AngryJoe's review on MEA

Except that while MET has its juvenile MOMENTS, Teen Effect: Andromeda is one big juvenile moment through and through, with occasional but extremely rare and short moments of mature writing. Sorry sunshine, but in that context games are pretty much exact opposite of each other, so comparing them the way you did sounded exactly like a case of moderate fanboyism.

Not really sure what was so compelling about the Reapers and the Collectors. The Reapers were threatening because they were mysterious, but the reveal behind the curtain didn't exactly pan out well. And the Collectors were just a mindless tool of the Reapers.

The Kett may have been a bit bland, but at least they had a somewhat coherent motivation.

So, following that logic, one can make "RPGs" with shittiest writing and stories ever, but as long as graphics and performance are good, and there are no technical issues, then the game is good, right? I hate to disappoint you but this is not how genres work. Some things are more important in certain game genres than the others. So no matter how good from technical perspective a story driven, party RPG is - if it got bad story and character writing it is deserves to be grilled, and while things like sotry and dialogues are more subjective than a hard math of technical part, there are still a number of ways to measure those.

But hey, why would I expect anything sensible from someone who claims he cracks jokes to a weeping widow on funeral, considers it normal, and threatens everyone challenging him with a concealed gun...  In other words, you don't have to bother replying me.

Has anyone elaborated on Del repeating himself three times in a row? I mean, I get that he was interrupted by Joe the first time, but like, word for word 2 more times?...I thought my PC glitched or something or maybe an editing error

To start off, I have never gotten into a fight in my life. Even though I joke, I prefer to use words instead of violence to get myself out of situations; the conceal carry is a last resort. Two, I will defend false claims like you put out.

Yes, all writing is subjective even in RPGs. I like comedic writing because it lightens the mood, so I disagree with your claim that is now how the genre works because it does work that way. It can be a good story person A, but crap to person B. Please, leave your personal feelings for me out of this. You are capable of talking and debating with people you don't like correct?

I give the game a solid 8/10. Honestly the story isn't bad in my opinion, as for the Kett they are enemies with alot of potential and definitely more character than any of enemies from the original trilogy aside from Saren & the Illusive Man. Facial animations were definitely bad for several characters during conversations but not all. The biggest thing though are the glitches, not sure if mattered but in my entire 72 hour run I entire a total of THREE glitches, one where the Outpost area on Eos was all blacked out and would not load but fixed after restarting my game, and the 2nd being a conversation not loading in and being skipped entirely again fixed after reloading, last one being the occasional floating enemy. Honestly I can't say if it makes a difference but I played on console so maybe glitches were less serious there than on PC

In any event I do get the lack of real Renegade choices and Ryder being less serious than Shepard but as someone who watched his stream while playing, Joe seemed to hate the game from the outset so that may have factored in. Frankly I was expecting him to go lower than 6

I mean you can

That IDIOT angry joe plays immersive games on a spinning chair while spinning on it with his buddies.
how can you get immersed while cracking jokes and FARTING along with your friends when playing any game?

I don't know their stance on it, but I don't think it'll be a viable option with it being paired with the frostbite engine. It's hard enough for people just to get small details working with the engine. They'll really have to redesign the engine or move to a different one entirely to allow proper modding. I myself am not to big into mods, FO4 is literally the first game I've ever used them and I Barely played that game. It's still sitting in my Xbox with maybe 20ish hours played (I've been a fan of the elderscrolls franchise but not so much the fallout franchise). I thought it was cool to change your characters looks and outfits, plus you could use mods to help the game look better.

because of my own inexperience with mods, I genuinely don't understand why people like them. I understand they add options as well as quick fixes to what the devs don't do, but I've also heard they can interfere with the games too if you're not careful how you use them or how you set them up. I mean, in my short time with FO4 I saw mods with descriptions "don't use this mod with x mod also active" as they'd interfere with each other and cause issues.it also then leads to the assumption that fans can make better content than the devs if they were given the same tools, which I can bet there probably would be some capable, however modding and actual game development are entirely different from each other. 

In fairness, the geth didn't really get interesting until ME2. In ME1, they were just robomooks with a decent backstory that was largely reminiscent of BSG. 

7 or around there seems to be the general rating from just about everyone. From what I've seen I'd go with 6 or 7 myself. C grade at best but not a complete failure either. Bugs aside not much about it just stands out from a story or character perspective to me. Except for Drack, Drack is wonderful.

Fallout 4 was my first experience with them as well, but the reason I like them is because a lot of times they add stuff better in the game then what is in the vanilla game. For example, a lot of times the SR suck in Fallout 4 failing to oneshot head kill certain enemies. With a weapon mod, I have an anti-material rifle that one shot kills everything.