So SAM Is The True Hero (warning spoilers)

That is totally disagreeing though : P

My POV is exactly the opposite of that. 

It's kind of a question of POV, so pretty moot argument I'd say.

I'm reasonable and mature though, this isn't important enough to get worked up over.

When Ryder used the Remnant without Sams help, my minds eye immediately was filled with Keanu Reeves holding up his hand and frying the Sentinels..... I think the reliance on Sam just became boring... Oh scan 3 times in 3 different locations for Sam to conjure up a nav point with giving you no other option to just figure out or wander yourself. Honestly I think the sudoku type puzzles would have been a good fit to figure out Nav points for inconsequential fetch quests.... About the other comments about Shepheard vs Pathfinder... It's a narrative dead end when you write into the script "Only you can save the world" and like many people said already, where is the prove... I thought the handling of the Pathfinder was ridiculous right from the get go. The whole initiative is relying 4 people and AI ti figure out everything?.. And you save the day , just because of happenstance, there is a vault?.... I don't need the game to kiss my ass when I kill the same enemy with the same guns everyone else is using. Don't tell me my armor is special and that's how you knew I was different either.....

Actually the Pathfinder thing makes a little sense.

It sounds like the Ryders signed up VERY late, or at least the 'whole family'.

And then, yes they thought this was more likely to be a cakewalk than any opening of a mass relay route to unknown space. Challenges, sure, but that in several centuries nothing that crazy would happen. And they have a history of tens of thousands of years to act as example.

True, the Resurrection thing was a 'what?' BUT Shephard does most things that follow of his/her own back and allies, (apart from the Catalyst, which is one part of the reason I utterly loathe space-Pol Pot) if they had left out the weird died/ressurected cycle, Shephard would have still worked, however, leave out SAM And Ryder doesn't, everything Ryder achieves is because of SAM, the profiles? SAM, the code breaking? SAM, the interfacing with remnant tech? SAM.  

Yup, it does.  It also highlights a problem: with the quality of writing and variety of Shephard, people would most likely have been more ok with that, but Ryder just feels, bland, he doesn't really get angry, or act out of idealism, he just is, a feel good hero, with no depth to him. 

Listening to SAM tells you "if you scan this you can do that" is not very different from hearing Geralt tells himself "If I witcher sense this I can find that".How else would a player know what kind of griffin you are dealing with if Geralt didn't talk to himself about it?

It is just a way of explanation things to the player.