on a semantic value. I'm stating that said person quoted is trying to inherently trivialize the subject.
|
|
inherit
Darth Dennis
111
0
Jul 27, 2022 16:20:32 GMT
9,146
masterwarderz
8,113
August 2016
mastermasterwarderz
19,824
|
Post by masterwarderz on Aug 8, 2016 14:59:25 GMT
|
|
inherit
118
0
6,166
The Hype Himself
Proud Sponsor of Swingin' Seamen Charter Fishing: My Live Bait Will Catch Your Fish Every Time!
4,023
August 2016
hawkeyegod
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
|
Post by The Hype Himself on Aug 8, 2016 14:59:53 GMT
I wrote some impressions about episode VII after leaving the cinema. Pasting them here: Last night I went with a friend to see the new star wars movie. I will now talk about it in depth because I'm that big of a nerd. SPOILERS FOR STAR WARS! First, a note on the series in general: Star Wars is space adventures for the whole family. It contains values for children. Good versus evil. Sorting out differences to overcome obstacles. The Force is faith. Or, if you're not religious (Lucas is), trust and confidence. Or love. Whatever you believe we all share and brings us together, that's what the Force represents. And yes, the Empire are simply Space Nazis. They still are here. With this standard in mind, the new movie is definitely Star Wars.
I think the new main characters are the best thing about the movie. Rey, Finn, and Ren are all multi-layered characters and there is chemistry between them. They look good together and interact in interesting ways. They often play with tropes and subvert them, the dialogue is tight. I like these people.
Rey is blunt as it corresponds to a loner from a desert who yanks parts off abandoned ships for a living. Still she longs for something else. We see this in a moment when she puts on a pilot's helmet. She fantasizes about the events of the old trilogy, which are legendary a generation later. She also has unlikely beliefs keeping her stuck on the desert planet. A parallel with Luke.
Finn is a wimp with a strong sense of responsibility. A weak hero. Indeed, he loses every single fight he takes part in because he goes up against people with superior skills and training. Esentially he's just a normal guy like us. He can tell right from wrong but has no superpowers or any kind of special training. I find him compelling and easy to identify with.
(Something nice about Rey and Finn is that they become friends with no hint of romance. I think it's refreshing, to see a young man and a young woman being good friends. It's possible! For example, during an attack by the Space Nazis, they're separated and each one sees the other getting captured. In 99% of movies, they would have kissed when they meet again. Here, they hug. That's highly unusual and very cool.)
Kylo Ren is an edgy teenager. A brat who wants to look hardcore in front of his friends but secretly cries watching The Sound of Music. His idol is uber badass Darth Vader so he made himself a similar mask to look like a badass. Sometimes he pulls it off. But he's not quite there yet. He's very insecure, unstable, and easy to manipulate. Like a teenager basically. His sword has a nice detail in it that the blade is unstable, like him. Nice touch.
That's that for the characters. Now, we must talk about nostalgia. Everything old in this movie adds little value. This includes the Millennium Falcon, Han Solo, Chewbacca, Leia, and the new Death's Star. In my opinion, the only old thing that should have appeared in the movie is Luke's sword. Rey's discovery would have had more impact that way. But since the movie has been bombarding us with "LOOK, REMEMBER THIS? YOU LIKE THIS, RIGHT? THIS IS VERY STARWARSY. AND WHAT ABOUT THIS? COOL HUH?", we kinda expect it.
Also I found the action boring, but then I always find the action boring in movies (except for the fight scene in the Godfather, which is hysterical). The scene with Han and the alien octopus monster things are a waste of time. Other than that, nothing wrong with it. Planes flight around, things explode, etc. Blowing up the Death's Star this time lacks the tension of the original, when an extremely precise shot was required. This time they shoot it in a very large weak point until it explodes. Ok.
In terms of plot, this movie plays it safe by pretty much repeating the plot of the original movie. Nothing new here.
Overall, I think the characters have passed the test and they can be trusted to carry the torch of Star Wars so we don't need to rely so heavily on nostalgia. I hope the next movie develops a new plot we haven't seen before while maintaining the good chemistry between these three main characters. It would help for spoilers if you put a spoiler tag on here.
