inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Dec 8, 2023 7:41:19 GMT
The ME2 companion roster is my least favorite in the entire franchise. I disliked or couldn’t care less about most of them. Different strokes, that was me exactly re MEA. Almost instantly forgettable characters that will hopefully only exist as codex entries in the next game. Considering that Bioware hates Andromeda fans, it might happen.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Dec 8, 2023 7:16:44 GMT
I'm indifferent to the GOTY awards since it's just a big popularity contest run by games journalists. That being said, I'm pretty excited for Blade coming out.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Dec 7, 2023 23:45:36 GMT
Got the last achievement for smuggling cargo - woohoo! Then started the Ranger questline. Ranger questline is pretty good! You feel like a space cowboy lol.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Dec 7, 2023 15:52:37 GMT
Jonty Lowstar @jontylowstarReminds me of the ME3 stats that got released. If you went by the forums and fan art you'd think Female Shepard was universally played. She accounted for only 18% of finished games The same craziness occurred with Assassin's Creed: Odyssey, when Ubisoft decided to go with a canon female protagonist (Kassandra) after focus-grouping their play-testers, only to discover that the vast majority of actual gamers preferred the male option (Alexios). They were surprised by the disparity - I wasn't. I mean some games devs are actually shocked that majority of their player base is male?
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Dec 7, 2023 8:14:37 GMT
On a different note, how do you guys imagine a Qunari protagonist would be viable in this game? (If at all) It'll be a step back if they didn't include the horned beef boi. So I imagine they'll be playable.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Dec 7, 2023 7:09:57 GMT
GOTY is meaningless anyway and it's run by games journalists and you know how questionable their knowledge is.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Dec 7, 2023 6:50:48 GMT
True but not necessarily triple AAA competition or not a direct competition like two triple AAA SP RPG games launching in the same month.
EA is quite adept, I'm sure, at reading the tea leaves when selecting a launch date. A summer 2024 "reveal" gives Bio?EA the game release date flexibility they need to maximize success.
Larian were not AAA until, arguably, after BG3. Now they are. Regardless though of whether Obsidian or Whoever is AAA or not you guys saw my point fly right over your heads. THERE WILL ALWAYS BE COMPETITION. If BioWare are worried they should get a dog. Or maybe the fans should.I mean people are wringing hands over GTA ffs! A game whose hardcore adherents mostly do not give a shit about games with elves! Is there crossover? Sure. But the majority of gamers who play that won't play DA4. True, I think people are overestimating the impact that RPGs have in the gaming industry. Yeah, it has bangers this year like: BG3 and Starfield but a game like GTA 6 will eclipse them both in a day. Dragon Age I think will be fine regardless of when GTA 6 will release, the vast majority of gamers don't care too much about RPGs in the first place anyway.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Dec 6, 2023 23:34:55 GMT
Microsoft knows that they can't compete with Sony traditionally, so they're offering a more convenient way to play games while adding their exclusives to it. A game like Starfield was more of a way to get people's attention, not necessarily something to be their flagship game though. Yeah I don' tthinkthey really do mhave a flagship franchis eany more. Halo is the game that obviously got people's attention a tth estart but I wouldn' t say they have one now. As you say I think they know the ycan' tcompete ther bu twhewr ethe ycan compete is in wha tthe yoffe rservic ewise as I think thei rgame pass services blows Sony's PS plu sout o fthe water especial ygiven ho waffordable they'v emade it. I don' tuse gam epas mysel fbu tif I had moe rmoney and wanted to play a wider offering of games I might have used th eservices I think they'll be focusing less on flagships and more on variety. Of course, variety means nothing without quality which is why Starfield is added. Could be more to come given what Phil Spencer hinted at. (A Banjo-Kazooie revival?)
