inherit
3756
0
Mar 21, 2017 17:37:10 GMT
10
spookyfoxmu1der
7
Feb 22, 2017 17:22:27 GMT
February 2017
spookyfoxmu1der
|
Post by spookyfoxmu1der on Feb 23, 2017 18:18:38 GMT
From the articles I have read, it looks like the PS4 Pro game will still be locked at 30 fps. Has anyone heard any details as to what exactly is being added to the PS4 Pro besides upscaled 4k and better anti ailiasing?
I am on the fence about which console to get this for. I enjoy playing games on the Xbox One S and most of my friends are getting the game for the Xbox as well. I do also enjoy getting RPG's for the Xbox because I like achievement hunting and I do not care much for Trophies for some reason. However, I do have a PS4 Pro and a 4k TV. All the footage we have seen is from the PC at 60 fps.
I'm looking for some details that might push me to get it on the PS4 Pro instead of the Xbox besides just crisper lines. Does anyone have any details as to better effects or textures or fps for the PS4 Pro?
|
|
inherit
2509
0
Apr 16, 2017 11:03:16 GMT
1,411
missileglitcher
710
Dec 30, 2016 16:49:04 GMT
December 2016
missileglitcher
|
Post by missileglitcher on Feb 23, 2017 18:42:52 GMT
the highest resolution that the ps4 can output is 1080p.
the 30 fps cap is only a theoretical cap. in reality, the average frame rate will hover around the 15 fps mark with regular dips into the single digits. consoles are nothing more than garbage. brace yourselves for terrible graphics, single digit frame rates, extreme lag and a truly horrendous gaming experience.
|
|
crom
N2
Posts: 79 Likes: 46
inherit
3656
0
Apr 14, 2017 17:41:04 GMT
46
crom
79
Feb 19, 2017 17:55:55 GMT
February 2017
crom
|
Post by crom on Feb 23, 2017 18:47:11 GMT
From my understanding on the pro it will be upscaled and have hdr, so it will look very well on the proper tv. Until they actually release all the pretty graphics details for all platforms we are in the dark. Im suspecting the pc side of house will come out of hiding next week with the release of the 1080ti from nvidia. Or not
ps dont listen to the snowflakes above they just want to cry and make other people feel bad its evidently the new cool thing kids do these days.
|
|
TaliWhacker
N3
Negative, I am a Meat Popsicle.
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age Inquistion, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
Posts: 412 Likes: 633
inherit
3126
0
633
TaliWhacker
Negative, I am a Meat Popsicle.
412
January 2017
taliwhacker
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age Inquistion, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
|
Post by TaliWhacker on Feb 23, 2017 18:56:42 GMT
the highest resolution that the ps4 can output is 1080p. the 30 fps cap is only a theoretical cap. in reality, the average frame rate will hover around the 15 fps mark with regular dips into the single digits. consoles are nothing more than garbage. brace yourselves for terrible graphics, single digit frame rates, extreme lag and a truly horrendous gaming experience. I don't think I will brace myself for that. Yeah, I'm good.
|
|
MasterJukes
N2
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire
Posts: 108 Likes: 177
inherit
1529
0
177
MasterJukes
108
Sept 10, 2016 15:43:30 GMT
September 2016
punkpumpkin
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire
|
Post by MasterJukes on Feb 23, 2017 19:19:07 GMT
I wouldn't be surprised honestly. Peasant box pro is still peasant box... and Trash4 Pro is still trash and just a proof of how much Sony just wants money and don't care about their fans. Because games like The Last Guardian and Nioh have amazing performances on the Trash4 Pro, but on the regular console which most of the Sony fans own right now have degraded peformance, which just proves how much of an asshole Sony is to their fans, this is going to happen with every single game released to PS4, Horizon Zero Dawn is getting released next week, I ain't going to be surprised to see it running lock at 28-30 FPS on the PlayStation 4 and those who can't afford the Trash4 Pro having to suffer with constant fps drops to even 15-18 FPS. They do this on purpose and it doesn't matter how much updates they release, the performance of the games don't change, I know a girl who had to spend tons of money to get the Ps4 Pro because playing both The Last Guardian and Nioh was IMPOSSIBLE, both games were fucked up on the regular console. P$4 Pro is the greatest waste of money that has been shown up in the last 20 years of gaming, you may want to call it peasant box, but you can't deny the facts that even Digital Foundry (the greatest Sony Fanbitch out there) has shown us... Xbox Scorpio is light years ahead of the PS4 Pro and can even match High End PC's, while Trash4 Pro performance can't even compare to a low to starter mid-end PC. PC player here btw, and before you call me a Sony Hater... I have a PsOne, Ps2, Ps3 and Ps4 and some of the games made by some Sony studios are amongst the best I have ever played in my entire life. To the OP, if you are worried about graphics... Then build an Ultimate Gaming PC and wait for Star Citizen to be released, because well... Cloud Imperium Games stated themselves: " Neither Ps4 Pro or Xbox Scorpio are strong enough to run this game in medium settings ", but if you're not then choose whatever console it has the exclusive games you like the most, it doesn't matter if it is a PS4 or XBOX ONE, the important thing is to have fun. Some people like spending time playing Uncharted, while others rather be playing Forza Horizon.
