Unpopular opinions

I'm guessing they had the robot for a squadmate to save money instead of hiring another voice for a new character to be the techie.

There was no need for James. No need to have Ashley/Kaidan injured. They stay on the Normandy for the whole game.

How??? I left it but the bomb detonated and killed EVE and thousands of Krogan after the Coup.

I don't know about the geth individuality thing.  Legion was clearly an individual in ME2 regardless of what was presented to us.  As for their individuality, I think we don't really know the full ramifications.  It could be that they are still networked.  We just don't know.  But even if they aren't it was beneficial to the geth to not require being networked.  That is, they were fine that way in one way but in a very real sense they were always in danger of having their intelligence seriously depleted when large portions of the network went offline.  The Reaper upgrade prevents that and allows them to continue.

EDI, too, made choices based on her companions.  Whether or not she romances Joker, I can see why she would want to be more "human".  First, she was programmed to protect her crew.  In researching the best ways to do that she's discovered some admirable trains among humans that she wanted to emulate.  Even before she gained control of Eva Core's body she still liked to make jokes and look out for her crew.  Those are traits I'd ascribe to an emotional being.  Other examples of AI we've seen don't seem to have had emotions but EDI did.  Therefore, she wants to become more like the emotional beings around her.  Perhaps had she been with a turian crew she would have emulated them and placed duty above all.  If asari, god only knows.  If salarian, maybe research and espionage.  But she was with humans and we're how we are so that's what she wanted to be.

That does seem possible (given the conversation with Jack)... and I would have loved it if he/she had of truly stolen the ship and gone completely rogue.

Now that could have been a very interesting dilemma.  Mordin and Shepard could remain consistent with whatever viewpoints they held over the course of the game.  If Shepard was always pro-genophage, then he could have stayed that way and been in line with Mordin (in ME2, as well, where Paragon Shepard otherwise makes Mordin out to be a terrible person for his work on the genophage) when it came time to cure the genophage.  If Shepard was anti-genophage, then they're at odds and Shepard kills Mordin to stop it.  That would definitely be a case of prior decisions having an impact.

As an FYI, we're on the verge of having sexbots in real life.  It's only a matter of time before they have "True AI".  Most likely way before ME's timeline has it.

I don't recall the line in question in ME2.  I do know that the geth consensus was that they didn't want to have two divergent factions.  They simply didn't know how to handle it: destroy it (original idea) or rewrite them.  Even if they don't want to Reaper's to define their future in the sense that the Reapers control it (which is what they were doing) that doesn't mean they wouldn't be willing to take their tech and run.

Still, I can see where you were coming from with the geth.  They were a unique form of "life" as they were.  There was no need to alter them.  I suspect the reason for it was to make them a more palatable choice to humans who might see any kind of "hive mind" (not exactly what it was but similar) as lesser and therefore choose not to save them.  Given them the upgrades made people more sympathetic to them.  I don't entirely have a good feeling about the geth.  However, some of the actions taken by the quarian admirals are downright idiotic and it sometimes makes me feel less than friendly toward them.  Their history confirms that the quarians were and continued to be the "bad guys" when it came to how they handled the geth.  (Side issue, I know.)

I was specifically thinking of the time of the Morning War when the quarians started destroying the geth, even if unarmed or surrendered.  The geth, not being emotional, fought and killed until the threat was ended - which happened when the quarians fled the system.  They took no emotional stance on the issue, instead looking at it logically.  If the quarians aren't there then they can't be a threat.  And since not all quarians were the enemy they had no need to completely annihilate them.  As Legion said, they weren't sure what the implications would be of completely removing the quarians from existence so they made a choice not to do so.  In contrast, the quarians have only ever wanted to destroy the geth completely.  Tali was the only one who has diverged from that opinion and then only after meeting Legion, and even then only in relation to Legion.  She cared about Legion but not the geth in general.  That's why I consider the quarians to be the bad guys in regard to the geth.

That said, I tend to feel sympathetic to the random quarians I encounter, like on the Citadel, Illium and Omega.  Even the one dying civilian found on Rannoch (and his poor orphaned son).  It's the admirals that rile up my negative feelings toward the quarians and I sometimes wish there were an option to turn them over to the geth in the same way Xen wants you to turn Legion over to her.  Honestly, I only like Tali among the admirals.  Even Koris is an ass for trying to get Tali exiled as a way of getting his political opinion pushed forward.

I unserstand that Bioware should consider all players, the ones that are good at shooting and the ones who aren't. My question though is, how many players would end up with only 2 squadmates? Is it so common to do the Suicide Mission and end up (without planning) with Garrus, Tali and the other ME2 companion (the one replacing EDI) dead?
And even if there are a lot of players that unlucky they could have just make Vega a Sentinel and be done with it.

Sorry, I probably should have been more clear in expressing my opinion. I think the game came down too heavily in favour of curing the genophage, not the other way around.
I can see why you consider saving the data to be strange for a pro genophage Shepard and that's why I said it was just my/my Shepard decision (you can agree or disagree with my reasoning). I used this example just to show you that you could be in favour of the genophage and still have a resolution were the writers want to make you feel bad for your opinion (either because you saved Wrex or the data).

About the whole kill Mordin/save the genophage idea, it could have been done in a reasonable way. They could have had Padok Wiks as the salarian that wanted to cure the genophage and Mordin as a shadow antagonist for the Tuchanka act. Padok would have developed the cure and at the Shroud there could have been a confrontation between the two where you would have to pick a side (kill Mordin and the cure will be spread or kill Padok Wiks and sabotage it). 