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Dec 6, 2023 19:23:36 GMT
Microsoft knows that they can't compete with Sony traditionally, so they're offering a more convenient way to play games while adding their exclusives to it. A game like Starfield was more of a way to get people's attention, not necessarily something to be their flagship game though.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Dec 6, 2023 17:26:29 GMT
I mean Starfield is still top ten in most played games for Xbox despite not releasing any DLC yet and it helped with massively increase the subscriptions with Gamepass which was Microsoft's intention in Starfield as a day one gamepass in the first place. I think Microsoft knows that they're far away from competing with Sony, but they're still committed to the gaming but through another avenue. Starfield is just one of the major games that they'll use to build something off of. I think each succeeds in different ways though fo rexample Sony probabl yI have to admit have the better exclusives especiall ysingle player ones if yo utake games like Horizon or Spiderman and God of War an dsuch like that.Microsoft I would say has Sony bea tin other areas as they tend t ofocus on providing better services and cheaper ways to access games via their Gamepass service. The games they make go straight into gamepass day 1 fo rexample whereas with Sony you have to wait a bit before tha thappens with their PS plus. Also a lot of Xbox's games are built around multiplayer getting people to play toggether like Halo an dForza have different maps and such to shoot each other up on or race on. The ystil hav ethings like a story/casmpaign/career mode thing going on for those that wantto play on their own. As they know sometimes peopl edo. Bu tthe main focus in their games is the multiplayer. In summar yI think it's a matter of wha tdo you prefer? I generally prefer single player offerings given I'm a mainly a single player gamer so I probably do slightly lean more Sony's way in tha tsense but generally because the onl ygame I pla yon console is largely Fifa and I mainly game on PC I'm generall yhappy enough t owait for Sony's games t ocome PC's wa ylater as I have plenty of other games t okeep me occupied either from the Xbox side or multiplat. Especially as most o fthe games I play are multiplat. I mostly moved ove rto Xbox to mainly try Forza and Halo out because unti lthe XB1 befoer the ystarted t oput their games on PC I hadn' t really tried them. Well that and the fact at the tim ethe Master Chief collecdtion was announced Sony hadn't announced anythin gthat made me think of going for the PS4(as HZD wasn't revealed until late rafter I had made that decision.) I had played the origina lHalo and Halo 2 but th eremaster when I saw it reall yblwe m eaway in just how good it looked. Still does to be fair. It's the main reason why I stuck wit hth eseries X really when my XB1 broke as I sti ll wanted to pla those Xbox games I bought but I will admit I'm mostly using my Xbox as a sports game machine for playin ggames lik eFifa NHL an dgames like that. Mainly because I'm finding Fifa runs better on the Xbox than it does on PC these days Right now, Microsoft needs their exclusives offer something different than Sony. Their exclusives tend to be darker and more dramatic and while that's fine, it may not be for everyone. With Starfield and Hi-Fi Rush, I think Microsoft has a chance to appeal to people who want more player freedom and more a light hearted tone if they choose to go that route. They do have a single player that's equivalent to Sony's exclusives with Hellblade though I think it's more of an acquired taste given its themes and dealing with psychosis.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Dec 6, 2023 4:51:06 GMT
People commonly accuse Andromeda of being Marvel-esque which is complete nonsense.
Issue with MCU is that they constantly put jokes that ruin character development and moments. While Andromeda has a lot of jokes, they are not made in inappropriate scenes. Serious and emotional scenes do not get interrupted by forced jokes.