|
|
inherit
Korean Supermodel
1
0
1
7,464
Cyonan
2,189
Jul 31, 2016 20:55:30 GMT
July 2016
admin
Cyonan
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire
Cyonan
|
Post by Cyonan on Feb 23, 2017 20:04:38 GMT
The PS4 Pro is going to run at 1800p and use what's called checkerboard rendering. The idea behind that is that it only renders about half the pixels in the image, and then uses that as well as previous frame data to figure out the remainder of the image. The end result is that it takes less resources to do, but image isn't as good as if you were rendering it fully at that resolution.
Given the fact that in true 4k gaming on the PC the only video card that can even think about trying for a stable 60 FPS right now is the Titan X and that alone costs about 3 times as much as the PS4 Pro does, I seriously doubt any console will run the game at higher than 30 FPS.
The PS4 Pro could probably handle 60 FPS @ 1080p, but it seems they wanted to scale up the resolution rather than the framerate for that version of the game.
It will still look nicer than the Xbox One though, which if I remember right is running at 900p/30FPS. Microsoft has claimed the Scorpio when it comes out will be able to handle true 4k but again, I seriously doubt that considering the cost of doing it on PC right now. At best it might manage checkerboard rendering at 30 FPS.
|
|
inherit
3318
0
3,812
Psychevore
1,584
February 2017
psychevore
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
|
Post by Psychevore on Feb 23, 2017 20:12:25 GMT
The PS4 Pro is going to run at 1800p and use what's called checkerboard rendering. The idea behind that is that it only renders about half the pixels in the image, and then uses that as well as previous frame data to figure out the remainder of the image. The end result is that it takes less resources to do, but image isn't as good as if you were rendering it fully at that resolution. Given the fact that in true 4k gaming on the PC the only video card that can even think about trying for a stable 60 FPS right now is the Titan X and that alone costs about 3 times as much as the PS4 Pro does, I seriously doubt any console will run the game at higher than 30 FPS. The PS4 Pro could probably handle 60 FPS @ 1080p, but it seems they wanted to scale up the resolution rather than the framerate for that version of the game. It will still look nicer than the Xbox One though, which if I remember right is running at 900p/30FPS. Microsoft has claimed the Scorpio when it comes out will be able to handle true 4k but again, I seriously doubt that considering the cost of doing it on PC right now. At best it might manage checkerboard rendering at 30 FPS. It's likely things will be tweaked over the course of the first few patches. FFXV ran quite messy at first, especially on the higher graphics mode for the pro. The lite version even had trouble to run at 30 FPS. A few patches later the lite version runs at 60 FPS on the PS4 Pro and the higher graphics version runs smoothly (still at 30 FPS though). If ME:A, like FFXV, allows you to run in normal PS4 mode with 60 FPS over time, that would be great.
|
|
inherit
3657
0
2,378
Revan Reborn
Pathfinder
2,000
Feb 19, 2017 18:14:40 GMT
February 2017
revanreborn
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
Pax_Augusta
Heero the pilot
Pax_Augusta01
|
Post by Revan Reborn on Feb 23, 2017 20:23:15 GMT
The PS4 Pro will have upscaled 4K, which is marginally better looking than 1080p. The real difference is going to be HDR, which the standard PS4 can have patched in as well as the X1 S. As far as performance, it's going to be locked at 30 fps simply because the PS4 Pro isn't capable of running it higher with upscaled 4K.
If Sony was smart they'd sacrifice the upscaled 4K gimmick and just run the game at 1080p with 60 fps (assuming the Pro could actually handle that). Sony loves to try and "impress" by tossing around 4K to make their gimmick seem actually legitimate.