|
|
inherit
Darth Dennis
111
0
Jul 27, 2022 16:20:32 GMT
9,146
masterwarderz
8,113
August 2016
mastermasterwarderz
19,824
|
Post by masterwarderz on Aug 8, 2016 15:00:50 GMT
|
|
inherit
Psi-Cop
38
0
Feb 21, 2019 15:55:45 GMT
10,231
CrutchCricket
The Emperor Daft Serious
4,577
August 2016
crutchcricket
CrutchCricket
Mass Effect Trilogy
|
Post by CrutchCricket on Aug 8, 2016 15:05:58 GMT
To add to HawkeyeGod's point, part of the specialness of the Star Wars EU was its single continuity. Three decades of works from books, to comics to games created an entire universe with over 5000 years of history. It was a living, breathing thing, almost as intricate as real history. Star Wars had evolved so far past a simple trilogy or two it wasn't even funny. When he sold out George Lucas was once quoted as saying "it's time Star Wars grows beyond me". But what he failed to realize to all our dismay was that it already had. No franchise since has ever had such a massive, cohesive universe span decades and across so many forms of media and who knows if another will ever rise again?
It's not like comics you understand, where reboots and remakes are the rule. Comic universe have pretty much written everything off as alternate universes and that works great for them. There's so many version of the characters that none ever get overwritten or invalidated. Ultimate Spiderman doesn't erase 616 Spiderman or any other Spiderman. You just pick the one you like and there you go.
But that's not what Star Wars is, it never was. Star Wars was a (mostly) consistent whole, filled with characters, that lived in the world and made an impact that could be felt years or even centuries down the line.
And in one fell swoop Disney nuked the whole thing and has unceasingly gave fans of it the finger. The loss of what I described above would be met with sadness. But here is where the rage and yes, hatred come in. Disney fucked us for absolutely no goddamn reason. None of the reason they give or you could come up would explain their actions and the extent to which they scorched the earth.
-creative freedom: No. 1. There is precedent for movies overwriting canon set up by other media. Anything George Lucas put in a movie was gospel, the rest of the EU had to adapt to his word. 2. That doesn't explain EU works that are not in the period they want to write in (i.e. Post ROTJ) being nuked, like everything in the Old Republic era, the prequel era or basically anything that's not post Jedi.
-licensing concerns: No, they already own all the licensing
-new vision incompatible with EU: No, since they're constantly ripping off the EU and changing what they take to suck more. Also, what's their big vision so far? Reproduce the original trilogy? How is that not compatible with the EU lol?
-Money: No. producing EU media is a fraction of the cost that making movies incurrs.
-EU is a small fanbase: and?? Sure if you had to write them off, it wouldn't be as big an impact but even if you're pissing off a negligible number of fans, why piss them off if you don't have to?
The extent to which they've gone out of their way to tear up everything EU is almost phyiscally sickening. And what tips it over the edge is that it really didn't have to be this way.
|
|
inherit
550
0
1,258
Teabaggin Krogan
365
August 2016
teabagginkrogan
|
Post by Teabaggin Krogan on Aug 8, 2016 15:37:10 GMT
It's subjective dude, just because someone considers something stupid doesn't mean that it is inherently moronic. To quote someone, a thing is a thing, not what is said of that thing. People appreciate and find value in things differently especially in something as subjective as art or entertainment. I might not laugh at the same jokes as you do but that doesn't make the joke bad now does it? Also star wars isn't exactly sci-fi, it's more of a fantasy setting mixed with some cool space stuff Imo. So to compare it to the likes of Isaac Asimov or Arthur C. Clarke is kinda weird in that their works are different and have different aims. That's exactly my point, it is subjective. The sentiment I was stating was that this person was implying that it was inherently moronic, and I was calling said person out on expressing the same sentiment you're accusing me of. That's art, no? The stories are different within each other, making any inherent comparison nil - to which I was never doing. Space Fantasy, Sci-fi lite, whatever you want to call it, my point is that the quoted person is making a claim that there is no need for any kind of internal literary/thematic development, or expansion of the lore. You're getting hung up on a semantic value. I'm stating that said person quoted is trying to inherently trivialize the subject. Then why does it matter at all because if you do believe it is subjective, then you're both equally valid in your evaluation of the issue. Why call out his statement when it doesn't really matter because it's so dependent on the viewer's interpretation? My point being that he's perfectly valid to think that star wars is stupid because it is subject to his view or "taste" on the matter. Also from what I understand, I didn't feel like he was inherently trivializing the subject, as I felt his point about space magic, planes in space etc to be rather accurate. But that doesn't mean that star wars is any less off because of it, rather that it is a different kinda setting aimed at a different outcome. And yes, it does make a whole lot of difference when you're comparing a fantasy to a sci-fi setting because it's a difference of genres that goes beyond the stories being simply different to each other that runs through the core of how the author tells the story and sets up the universe. That'd be like saying the Need for speed games are the same as driving simulators like Gran Turismo when there's a world of difference between the two.
|
|