Do you think all dialogue will initiate cutscenes?

Nah, the problem I have with that split between cinematics and non-cinematics is that I sometimes felt DA:I was a 2-in-1 kind of game. You had your Bethesda wannabe open-world exploration game with bad quests and static environments and static conversations and then you had the BioWare game with a very short and too linear main plot and cinematics and I guess the companion content is an even split between those two. It felt like two games in one to me and the game lacked focus because of it.

I guess, to be fair, I'm still happy that the main critical path felt more important than the other content (despite spending only a third of the time on it) as opposed to the main quest just feeling like another side-quest in Skyrim. I'd rather just have a really good main path with smaller open-area enviornments within and branching paths like ME1/DA:O/Witcher3 style where each main story area is semi-open and allows for various story-outcomes. Basically that's what bothered me about DA:I and what they're saying about ME:A. The open-world areas could've each been main mission areas you had to beat the main questlines within to beat the game, and doing so would contribute to the development of the main story, but instead it's just all optional and unimportant. It can expand and deepen your understanding of the main narrative by learning about the Venatori, Red Templars and stuff, but it never develops the main arc, neither the antagonist nor protagonist. It's all segregated between "optional (50~ hours)/Companions (10~hours)/Critical path (10 hours~)", which makes it lame.