You may as well just play with your friends. Or, get a PC where you can have true, native 4K with way better performance!
|
|
inherit
Korean Supermodel
1
0
1
7,464
Cyonan
2,189
Jul 31, 2016 20:55:30 GMT
July 2016
admin
Cyonan
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire
Cyonan
|
Post by Cyonan on Feb 23, 2017 20:27:51 GMT
The PS4 Pro is going to run at 1800p and use what's called checkerboard rendering. The idea behind that is that it only renders about half the pixels in the image, and then uses that as well as previous frame data to figure out the remainder of the image. The end result is that it takes less resources to do, but image isn't as good as if you were rendering it fully at that resolution. Given the fact that in true 4k gaming on the PC the only video card that can even think about trying for a stable 60 FPS right now is the Titan X and that alone costs about 3 times as much as the PS4 Pro does, I seriously doubt any console will run the game at higher than 30 FPS. The PS4 Pro could probably handle 60 FPS @ 1080p, but it seems they wanted to scale up the resolution rather than the framerate for that version of the game. It will still look nicer than the Xbox One though, which if I remember right is running at 900p/30FPS. Microsoft has claimed the Scorpio when it comes out will be able to handle true 4k but again, I seriously doubt that considering the cost of doing it on PC right now. At best it might manage checkerboard rendering at 30 FPS. It's likely things will be tweaked over the course of the first few patches. FFXV ran quite messy at first, especially on the higher graphics mode for the pro. The lite version even had trouble to run at 30 FPS. A few patches later the lite version runs at 60 FPS on the PS4 Pro and the higher graphics version runs smoothly (still at 30 FPS though). If ME:A, like FFXV, allows you to run in normal PS4 mode with 60 FPS over time, that would be great. Looking at it the lite version of FFXV seems to run at 1080p, which isn't much of a stretch for the PS4 Pro to be able to handle at a decent framerate. Although even then, I'm seeing sites report that they averaged closer to 45 instead of 60. It would be nice if ME:A offered the same lite and high end graphics options so players could choose 1080p for a higher framerate, but so far we haven't seen anything suggesting that they've done that. I was really hoping BioWare would get some help from DICE on optimization, since the Frostbite Engine is their software as well as Battlefield 1 being a pretty well optimized game.
|
|
inherit
3318
0
3,812
Psychevore
1,584
February 2017
psychevore
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
|
Post by Psychevore on Feb 23, 2017 20:35:32 GMT
It's likely things will be tweaked over the course of the first few patches. FFXV ran quite messy at first, especially on the higher graphics mode for the pro. The lite version even had trouble to run at 30 FPS. A few patches later the lite version runs at 60 FPS on the PS4 Pro and the higher graphics version runs smoothly (still at 30 FPS though). If ME:A, like FFXV, allows you to run in normal PS4 mode with 60 FPS over time, that would be great. Looking at it the lite version of FFXV seems to run at 1080p, which isn't much of a stretch for the PS4 Pro to be able to handle at a decent framerate. Although even then, I'm seeing sites report that they averaged closer to 45 instead of 60. It would be nice if ME:A offered the same lite and high end graphics options so players could choose 1080p for a higher framerate, but so far we haven't seen anything suggesting that they've done that. I was really hoping BioWare would get some help from DICE on optimization, since the Frostbite Engine is their software as well as Battlefield 1 being a pretty well optimized game. Ofcourse it runs at 1080p, that's the version for the normal PS4. At least, that's what I've always thought unsure now though
|
|
inherit
Korean Supermodel
1
0
1
7,464
Cyonan
2,189
Jul 31, 2016 20:55:30 GMT
July 2016
admin
Cyonan
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire
Cyonan
|
Post by Cyonan on Feb 23, 2017 20:41:32 GMT
Looking at it the lite version of FFXV seems to run at 1080p, which isn't much of a stretch for the PS4 Pro to be able to handle at a decent framerate. Although even then, I'm seeing sites report that they averaged closer to 45 instead of 60. It would be nice if ME:A offered the same lite and high end graphics options so players could choose 1080p for a higher framerate, but so far we haven't seen anything suggesting that they've done that. I was really hoping BioWare would get some help from DICE on optimization, since the Frostbite Engine is their software as well as Battlefield 1 being a pretty well optimized game. Ofcourse it runs at 1080p, that's the version for the normal PS4. At least, that's what I've always thought unsure now though Most games on PS4 normal do run at 1080p. Though I remember somewhere BioWare noting they had the PS4 Pro running at 1800p on ME:A. The Xbox One will also run at 900p(which is pretty normal for games on that system). I'm not sure if they included the option to run it at 1080p anyway for a higher framerate, but I would hope that they do.