Actually, losing Garrus can be fairly common, since he's towards the start of the list for dying if one just doesn't upgrade the shields or cannon.  Tali does not become a potential squad mate in ME3 until after Priorty:  Geth Dreadnought... which is more than halfway through the game.  As of the "other ME2 companion" what you're really asking for here is for Bioware to create a recruitment mission in ME3 for every possible ME2 squad mate (that can be accessed early in the game) and then record dialogue for them to be potentially along on every other mission in the game... a huge cost in additional VA work.

I still think having a paragon or renegade option to talk Mordin into going along with not curing the genophage (if Wrex and Eve are dead) is sufficiently easy and there are enough hints in the changed dialogue about Wreav's aggressiveness being a big problem that people in that situation will be usually inclined to not cure the genophage.  AND you can still decide to shoot Mordin if Eve is still alive and all it costs you is Mordin as a War Asset.  Again, I find the choice to save Maelon's data rather bizarre if you have no intention of allowing it to ever be used and I also wonder why then you would "feel bad" about shooting Mordin (who is, in that case, basically a traitor to his own people) or why you would feel less bad about having to shoot Padok Wiks instead.

The geth don't seem to have the capacity to oppose one another - except for Legion.  They go by consensus.  The heretics chose to go their own way and the equation still worked out - whatever that means.  The geth don't make use of emotion and so are unlikely to invite the quarians back or care about the fate of organics.

I'm curious about the colony world you're referring to.  Tried looking it up.  Best I could find is that they were forced out of the Citadel embassy as a result of creating AI, even if unintentionally. The Council also made an agreement with the quarians to leave the geth alone so as not to provoke them.  In fact, I thought Shepard even brought up the idea of colonizing another world and the response was something along the lines of how difficult it would be because of their weak immune systems.  Difficult does not mean impossible.  Even if they hoped to return to Rannoch one day they could do so from a home world.  The Council really doesn't care what anyone does outside the boundaries of Council space so long as it doesn't threaten them.

That's all I've got.  I can see both sides.  There was fault all around but the quarians put themselves in dire situations, first with the Morning War and then again just prior to the Reaper invasion. Hard to be sympathetic when they make stupid decisions.

Genophage was a necessary evil. It's the same as keeping the Batarians out of council space because they can't be team-players except Krogans were fucking dangerous to every other species so something drastic needed to happen. The prolonging of it is the part where it calls for a remedy which can happen in ME3, and it's fair enough to sustain it if Wreav is the leader without Eve to hold him in check even though the disease is prejudice and lets a million fair and wonderful Krogan people left to live a shitty life with no freedom. Again, it's a necessary evil that was proven to be so and would not need to be removed unless the Krogan could prove themselves to be better than they were before they were infected.

It's akin to getting house arrest. That's not shameful if the person has actually done something terrible. The problem with the Genophage is the prejudice and racism that condemns all Krogan to be equally hostile which probably isn't true.

It's hard to say what conclusion the Geth came to when they fractured into Heretics, but the fact they fractured at all is evidence that opposition, even in its most passive peaceful form, exists within the species. As mentioned in the codices: "...this schism suggests that individual geth possess more free will and perhaps even personality than previously suspected. Without such individuality, no geth could have deviated from the group decision to join or reject Saren's mission. There could not have been a division.

Finally, there is the matter of Legion's word choice. The geth used the English word "heretics" to describe Saren's followers. Of the many words Legion could have chosen (nonconformists, dissenters, rebels, etc.), only the word "heretic" suggests a broadly accepted geth philosophy or religion, and that the actions of Saren's allies violated the orthodoxy."

Responsibility is still on the Geth Consensus' heads because they had full knowledge of what the Heretics wanted and allowed the unprovoked slaughter of organic races. To me, they're worse than their creators who panicked because these are the same intelligence who rebelled because they didn't wish to be wiped out. That they have been actively observing organic races takes away any claim to ignorance of the Heretics' actions.

The Geth had no need for Rannoch because: According to Legion, geth do not actually live on any of the quarian planets they conquered, serving merely as caretakers for them instead. They find it more efficient to live on space stations and draw resources from asteroids, though they maintain mobile platforms on the worlds to clear rubble and toxins left by the Morning War.

As for the Quarians' attempt to colonize elsewhere:

First discovered by the quarians at the turn of the century, Ekuna is habitable, but a second-tier choice for most species. Circling an orange sun, Ekuna averages below freezing temperatures. This led development firms to colonize at the planet's equator, where the climate is tolerable for agriculture.

The quarians, seeking a homeworld of their own, petitioned the Citadel Council for the right to take over Ekuna, but they had already settled a few hundred thousand quarians on the planet before approaching the Council. Seeing this occupation as an illegal act, the Council turned a deaf ear to quarian pleas and gave the world to the elcor, who could withstand the high gravity of the world far better. The quarians squatting on the planet were given one galactic standard month to leave, at which point their colonies would be bombarded.

There's also mention in the novels about how the Quarian Liveships were facing ship integrity degradation and that it was a matter of time before their ships disintegrated despite their numerous repairs and addition of new ships. They were discussing leaving to venture outside the galaxy because they truly didn't have any place to settle without being attacked.

In short, the quarians were forced into attacking Rannoch because they really didn't have much choice. It wasn't stupidity, it was desperation. Calling them stupid is oversimplifying the situation they were in and ignoring the hypocrisy in the Geth's actions.