Patch Notes and PC System Specs

I'm getting about the same.  Wish I could level it out a little.

To be fair Titanfall is based off the Source Engine which can run on a potato while Frostbite 3 is vastly more demanding.
Try lowering the resolution scale and see if it helps.

Here below link, guy on youtube test ME:A with GTX660m (same level like GT940m) and it seem run ok around 30fps for custom low setting at 768p.
Hope this can help.

link

This black screen problem has me on edge, to be honest. The only thing called corsair on my PC is my power supply. 

Yeah I had the settings on Ultra and I suffered quite a few fps drops during cutscenes.

Especially when I entered the Tempest for the first time. Now I got everything on High and it runs great.

Its probably just some minor issue that needs fixing, since I got an i7 6700K and 16 GB DDR4 Ram.

That set up shouldnt have any issues.

I'm back guys with an update after playing 4 hours of the trial!

Alienware Alpha ASM100:

Processor: Intel Core i3-4170T Processor
Graphics: Nvidia GeForce GTX 860M
Memory: 8GB

I can confirm that the games DOES play on these requirements, however my settings are on Low/Medium with Shadows off, and Textures are set to high. The screen resolution can vary between 720p and 1080p however I noticed that putting it to 1080p made my PC sound like it was going to lift off from my desk and start flying around the room so I left it at 720p. I can pretty much say even with the graphics on low/medium the graphics are impressive, however I am used to low graphic games as I normally play for story and combat not how it looks. The gameplay is smooth and I only had a few little drops now and again.

I believe there is room to play around with these graphics, on start up the game had automatically set all my settings to Medium/High however as I said I prefer not to have my PC flying. For this PC I recommend that you do play with the graphic settings more than I have. I am pretty sure the PC can handle a much larger mix of medium and high settings, as long as shadows are off

EDIT: Do you think improving the ram could increase the games performance? I have 8GB but could easily upgrade to 16GB what do you think?

Anyone else finding Andromeda really CPU intensive? On Win 7 64bit, 1060 6gb, 16gb RAM and i7 2600k (stock speed). All 8 cores are blasting out and taking CPU to near 75 degrees C!! I don't have the best cooling but not experienced anything like this on other recent games...

Did anybody else have issues with the game freezing for a couple of seconds on a regular basis (PC version)? It wasn't frequent enough to make the game unplayable, but it was very annoying and I'd like to find a fix before release.

Andromeda runs much better on a mix of high/ultra settings than it did when I ran on low/medium. I'm not complaining at all, but.... huh? My rig was built 2 years ago on a budget, so it's not incredible but it's sturdy enough to run most things. This one didn't even pass minimum spec according to the link that Origin included in their system requirements section.

Processor:
AMD Athlon(tm) X4 860K Quad Core Processor

Video Card:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960

RAM:
8.0 GB

i7 4770k
16 GB Ram
GTX 980 SC

everything on ultra except shadows they're on High

constant 60 fps in multiplayer, haven't tried single player.. waiting for release

Hello.

I need some advice. I'm thinking of making an upgrade if it will help, if not I'm gonna wait and make a bigger one once I have the money.

My specs are: i7 - 2600k at 3,8 ghz., gtx 970 and 8gb of ram ddr3 at 1600 mhz.

Right now I'm thinking of changing my motherboard (since it doesn't support ddr4) and get 16gb of ddr4 at 3200mhz.

Will this have a visible effect on the game? Right now it plays at 50-60 fps on medium most of the time.