|
|
Cypher
N3
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Jade Empire
Origin: ItsFreakinJesus
XBL Gamertag: ItsFreakinJesus
PSN: TheMadTitan
Posts: 848 Likes: 1,024
inherit
2419
0
1,024
Cypher
848
December 2016
cypher
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Jade Empire
ItsFreakinJesus
ItsFreakinJesus
TheMadTitan
|
Post by Cypher on Feb 23, 2017 20:51:03 GMT
From the articles I have read, it looks like the PS4 Pro game will still be locked at 30 fps. Has anyone heard any details as to what exactly is being added to the PS4 Pro besides upscaled 4k and better anti ailiasing?I am on the fence about which console to get this for. I enjoy playing games on the Xbox One S and most of my friends are getting the game for the Xbox as well. I do also enjoy getting RPG's for the Xbox because I like achievement hunting and I do not care much for Trophies for some reason. However, I do have a PS4 Pro and a 4k TV. All the footage we have seen is from the PC at 60 fps. I'm looking for some details that might push me to get it on the PS4 Pro instead of the Xbox besides just crisper lines. Does anyone have any details as to better effects or textures or fps for the PS4 Pro? The usual 4k30 with standard level of effects and textures 1080p30 with better textures and particle effects. Usually what every other game has done when they don't have 60fps mode.
|
|
inherit
3756
0
Mar 21, 2017 17:37:10 GMT
10
spookyfoxmu1der
7
Feb 22, 2017 17:22:27 GMT
February 2017
spookyfoxmu1der
|
Post by spookyfoxmu1der on Feb 23, 2017 23:09:50 GMT
Thank you to everyone who actually answered my questions. And thank you to all the PC users who have proven that there are still people in this world who are more outwardly annoying than vegans.
|
|
n7vakarian
N2
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Mass Effect Andromeda
Origin: N7Vakarian
PSN: Hasseo
Posts: 205 Likes: 315
inherit
2833
0
May 21, 2018 13:32:18 GMT
315
n7vakarian
205
January 2017
n7vakarian
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Mass Effect Andromeda
N7Vakarian
Hasseo
|
Post by n7vakarian on Feb 23, 2017 23:14:00 GMT
I don't care 30 or 60. I'd just rather have the game run consistently than get all funny since it's not "OH MY GOD IZ NOT 60FPS....I HATE THIS GAMEZ NOA!"
|
|
inherit
Korean Supermodel
1
0
1
7,464
Cyonan
2,189
Jul 31, 2016 20:55:30 GMT
July 2016
admin
Cyonan
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire
Cyonan
|
Post by Cyonan on Feb 23, 2017 23:40:14 GMT
I don't care 30 or 60. I'd just rather have the game run consistently than get all funny since it's not "OH MY GOD IZ NOT 60FPS....I HATE THIS GAMEZ NOA!" After you've gotten used to how smooth 60 is, you just can't go back to 30 =P Though 60 shouldn't be a PC only thing. The PS4 Pro and the Xbox Scorpio when it comes out should both be capable of handling respectable framerates at 1080p, and developers should allow you to choose between 1080p/60 or 1800p/30 like FFXV has the option for.
|
|
Sanunes
N6
Just a flip of the coin.
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Anthem, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Prime Posts: 4392
Prime Likes: 882
Posts: 6,004 Likes: 9,088
inherit
1561
0
Nov 26, 2024 22:18:50 GMT
9,088
Sanunes
Just a flip of the coin.
6,004
Sept 13, 2016 11:51:12 GMT
September 2016
sanunes
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Anthem, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
4392
882
|
Post by Sanunes on Feb 24, 2017 3:55:23 GMT
My understanding from what developers have been saying is that the PS4 Pro is not capable of reaching 60fps while running at 4K resolution. Now that might not be accurate, but it makes sense to me.