Sign me up with that complete nonsense. Its one of my chief issues with the script of that game. True that it doesn't interject with most of the most important scenes, but it otherwise permeates the overall vibe of the majority of active gametime. Both DAI and MEA are games that would have been better served with focusing on how they did the main questlines, and polishing and branching off from just that. The peripheral, in different ways, was sub-par gaming (though not as torturous for me as with some gamers). In MEA, I was sick of the dialogue of everyone by the end of my 100% run, when I know I wouldn't have with how MET writing mostly worked.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Dec 6, 2023 4:43:35 GMT
BY THE WAY ... there's apparently someone who playtested the game doing a Q&A on the dragonage reddit. Take that with a massive grain of salt. They did say 3 party companions and feels like GOW though, so for anyone interested *shrugs* https://www.reddit.com/r/dragonage/comments/18apco4/comment/kbzczh1/ I read through the whole thing and it struck me from his description that GoW may be off the mark. The more I read his descriptions the more I thought he was honing in on a game that will feel a lot like Mass Effect. Now this makes sense to me in that if they can do it they might be able to set a pattern for the next Mass Effect too or a template if you will at least it sounds like they are trying to do that. It might work. It might be fun and maybe it is better to leave the hardcore rpg stuff to Larian and Owlcat etc. Yeah, no more trend chasing for Bioware please.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Dec 6, 2023 4:27:06 GMT
I mean Starfield is still top ten in most played games for Xbox despite not releasing any DLC yet and it helped with massively increase the subscriptions with Gamepass which was Microsoft's intention in Starfield as a day one gamepass in the first place. I think Microsoft knows that they're far away from competing with Sony, but they're still committed to the gaming but through another avenue. Starfield is just one of the major games that they'll use to build something off of. Microsoft mentioned it helped with growth, they did not say it generated massive growth. I'm certain they wanted it to generate that growth but revenue grew by 9% after Starfield launch. They also said year on year revenue increased 13% driven in part by Starfield. None of this indicates massive growth driven by Starfield ... well, relative to what we all thought. I think we're spoilt by Skyrim and the massive reception there that we all had unrealistic expectations. I think it was a moderate success by Bethesda standards and a decent success overall. IMO though, I imagine World of Warcraft ending up on gamepass at some stage which might actually generate massive growth. EDIT: By this I mean we all thought Starfield would be a massive system seller and while it generated some growth on Gamepass, whether that growth is sustainable remains to be seen. Phil Spencer says he wants Starfield to be a 10 year game, which means he wants it to drive long term game pass numbers. I honestly don't think it's going to in the numbers he wants. But Bethesda also said that they want Starfield to be a long game as well so Phil basically reiterated what Todd and the other guys said, I don't think there's any concern especially since Starfield was Bethesda's biggest launch in their history and it made many people subscribe to gamepass. I feel that Micrososft is very happy with Starfield financially and are looking to grow from there. Bethesda may be one of the biggest RPG companies in the gaming industry but they're not like Rockstar or a game like COD, something that I think Microsoft understood which is why Starfield was a day one Gamepass. It was less about the system and more about getting people to subscribe since Gamepass is also on PC. I just feel that we're overestimating the impact of single player RPGs here even with Skyrim. They may be on the rise especially this year with bangers such as BG3, Phantom Liberty, and Starfield , but a COD game can make 10 times the revenue than all three of those games combined. And that's not even talking about GTA...... Still, with Bethesda, Microsoft is offering something for the more "casual" and freedom-oriented RPGs that Bethesda is known for and given how the game is still played by a decent amount of players months after it's release, I think they have a great start. It's all about building on that the way Skyrim, Fallout 4, and even Fallout 76 have been built upon.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Dec 6, 2023 3:46:54 GMT
I mean Starfield is still top ten in most played games for Xbox despite not releasing any DLC yet and it helped with massively increase the subscriptions with Gamepass which was Microsoft's intention in Starfield as a day one gamepass in the first place. I think Microsoft knows that they're far away from competing with Sony, but they're still committed to the gaming but through another avenue. Starfield is just one of the major games that they'll use to build something off of.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Dec 6, 2023 3:45:04 GMT
I wonder if some of the "Marvel" dialogue is because they are getting a lot of banter which is usually more playful than the rest of the dialogue in the game. If they are just doing a mission that might be a lot of what they are hearing. I don't know, I just find it difficult to believe with the writers on the DA team that suddenly all of the dialogue would sound like Marvel. Bah! Dragon Age has excellent humor! It's definitely not "marvel" like people love to keep pushing out. I just hope we get a Sarcastic Hawke esque dialogue again. I mean even with Andromeda, the sense of humor far exceeds modern MCU.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Dec 6, 2023 3:43:31 GMT
It looks pretty exciting! Are we actually going to 3 different countries that we've never seen before? This trailer definitely caught my attention!