The one thing I really hope Microsoft does with the Scorpio and I wish that Sony did with the PS4 Pro was to give people the choice of 1080p@60fps or 4K@30fps, then there is a good chance I will buy one. I know some games do offer that option on the PS4 Pro, but not enough for me.
|
|
Cypher
N3
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Jade Empire
Origin: ItsFreakinJesus
XBL Gamertag: ItsFreakinJesus
PSN: TheMadTitan
Posts: 848 Likes: 1,024
inherit
2419
0
1,024
Cypher
848
December 2016
cypher
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, KOTOR, Jade Empire
ItsFreakinJesus
ItsFreakinJesus
TheMadTitan
|
Post by Cypher on Feb 24, 2017 4:00:47 GMT
I don't care 30 or 60. I'd just rather have the game run consistently than get all funny since it's not "OH MY GOD IZ NOT 60FPS....I HATE THIS GAMEZ NOA!" After you've gotten used to how smooth 60 is, you just can't go back to 30 =P
Though 60 shouldn't be a PC only thing. The PS4 Pro and the Xbox Scorpio when it comes out should both be capable of handling respectable framerates at 1080p, and developers should allow you to choose between 1080p/60 or 1800p/30 like FFXV has the option for. That's not true, I go back to 30fps all the time. i can't do sub 30, though. That's what kills me now.
|
|
inherit
Korean Supermodel
1
0
1
7,464
Cyonan
2,189
Jul 31, 2016 20:55:30 GMT
July 2016
admin
Cyonan
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire
Cyonan
|
Post by Cyonan on Feb 24, 2017 4:16:18 GMT
My understanding from what developers have been saying is that the PS4 Pro is not capable of reaching 60fps while running at 4K resolution. Now that might not be accurate, but it makes sense to me. The one thing I really hope Microsoft does with the Scorpio and I wish that Sony did with the PS4 Pro was to give people the choice of 1080p@60fps or 4K@30fps, then there is a good chance I will buy one. I know some games do offer that option on the PS4 Pro, but not enough for me. The PS4 Pro isn't capable of 60 FPS @ 4k, and neither will the Scorpio be capable of it. Right now even on PC, the only video card capable of even thinking about that is the Titan X Pascal which costs around $1200 USD. Later this year the 1080ti will be released which is supposed to aim for the mark, but it's expected to still cost around $800-$1000 so those are well out of the range of what consoles will use. For comparison we use FLOPS(floating point operations per second) to determine how much raw throughput a CPU/GPU can do. The Titan X Pascal does about 11 tera-FLOPS while the PS4 Pro does 4.2 and the 1080ti is slated to do 10.8 from what I can find. To be honest, I expect that the Scorpio wont actually hit 4k @ 30FPS either. The PS4 Pro technically doesn't either and runs at 1800p(true 4k is 2160p) instead. Though Microsoft states that the Scorpio will run at true 4k, but we wont know the actual specs of the system until June I believe. Though I agree, it would be great if they included more options to choose between 1080p/60FPS or 1800p/30FPS. The pro consoles should be able to handle 1080p/60 for the most part.
|
|
inherit
3657
0
2,378
Revan Reborn
Pathfinder
2,000
Feb 19, 2017 18:14:40 GMT
February 2017
revanreborn
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
Pax_Augusta
Heero the pilot
Pax_Augusta01
|
Post by Revan Reborn on Feb 24, 2017 4:50:20 GMT
My understanding from what developers have been saying is that the PS4 Pro is not capable of reaching 60fps while running at 4K resolution. Now that might not be accurate, but it makes sense to me. The one thing I really hope Microsoft does with the Scorpio and I wish that Sony did with the PS4 Pro was to give people the choice of 1080p@60fps or 4K@30fps, then there is a good chance I will buy one. I know some games do offer that option on the PS4 Pro, but not enough for me. The PS4 Pro isn't capable of 60 FPS @ 4k, and neither will the Scorpio be capable of it. Right now even on PC, the only video card capable of even thinking about that is the Titan X Pascal which costs around $1200 USD. Later this year the 1080ti will be released which is supposed to aim for the mark, but it's expected to still cost around $800-$1000 so those are well out of the range of what consoles will use. For comparison we use FLOPS(floating point operations per second) to determine how much raw throughput a CPU/GPU can do. The Titan X Pascal does about 11 tera-FLOPS while the PS4 Pro does 4.2 and the 1080ti is slated to do 10.8 from what I can find. To be honest, I expect that the Scorpio wont actually hit 4k @ 30FPS either. The PS4 Pro technically doesn't either and runs at 1800p(true 4k is 2160p) instead. Though Microsoft states that the Scorpio will run at true 4k, but we wont know the actual specs of the system until June I believe. Though I agree, it would be great if they included more options to choose between 1080p/60FPS or 1800p/30FPS. The pro consoles should be able to handle 1080p/60 for the most part. In his defense, Sony has been claiming the PS4 Pro is a "4K console." For those of us who know better, there's no way that's actually possible given the price of the hardware. Upscaled 4K? Yes. Native 4K? Not in a million years. Even the Titan X Pascal can't maintain a steady 60 fps at 4K. It at best ranges in the 50s, obviously depending on the game. The GTX 1080 Ti is rumored to be unveiled at the GDC next week. Historically, that series of cards has never been stronger than the Titan X. That being said, the 780 Ti was actually a better card than the Titan X for that year, but that's not the norm. I would love if the 1080 Ti is better than the Titan X Pascal, though, as I'm planning on buying it. If the Scorpio is actually capable of running games at 4K with 30 fps, I expect the system will likely cost $600-700. Microsoft has said time and time again that it will be a "premium console," so they seem to expect only the most diehard of Xbox fans will buy the system anyway. It's actually not in Sony's best interest to promote a better framerate at a lower resolution on the Pro. That would be Sony admitting the Pro isn't nearly as power as they've been claiming since it launched. Not to mention, I think there would be an uproar from all of the Sony diehards who actually believe the PS4 Pro is capable of native 4K.
|
|
inherit
Korean Supermodel
1
0
1
7,464
Cyonan
2,189
Jul 31, 2016 20:55:30 GMT
July 2016
admin
Cyonan
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquistion, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire
Cyonan
|
Post by Cyonan on Feb 24, 2017 4:59:51 GMT
The PS4 Pro isn't capable of 60 FPS @ 4k, and neither will the Scorpio be capable of it. Right now even on PC, the only video card capable of even thinking about that is the Titan X Pascal which costs around $1200 USD. Later this year the 1080ti will be released which is supposed to aim for the mark, but it's expected to still cost around $800-$1000 so those are well out of the range of what consoles will use. For comparison we use FLOPS(floating point operations per second) to determine how much raw throughput a CPU/GPU can do. The Titan X Pascal does about 11 tera-FLOPS while the PS4 Pro does 4.2 and the 1080ti is slated to do 10.8 from what I can find. To be honest, I expect that the Scorpio wont actually hit 4k @ 30FPS either. The PS4 Pro technically doesn't either and runs at 1800p(true 4k is 2160p) instead. Though Microsoft states that the Scorpio will run at true 4k, but we wont know the actual specs of the system until June I believe. Though I agree, it would be great if they included more options to choose between 1080p/60FPS or 1800p/30FPS. The pro consoles should be able to handle 1080p/60 for the most part. In his defense, Sony has been claiming the PS4 Pro is a "4K console." For those of us who know better, there's no way that's actually possible given the price of the hardware. Upscaled 4K? Yes. Native 4K? Not in a million years. Even the Titan X Pascal can't maintain a steady 60 fps at 4K. It at best ranges in the 50s, obviously depending on the game. The GTX 1080 Ti is rumored to be unveiled at the GDC next week. Historically, that series of cards has never been stronger than the Titan X. That being said, the 780 Ti was actually a better card than the Titan X for that year, but that's not the norm. I would love if the 1080 Ti is better than the Titan X Pascal, though, as I'm planning on buying it. If the Scorpio is actually capable of running games at 4K with 30 fps, I expect the system will likely cost $600-700. Microsoft has said time and time again that it will be a "premium console," so they seem to expect only the most diehard of Xbox fans will buy the system anyway. It's actually not in Sony's best interest to promote a better framerate at a lower resolution on the Pro. That would be Sony admitting the Pro isn't nearly as power as they've been claiming since it launched. Not to mention, I think there would be an uproar from all of the Sony diehards who actually believe the PS4 Pro is capable of native 4K. Yeah, that's why I like clarifying in these threads the false information about the PS4 Pro's "4k gaming" =P I'm looking to upgrade my computer soonish, so I might go for a 1080ti depending on how it stacks up against the Titan X Pascal. Alternatively I could probably hold off another year and a little bit to hit the next generation of cards since I'm still able to hold up pretty well in 1440p right now. I get to write my PC off as a "work expense" on income taxes because I work from home, so I tend to go all out on my upgrades. If Microsoft does sell the Scorpio for $600-700 I'd be interested to see how well it actually sells.