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Nov 8, 2023 7:17:55 GMT
And besides, I don't want more souls like games or BG3 games. Won't THEY dilute the AAA gaming sphere to the point where the cycle starts all over again? Or is it games that people like are more prominent then "brain dead" multiplayer games or action games? No actually, they won't. The past few years have been extremely good for RPG fans partly because of the increased variety in the genre which Soulslike and BG3 games bring. Like Open World? Zelda. Live Service open world? Assassins Creed. Soulslike? Lies of P. Isoemtric BG3 and Pathfinder. Games for everybody. You may not like these games but others do and having more games for different people so people have choice is always a good thing. Until they don't make games you like anymore because AAA are chasing the current trend.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Nov 8, 2023 7:16:41 GMT
More like rabid fanbases overrating games and shouting down people who disagree with their opinion. People just want to look for "heroes" to take down mighty empires. They did this with TW3 and now they're doing this with BG3 and Elden Ring. I'm already sick of it because the Starfield Reddit has been filled with people harassing others for not putting Elden Ring and BG3 on a pedestal to the point where the Mods had to make a thread telling them off. Point is, these games are no different from the other monetized games that's constantly put out there, but people act as though like they're the underdogs or something like that. The Starfield reddit is not as you describe, the vast majority of content on the Starfield reddit is Starfield related (shockingly enough). I feel like you're desperately trying to find the few posts that are otherwise to confirm your biases. Most of the stuff on the Starfield Reddit is fluff about Starfield. When you find the few people that are otherwise, just block them and move on. Reddit allows you to do that. The biggest problem with the Starfield reddit has been people posting spoilers. As the pinned comment states, 40000 mod actions before and after launch in a bid to keep everyone spoiler free. I'm not the only one who saw people getting harassed, there were plenty of others who were harassed in that subreddit as well just for liking the game. The mods had to work overtime just to get rid of the stuff otherwise, It would've ended up like the Steam forums. I mean for crying out loud, people were spamming reviews of Starfield talking about the same thing about the game being "mid" until the mods had to put a stop to it. It's not me trying to "confirm my biases" it's based what I've observed and the people I've talked to.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Nov 8, 2023 2:49:07 GMT
I've begun the UA Vanguard questline.... oh my word! Talk about being absolutely invested in a story. I can't actually recall ever being this invested and eager to continue with any other Bethesda game, and I'm speaking as someone who played Fallout and TES games for insane number of hours. Starfield is rapidly taking it's place in the 'best game ever' top spot. I dunno if it will ever knock Dragon Age Origins off the list, probably not, but it's certainly in the ballpark. Yeah I love the United Colonies Vanguard questline. Wait until you get to join the UC SysDef. Like I said before for a Bethesda game the faction questlines are pretty good. Better than vanilla Skyrim in my opinion. Head and shoulders better, the FC questline was engaging as well and had one of the most satisfying endings, I've played in a long time.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Nov 8, 2023 2:48:21 GMT
Probably will be a controversial opinion but I started a new MEA PT yesterday for N7 day, but this is what I wrote in another thread: "Not sure I can go back to Starfield after playing MEA again TBH. Everything is better, character quality, better story already, better combat, the flying between planets, the ship interior, knowing where your companions are on the ship, having more than one companion with you, companion banter, The Nomad instead of walking, the overall graphics, music and sound etc." What Starfield desperately needs right now are vehicles so you can easily traverse through the planets. ME: A achieved this brilliantly while still having a vast planet to explore.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Nov 8, 2023 0:45:13 GMT
And besides, I don't want more souls like games or BG3 games. Won't THEY dilute the AAA gaming sphere to the point where the cycle starts all over again? Or is it games that people like are more prominent then "brain dead" multiplayer games or action games?