|
|
inherit
3657
0
2,378
Revan Reborn
Pathfinder
2,000
Feb 19, 2017 18:14:40 GMT
February 2017
revanreborn
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
Pax_Augusta
Heero the pilot
Pax_Augusta01
|
Post by Revan Reborn on Feb 24, 2017 5:13:26 GMT
In his defense, Sony has been claiming the PS4 Pro is a "4K console." For those of us who know better, there's no way that's actually possible given the price of the hardware. Upscaled 4K? Yes. Native 4K? Not in a million years. Even the Titan X Pascal can't maintain a steady 60 fps at 4K. It at best ranges in the 50s, obviously depending on the game. The GTX 1080 Ti is rumored to be unveiled at the GDC next week. Historically, that series of cards has never been stronger than the Titan X. That being said, the 780 Ti was actually a better card than the Titan X for that year, but that's not the norm. I would love if the 1080 Ti is better than the Titan X Pascal, though, as I'm planning on buying it. If the Scorpio is actually capable of running games at 4K with 30 fps, I expect the system will likely cost $600-700. Microsoft has said time and time again that it will be a "premium console," so they seem to expect only the most diehard of Xbox fans will buy the system anyway. It's actually not in Sony's best interest to promote a better framerate at a lower resolution on the Pro. That would be Sony admitting the Pro isn't nearly as power as they've been claiming since it launched. Not to mention, I think there would be an uproar from all of the Sony diehards who actually believe the PS4 Pro is capable of native 4K. Yeah, that's why I like clarifying in these threads the false information about the PS4 Pro's "4k gaming" =P I'm looking to upgrade my computer soonish, so I might go for a 1080ti depending on how it stacks up against the Titan X Pascal. Alternatively I could probably hold off another year and a little bit to hit the next generation of cards since I'm still able to hold up pretty well in 1440p right now. I get to write my PC off as a "work expense" on income taxes because I work from home, so I tend to go all out on my upgrades. If Microsoft does sell the Scorpio for $600-700 I'd be interested to see how well it actually sells. Indeed. I really wish Sony would stop this tomfoolery and getting their fan base to believe their half-truths. Then again, they are winning this generation of console hardware, so they may as well milk their customers dry if they are gullible enough to buy the "Pro." I've been holding off to build a new gaming PC due to 4K. I'm still running a GTX 770, which still holds up fairly well, but it's definitely showing its age. I didn't want to buy a GPU that wasn't capable of running games at 4K with 60 fps. Nvidia is almost there, and perhaps the 1080 Ti will be that card, but we'll know soon enough. I might be tempted to wait for the Volta GPU series, as that will definitely hit the sweet spot, but I don't think I can wait that long. Assuming it is priced that high, I'm really curious who Microsoft believes will actually buy it. Being capable of native 4K at 30 fps will be nice and all, but what's the point if the price tag is a barrier for most console gamers? When you start spending that kind of money, I'd rather just invest in a PC that has far more uses and that will have far more longevity.
|
|
Sanunes
N6
Just a flip of the coin.
Games: Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Anthem, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
Prime Posts: 4392
Prime Likes: 882
Posts: 6,004 Likes: 9,088
inherit
1561
0
Nov 26, 2024 22:18:50 GMT
9,088
Sanunes
Just a flip of the coin.
6,004
Sept 13, 2016 11:51:12 GMT
September 2016
sanunes
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Baldur's Gate, Neverwinter Nights, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda, SWTOR, Anthem, Mass Effect Legendary Edition
4392
882
|
Post by Sanunes on Feb 24, 2017 6:50:41 GMT
Indeed. I really wish Sony would stop this tomfoolery and getting their fan base to believe their half-truths. Then again, they are winning this generation of console hardware, so they may as well milk their customers dry if they are gullible enough to buy the "Pro." I've been holding off to build a new gaming PC due to 4K. I'm still running a GTX 770, which still holds up fairly well, but it's definitely showing its age. I didn't want to buy a GPU that wasn't capable of running games at 4K with 60 fps. Nvidia is almost there, and perhaps the 1080 Ti will be that card, but we'll know soon enough. I might be tempted to wait for the Volta GPU series, as that will definitely hit the sweet spot, but I don't think I can wait that long. Assuming it is priced that high, I'm really curious who Microsoft believes will actually buy it. Being capable of native 4K at 30 fps will be nice and all, but what's the point if the price tag is a barrier for most console gamers? When you start spending that kind of money, I'd rather just invest in a PC that has far more uses and that will have far more longevity. I have to build a new PC myself, I am still using an old i7 920 and the only thing I updated was the video card a few years ago. Now I have to be a bit more budget minded, but I think I am going to go as far as I can and get a 6gig 1060. As far as who Microsoft is aiming for with consoles, I have plenty of friends that buy consoles for the simplicity they offer and don't have a need for a PC. I could see them being interested in a Scorpio.
|
|
inherit
3657
0
2,378
Revan Reborn
Pathfinder
2,000
Feb 19, 2017 18:14:40 GMT
February 2017
revanreborn
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
Pax_Augusta
Heero the pilot
Pax_Augusta01
|
Post by Revan Reborn on Feb 24, 2017 7:04:44 GMT
Indeed. I really wish Sony would stop this tomfoolery and getting their fan base to believe their half-truths. Then again, they are winning this generation of console hardware, so they may as well milk their customers dry if they are gullible enough to buy the "Pro." I've been holding off to build a new gaming PC due to 4K. I'm still running a GTX 770, which still holds up fairly well, but it's definitely showing its age. I didn't want to buy a GPU that wasn't capable of running games at 4K with 60 fps. Nvidia is almost there, and perhaps the 1080 Ti will be that card, but we'll know soon enough. I might be tempted to wait for the Volta GPU series, as that will definitely hit the sweet spot, but I don't think I can wait that long. Assuming it is priced that high, I'm really curious who Microsoft believes will actually buy it. Being capable of native 4K at 30 fps will be nice and all, but what's the point if the price tag is a barrier for most console gamers? When you start spending that kind of money, I'd rather just invest in a PC that has far more uses and that will have far more longevity. I have to build a new PC myself, I am still using an old i7 920 and the only thing I updated was the video card a few years ago. Now I have to be a bit more budget minded, but I think I am going to go as far as I can and get a 6gig 1060. As far as who Microsoft is aiming for with consoles, I have plenty of friends that buy consoles for the simplicity they offer and don't have a need for a PC. I could see them being interested in a Scorpio. I'm still using an i7 930, myself. This gaming PC has served me well, and the processor is still largely fine, but it's definitely not top of the line anymore and it's time for an upgrade after almost seven years. I plan to splurge on this PC making it last for the next five or so years. The only piece of hardware I'll have to upgrade will be the GPU, and if I get a 1080 Ti I shouldn't have to worry about that for a few years. I always found the term "simplicity" to be largely subjective when it comes to consoles. I have a standard X1, and I wouldn't necessarily say it's more simple. I haven't particularly found the UI for the X1 or the PS4 to be that great. Not only that, but since the X1 and PS4 are required to install games on their hard drives just to run them, there's really no difference to me compared to a PC. The PC just offers me more options, I don't have to pay for an online service for multiplayer, and my PC will always look better and run games faster than any console ever will. I started off as a console gamer, mind you. I grew up on the Sega Genesis and the Super Nintendo. However, once I saw the inherit benefits of PC gaming, I just never looked back. Not to mention, games also are considerably cheaper on PC than they are on consoles. I don't even know the last time I actually paid full price for a brand new game not yet released on PC.
|
|
crom
N2
Posts: 79 Likes: 46
inherit
3656
0
Apr 14, 2017 17:41:04 GMT
46
crom
79
Feb 19, 2017 17:55:55 GMT
February 2017
crom
|
Post by crom on Feb 24, 2017 7:15:54 GMT
Yet another thread full of platform bias. I vote for a pc vr version, you want to talk about immersion! You guys need to look at the consoles going the 4K direction as a good thing as it won't hold our uber gaming pcs back as much anymore. I've never been a console guy but I am very much enjoying the pro with the higher resolution and hdr on my big fancy tv.
|
|
inherit
3657
0
2,378
Revan Reborn
Pathfinder
2,000
Feb 19, 2017 18:14:40 GMT
February 2017
revanreborn
Mass Effect Trilogy, Dragon Age: Origins, Dragon Age 2, Dragon Age Inquisition, KOTOR, Jade Empire, Mass Effect Andromeda
Pax_Augusta
Heero the pilot
Pax_Augusta01
|
Post by Revan Reborn on Feb 24, 2017 7:27:51 GMT
Yet another thread full of platform bias. I vote for a pc vr version, you want to talk about immersion! You guys need to look at the consoles going the 4K direction as a good thing as it won't hold our uber gaming pcs back as much anymore. I've never been a console guy but I am very much enjoying the pro with the higher resolution and hdr on my big fancy tv. I'll be glad when consoles actually are 4K. It's still possible the Scorpio might be, but the Pro is nothing more than a half-baked scam on Sony's part. I'd be more than happy for consoles to get substantially better hardware. It gives developers more power to make more ambitious games, which means better games for PC gaming. Until then, PC gaming won't get better because Sony (maybe Microsoft if the Scorpio is also a bust) will resort to smoke and mirrors by misrepresenting technology and terms to make its products sound better than it is. That doesn't do anyone a service, especially those who actually fall for it.
|
|