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Nov 8, 2023 0:30:14 GMT
My issue isn't the game itself, but I don't see what these articles are seeing that is unique or special about Baldur's Gate 3 and how it has upheaved the industry by what it did. For I don't see it doing anything special the stars just aligned perfectly for the game and it did very well which is great. Even EA has released games that don't have monetization such as the two Jedi games, the Dead Space remake, or going all the way back to the sequel to Mirror's Edge so for me it isn't a radically new thing just a choice by developers. My commentary is more about that I don't see what people are seeing that makes Baldur's Gate 3 this game that unended the game industry or frightened developers. There is nothing wrong with talking about the lack of MTX in the games, but I don't see the lack of them being the shock that those articles seem to make it out to be. The two Jedi games were held up to EA, mocking them. Those are two other games that are beloved by fans, and guess what ... they're soul-likes, the combat was inspired by Dark Souls. You wouldn't have Jedi Fallen Order without Dark Souls. Fromsoft changed the industry. EA came out and said The Dead Space Remake underperformed, which sucks btw. Mirror's Edge was released 15 years ago. You can't hold up a game that turns modern gaming on its head when it isn't a modern game. People are just celebrating AAA games that go away from the modern formula of being hyper monetised and the game suffering for it being hypermonetised. A self contained, 60 dollar game that is a complete package that is actually good at launch. If more are celebrated then we'll get more of them going forward. Like, for example, Fallen Order. If Fromsoft didn't make Dark Souls then we'd never have Fallen Order. How do we know this? Because EA closed down Visceral Studios who were working on an Uncharted like Star Wars game because according to EA "gamers don't like those games anymore". If Fromsoft never proved otherwise then the industry would be in a different place. The more AAA games come out upending what is becoming the normal AAA industry, then the better off and the more diverse the gaming space will be. BG3 will continue to be, and should be, held up as a shining example. More like rabid fanbases overrating games and shouting down people who disagree with their opinion. People just want to look for "heroes" to take down mighty empires. They did this with TW3 and now they're doing this with BG3 and Elden Ring. I'm already sick of it because the Starfield Reddit has been filled with people harassing others for not putting Elden Ring and BG3 on a pedestal to the point where the Mods had to make a thread telling them off. Point is, these games are no different from the other monetized games that's constantly put out there, but people act as though like they're the underdogs or something like that.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Nov 8, 2023 0:18:12 GMT
Seeing new Mass Effect footage:
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Oct 15, 2023 23:16:18 GMT
Wait..... I thought the narrative was that modern games suck. In seriousness, I'm sure they'll improve on what was weak in Inquisition. I know it's a joke but I actually keep hearing it from people and I feel like everyone who says "modern games suck" must be shooter fans. Or maybe adventure fans or something. Because the shooter genre is in a terrible spot right now. I keep telling them as an RPG fan, we've just had an amazing couple of years Elden Ring, Zelda, BG3, Cyberpunk, * glances over at Starfield* ... all the Horizon games, Persona 5. It really depends which genre you're in. If you like open world sandboxes again I feel like this is an incredible time. Spiderman 2's just coming out and everybody's looking forward to it. MMOs and Shooters, boy they're in a rough spot though. I'm just going to say this before I dip out from this thread as I caused too much of a ruckus which I apologize to everyone for. Starfield is a way better game than Cyberpunk, it didn't have the most disastrous launch in recent memory AND the fact that Starfield ran smoothly (for the most part) on my console, while Cyberpunk was filled with soooo many technical issues that it crashed my game numerous times. The fact that people actually have the gall to dunk on Starfield while placing Cyberpunk on a pedestal is hysterical. To me, It cemented that some gamers are not only forgiving but hypocritical.
|
|
inherit
The Smiling Knight
538
0
Member is Online
23,507
smilesja
14,336
August 2016
smilesja
|
Post by smilesja on Oct 15, 2023 22:12:18 GMT
It's hard not to be disappointed reading how the former employees are treated. I really thought better of the company (EA and Bioware) than that, they are not some small indie studio scrambling to survive. Man, I want them to succeed so bad and then I feel like any news we've had lately have been on the depressing end... Like the product, but don't have strong feelings for a corporation even the Indie ones. At the end of the day, they want your money.
|
|